Doug Obegi

Doug Obegi

Posted January 28, 2009 | 05:06 PM (EST)

California's Water Problems Weren't Caused By a Fish: We Need a 21st Century Water Policy for Fish and People

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

California has a water crisis but, contrary to what many believe, a tiny fish is not the cause of this ongoing problem. There simply isn't enough rain and snow in a dry year, like this one, to meet projected demands for water.

We've known for years that water exports from the Bay-Delta cannot continue growing to meet California's water needs. Both the law and the science were settled awhile ago: we've diverted too much water from the Delta for too long, as the Governor's Delta Vision Task Force recently concluded. And with climate change, the ecological crisis in the Delta, the closure of California's salmon fishery, and the potential for a catastrophic levee failure, if we don't change our ways, the future looks grim for both people and fish.

That's why it isn't surprising that the California Department of Fish and Game today considered water pumping restrictions in the Bay-Delta to protect longfin smelt from being sucked into the export pumps of the state and federal water projects. The longfin smelt was historically one of the most abundant fish species in the Bay-Delta, but in the past several decades its population has been plummeting and is now at risk of extinction (joining a long list of species that are declining as a result of unsustainable actions in the estuary). This review was triggered by DFG finding the fish near the export pumps (you can see a map of where the fish currently are here). The regulatory process is designed to keep these the fish from being sucked into the pumps, which has been a significant source of mortality: DFG estimates that more than 1.5 million adult and juvenile longfin smelt, and millions more larvae, have been killed by the water projects since 1993.

We hope that the Department is right that current operations will prevent significant numbers of longfin smelt from being sucked into the pumps, and we expect that DFG will closely monitor the situation and take prompt action in future weeks if there is a problem. But whether today or a month from now, there's a good chance that restrictions will be imposed to prevent a problem from occurring, whether because of longfin smelt or because of one of the other endangered and threatened fish that the pumps put at risk. Today's action is a reminder that our water resources are fragile and we need to continue to invest in new ways to replenish our water supply without relying on the Delta.

In fact, reductions of water exports from the Delta are inevitable. In the early 2000s, water exports were at historically high levels (5 of the 6 highest levels of water exports in the history of the CVP and SWP occurred in the past 8 years). For the foreseeable future, we're likely to have to return to water export levels seen in the 1990s.

Bottom line: California is at a crossroads; it can either follow its old course toward drought, failed crops, failing fisheries, and an insufficient drinking water supply - or it can commit to a new, smart-water solution for the 21st century.

We cannot continue to meet California's water needs the way we have in the past.

Fortunately, there is a solution. We can obtain real water from a Virtual River of water efficiency, trimming water waste, recycling wastewater, and capturing rainwater in urban areas before it flows into storm drains. There's more water available from these sources than we've ever exported from the Delta.

We're already seeing important steps forward to get the water flowing from these environmentally friendly alternative sources:

* Orange County built a water recycling plant that is generating enough drinking water each year for more than 500,000 people, while at the same time cleaning up coastal water quality and reducing electricity use, all at a cost that is comparable to water from the Delta.
* The Governor last year called for a 20 percent reduction in per capita water use by 2020, and the State Water Resources Control Board and other agencies are working on implementation plans. Assemblymen Mike Feuer and Jared Huffman have introduced AB 49, an NRDC sponsored bill, to achieve this goal. State agencies, local governments, and water districts (such as the Metropolitan Water District) are providing money to increase water conservation, such as funding homeowners to replace old toilets and showerheads with high efficiency models, and providing tips and advice on how to use water more efficiently.
* The omnibus public lands bill (S.22) passed by the U.S. Senate last month authorizes the federal Bureau of Reclamation to fund, design and construct groundwater banks and water recycling projects in California in conjunction with local governments and to restore flows and fish to the San Joaquin River. Like Orange County's plant, these recycling projects could create new water supply while reducing water pollution. The groundwater bank could help reduce water supply impacts in dry years by banking water in wet years to be utilized during dry years. This bill offers a glimpse of a 21st Century policy for the Bureau of Reclamation: smarter, more cost-effective and environmentally friendly ways of providing water for public use, while helping to restore our rivers and wildlife.

These are the solutions we need to implement today to meet our water needs tomorrow.

It's still relatively early in the water year, and we're all hoping for rain. But hoping for rain isn't a strategy for meeting our water needs today, let alone in the future when climate change makes our existing water supply system ever more tenuous. If we utilize our fish-friendly water solutions, we can meet the needs of Californians -- at their faucets and in the fields -- as well as our wildlife for generations to come. And we can become the national model for smart-water solutions for the 21st century.

This post originally appeared on NRDC's blog.

California has a water crisis but, contrary to what many believe, a tiny fish is not the cause of this ongoing problem. There simply isn't enough rain and snow in a dry year, like this one, to meet pr...
California has a water crisis but, contrary to what many believe, a tiny fish is not the cause of this ongoing problem. There simply isn't enough rain and snow in a dry year, like this one, to meet pr...
 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Let's see, in California, growing alfalfa uses 4 million to 5.5 million acre feet of water a year. The entire city of Los Angeles uses only about 650,000 acre feet. Agriculture uses four times more water than urban areas. The California gross domestic product for agriculture is $15 billion; for urban-based manufacturing, it's $172 billion. So, when we talk about water conservation, let's talk about California's biggest water user.
http://blog.jimgogek.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 02/11/2009
- LeftRight I'm a Fan of LeftRight 135 fans permalink
photo

I've never understood why we just waste so much of the water that falls on us. Municipalities create VAST underground caverns to carry away flood water, and then once the flooding danger is reduced, they just throw all of that away!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 01/29/2009
photo

Do a little homework to find out that Carlsbad by the Sea in San Diego, CA will have a Desalination plant in operation in 2010 to service the needs of it's water uses into the future using Ocean water They are way ahead of the pact on this issue. It will cost $100 Million, but that is a drop in the bucket compared to what will happen if it is not done. Coastal cities will all need to do this to take the pressure off of the waters sources currently being consumed. The South West will need to take action now and not think that "God" will take care of our problem through praying and preaching.
Human intellect and science is our best and only hope for a future period!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 01/29/2009

Toilets account for approx. 30% of water used indoors. By installing a Dual Flush toilet you can save between 40% and 70% of drinking water being flushed down the toilet, depending how old the toilet is you are going to replace.
If you are serious about saving water, want a toilet that really works and is affordable, I would highly recommend installing a Dual Flush toilet. Caroma toilets offer a patented dual flush technology consisting of a 0.8 Gal flush for liquid waste and a 1.6 Gal flush for solids. On an average of 5 uses a day (4 liquid/ 1 solid) a Caroma Dual Flush toilet uses less than 1 gallon per flush. The new Sydney Smart uses only 1.28 and 0.8 gpf, that is an average of 0.89 gallons per flush. This is the lowest water consumption of any toilet available in the US. Caroma, an Australian company invented the two button dual flush in the 80's and has more toilets on the list of WaterSense labeled HET’s http://www.epa.gov/watersense/pp/find_het.htm than any other manufacturer. With a full 3.5″ trapway, these toilets virtually never clog. All of Caroma’s toilets qualify for the rebate programs available in the US. Please visit my blog http://pottygirl.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/what-you-should-know-about-toilets/ to learn more or go to http://www.caromausa.com. Best regards, Andrea Paulinelli

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 AM on 01/29/2009
- mattamorr I'm a Fan of mattamorr 3 fans permalink

Your post hits the California water problem square on the head.

Just like we will have to accept and learn new ways to sacrifice and survive economically, we are going to have to change (drastically) the way we look at water. Water thirsty green grass lawns will become a thing of the past as water becomes more scarce and more expensive and we start landscaping our homes with more native and drought resistant plants. No more rain run-off out into the streets and into the sewers towards the ocean, but instead; rainwater redirected into landscapes, rainwater tanks and aquifers; permeable instead of non-permeable hardscapes that allow replenishment to groundwater tables; and of course the simple things, like shorter showers, better irrigation practices, low-flow and composting toilets, reusing greywater, EnergySmart dishwashers and washing machines....
Water is the new oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 01/28/2009
photo

Oil is a choice to use as fuel, yet water has no alternatives and that is why it is so important that we humans address this issue scientifically and respectfully.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 01/29/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect