iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Don McNay

GET UPDATES FROM Don McNay
 

Is 401(k) a Ticking Time Bomb?

Posted: 05/ 3/2012 9:08 am

"Running on Empty. Running into the sun but I'm running behind.

-Jackson Browne

Internal Revenue Code section 401(k) is the only section of the US tax code that the average person can cite.

They know it has something to do with whether or not they can retire with dignity. Or retire at all.

The adoption of section 401(k) in 1982 turned out to be one of those big moments that changed everything.

401(k) plan investments are a primary driver of the investment markets. It is the employee retirement benefit that most companies offer. The performance of the plan's investments are also the reason that many people are pacing the floors at night, worrying if their retirement will get delayed or destroyed.

Until 401(k) came along, pension plans were usually defined benefit plans.

A defined benefit pension gives you a set number of dollars for set period of time. It usually pays out over the course of your lifetime after you retire. (Like an immediate annuity does.)

With a defined benefit plan, the employer takes responsibility for making sure pension money is safe and properly invested.

With the advent of the 401(k), employees with little or no investment experience were required to pick among investment options offered by an employer.

Employees were put in the position to fail. Many have.

It is up to the employer to pick what investment company handles the employee's money. If the employer picks a dog, with few options, the employee is out of luck.

Even worse, some companies push their employees to use 401(k) money to buy stock in the company they work for. If the company goes broke, people lose their jobs and their retirement savings, too.

There is a second major problem: Not putting enough money in the 401(k) to begin with.

401(k) plans give people a lot of freedom but my experience in working with injury victims and lottery winners who get big money is that too much freedom is not a blessing.

Freedom without perceived consequences can lead to disastrous decisions.

I've always encouraged people to put the maximum amount into a 401(k) plan. Few do.
Many put in little or nothing at all.

Now many are looking at a bleak retirement.

Defined benefit plans encouraged people to stay at the same employer. 401(k) plans do not.

I've watched tons of people change jobs and then blow the 401(k) money before they start their new job.

It's been said that 90% of people with a lump sum of money will run through it in five years or less. The same statistic can hold true for people who receive 401(k) rollovers as it does for lottery winners.

When historians study the cause of the 2008 economic meltdown, they will see that the change from defined benefit plans to 401(k) plans in 1982 was a factor. It was one of many shifts where dramatic changes were made in people's lives and liberties. People didn't realize just how dramatic until years later.

If we are going to keep from running behind, 401(k) is one of those things that we need to fix.

 
 
 

Follow Don McNay on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Donmcnay

FOLLOW MONEY
"Running on Empty. Running into the sun but I'm running behind. -Jackson Browne Internal Revenue Code section 401(k) is the only section of the US tax code that the average person can cite. ...
"Running on Empty. Running into the sun but I'm running behind. -Jackson Browne Internal Revenue Code section 401(k) is the only section of the US tax code that the average person can cite. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
06:04 PM on 05/22/2012
The 401k is nothing more than another avenue to transfer the meager retirement funds of the working class -who doesn't have the time, knowledge, or resources to properly monitor their investment accounts- and concentrate them to benefit those who do.
11:24 AM on 05/09/2012
I feel like I've been making a poor choice by not choosing. Let me explain. I'm currently in a job where I don't have an employer offering 401k packages. I'm in my mid-20s and I've started to realize I should really start saving for retirement. But I don't want to make a bad choice, so I haven't set up my own solo 401k yet. But not making a choice is a choice. And it means I am putting nothing towards my retirement at the moment. So where would you suggest I get started? ( http://www.mysolo401k.net )
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tcolby6
01:38 PM on 05/05/2012
I have put into a 401k plan sense the first time I could my wife also we have put in at least 10% sense that time I have always rolled my 401 over if I left a job. I have deversified my investments so all my eggs are not in one basket. I have done the things the experts said to do invest in the stock market. I did not put all my money in stocks someways in bonds and other safer investments. The money I did invest in the stock market was spread among high risk medium risk and lower risk. My wife and I have done this for21 years. I am now 59 years old and my retirement does not look all that good. I have come to believe that the 401k was nothing more then a way for big investors and corporations to use my money to get rich. I do not believe I am in the minority of people my age. I believe we were fed a huge lie that most of us bought hook line and sinker and now we are the ones who will suffer. It is truly ashame when this is the way hard working people who followed the rules are treated
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Viable Way
Common sense is so unusual.
08:15 PM on 05/03/2012
Perhaps people would do better if there were a PORTABLE DEFINED BENEFIT PROGRAM. I think right now we call it SOCIAL SECURITY. What if people who worked for a company were encouraged to put that very same 401K money (required, just like my teacher retirement money) into their SS fund instead of a 401K, but not permitted to withdraw more than 50% of the EXTRA money put in (not the base amount that we have currently)...that would leave a little room for emergency withdrawals, but not an incentive to squander money, or panic during a downturn of the stock market.
03:54 PM on 05/03/2012
Yeah defined benefit plans are the answer??? are you kidding...this is why half the states in this country are so deep in debt they will not be able to recover. Illinois is close to 100 billion in debt because of defined benefit plans.

401K take responsibility for your own retirement...
05:10 PM on 05/03/2012
Corporate welfare, not defined benefit plans for employees, is what's bankrupting states. You know, the guys who talk about personal responsibility and small government - until they want a subsidy or need a bailout.
10:03 AM on 05/04/2012
BS...the state does not come close to handing out 100 billion in corporate welfare...but it is 100 billion in the red when it comes to public pensions.

Defined contribution plans are the answer to the pension mess. Your retirement income is what you save and contribute. No magic wand (defined benefits) that multiplies what you ever contributed...no big pile of money for politicians and union leaders to dip into...no big pile of money for the state to "manage" (steal).
02:32 PM on 05/03/2012
There are people out there who still plan to retire someday? I envy you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:59 PM on 05/03/2012
If you have a connection to make between the 1982 law and the 2008 eceonmic downturn, you didn't make it.

Secondly, 401ks have a silver lining that never gets talked about anymore. If your in a defined benefit plan you are STUCK in the company you work for because that is the only way to get the defined benefit. The portability of a 401k was not only wanted, but needed, in order for people to pursue employment to their best economic advantage. And oh by the way, this portability has contributed at least in some small way to wages rises for poeple at the top. Competition for good personnel.

Third, the people who took the biggest hits in 401ks in the past couple years were mainly invested in the Stock Market. Those markets have recovered, meaning you should have as much money in them now as you did back then. If you were riding the stock market when it was soaring, and then rode it to the bottom, and THEN sold your stocks, you don't understand the stock market. And you should never have been invested in it.

LASTLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY!!! If you did not understand my third point, and you have a 401k and are invested in the Stock Market, I would highly recommend you shift your money to a more fixed income asset.
05:16 PM on 05/03/2012
401(k) plans will never provide a decent retirement for the average worker. The are fatally flawed. They are a great deal for the ever greedy financial services industry, not for retail investors. And BTW, while diversification is a good idea, it's no panacea. If interest rates start rising, your bond exposure is going to take a hit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:10 AM on 05/04/2012
I beg to differ, if I may. 401k is working just fine for me, and it can do so for anyone else who is interested in saving the same percentage of their paycheck as I am. Its not about being a millionaire, its about replacing some portion of your income in your retirement. And frankly, that is within EVERYONES reach.

And if you re-read my post, I never said anything about diversification. I said fixed income investments. If you don't understand a markets, whether that be stocks, bonds, commodities, or futures, you shouldn't be invested in them. That should be common sense.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
07:56 PM on 05/03/2012
"Those markets have recovered, meaning you should have as much money in them now as you did back then"

That is the problem. People are told that their funds are back where they were. Meaning they lost big time.

This is an attempt to gloss over the fact that they lost big money. No one dares talk about where the 401k's would have been if they had not been raided by the banks.

The simple truth is these people have lost money that can never be recovered. In most cases your 401k statement will not even show the amount of your loss.

Remember: Your 401k statement will show that your position has improved. It will even look like you have gained ground. But that is because you have been putting money in it every month. Look very closely and you will see that your individual investments may be losers. But how can you really tell if y7our statement shows you have more in there now than you did a year ago. That is enough to fool most people into thinking their 401k is not losing them money when it really is.
09:48 AM on 05/05/2012
401K plans were not raided by the banks. Maybe the management fees are too high (and they are with many small plans) but that is your employer's fault. As a retiree, I have been taking money OUT of my 401K plan every year since 2007 and there is more money in it now than since before the crash.
12:40 PM on 05/03/2012
Not to mention many 401(k) retirement plans have not recovered from the market losses of the last recession. This recent ABC News article says median 401(k) balance is now down to $23,000.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/colorado-man-wiped-401k-fund-guidance-needed/story?id=16264550#.T6KxAOhYuCf

My strategy now is to follow Paul B. Farrell's advice in the MarketWatch columns and build a Lazy Portfolio for my retirement.

http://www.marketwatch.com/lazyportfolio
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
10:43 AM on 05/03/2012
Where was your chagrin when the markets were returning 20 and 30 percent.

What goes up also has the risk of going down.

Another talking head who bugles about the dangers of risk without explaining reward. Another pundit of the risk free society league
photo
KarmaPatrol
Riverboat Gambler, satellite whisperer. Independe
09:27 AM on 05/03/2012
Human behavior is to blame. People exhibit a herd mentality and only invest in a "sure" thing. By that time the assets have become pretty pricey. Recently a well-known hedge fund manager lamented retail investors did not have enough equities in their 401k's, especially during the recent 3 yr bull market, and the whole retirement industry was pretty much "doomed" (his words). Maybe the industry needs to publish literature for retail investors about keeping a certain percentage in equities during good and bad times. Then again the crash of 1929 didn't fully recover until 1954.