iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Diane Francis

Diane Francis

Posted March 19, 2009 | 06:28 PM (EST)

US Dollar Devaluation as Predicted


The Chinese are starting to switch from investing in U.S. T-bills to buying hard assets for stockpiling or acquiring corporations at bargain-basement prices.

Others are buying gold. Or oil.

This week, Washington surprised markets by mopping up 5% of its own Treasuries, a form of printing money to finance deficits that the rest of the world isn't interested in financing any longer. Or cannot.

(This looming devaluation of the U.S. dollar I blogged about on February 3 in the Huffington Post calling it the Big Bang or monetization of massive deficits.)

It's inflationary which is why the US dollar tumbled about 3.5% right away. But there are many more T-bill cannibalizations to come because deficits are going to reach the stratosphere until this bottoms.

Markets jumped, guessing it's the bottom or the reverse of deflation or both.

Whatever the reason, the Americans are becoming very worrisome and the new regime looks a lot like the old regime, only newer with the same old faces. Concern should be that America's system of government may have reached its best-before date in history because, like its financial sector, Washington appears paralyzed and unable to deal with this crisis.

The problem now is the problem solvers, both financial and political.

The world as we knew it ended because Wall Street, AIG and banks made bets to protect trillions in bond values -- bets they could not pay out if they were wrong. Massive fees blinded judgment and a regulatory vacuum in the global financial space permitted recklessness.

Lacking anyone to mind the proverbial financial store anymore, the board of directors is the executive and legislative branches in Washington.

It's a system of paralysis, through checks and balances and lobbyist corruption, that has been made worse by a two-year primary tangle for the presidency, partisan battles over the crisis and a succession of Treasury Secretaries and Federal Reserve officials, appointed by both parties, who don't get it or have conflicts of interest.

For instance, Republican appointee Alan Greenspan printed too much money for years. In 2007 the tipping point was reached and the response to the credit meltdown was when Republican Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson rescued his old Wall Street firm, Goldman Sachs, plus AIG and others but left some to go bust such as his former arch rival Lehman Bros.

Now we have Democratic Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner who has a conflict because he didn't see the trouble coming either when he was at the FedReserve with Greenspan, did nothing about it and helped cobble together the Paulson, Bernanke fiasco that hasn't worked.

Lots of opinions are out there, but here are a few of the more thoughtful ideas as to what the future holds:

-- Gold is the safety play as the US dollar slides. Some estimate may reach as high as US$1,500 an ounce in 2009.

-- AIG and the others should be, and will be, put into a de facto, strict bankruptcy workout. Outrage over the process thus far will lead to renegotiation of salaries and counterparty payments to stop the ad hoc and cronyist nature of this and indirect bailouts.

-- China is concerned about the fact it holds US$1 trillion of the U.S. debt and is diversifying its portfolio as well as not buying more U.S. Treasuries. Neither will the Saudis.

-- Obama will replace Geithner, preferably with a European or Canadian or Asian team, who get it and haven't got conflicts of interest with all the "boys" on Wall Street and banking.

-- The American, and most of the world's, banking system may eventually have to be nationalized in order to systemically and fairly recalibrate the financial economy. This will also allow the Americans to write off 25% of all mortgages, sub-prime and others, to kick start the real economy again.

Diane Francis blog

The Chinese are starting to switch from investing in U.S. T-bills to buying hard assets for stockpiling or acquiring corporations at bargain-basement prices. Others are buying gold. Or oil. This wee...
The Chinese are starting to switch from investing in U.S. T-bills to buying hard assets for stockpiling or acquiring corporations at bargain-basement prices. Others are buying gold. Or oil. This wee...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:12 PM on 04/16/2009
We will continue down this destructive path unless Obama fires Geithner and Summers who are giving him bad advice because they have conflicts of interest.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Diane Francis
08:50 AM on 03/20/2009
Currency specialists tell me that every time the U.S. dollar falls in value inflation is imported because surplus dollars come home...
So we are talking about monetizing the national debt, which is designed to arrest deflation but is also inflationary because it dilutes the value of money which means dollars will go unused, thus more inflation.
Germany is frozen at the switch in terms of stimulus in the EU because it is terrified of hyperinflation, which brought about its political-national suicide and WWII.
10:21 PM on 03/19/2009
"Republican Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson rescued his old Wall Street firm, Goldman Sachs, plus AIG and others but left some to go bust such as his former arch rival Lehman Bros."

This part is especially important and should raise the call for Congressional investigations! Lehman was hated by Goldman. In fact they had very few friends on the Street. This proves that they eat their own, and that the government helped them set the table!
10:18 PM on 03/19/2009
Just can't get this one to go through, sorry if it posts more than once.

Diane, I love this article, but what happens when the dollar hits bottom? Will all the oligarchs already be into metals, land, businesses and other hard tangibles? And if they are, and that means they are not holding any of their assets in American Dollars, will we see a recall of the currency or the rolling out of a new one?

Will that make all the money average Americans have in their pockets worthless? Or will we be expected to turn it in for pennies on the dollar, the way AIG WASN'T forced to deal with their counter parties' demands to be paid?

And to go all the way out on a limb, can we expect to see the North American Union and Amero any time soon as the "final solution?"
08:16 PM on 03/19/2009
Ms. Francis, a fine blog. Thank you. However, you clearly must be jesting that the president would have the smarts to hire some experts outside of the USA. I personally wished that he would have a team of Soros, Krugman, Stiglitz, Roubini, Taleb, and Baker. Each of these gentlemen knew what was going to happen. Together, I think they would develop a good plan.
09:34 PM on 03/19/2009
I like all of them with exceptions; You missed Prof. Hudson at Missouri and Robert Reich, and I have some doubts about Soros. He's just a little to cozy with the international banks for me...
06:49 PM on 03/19/2009
"-- China is concerned about the fact it holds 50% of the U.S. debt and is diversifying its portfolio as well as not buying more U.S. Treasuries. Neither will the Saudis."

This statement is not true. The U.S. Treasury total debt is $11 trillion, and the PRC holds at most $1 trillion and we're not certain whether all of that is in U.S. Treasury obligations.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Diane Francis
07:12 PM on 03/19/2009
Henry: Your are right, according to Wikipedia. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt) China holds about US$1 trillion is correct which is about 50% of the amount held by foreigners of all kinds. This is hot money.
Thanks so much.