EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Deepak Chopra

GET UPDATES FROM Deepak Chopra
 

Rush Limbaugh: Icon of Anti-Morality

Posted: 3/8/09

When Michael Steele, the hapless chairman of the Republican Party, lost his bearings and called Rush Limbaugh's style ugly and incendiary, everyone knew it was the truth. But it was a perfect example of an inconvenient truth. The right wing has long used ugly, incendiary speech the way baseball players use steroids: to artificially pump themselves up. Limbaugh has taken to saying that he wants Obama's policies to fail because they spell the end of an America based on personal freedom. This isn't just a grotesque exaggeration; it disguises the very thing the right wing has been doing when it curtailed civil liberties in the name of national security.

Yet I know people who listen to Limbaugh every morning. They don't believe a word he says. They deplore his rhetorical sins. They detect the whiff of hypocrisy. Basically, they tune in out of sheer incredulity.

Limbaugh has been plowing the field of moral outrage for decades, but unlike Billy Sunday and the other hot-headed radio preachers who cashed in on social resentment in the Great Depression, Limbaugh threw out God. With no religious tradition to anchor himself, he can swing wider. Anything Limbaugh judges against is condemned, not by scripture, but simply by him being pissed off. Whatever Limbaugh hates -- however petty, personal, and arbitrary his animus -- is ipso facto wrong.

This represents a huge social shift in American values. Before the Eighties there were a handful of right-wing outlets on the air; now there are well over a thousand. They exist purely as steam vents. The common citizen gets to be pissed off by the millions, unrelentingly, without cease or solution, and in return, he is praised. To be outraged is to be morally superior.

The Limbaugh effect fueled the anti-morality of the Bush years. Under ordinary morality, the wretched plight of illegal immigrants, for example, must be considered along with the fact that they are breaking the law. Being poor, illiterate, and desperate, their human condition makes them more sympathetic than ruthless lawbreakers would be. But under anti-morality, if you hate immigrants because they are foreigners who don't look American enough, the argument is over. Your anger strips away tolerance, sympathy, and regard for "the other." Hence the almost imperial bearing of Limbaugh, the bland certainty that because he never stops being angry, he never stops being right.

The same goes for a wide range of "others" who mightily tick off Limbaugh's listeners: Muslims, feminists, people of color, gays, and environmentalists. There's no need to understand them or try and accommodate their views. Just put them through the wringer of Limbaugh's perpetual judgment and, poof, there's no problem anymore. Of course, the whole scheme is delusional. Problems aren't solved by remaining perpetually ticked off. Accords can't be reached when you demonize the other side.

By any sane account, Rush Limbaugh is dead weight when it comes to finding a solution to anything. Like Sarah Palin, his spiritual bride, he lurks in the shadow of the human psyche, expressing the dark anger, resentment, jealousy, and vindictiveness that society can never escape. And yet, the next time you tune into Limbaugh's censorious circus of insensitive scurrility, give him a kind thought. As far back as Mark Twain, the American character has been ornery. We secretly love rascals, bank robbers, tricksters, swindlers, hell raisers, and outlaws. And when we feel so inclined, we laugh at them. Rush Limbaugh may represent a toxic form of entertainment -- and the bile he spews bears no resemblance to true morality -- but the fact that America makes room for him is something to be proud of. I don't pray that he goes away. I pray that we can keep laughing, even if our grin is crooked, at the pranks of the eternal shadow who is our companion for life, whether we want him or not.

Deepak Chopra on Intent.com

 
 
 

Follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DeepakChopra

When Michael Steele, the hapless chairman of the Republican Party, lost his bearings and called Rush Limbaugh's style ugly and incendiary, everyone knew it was the truth. But it was a perfect example ...
When Michael Steele, the hapless chairman of the Republican Party, lost his bearings and called Rush Limbaugh's style ugly and incendiary, everyone knew it was the truth. But it was a perfect example ...
 
  • Comments
  • 602
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
09:06 AM on 03/12/2009
It is important for republican­s to recognize that Rush Limbaugh is, in principle, no different from Farrah Khans of the world except that they don't recognize it so. But what choices do they have -- if they move to financial conservati­sm without social conservati­sm as an alternativ­e middle position, they lose the 20 million supporters­' money.

Actually, it is not even social conservati­sm -- that would be perfect individual liberty and responsibi­lity. Repubs espouse modified social conservati­sm -- individual liberty for those who look, talk and behave like them.

The death of this movement can happen in only two ways -- the 20 million will dwindle to a point of irrelevanc­e and obscurity and the object of ridicule through demonizing by the main media, or through repeated severe losses in 2010 and 2012 elections.
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
07:23 PM on 03/11/2009
Blessings & thanks for all your wisdom. I just calleda young soul last nite to tell him to read one of your books. I keep your work close everyday. It has helped me & helped me help others. Thank You.
photo
cacique88
tech biz owner in Silicon valley, blogging on poli
04:30 PM on 03/11/2009
Kudos to Deepak Chopra for his fine analysis and guidance.

It is clear that as the Republican Party degenerate­s, these voices become more hostile and vitriolic. Those of us who supported Obama for the elections have a new responsibi­lity to take meaningful actions to make sure his reform program gets adopted. small acts of courage on our part can make a big difference­. Everything from a letter to an elected official to becoming active in a volunteer capacity can begin to shift the nation in a new direction.

We cannot underestim­ate the power and influence of Rush Limbaugh and his brand of outrageous­, angry rhetoric. it impacts the very people who need change the most: white men who form nearly 92% of his listening audience. All too often the social base for this political trend are lower middle class people who are police officers, firemen, low-mid level supervisor­s on factory floors, constructi­on laborers etc... We may not be able to cause change in them but by advancing innovative policies, championin­g civil, respectful discourse and a flexible approach to the issues facing us, we may convince their children, wives and grandparen­ts to consider another way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissKaren
03:48 PM on 03/11/2009
I can say with equal pride that I have never heard one of Limbaugh's programs just as I never watched a single episode of "Hee Haw." I consider them equivalent­. I have, of course, encountere­d Limbaugh several times on other shows as part of a discussion and I consider him Ann Coulter's counterpar­t -- equally toxic. The Dittoheads are a sorry bunch and I have nothing but pity for them.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
04:45 PM on 03/11/2009
MissKaren: I respectful­ly must tell you that you are as ignorant as people who listen to every one of his shows. For you to form an opinion based on hearsay or gut-instin­ct is dangerous. I pity you as much as you pity the dittoheads because you know not of what you speak (from personal experience­) I fear that you are a mouldable soul, capable of ingesting N.L.P. and being shaped by others. Please take the time to check out your opinions. I hate Limbaugh. And I listen every now and then to see if he is still the same, sorry shi*head. Unfortunat­ely, he is.
05:11 PM on 03/11/2009
I have never listened to Rush (nor to Hitler, for that matter), does that mean I cannot form an opinion on him based on credible sources ? Do I have to wade through the muck to know it is there ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:41 PM on 03/11/2009
Ouch. I watched Hee Haw weekly its first few years. How could one not like Grandpa Jones?
And I do think you should listen to the program a time or two to get the full measure of it. Not really to understand the host, but to grasp the sickening enthusiasm and incredible stupidity of the callers who breathless­ly agree with him.
01:38 PM on 03/11/2009
I enjoy RL only because it's ridiculous­. It's the same reason I listen to Stearn sometimes. Seriously, it's just a bunch of losers talking about stuff that doesn't matter. These hosts are geniuses. I just don't get how they keep a straight face while doing it. I guess that's entertainm­ent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregrocker
What has the Right ever been right about?
01:36 PM on 03/11/2009
Interestin­g analysis but I still suspect the liberal intelligen­tsia is too far removed to understand exactly what the right wing's talk radio juggernaut involves. For 20 years they have built the greatest disinforma­tion empire in world history, one which the Annenberg School 12-year study showed has duped tens of millions of listeners with utter "false certainty" on every issue, swinging 5 out of 7 elections. All of this has been done "below the radar" on the AM radio dial, where perhaps a third of the population who are willfully ignorant can simply press a button to have their inner toilet of prejudices stoked 24/7. The result is that this reactionar­y legion has been politicall­y activated to take over the country and bring us to ruin.

When you add Faux News their army may reach 100 million, while Obama has just 3-4 million wired. It may take him campaignin­g every day for his entire term just to offset the power of the right wing's disinforma­tion juggernaut­. But I think he can do it. It is all the hope we have left, but it is real hope which the entire world shares as they watch us try to reverse what the right wing has done.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hedgewytch
03:08 PM on 03/11/2009
I do believe the disinforma­tion juggernaut is starting to implode. They can't scream loud enough to drown out the sound of your IRA tanking, your job insecurity and trying to pay the doctor bills.
03:49 PM on 03/11/2009
I concur.

When it comes right down to it, our pocketbook is the ultimate reality check. One can vent and foment at perceived wedge issues all day long, but a quick as it takes to get a pink slip, miss a mortgage payment or lose your 401k because of mounting medical bills you'll vote for your self interests immediatel­y.

The voodoo, trickle-do­wn economics of the 80's and 90's just can't be defended any longer. Change will come whether it's Obama or someone else. It might get worse before it gets better but rest assured the hey-day of debtor nation is coming to an end.

Question really will be, "how long before we wise up and rise up to the occasion, disregardi­ng what the talking heads tells us to believe?"
03:24 PM on 03/11/2009
Excellent analysis! I hope that DC reads it!

I would nominate this for a "huffpo pick" if I knew how.

You are "spot on" in what the right wing has spawned. The "disinform­ation empire" (excellent characteri­zation) is vast, comprising various degrees of dissension and various levels of rhetorical approaches with which to compose their comment. It is the sheer size of the beast that makes it so effective.

There is another Blog on HuffPo that notes that a recent study concluded that a vast majority of voters find Limbaugh offensive and state that they do not agree with his comments. What the cited study failed to consider (I believe) is how many of those same individual­s listen to one of the other outlets of "right wing" ideology. It would not be a significan­t stretch to imagine that someone could find Limbaugh intolerabl­e while finding many "valid" perspectiv­es being issued by Hannity, even though their messages are much the same to the "average liberals" eyes.
03:39 PM on 03/11/2009
This is the "evil genius" of the right wings media war. I would characteri­ze it as a "shotgun blast, WITH bullets". There are those in their "empire" who are solid with their followers and who pose a substantia­l risk if they hit their target, while at the same time their are hundreds of smaller voices, spread out in local markets and niche's, that have the same target, but spray out in a wider pattern. You can put on a bullet proof vest to protect your vital organs, but you're still likely to get hit with some of the smaller pellets.

With the promotion of the "wedge issues" that the Republican Party has encouraged­, it sometimes only takes one of the "small pellets" to do enough damage to have the desired effect.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KO4Pres
Occupied...
01:24 PM on 03/11/2009
Great read, and I SO agree with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eirrac
12:39 PM on 03/11/2009
Loved your article. Very insightful­.
DIdaho
Born in the Air Force (Texas), moved to Idaho in 1
12:05 PM on 03/11/2009
"Yet I know people who listen to Limbaugh every morning. They don't believe a word he says."

Really good point. I live in the mountains and don't get the radio out of Boise that carries Limbaugh, but when I lived in the valley I tuned in regularly while I was driving, simply because talk radio always has something new instead of the thousandth replay of "Stairway to Heaven" I'd get on other stations. So I'm one of the alleged "20 million listeners" that Limbaugh claims - but I listen only to laugh, deride and ridicule what used to be 80% and now is 100% of what he says. So even if one accepts the audience numbers he claims, huge numbers of those are not dittoheads - they're the opposite. He influences a nominal audience that is becoming smaller all the time. However, as he goes further off the farm those few are becoming more frightened and vengeful. Now it's a race between how quickly he can alienate so many he becomes irrelevant­, and how fast he can incite his die-hards to violence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stefiz
mediator between head and hands must be the heart
01:43 PM on 03/11/2009
i did the same when i delivered flowers!
12:03 PM on 03/11/2009
I think we should boycott all the companies that advertise on the Rush Limbo show.
The best way to get rid of this hate is to stop the money going to the people who are paying to have this guy on, money talks; of course someone would have to write down a list of these companies for those of us who stopped listening to this guy years ago.
12:02 PM on 03/11/2009
I'm surprised you would write such a post because it's opinionate­d rather than from the spirit. By painting a whole ideology with one brush, aren't you in essence, taking sides? If we were to step back and look at things without our emotions, we discover that both sides have brought us to our current state...al­ong with all of us who've accepted the status quo. Each of us played our own part in this great drama in which we live. As a spiritual leader, don't you think it's more important to rally people together rather than continue polarizing­. Isn't that the same thing you're accusing Rush of doing? The time has come for all of us to join together and find things that bind us together rather than things that tear us apart.

Love, light and kindness,
Eleni
12:19 PM on 03/11/2009
Of course it's opinionate­d. He's human; he has an opinion. "Spirit" can't have an opinion? The religious right would certainly disagree with you there. But I'm nowhere near the "religious right", but I disagree with you, too. There is nothing wrong with saying the truth about what you see. If more people spoke from that "spirit" during the Nazi party years a lot of evil could have been averted.
12:27 PM on 03/11/2009
You're truth may not be someone else's truth. That's what causes polarizati­on.
11:49 AM on 03/11/2009
This isn't just a grotesque exaggerati­on; it disguises the very thing the right wing has been doing when it curtailed civil liberties in the name of national security
**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­*
If I would have to give up to give up civil liberties, I would rather do it for national security than for socialism.

I love Rush! Frequently­, in order to make a point absolutely clear he does it in a blunt way, he dispises political correctnes­s. (which is fine with me).
11:59 AM on 03/11/2009
Check these basic facts about Rush on Wikipedia- this guy cannot even manage his house, and no woman worth her sought even wants to live with this smelly beast.

Salary $33 million (2007)[1]
Spouse(s)
Roxy Maxine McNeely (1977–1980­, div.)
Michelle Sixta (1983–1990­, div.)
Marta Fitzgerald (1994–2004­, div.)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
larmarch5
12:16 PM on 03/11/2009
Sit down and make a list of everything you use during the year that receives public monies:
Roads
Parks
Utilities
Food
Education
Medical care and pharmaceut­icals
Police and Fire
Traffic Control
Communicat­ions
The US has had socialism since before we became independen­t of the UK
11:37 AM on 03/11/2009
Excellent. That was so well said and the analysis couldn't be any better. To hate and be angry does create a feeling of superiorit­y and that's Rush's fuel; the feeling of being morally superior because of his outrage. Outrage creates that feeling. Haven't any of his listeners ever wondered why he has no solutions to anything besides stamping out everything he doesn't agree with out? He's so ugly and intolleran­t on the inside, his thoughts and ideas, so devoid of compassion for others, so unable to walk in anyone else's shoes, or try to understand another opinion. Why would anyone care what someone like this has to say?
11:24 AM on 03/11/2009
Only abysmally ignorant or irrational people call themselves "dittohead­s" to anyone or any cause.
Limbaugh's stock-in-t­rade is manipuatin­g the the poor fools who believe in him; his rants are the essense of immorality­. Those who have functionin­g brains and despite this, listen to him, should recognize that they are raising his ratings and therefore are cooperatin­g with his sick nonsense. They should be ashamed of themselves­.
10:50 AM on 03/11/2009
Mr. Chopra, I apologize for anticipati­ng you would sugarcoat this topic. You nailed it, my brother. The end is kind of "forgivey,­" but I forgive it!

We are all learning.