Over the past week, an almost unthinkable series of events unfolded in the Chester Upland School District near Philadelphia.
District leaders told educators that there wouldn't be enough money to pay them. Despite this disturbing and surprising news, educators voted to continue working as long as they were personally able to make ends meet, because their students simply had nowhere else to go.
People in the community held candlelight vigils and rallied around their public schools, demanding that the state help the district through the crisis. Governor Tom Corbett originally said there would be no more help from the state, but after the public outcry continued to build, the state agreed to provide $3.2 million in funding.
That will help get the Chester Upland district through a few more pay periods, but public education in this community still faces real threats from those who would place private profits above the success of students.
The district serves about 3,650 students in one high school, two middle schools and six elementary schools. More than 70 percent of the students are eligible for free or reduced-price lunches, which is more than double the state average.
So far, the governor has remained silent on what the students of Chester Upland would do if their schools were forced to shut down. As a group of Pennsylvania state legislators recently pointed out in a letter to Gov. Corbett, there is no neighboring school district or charter school currently prepared to accept the district's students.
Chester Upland has "long been a troubled district" -- and privatization has played a role in those troubles. The district was under state control from 1994 until 2010, and managed by a for-profit company, Edison Schools, for four years during that time.
Today, about 45 percent of the district's total education budget goes to two charter schools, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. The larger of those two schools was founded by Gov. Corbett's top political contributor in his 2010 election, who also has received an undisclosed amount of money to manage the school.
So while the sad saga of the Chester Upland district seems unique, it actually reflects some troubling trends that are all too common in public education today.
There is nothing inherently wrong with the concept of charter schools, but too often today they are used as a vehicle by those whose ultimate goal is the privatization of public education. These people see public spending on education not as an investment in our future, but as a treasure chest ripe for plunder. Managing charter schools -- including online schools where students have little or no interaction with teachers -- is a way for them to wring profits from a district's education budget.
It should surprise nobody that those who are intent on privatizing education have allied themselves with politicians who would like to silence educators and our unions. Our strong voice -- for our members, for students, and for the middle class -- is an obstacle to the agenda of private profits above anything else.
I believe that most people understand this, and that's why the events in Chester Upland district resonated so loudly across the nation. That is also why we must continue to focus on this situation, even after the short-term crisis abates. We must continue to speak up for students in Chester Upland and anywhere else that public education is threatened. And we must continue to stand up against politicians who launch cynical attacks on educators and other public workers.
Follow Dennis Van Roekel on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@NEAMedia
corbett has done NOTHING since entering office but cut funding for education, mental health social services, et al, while pushing for deregulation so that the fat cats running the coal mines and marcellus shale can continue destroying the environment, in the name of capitalism.
Let's reiterate some facts that place some of the current propaganda in perspective:
1. The district has not been under local control for 16 of the past 17-18 years. During 4 of these, a for-profit entity was managing. This should be more closely scrutinized to learn whether or not Edison may have "defrauded" the district.
2. Teachers who are members of the selfish union are willing to try to continue to work, for the benefit of the children, though most of them have to make a living, too. Kind of kills the "teachers unions are selfish and don't consider the needs of students" argument that has been proliferating.
It is clear that the Charter school movement, the online education movement...are all intended to dismantle public education as we know it and ultimately deliver our tax $$$ spent on education into the hands of private enterprise in this country.
Neither statement is true. The most famous charter school--the Harlem Children's Zone in NY--costs around $15,000 per student, far more than the average in any public school. This is because they basically raise the child for the parents from birth. Pre-birth, actually.
Does it work? Well, because the problem is poverty and unstable families, and they are trying to address those things, it kind of does. But that's what it will cost, so let's not delude ourselves about charter schools. They cost far more when they actually live up to their promises, and they will never be able to duplicate that for all students.
For more insights about education from a teacher in the trenches, see my blog at www.edu-truth.com
My reaction and plan for Chester Upland.
Oh, oh, except for one change....they need more money.
The "status quo" thing has achieved talking point status. If you favor charters and I oppose them, you'll scream "status quo!" at me, but my position is still better for students.
According to posts on the Arizona Education Association Facebook page, the Gilbert Education Association president approached a board member who voted against firing that National Board Certified Teacher, saying "great teacher, just not suitable for the Gilbert environment." What made that teacher "unsuitable" was protecting her students against bullying and racial discrimination. The GEA president has been trying to recruit new members -- but this situation shows the reality of membership in the GEA.
Dennis Van Roekel, do you know about this situation? Surely the NEA doesn't condone what has happened to a member in Gilbert, Arizona.
http://westernconnections.com/betrayedbygea.html
-Teachers being paid professional salaries
-Kids having schools to go to
-A relatively fair funding plan amongst the schools in a district, and not nearly half of the money going to two schools out of nine.
I'm ok with that...and this from a teacher in a charter school who is very happy with his job.
While filing lawsuits at every corner to receive taxpayer dollars, the charter school operator company has refused, in court, to provide financial records.
Dark story needs light.