Doree Lewak

Doree Lewak

Posted: April 22, 2009 02:30 PM

Is Green Lit So Green After All?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
What's Your Reaction?

If you harbored shame reading that Tori Spelling tome before, imagine how guilty you'd feel if you knew about the egregious expenditure of natural resources used to produce it.

With Earth Day upon us, booksellers are putting front and center not-so-subtle reminders to give back to Planet Earth. Although nowadays it seems like every day is Earth Day -- with an almost daily mandate to green the world or pay the price -- the sheer volume of self-styled "green books" has to make you wonder: how green is "Green Lit"?

The explosion (and some say over-saturation) of the category -- with green solutions to every non-problem in your life (how to green your grandma, how to green your next dental visit, and of course, how to green your sex life) -- suggests that "Green Lit" authors may not be practicing what they publish. So what are they really offering, and more to the point, is it almost becoming a self-parody of that which the authors are trying to fix?

To keep pace with the American book publishing industry alone, 30 million trees per year are used on book production, according to data from the Green Book Initiative. Now we know what reading a "guilty pleasure" really means.

So the question raised is whether the production of these books in such high volume negates the spirit of their message. If the authors and publishers were serious about sending their message, wouldn't exclusively sold e-books work just as well?

Even if it does feed a rapt market, might green authors serve the environment better to use an alternative means to publish? Sure, authors may stand on top of their soapbox of moral superiority and point fingers at everyone else, but there's a certain underlying hypocrisy with such striking figures on books' environmental impact.

The Green Book Initiative reports that the production of one new book -- through the various stages of the publishing process -- expends 8.85 pounds of carbon dioxide, while scooping up used books online emits a mere fraction of that figure.

While most publishers are mindful of their environmental impact and pledge to do their part, few real inroads have been made in the quest for a greener industry.

It turns out, though, that some of those eco-friendly messages stuffed into those green books are getting through: a 2006 Opinion Research Corporation poll reveals that 80% of book buyers would spend more to buy books on recycled paper.

As it stands now, less than 10% of US books use recycled fiber for paper.

Now there should be no shame in holding a real-life book (unless, of course, Tori Spelling is on the cover of it), but not without exhausting every measure to make that process as environmentally-friendly as possible.

I can see the next wave of Green Lit now: how to green the book industry. Now even the Kindle-averse may start to relent.

Follow Doree Lewak on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DoreeLewak

If you harbored shame reading that Tori Spelling tome before, imagine how guilty you'd feel if you knew about the egregious expenditure of natural resources used to produce it. With Earth Day upon us...
If you harbored shame reading that Tori Spelling tome before, imagine how guilty you'd feel if you knew about the egregious expenditure of natural resources used to produce it. With Earth Day upon us...
 
Comments
2
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Hi Doree:
I am currently struggling with this issue, I am a Green Author who feels guilty about having business cards, and the only solution I can come up with is carbon offsetting.

I recently published a book on Amazon Kindle, "Million Dollar Difference", however my next book (a Green Book that helps people save their finances by saving the planet) needs to reach more than the 300,000 Kindle users. What are some solutions?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 04/23/2009
- jhNY I'm a Fan of jhNY 58 fans permalink

The Green Lit is ironic in itself, as you suggest, given the stuff out of which it is made, but this points up a larger problem: the resources we use for a great many products that surround us in the marketplace are precious, yet have been priced as if they were easily replenished, which makes it easy for their uses to be absurd, as in anything Tori Spelling could write. The petroleum on which our entire economy is based (transportation, fertilizer, heating, plastic) derives from an era in the development of life on earth that will never come again, and yet many millions of gallons have been burnt away in the activity of just drivin' around to nowhere in particular, for no particular reason, all while the gray smoke wafting out the back of the vehicle is raising the temperature of the earth to unwholesome ranges which threaten all life.

We dream of a life of effortless, low-cost consumption, and then we live as if it were so. And yet, it isn't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 04/22/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect