iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Deepak Chopra

GET UPDATES FROM Deepak Chopra
 

The Illusion of Attacking Iran

Posted: 03/12/2012 3:34 pm

Co-authored by Ken Robinson

War is where illusions go to die. This was true of Vietnam and the war in Iraq. It is being ground into us every day in Afghanistan.

At this moment, those who want Israel to mount an air attack on Iran's nuclear facilities are counting on mass amnesia. But forgetting the lessons of past wars won't save the next bout of military adventurism.

War with Iran is a real possibility, and yet there has been no real debate on its consequences. The rest of the world may cast Iran as the villain of the peace, but Muslims are at best ambivalent. Considering the firestorm that arose from the burning of the Quran at a U.S. base in Afghanistan, it was wily religious politics for the Iranians to build the Fordow Uranium Enrichment Facility right next to "Qom," the center of Shi'a scholarship globally and the site of the Holy Shrine of Fatema Mae'sume, sister of the Imam Reza (789-816 AD). It is a significant destination of pilgrimage.

An attack on Qom is equivalent to an attack on Mecca for the Sunni Muslims, which most people agree would be catastrophic for the West. Even if the Israelis show remarkable precision in their air strikes, as they have in the past, targeting the area will certainly galvanize and nationalize the Shi'a in a way that George Bush's "axis of evil" speech only suggested.

This and other risks are not lost on Israel, but Americans have no clue that this location must be target number one, if a major attack aims to destroy or greatly degrade Iran's nuclear program. The uranium enrichment facility there is built into the side of a mountain, considered too deep for our bunker busters, which in any case Israel doesn't possess in its arsenal.

Before invading Iraq, the neoconservatives surrounding Bush characterized a unilateral act of preemption as a"clash of civilizations," a right-wing illusion that is deservedly dead. But an attack on Iran will revitalize such thinking. The impact of Western interference as "neo-crusaders" in the Islamic world could well define the West, if not for a thousand years as the earlier Crusades did, then for the foreseeable future.

Instead of feeding the public on a new batch of illusions, these points are worthy of illumination, to educate Americans on how high the stakes are and how quickly the security of the nation could unravel if we have to fight the A-Team of the Quds Force and Hezbollah, either here or overseas.

President Obama has served the country well by his cautious attitude and refusal to stoke war fever, but his coolness only inflames the right wing. For them, the greatest illusion is American exceptionalism carried to the point that this country is invulnerable. After 9/11 this illusion was hard to keep alive, but the right has managed by stoking wildly exaggerated fear about national security and by claiming the best antidote for one failed war is to wage a new one.

We need for realism to prevail over illusions. This time won't be like Operation Babylon, the Israeli attack on the Iraqi reactor in Osirak in 1981. An attack on Iran will have global consequences, setting in motion a series of cascading events that cannot be accurately calculated by game theory whizzes at the Pentagon or paranoid Israeli nationalists. All we can know for certain is that the consequences will be irreversible and out of our control.

deepakchopra.com

Ken Robinson is a former special operations and intelligence professional with 30 years of experience, globally, and a member of the National Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.

 
 
 

Follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DeepakChopra

 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:11 AM on 03/17/2012
The article doesn't seem to weigh the fact that Israel is at existential risk if Iran develops a bomb. Dr. Chopra should remember from his medical practice that if a patients life is at imminent risk, then extraordinary measures may be required, and action may be preferable to conservative measures once the options are weighed. Israel does not have an obligation to protect the rest of the world from unrest/turmoil. It does have an obligation to ensure the survival of its citizens, however.
12:55 PM on 03/13/2012
Thank you for your thoughtful article. I wish we would stop looking for enemies and start cleaning up our acts and the environment before it is too late to reverse all of the damage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
07:30 AM on 03/13/2012
They are farming war who never feel peace within themselves. Why they never close their eyes to feel peace withing themselves?
08:46 PM on 03/12/2012
Thank you for articulating what I think in a manner much better than I ever could. But how does the average everyday taxpayer, struggling to stay afloat, overcome the zealots and ensure our government doesn't defy common sense and rational long-term thinking and behavior? In other words, what can I do, one person, to stop the insanity?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:50 PM on 03/14/2012
One step at a time, one friend at a time, one house at a time, then the neighborhood, then the town hall, then all friends, relatives, and acquaintances, call and write your congressman, the white house, your state and local representatives, your Governor. Believe it or not, people in power pay attention to one thing, the total number of people who speak their mind, for or against something. Their fear is an informed, united public. Its hard to deceive someone who is informed. Its easy, if you just say, not my problem. Every movement that succeeds, does so via viral videos and education, at the local level. Stay connected, informed, then act! You will get the bill, one way or another. Ken Robinson Co-author
07:27 AM on 03/15/2012
Thank you. That gives me an action to begin with! I invite other readers of and commenters on this post to do the same.
06:25 PM on 03/12/2012
It is unfortunately true that most have no idea in America the implictions of staring yet another war especially with Iran under their unstable, fearless and careless leadership. Certainly, they would enjoy the support of other Muslim nations if attacked especially by Isreal or a likely Isreal /American partnership. The point about attacking near a holy place to get at the reactor is also crucial as it would add more unforgivable insult to devotees in and outside Iran.
However, there is not likely to be a peaceful solution either especially under the current Iranian Leadership that is polarized and not frankly interested in Peace. War is always the result of two or more parties more invested in being right in their own view than being alive or at peace. That will remain the problem here and there until we have leaders in all countries willing to focus on our commonalities and humanity rather than our dogma and differences.
06:08 PM on 03/12/2012
Very good article. One has to be steeped in illusion to consider any further invasions into the middle east, without international support (and I don't mean Israel) a good idea. America needs to rebuild its credibility in the eyes of the world.
photo
Think for once
Liberate Liberty
06:05 PM on 03/12/2012
Iraq and Afganistan were distractions to raise our imunity levels to the real consequences of war.
I really don't think we will attack Iran as we have allowed a pro-Iranian faction to rise to the highest levels of the Iraqi govt.
With all of the sabre rattling by the pro-Israeli faction of our federal govt. I really doubt there is broad-based American support or World-wide support for such attacks.
We simply allow Iran to save face by condemning us. That is of little consequence outside of Iran and those here who would attempt to convince us that the threat is real.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Harlan
06:02 PM on 03/12/2012
She doesn't get it. It's not a problem for us. We can just pass some sanctions and hide our heads in the sand and hope the problem will go away. It's Israel's problem. They have everything to lose if Iran develops nuclear weapons, and have told us repeatedly they won't let it happen. By weak leadership we have lost any semblance of control of the situation. We left Israel cornered. Netanyahu is a good judge of character and he knows he can't trust Obama. Does anyone remember what Israel always does when they are cornered? Bingo! Now you have it. Nothing anyone says is going to keep it from happening. Peace is totally dependent on Iran backing down. How many idiots are there out there that believe Iran is going to back down? Enjoy every day that the middle east is not at war, because there aren't that many left. It's going to happen before Memorial day.
05:34 PM on 03/12/2012
If it were impossible to respond to this situation with force, many more creative alternatives would emerge. Having violence on the table results in intellectual laziness. If the genius of the American people was unleashed on this problem, with the constraint that no violence is allowed under any circumstances, amazing and beautiful solutions would arise.
05:25 PM on 03/12/2012
JUST BECAUSE MUSLIMS WILL GET THEIR FEELINGS HURT THAT IS NOTHING COMPARED TO IRAN WITH ATOMIC WEAPONS. AND WE JUST NEED TO BOMB THOSE FACILITIES FOR NOW.
05:14 PM on 03/12/2012
Very good observation.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Monique Ruffin
05:07 PM on 03/12/2012
Thank you so much for saying this out loud. I want us to understand that war is not an option for citizens of the world at this time and we need to stand up and say NO!
04:47 PM on 03/12/2012
Deepak is right on and the war mongers of the pentagon and the congress and the Israelis better take good note of the consequences that would follow such an attack on the Iranians. diplomatic channels are by far the best way to negotiate an end to this conflict.
04:18 PM on 03/12/2012
Thank you Deepak for framing this discussion with real world ground target information.
04:03 PM on 03/12/2012
invade? No; Endless airstrikes? Yes promote revolution? yes destroy the oil fields? yes Easy? No Probably necessary? Yes