And in other news about People Who Are Not Charlie Sheen Saying Crazy Things That Piss Off Their Employers, Dior has fired John Galliano as its head designer after a video surfaced Monday of Galliano telling a group of French and Italian women--whom he presumed were Jewish--that he loved Hitler and that their ancestors would have been "fucking gassed."
Galliano's firing came on the heels of his suspension from the fashion house last week over a similar but separate incident in the same Paris bar where the video was taken, in which he allegedly insulted French couple Geraldine Bloch and Philippe Virgiti, telling Bloch she had a "dirty Jewish face" and Virgiti, who's of Asian descent, that he was a "fucking Asian bastard" before threatening to kill him. Bloch and Virgiti eventually called police to the bar, where Galliano, who was inebriated, was arrested.
(Neither Bloch nor the women Galliano addresses in the video are, in fact, Jewish.)
What's interesting about all this is how the fashion world circled the wagons around Galliano once these incidents came to light. (Hey, we don't call it "fashism" here for nothing.) I first read about Galliano's suspension on Scott Schuman's style blog The Sartorialist--known generally for its pictures and not its commentary--about which Schuman wrote:
Dior has suspended John Galliano while they investigate the alleged anti-Semitic remarks that landed the designer in jail last night.
So, I understand and agree with the Dior zero-tolerence policy regarding race and religion, but isn't suspending someone based solely on allegation a little hasty? I thought that, even in Paris, you're considered innocent till proven guilty...Basically, Dior just threw their star designer under the bus based on the word of strangers with no "reported" third party eyewitness account of the actual events. That ,to me, is the real issue at this stage of the game.
Around the same time, NY Mag's The Cut interviewed "a source" who'd "worked closely with Galliano on several projects" who said:
"I'm an observant Jew, and I know from my own experiences with him that there's no way he hates Jewish people. He's incredibly gentle."
Even after The Sun released the "I love Hitler" video (watch above), there were still a number of people in the fashion world who couldn't bring themselves to call Galliano racist. From Reuters:
Donatella Versace said in Milan there was no justification for the insults but she doubted Galliano had meant to be racist.
Giorgio Armani told fashion reporters the episode must have been due to "a moment of weakness." "You can't expect exemplary behavior from an eccentric man like him," he added.[A] person close to Galliano, a fashion expert who asked not to be named, said he has struggled with having to constantly outperform and with living a life disconnected from reality.
"The truth is that the lid has been removed. Dior had kept him inside this closed pressure cooker and he was trying to survive. Dior wanted people to believe that everything was fine but he was not alright," she said...
"It's sad. That's the only thing I can say. He's an artist and it's sad for me," said Portuguese designer Fatima Lopes.
Sex and the City costume designer Pat Field, a friend of Galliano's, went so far as to call the video "theater":
"People in fashion all they do is go and see John Galliano theater every season," she said. "That's what he gives them. To me, this was the same except it wasn't in a theater or in a movie. John lives in theater. It's theater. It's farce. But people in fashion don't recognize the farce in it. All of a sudden they don't know him. But it's okay when it's Mel Brooks' The Producers singing 'Springtime for Hitler.'"
Yes, it's not anti-Semitism and racism, it's theater! It's eccentricity! It's the pressure to perform! And it's only sad to call someone a dirty Jew when the name-caller is...AN ARTIST!
Move over, Roman Polanski, there's a new martyr in town.
Before the "I love Hitler" video surfaced, Galliano had filed a defamation suit against his accusers Bloch and Virgiti over the weekend. It's unclear now what will happen with Galliano's suit, but here are a few things to know about the French legal system, according to HuffPo:
In France, the penalty for defamation can result in up to one year in prison and a fine of 45,000 euros.
The penalty for anti-Semitism, however, only carries a maximum sentence of six months in prison.
Because racism may be a lot of things--a moment of weakness, stress, drinking too much, mistakenly believing you're a pirate--but it's not defamation, okay?
(I guess someone should mention that to the Anti-Defamation League.)
[HuffPo: John Galliano Arrested For Alleged Assault & Making Anti-Semitic Remarks]
[The Cut: What Really Happened With John Galliano Last Night?]
[The Sun: Film of Galliano's racist rant in bar]
[Reuters: Dior fires "odious" Galliano over racist slurs]
[EW.com: Designer Patricia Field defends John Galliano's alleged anti-Semitic remarks as 'farce']
Follow Disgrasian on Twitter: www.twitter.com/disgrasian
Rabbi Jason Miller: Are Charlie Sheen, Glenn Beck, John Galliano and Julian Assange Anti-Semites?
The fashion press and the banks who own the houses are nothing but parasites.
It was part of the Napolenaic code.
it affects the tech industry so it was covered here - http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090403/0834454377.shtml
It is a known and unfortunate facet of human nature that some of us who are very insecure or have fragile, low self-esteem often lash out at others with the most vile, hateful remarks possible.
It is unfathomable that an openly gay and educated man is not aware of the Nazi regime's appraisal of or approach to homosexuality. Moreover, these incidents, disturbing as they are, simply do not square with Galliano's reputation within the fashion industry or with those who know him well.
Wasn't it last year that Perez Hilton hurled the insult 'fa**ot" at one of Fergie's bodyguards? Hilton was taken to task for that remark, and his response was that he knew the barb would hit home and wound deeply.
Galliano clearly is an unhappy man, and likely can no longer prop himself up with fame and riches. He's admitted to adopting an obsession with the gym and 'improving' his body, as well as undergoing cosmetic procedures. I strongly believe he has succumbed to the pressures we all face to appear handsome, beautiful and fit, and yet, feels he comes up short and thus perceives a (false) vulnerability -- hence lashing out at strangers.
Not a psychologist, but my word, consider the complex nature of human beings. We must look much further than the surface if we are to have rational discussions about anything, or, find solutions whenever possible.
Comparing him to Polanski is also, frankly, bordering on the outrageous. There's been no drugging and raping of a minor here. Please keep things in perspective and proportionate. Those who know him are supporting him which they're entitled to do and probably entirely qualified to, too. I can appreciate that Dior had no choice but to sack him and he probably deserved to be given his being the ''face'' of the brand but to deny him any support or to pour scorn on those who do just smacks of petty vindictiveness and a complete lack of insight into what drives intolerance and bigotry to begin with. If there's one thing as bad as a racist, it's a self-righteous hypocrite.