Rectal hydration? There's no way I'm Googling that.
Rectal feeding? I can't even...
The Senate released its report on torture on December 9. Turns out, we did some pretty horrific things to other human beings in the name of national security.
'You have to understand just how scared everybody was after 9/11,' I've been repeatedly told on social media. 'We were just trying to prevent any more catastrophic attacks. Because terrorism.'
I get that, I guess. I was scared after 9/11 too. Who wasn't?
I also understand that people do things when they're afraid that they might not otherwise do. When the lizard brain kicks in, almost anything can look like a threat that needs to be eliminated... by whatever means available. And if torture can prevent harm to me and mine, well then, that seems like a small price to pay.
It's that last part that really worries me -- the rationalization of violence part. Distilled to its essence, the rationalization amounts to something like: If torture successfully helps us to confront threats to our safety, it's morally acceptable. You have to break a few eggs, right?
This is classic Utilitarianism: That act is moral which maximizes general utility. In other words, an act can be judged by the amount of pleasure (Bentham) or happiness (Mill) it creates relative to its negative effects. In the case of torture, the calculation is: Torture harms a person, but it may save lives by helping to uncover existing plots that endanger people's lives and well-being. Therefore, the primary calculation is whether torture "works" to prevent terrorism.
So, here's my problem: I've recently seen Christians defend torture on purely utilitarian grounds. In 2009, the Pew Research Religion and Public Life Project found that 62 percent of white evangelical protestants at least sometimes believe torture is an acceptable practice, presumably because sometimes you have to hurt people preemptively to secure your safety.
I'm just not sure how you square that circle, though. Those who follow a man tortured and executed by the state as a threat ought to be especially circumspect about supporting state sanctioned violence -- even if it should somehow maximize general utility.
But here's the thing: I keep hearing otherwise good Christian people debate torture by referring to torture's success or failure at producing information that thwarts terrorist plots, as if whether or not it "works" is the only meaningful criteria for determining whether it should be done.
From a moral standpoint, for those who follow Jesus, whether torture works or not isn't a particularly interesting question. The moral question for those serious about their commitment to the itinerant Galilean is always, "Is it right?"; which is to say, is it liable to make us more like Jesus, more capable of helping us embody God's unfolding reign of peace and justice?
Or does it make us into people harder and harder for Jesus to recognize?
And torture, as an answer to these questions, fails the moral calculation, utterly, miserably, "thanks-for-playing-we-have-some-lovely-parting-gifts-for-you."
It seems to me that the burden of proof lies with those who would read the Gospels and come away saying that Jesus -- a man who chose to absorb violence rather than inflict it -- would be totally cool with rectal hydration, if it, you know, gets the job done.
Unfortunately, the only theological case for torture that I've heard sounds less like Jesus, the suffering servant, is at the heart of moral reckoning than, what appears to be, an unwavering commitment to cost-benefit analysis.
Look, I'm not saying you can't be a Christian and support torture. I'm just saying that you're going to have a hard time convincing Jesus that it's a Christianity he would recognize.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.