Don Parker

Don Parker

Posted: September 17, 2009 01:01 PM

Mad Max Baucus (D-BC/BS) and his Gang of Styx

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
What's Your Reaction?

Is this democracy? How can we let this Gang of Styx -- six senators so unrepresentative of the American population -- decide who gets health care and who doesn't, in some cases who lives and who dies, who gets rich and who goes bankrupt?

They are known as the Senate Finance Committee's Gang of Six. I call them the Gang of Styx, in honor of the Styx River, the "river of hate" in Greek mythology that wound around Hades nine times and divided the world of the living from the world of the dead.

Under our current system, health insurance company clerks anonymously decide each day which of their captive customers will live and which ones will die by denying life-saving medical treatment. Health insurance executives make megamillions, while millions of people who made them rich go bankrupt.

Decisions still to be made by the Gang of Styx could ultimately decide who gets health care and who doesn't.

In the last two elections, America called for reform by overwhelmingly electing President Barack Obama and large Democratic majorities in the House and Senate. Where are they now?

Four other House and Senate committees have agreed on health care legislation largely in line with the president's prescription.

But Mad Max and the Gang of Styx insist on ignoring the elections and their own voters. Rather than represent voters, they'd rather dance with the corporate executives and health industry lobbyists who have given them millions of dollars in campaign funds.

Could any six senators be more unrepresentative of the nation than these six? Most Americans have never heard of them. They are Mike Enzi of Wyoming, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, Olympia Snowe of Maine, Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, Charles Grassley of Iowa, and their fearless leader, Max Baucus (D-Blue Cross/Blue Shield) of Montana.

Added together, they collectively represent only 2.7 percent of the American population. Rural states deserve representation, but not to the exclusion of all other parts of the country. Among them only one state has what could be considered an urban center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, at 522,000 the 34th largest city in the country. Next is Des Moines at 197,000, the 112th ranked city. Billings, Montana and Fargo, North Dakota both top their states at about 100,000 each. The largest town in Maine is Portland at 63,000 and in Wyoming it's Cheyenne, 53,000.

This is comparable -- by proportional population -- to having international policy determined by Chad, Guatemala, Sri Lanka, Uzbekistan, Tanzania, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. With the president of Sri Lanka serving as the chairman.

Between them, the Gang of Styx represent 8.4 million Americans but they have been given more dollars from the health care industry than they have constituents. Mad Max alone has received approximately $3 million since 2003, triple the 958,000 people he represents. Seems like a bargain for the industry that will rake in billions more dollars from Max's new bill.

Hmmm, makes me wonder -- if Baucus's constituents would pool their money and contribute $3 each to his campaign, could they buy one night in a cheap motel with their senator?

 
Comments
5
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

thanks don revealing just how unrepresentative the gang of styx really is!

the other bit that needs to be repeated over and over again is this fact:

"Health insurance executives make megamillions, while millions of people who made them rich go bankrupt."

to truly reform h.c. in the u.s.a we MUST remove profit from the health insurance .... it is clear that the only folks this gang really represents are the for-profit interests of the phrama/insurance corporations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 09/18/2009
photo

Don,
The newest "Tricky Dick," had but one goal - convolute the process enough with the cutting edge, '3 on 3' board concept to make sure the committee's report would be so held up - there would be plenty of time for summer vacation and 2009's, "Summer of Love! It couldn't have worked out any better for the, "Party of No!" Are we really surprised. We could lynch this guy - but instead - let's Mark-Up and Health Care Plan with a Public Option anyway... - Brad Michael Moore

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 AM on 09/18/2009

Well said!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/17/2009
- veracity I'm a Fan of veracity 77 fans permalink

< Is this democracy? How can we let this Gang of Styx -- six senators so unrepresentative of the American population -- decide who gets health care and who doesn't, in some cases who lives and who dies, who gets rich and who goes bankrupt? >

NO, it is NOT Democracy!

Michael Lind, in his landmark book, "Made in Texas: George W. Bush and The SOUTHERN TAKEOVER of American Politics"
http://www.amazon.com/Made-Texas-Southern-Takeover-American/dp/0465041213
(where "politics" = POWER, when you win or steal elections, and thus the machinery of law enforcement, taxation, using govt. powers to reward your friends & PUNISH your opponents, etc.)

....DESCRI­BES how "democracy" in the Deep South during the ENTIRE Segregation era was a ONE-PARTY OLIGARCHY, effectively a DICTATORSHIP of the cabal of wealthy elites that ran the Democrat Party.

That was also THE IDEAL for the Confederate States during the Civil War: you could have ALL the "democracy" you wanted, AS LONG AS you supported the 'right' of WEALTHY PLANTATION OWNERS to OWN SLAVES, and DOMINATE state, local, and national government.

(Until the Civil War, fully TWELVE of FIFTEEN US presidents were SLAVE OWNERS or FROM slave states.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 09/17/2009
- Jim Jaffe - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Jim Jaffe 7 fans permalink

don't exactly understand what the problem is. if All Good Democrats support the HELP bill it will pass on the Senate floor and go to conference with the House bills and then we'll all live happily and healthily ever after. If All Good Democrats don't support the HELP bill, then there's a bit of a problem that has nothing to do with Max Baucus, the size of Montana or magnitude of campaign contributions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 09/17/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect