The Swiss sting
The Swiss have been surrounded by mountains of snow and of dirty money.
That's why it is indeed welcome news that Washington has been able to pry open Switzerland's bank secrecy laws this week. UBS will hand over information on the accounts of 4,450 wealthy Americans.
But this should be just the beginning and the next big target should be Singapore, according to Washington-based attorney Jack Blum. "As a result of the pressure on Switzerland, a lot of the client bank accounts have been shifted off to Singapore. UBS said [last year] it will cooperate in giving up the names, so billions fled and it all appears to be heading to Singapore," he said in a recent telephone interview. Singapore is the "preferred destination" for Wall Street denizens, according to Singaporean opposition politicians. Who knows? Maybe some of Madoff's billions are there.
Bankers are accessories
Singapore maintains that it has weeded out criminals. But that's what the Swiss said, too. There is no way a bank can determine who is behind the person or entity with the numbered bank account. It's an excuse trying to mask the fact that secrecy havens are willing accessories to crimes.
"Crooks set up offshore corporations in the British Virgin Islands, get a bank account in Singapore or in the Pacific islands or in a trust in the Isle of Man and there's no way to crack through all of that at the moment," said Blum.
This is why the UBS deal must be only the beginning of a global crackdown. Governments worldwide have incurred enormous debts to pull the world back from its economic brink, due to banking malpractice, and tax evaders must be pursued to help ease the burden on all taxpayers.
Secrecy invented in 1934
The Swiss invented the secret, numbered bank account to help Jews and others hide money from the Nazis. But the Nazis used this service, too, because secrecy enables despots, drug cartels and tax evaders of every race, religion and nationality to evade taxes and detection.
Swiss bank accounts have facilitated corruption worldwide and involved high-profile cases in Pakistan, Africa and South America. The late Yasser Arafat stashed $300 million safely away in Switzerland, and safely out of the reach of the Palestinian people to whom it belonged. Likewise, every tinpot dictator, terrorist organization, kickback artist, tax cheat and drug dealer in the world likely has a Swiss gnome protecting his money from police, other crooks, tax authorities and ex-wives.
UBS nickname: used to be smart
This UBS precedent was the result of investigations which followed revelations from a UBS whistleblower about the bank's "offshore" marketing techniques such as smuggling diamonds in toothpaste tubes for clients. But UBS is only the tip of the iceberg.
Last week, allegations were made in an Italian court by the daughter of the late Gianni Agnelli, whose family owns Fiat, which is Italy's largest industrial empire, that there was US$1 billion hidden in Lugano banks that her mother was hiding from her. This dirty money business has gone on for years and there are trillions sloshing around in dozens of countries from Liechtenstein to the Channel Islands, Cayman Island, Vanuatu, Austria and others.
The Swiss must now also force Credit Suisse and other financial intermediaries to cooperate with foreign tax and police authorities. This bank also came under fire in the 1990s when the World Jewish Congress discovered that there was no effort to help find the heirs to accounts of Jews who were murdered or who disappeared in the Second World War. The money was being used by the bank.
The Swiss have been targeted for some time and now Singapore and others must become the focus. Ending bank secrecy will reap many benefits for the world, such as finding out if public officials and politicians are on the take.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Secrecy is important.
r initial pourpose served.
p drug supply no Drug money.
Does any one want a system were his/her money can be tracked by any Gov.
Say you have pissed of America, but not done something illegal, US can very well block your funds.
Or even easier still, through some outlandish charge against you, block your funds for 5-10 years , untill you go & fight a case in court.thei
Monopoly of anything is bad, without secrecy America can do what ever it wants.
There is certainly misuse of this,illegal money comes from crimes, you stopthe crimes you stop illegal money supply.Sto
This is what happens when the super rich destroy the middle class.
. always WAS RIGGED and feel a huge betrayal.
..... more and more populist types are going to win office, here and around the world..... because WEALTH is now something to hide.....
.. a cheat..... and a TARGET
...
the RICH had it good when a thriving middle class believed in the American Dream.....
No MORE
Americans know the game is rigged....
that's why Obama is not an aberration
WEALTH tags you as a villain...
You did it to yourselves
I was a Republican all my life..... loved Perot.... and then lost faith in the system.
I am no welfare case... I"ve been a successful business owner all my life...
but you don't get RICH by playing by the rules.... you SURVIVE and have a few toys and travels.
RICH means CRIMES
Bank clients are as entitled to the presumption of innocence as everyone else.
Why do you think banks have any obligation to police other country's tax laws?
As the article pointed out: "This UBS precedent was the result of investigations which followed revelations from a UBS whistleblower about the bank's 'offshore' marketing techniques such as smuggling diamonds in toothpaste tubes for clients."
Smuggling is already illegal.
I have to agree with you here, there should be no rhyme or reason for UBS, or in fact any other bank being forced to open the books on their clients - without a bloody good and lawful reason to do so.
Yes, there's a good chance that individuals and criminal organisations might be hiding ill-gotten gains in these banks, but unless any government instrumentality rocks up their with a warrant, signed by an appropriate court's judge, and back with evidence that justifies such a lookie-loo, then the banks should slam the door in their face.
Have governments the world over not learnt from the lessons of warrantless wiretapping, and many other violations of free speech, freedom of association, and the other rights/privileges which presume innocence until proven otherwise.
I would love to know what the average account size was for the 4,450 American accounts. Ah well, I suppose reporters would like to know as well.
Not so neutral now, are they?
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with