More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Don McNay

Don McNay

Posted: January 30, 2010 01:39 PM

Death By Lottery

What's Your Reaction:


Ooh, ooh that smell
can't you smell that smell?
Ooh, ooh that smell
the smell of death surrounds you

-Lynyrd Skynyrd

He even had a tragic name.

Abraham Shakespeare should have been on top of the world. In 2006, he won $16.9 million in the Florida lottery.

Last week, they found his body. Buried five foot deep and under concrete.

His death wasn't a big surprise. He had been missing since April, but no one bothered to report him missing until November 9th.

Shakespeare had acquired a huge entourage, but they didn't really miss him. They just missed his money.

I hope Mr. Shakespeare is now in heaven. From the day he stood in front of the cameras at a lottery-led news conference, holding a big replica of a Florida lotto check, his life became a living hell.

Like every other lottery winner, Shakespeare said the money wouldn't change him.

Like every other lottery winner, it did.

And not for the better.

Right off the bat, one of Shakespeare's co-workers sued, claiming that Abraham had stolen the winning ticket from him. The jury ruled for Shakespeare six months later, but by then, according to the New York Daily News, "there were people constantly asking for a piece of his fortune."

Dorice Donegan "Dee Dee" Moore was a person who apparently got a good chunk of it.

Moore is considered "a person of intense interest" in the police investigation of Shakespeare's disappearance and death. Troy McKay Young, a Lakeland, Florida, police office, was arrested for unlawful compensation, on allegations that he sold confidential information, such as Shakespeare's license plate number, to Dee Dee Moore.

It seemed like everyone wanted a piece of Shakespeare.

According to published reports, Dee Dee Moore had a joint bank account with Shakespeare and acquired nearly $2 million of his money.

They found Shakespeare's body on land owned by her boyfriend.

I've written a book about what to do when you win the lottery. Shakespeare was a textbook example of doing everything backwards.

I tell lottery winners to keep it confidential. Shakespeare had a news conference and waved a big check.

I tell people to take the annual payments. Shakespeare took a lump sum.

I tell people to get professional advice. Moore, who seemed to be his adviser, apparently went to great lengths, and possibly used illegal methods, to track him down.

Professional advisers don't track down clients. Clients are referred to them by attorneys or other financial professionals.

I tell people to use their money to make a positive impact on society. Shakespeare talked about setting up a foundation to help poor people, but it never happened.

Instead, the money was wasted and frittered away.

Just like his life was wasted and frittered away.

The day that Shakespeare cashed his winning ticket, the smell of death surrounded him.

Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC is one of the world's leading authorities in helping people deal with "Big Money" issues.

McNay is an award winning, syndicated financial columnist and Huffington Post Contributor. He is the host of the daily, "McNay on The Money" syndicated radio program.

You can read more about Don at www.donmcnay.com

McNay founded McNay Settlement Group, a structured settlement and financial consulting firm, in 1983 and Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC in 2000. You can read more about both at www.mcnay.com

McNay has Master's Degrees from Vanderbilt and the American College and is in the Eastern Kentucky University Hall of Distinguished Alumni.

McNay has written two books. Most recent is Son of a Son of a Gambler: Winners, Losers and What to Do When You Win The Lottery

McNay is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Round Table and has four professional designations in the financial services field.

 
 
 

Follow Don McNay on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Donmcnay

 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:28 AM on 02/01/2010
IT doesn't matter how much or how little money a person has. What matters is how that great or small amount is managed by the person. Two examples: 1. Mike Tyson - What did he do with his millions and where are they now? 2. MotherTeresa in the midst of immense poverty eased the suffering of multitudes starting from nothing.

One might also consider the plight of the banksters who are being awarded multimillion dollar bonuses. They live in huge houses full of the finest stuff. Their childern go to smooty schools where drugs are much more expensive. They live in exclusive guarded estates with awful neighbors. Even the most elite have to deal with their own human nature.

I would submit for consideration that rather than planning what to do after winning the lottery is less important than applying reasoning to the assets we are presently in posession of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
10:49 AM on 02/01/2010
Never get between a conservative and money they didn't earn.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:03 AM on 02/01/2010
My husband and I have a pact, if we won...we wouldn't tell a soul, not even our family. Most of them are financially well off anyway.
08:00 AM on 02/01/2010
If I win the lottery I'll get cable.
05:24 AM on 02/01/2010
I can count on one hand the number of lottery tickets I have bought. You know the chances of winning without a ticket is not much worse than those who do buy the silly things.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:36 AM on 02/01/2010
I met and talked with a man who won $212,000 in one of the California lotteries. He told me that he hadn't known how to handle it, and that within 2 years he was worse off than if he hadn't won anything.

We can all draw our own conclusions from these stories, but one thing seems sure - individual humans can be awfully dumb and mean.

I do like the idea of long, drawn out, multiple payments. Even if the first couple of payments are completely wasted, the individual has a chance to learn from his or her mistakes. Experience is a hard taskmaster.
01:29 AM on 02/01/2010
We had an elderly black man win the big scratch jackpot in Grand Prarie, Texas. He unwisely went to the covenience store and presented his million dollar win to the Nepales clerk who informed him that he was mistaken and it was only a two dollar win, promptly shoved on the counter. The old gentleman left the store while the clerk beat a path to state lottery payout HQ and promptly bought a ticket to Katmandu and hasn't been seen since. When an attorney for the man contacted the Lotto boys they get "Too bad, theres nothing we can do about it".
yukoner1
Living way up the left coast.
11:41 PM on 01/31/2010
In addition to being guaranteed anonymity, winners of substantial sums of money should have to show that they have consulted a reputable, independent financial advisor before any funds are dispersed.
photo
RonK Michigan
Half of the people you know are below average
10:41 AM on 02/01/2010
LOL - Shazam! Big brother is watching eh? Bet you are a blind supporter of the Patriot Act too eh?
09:21 AM on 01/31/2010
Even if he was very foolish with his money and unwise in choosing who he associated with, killing him is an even dumber move. You don't get the money and you loose your freedom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RButler
"Who wouldn't love a person who had a pony?"
04:03 AM on 01/31/2010
I live in California where the lottery was mainly to provide extra funds for education and it's free of state income tax. However, it's a windfall for the federal government when someone wins a big jackpot. It doesn't seem that the few dollars a person would spend a year on lottery tickets wouldn't have any effect on his federal income tax. But, when the lotto/lottery began suddenly there were millionaires weekly and the big tax liabilities. If, instead of big lottery payouts, those individual dollars went to purchasing goods and services in CA, would the feds reap as much total tax? Any guesses?

I would prefer that the taxes sent to the IRS at least went to education as well as a portion of the winnings.
03:11 AM on 01/31/2010
When collecting the big winnings, some states require you to hold up that big check and get your picture taken by the media for publicity. The lottery reasons that it's to show that they are legitimate in handing out the winnings. I think this rule should be changed so that the winners can remain anonymous. The state lottery directors, who are appointed by the governors, should be able to guarantee the legitimacy of the winnings.
07:59 AM on 02/01/2010
That's a very good point. They might as well give the winners a jacket with a bulls-eye painted on it if it's done publicly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
If ur neibor wtchs Fox Nws wtch ur neibor
08:49 AM on 02/01/2010
Unfortunately that won't work in an age where we have learned we can not trust our government. There won't be a way to publicly prove there was really a winner, and the money didn't go to the gov.s girlfriend or into some kind of dishonest payout mechanism. A nice thought though.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:41 AM on 02/01/2010
Are you just now awakening to the idea that you can not trust your govenment? Was there some thought that we had elected men of honor to represent us and so had nothing more to think about? Governments can work and work quite well in other nations where citizens require their representative to account for their actions Unfortunately we allowed our government to be hollowed out and privatized and staffed with incompetent and worse political stooges over the last thirty years. And those actions were taken by people who insisted government could not work so it should all be left to multinational corporations to run with no rule of law to interfere. But you are right - No government can ever be trusted. Freedom must always be guarded.
Nice hearing form you.
photo
ScottishScript
"I am not a number, I am a person!"
03:03 AM on 01/31/2010
I’ve long believed winning the lottery was an extremely dangerous proposition. Yeah it’s nice not having to worry about paying the bills, but the price you pay, is worrying about everything else.

We have a tradition here that may be unique to Scotland. When a Bride and Groom exit the church, a gang of children wait outside for the “scramble.â€

The “scramble†involves the groom tossing a pile of coins into the street so that the children can fight or “scramble†over it. It’s not a pretty sight. In fact it’s not unlike a pack of Hyenas fighting over a carcass and with very similar sound effects.

I’ve personally never been materialistic, even as a child, so I found all the hair pulling and stomping a little hard to understand. And later I often marvelled at just how insane this little ritual was. Then again, it does tell you all you ever need to know about people and money.

I mention this because when I read this sad story I immediately thought of the “scrambles†of my childhood.

Except instead of a pile of coins being clawed at on the ground, it was a man called Abraham Shakespeare.
09:07 AM on 01/31/2010
Scottish script says

I’ve long believed winning the lottery was an extremely dangerous proposition. Yeah it’s nice not having to worry about paying the bills, but the price you pay, is worrying about everything else.

Truer words have never been spoken
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:06 AM on 02/01/2010
Interesting, the effect money has on people. When I was a cashier, management had a policy of having us drape a bag over the drawer when we carried it to the office for counting. The bag was a visual deterrence. Customers seeing cashiers walk around with the money drawer open had been known to impulsively grab the cash and run.
02:25 AM on 01/31/2010
Limit the lottery to a useful but not extravagant amount - perhaps $100,000. Enough to pay a good portion of a house, or send a couple kids to college. One would still need to keep their job. Then instead of one $20 million winner there could be 200 $100,000 winners - you would have a good chance of knowing one. It would get used for practical things - likely locally.
photo
RonK Michigan
Half of the people you know are below average
10:50 AM on 02/01/2010
Why would you buy a $1.00 ticket to win 100K when your odds of winning are 10 quadrillion to one? The ONLY lottery winners are the state, the fed and the company that thought up the lottery game......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:49 AM on 01/31/2010
Given the uncertainty of the times and the dim prospects of our institutions going forward, do you still advise lottery winners to take the annual payments rather than the lump sum?
photo
notb observer
Technically it's a micro auto-bio...
01:26 AM on 01/31/2010
What a sad story for this man, but you have to admit, he did not use his head. He could have sought professional advice and financial counseling, and he must have realized that he was going to be a target of scammers and parasites. I wonder if the lottery organizations have some kind of referral service that they, as a trusted agent, can recommend to lottery winners. Keeping a list of decent financial advisers, lawyers and counselors who have experience in these matters would not cost anything and would be invaluable to anyone who never really handled money and doesn't know the first thing about how to make the best use of such a fortune.
01:01 PM on 01/31/2010
It would be preferable if the government would, at least, give anonymity to those who would want it; simply because there's no need to use public exposure of winners for promotional purposes. A $I00,000,000 jackpot is enough promotion in itself! In fact, I suspect that more people would actually play under the cloak of anonymity. It's kind of like Bally Total Fitness mistaken assumption that locking people into long termed contracts would be profitable, when out of necessity, they found the opposite to be true.