More

Dina Rasor

Dina Rasor

Posted: October 10, 2007 10:15 AM

Way Beyond Blackwater: The Public is Finally Learning the Truth About Private Security Contractors


Another day, another story about an out of control private security contractor shooting. This time it is an Australian run company, Unity Resources Group, was returning from escorting a USAID subcontractor convoy. They shot two women in a car. The Washington Post reports, "'A vehicle got close to them and they opened fire on it randomly as if they were in the middle of a confrontation. You won't find a head. The brain is scattered on the ground,' said Ahmed Kadhim Hussein, a police officer at the scene. 'I am shaking as I am trying to describe to you what happened. We are not able to eat. These were innocent people. Is it so natural for them to shoot innocent people?'"

The public is finally learning about these companies and the havoc that they have been wreaking on the Iraqi citizens for years. Many of these past attacks were not routinely reported or reported on by the media. Since the Blackwater shooting in September, the Iraqi government has found its voice and the press is now paying attention to these attacks.

Private Security Contractors, part of what I call the War Service Industry, don't just guard diplomats. Except for KBR who has their security provided by the U.S. Army, every contractor in Iraq who delivers a service or builds something needs private security contractors to protect them. So these security contractors escort company convoys of supplies and equipment, protect job sites and escort convoys of personnel. The problem is how they do it. They have a different goal than the U.S. Army. The Army is trying to secure areas and win over various sectarian factions but the private security contractors are just trying to get their job done...such as moving equipment and people from point A to point B and they don't want to deal with the Iraqis on the road.

While researching my book, I came across Will Hough, a very impressive ex-Marine who was hired as a security guard for the now defunct Custer Battles company. He mainly did convoy work and was very upset on how his company treated the Iraqis while running their convoys. I was so moved by his story that I devoted a whole chapter on his experiences. Here is an excerpt:

Custer Battles hired Kurdish guards to go along with the American guards on these convoys. Many of the Kurds were barely out of their teens, and Hough worried for them. According to Hough, Custer Battles sometimes would only supply one helmet per SUV, and the American guard usually wore it. Bothered by this, Hough tried to scrounge up enough helmets for the young Kurds. He did not feel right leaving them so unprotected.


When he was traveling with his Kurdish guards through various towns providing protection to convoys, Hough told them not to shoot at any of the civilians unless they were fired upon. They were confused and told him they were taught by the other American guards to shoot randomly at people while going through the town to keep everyone back from the convoys and it was all right to hit civilians with gunfire. It was important to remember that these Kurds had a natural animosity toward Iraqis because of Saddam's killings and suppression of the Kurds. However, Hough was stricken when he heard this because he knew that would just cause the civilians to attack them the next time the convoys went through the town. He strongly told them not to shoot civilians. He taught them hand signals to show civilians on the street and in cars, they would understand, to "keep back from the convoy."

According to Hough, shortly after that, a leader of one of the convoys told his crew, to not let cars near the convoy on the road and to shoot any care that got near them even if they had families in them. After the mission, one of the crew told Hough he shot up at least four cars with families in them because they came near the convoy and the cars had crashed and burned.

Hough was in Iraq in the summer of 2004. These private security convoys have been breeding hatred throughout the occupation. The stories are now coming out to the public but it is too little, too late to curb them in and convince the Iraqi population and their government that we don't condone the random shooting of civilians. It has been going on for years. Now Congress is scrambling to find some effective legal solution to the problem. It is another example of unintended consequences in using contractors in the war zone. It was not well thought out by the military and the State Department and now the U.S. is reaping the hatred that the contractors have bred among the Iraqis. How would you like to be a U.S. Army foot soldier who has to patrol a town that the private security contractor had just gone through, firing at civilians?

If you want to learn more, go to my website www.followthemoneyproject.org .

Follow Dina Rasor on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dinalynnrasor

 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
ImmanuelGoldstein
Founder of the "Brotherhood"
02:34 PM on 10/10/2007
What I want to know is why anyone would name a secrurity firm after a general who got his entire command wiped out?

Custer Battles? How about naming your hospital 'Gangrene Operations'. How about a Optometrist named 'Helen Keller Optics"?
01:20 PM on 10/10/2007
Tort lawyers are, and always will be, a bigger threat to America than Security Contractors.
01:31 PM on 10/10/2007
Tort lawyers don't get soldiers and civilians killed while overbilling the government and affecting the mission. It isn't just the security contractors, the ones like KBR are overbilling the government in breathtaking ways. KBR is billing about half a billion a month...would put any corrupt tort attorney to shame.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:21 PM on 10/10/2007
We can now plainly see how "The Fixers" at the Justice Department have busily done their part to conceal a monumental crimnal enterprise.

The scope and breadth of this conspiracy is breathtaking, in a strange way. Who would have thought that THIS could happen HERE?
01:33 PM on 10/10/2007
Sooner or later the DOJ will have to either join the qui tam suits or decline them and they then will be made public. They can't sit on them forever. When they do go public, I hope that the Congress takes notice...especially if the DOJ declines to enter many of these cases.
11:47 AM on 10/10/2007
I watched an Iraqi on tv not long ago and he said "If you speak English you are an american". So many of the private cowboy soldiers are in the job because they like shooting people and bloodshed but most are there for the money. Our soldiers quit the military and turn into these guys for the money and the freedom to do what they want to without military guidance and rules. All of these private soldiers are also who leaves the image of who we are in the minds of Iraq so it is finally coming to knowing the way so many hate us.
outnow
Ban the bomb
11:32 AM on 10/10/2007
Over at Truthout.com there is an article about Qui Tam and False Claims lawsuits against Iraqi contractors. The article shows that the tort system cleans up fraud by government contractors. The case are difficult and expensive.

The Department of Justice has most of these suits under court seal so that the veil of secrecy protects the outrage of this fraud, waste and abuse.

If consumer lawyers are unleashed on these contractors and legislation is passed to take the profit out of war, you will see the dawn of a new age.

I urge everyone to read everything they can about these pending cases where the discovery has already traced the money all the way to the highest offices in the land. The cases are not supposed to remain under seal for more than six months. However, the administration has persuaded the courts to collude with or tolerate the fraud by hiding it for as much as six years.

When the dam breaks, this war will be seen for what it is - the biggest fraud in US history. Robert Novak bemoans the "evil" tort lawyers for even suing Blackwater due to the death of contractors. That criticism, in itself, is the sign of the dam breaking. Let justice shine!
01:28 PM on 10/10/2007
I make my living as a consultant on qui tam False Claims Act lawsuits...my cases have returned over $100 million back to the government. I agree that they are one of our only hopes in getting fraudulently obtained money from Iraq back to the treasury. The law requires that the cases are filed under seal so that the government has time to investigate. Most whistleblowers and their attorneys will agree to extending the seal (can the government do anything in 60 days?)because it is very hard and costly to pursue these cases if the government does not intervene.

There probably are many qui tam cases out there under seal but I also want to work very hard to get the necessary oversight to prevent the fraud from happening in the first place. Qui tam, unfortunately usually only retrieves a small portion of the original fraud.

Thanks for pointing out the importance of the qui tam law but I hope the public and the media push the Congress even harder to enact and enforce oversight on these contractors. You can't do that in a hostile zone, so my position is that the contractors must be pulled back to the superbases, the Green Zone and Kuwait so that they can be watched. Right now, they are doing damage to the troops and our mission.