iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Douglas LaBier

GET UPDATES FROM Douglas LaBier
 

The 4.0 Career Is Coming... Are You Ready?

Posted: 11/17/10 06:03 PM ET

Even in the midst of our economic disaster that's hitting all but the wealthiest Americans, a transformation is continuing within people's orientation to work. I call it the rise of the 4.0 career.

This growing shift concerns how men and women think about and pursue their careers. It also defines the features of organizations that they want to work for and commit to. This shift that I describe below transcends its most visible form: Generation X's and, especially, Generation Y's attitudes and behavior in the workplace. Those are part of a broader shift whose origins are within men and women at the younger end of the baby boomer spectrum.

I first encountered this while interviewing yuppies (remember them?) in the 1980s for my book "Modern Madness, about the emotional downside of career success. I often found that people would want to talk about a gnawing feeling of wanting something more "meaningful" from their work. They didn't have quite the right language back then to express what that would look like other than feeling a gap between their personal values and the trade-offs they had to make to keep moving up in their careers and companies. The positive ideals of the 60s seemed to have trickled down into their yearnings, where they remained a kind of irritant.

Flashing forward 25 years, those people are now today's midlife baby boomers. Their earlier irritation has bloomed into consciously expressed attitudes and behavior that have filtered down into the younger generations, where they've continued to evolve. Today, they're reshaping how people think about and pursue their careers within today's era of interconnection, constant networking and unpredictable change.

I'll oversimplify for the sake of highlighting an evolution of people's career orientations:

Career Versions 1.0, 2.0, 3.0... And The Emerging 4.0

The 1.0 career describes doing whatever kind of work enables you to survive. It's what people do when they're in situations of extreme hardship, political upheaval, or within socioeconomic conditions that limit their opportunity and choices. That probably describes the situation for the masses of people throughout most of history. And of course it exists today, especially among those who have been hardest hit by the current recession. In these situations, your criterion for "success" is being able to earn enough of a living to survive -- pay your bills and support your family. The conflicts that people experience within the 1.0 career often include the impact of working conditions, discrimination and limited opportunities for getting onto a career path that can lead to something better.

Version 2.0 emerged with the political and economic environments that supported the emergence of the modern "career." That is, work within increasingly large, bureaucratic organizations that developed from about the late 1800s into the early 20th century. Those organizations required layers of management and administration -- white-collar jobs, within bureaucracies. Your career could advance along a defined path, and it was available to people who were able to gain a foothold within it. That path was often facilitated by educational opportunities and/or social class advantages people brought with them.

The 2.0 career is what most people define as "careerism:" Pursuing more power, authority, money and position within an organization. It's all about performing -- doing whatever gets you those external rewards. Our career culture begins conditioning many of us that way in childhood, as Madeline Levine described in her book, "The Price of Privilege." It probably even contributes to the widespread experience of ADD.

Over time, you become set up for conflicts between performing to get those rewards on the one hand, and your internal desire to achieve something of deeper value, on the other. The 2.0 career still predominates within today's career culture. It's where you find the conditions that generate, for example, work-life conflict, boredom, workplace bullying, hostile management practices, and subtle racial and gender barriers to moving up.

The TV show "Madmen" highlights much of the experiences of the 2.0 career, and it predominated until harbingers of the 3.0 career began to appear during the last 20 years. The 3.0 career reflects a desire to find more personal meaning and sense of purpose through work. That's what I began to find among members of the baby boomer generation when I interviewed them in their younger years.

The 3.0 careerist struggles for more balance between work and personal life, and is less willing than the 2.0 careerist to stick with an unfulfilling job, or settle for one when job-hunting. Conflicts within the 3.0 orientation are visible, for example, in the pushback against the longer hours companies increasingly pressure people into. Or, in rebellion against being available 24/7, even while on a vacation. Also, an increasing number of people say that moving up is a downer for them. For example, a Families and Work Institute report found that promotions are being turned down by workers in the thick of their careers. Workers used to be eager to take on more responsibility, and now they aren't as much.

A woman in her 40s expressed that theme, saying, "Simply put, I want more fun in my life." She added that there was "too much disconnect" between her duties as Chief Operation Officer -- including managing her staff and dealing with the other people on the senior management team -- and what she described as the "neglected me, this person hiding inside the roles I have to perform every day." She said, "I'm going to do something different at this point, no matter what kind of adjustments I have to make."

The 3.0 careerists do not want their professional lives to be the enemy of their talents or interests outside work. They want less fragmentation and more integration among the different parts of their lives. More than just having a successful career, they want their careers to serve and support a successful personal life.

That latter point distinguishes the 3.0 from the emerging 4.0 career. The former is more self-development-focused. In contrast, the 4.0 careerist wants more than sufficient work-life balance and personal meaning. To be sure, those remain important. But the 4.0 career is more focused on having impact on something larger than oneself.

In essence, the 4.0 careerist is motivated by a sense of service to and connection with the larger human community through the product or service he or she contributes to. The vehicle for this is the opportunity for continuous new learning and creative growth, through which you use your talents and capacities for having a positive impact on human lives, through your work.

This is the future. You're likely to be feeling the pull towards the 4.0 career. And even if you're not, you need to know how to work with those who are. For example, the most savvy men and women already know that today's workplace requires a high level of collaboration with very diverse people. You need to align your talents and skills with common objectives, whether a product or service. That means diminishing your ego, learning to "forget yourself" in the service of teamwork towards that larger purpose, while also constantly looking for opportunities for learning, growth and having impact.

From the 4.0 perspective, you move through self-interest, not into it. You're tuned in to the larger picture, in which you're one player, while finding ways to make a positive contribution to the service or product. It includes being aware of how you're perceived by others, and scanning for ways to be collaborative rather than self-promoting at others' expense. As a CEO recently commented, "the definition of success is the company, not an individual."

Consistent with the above themes, the 4.0 careerist wants to work for a company that practices and values positive leadership, transparency, informality, collaboration, high ethical standards, innovation... and is also a fun place to work. They want companies that promote and value diversity and an equitable reward system for achievement. Within them, people work hard but also have fun.

The 4.0 career is visible in the pull men and women report towards wanting to contribute to the common good -- whether it's through the value and usefulness of a product or service. That theme links the 4.0 career with the emerging new business model focused on creating sustainable enterprises and the "triple bottom line" -- financial, social and environmental measures of success. It combines financial success with contributing to social needs and problems. This is "social entrepreneurialism" -- the movement towards creating successful businesses that also contribute to the solution of social problems. In effect, the 4.0 careerist thinks of work as a vehicle for change and influence upon the larger human community.

A Broad Movement

I mentioned above that Generations X and Y embody many of the characteristics of the 4.0 career. I'll describe their contributions to this evolution in a future post. But it's clearly a broad movement transcending generations.

For example, a survey of 8,000 workers across all age groups and occupations by Concours Group found that the most productive, energized workers gravitate towards companies that provide opportunities for ongoing learning, growth and creative challenge. They want their work to have a positive impact on something more meaningful than just the narrower rewards of money, position, or power. And, they want the service or product they work on to have a positive impact on people's lives. Regarding older workers, the New Face of Work Survey conducted by the MetLife Foundation and Civic Ventures found similar trends among older baby boomers. It reports that half of that group say they're looking to shift their careers in a direction that would provide more service to others.

And, a 2007 survey by MonsterTRAK found that 80 percent of those surveyed said they want a job that has a positive impact on the environment. And 92 percent said they would choose working for a "green" company. Other research shows employees working at companies with corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs are the most satisfied. They stay at their jobs longer and are more content with senior management then their peers at companies with lackluster CSR programs, according to a survey conducted by Kenexa Research Institute.

How The 4.0 Careerist Thinks And Behaves

Here are some ways to assess yourself and your work environment in relation to the 4.0 careerist. Do you find:

  • Ways to contribute something positive to people's lives, whether through the product or service, regardless of your status within the company.
  • Opportunities for new learning, continued growth and expanding your skills and competencies.
  • A positive, fun work environment that makes you look forward to going to work.
  • A safe and nontoxic office environment and building, including sufficient natural light, and green equipment and furniture.
  • Open communication and feedback, up and down.
  • A team-oriented, innovative and challenging work culture.
  • Employee recognition and reward programs that are fairly applied.
  • Positive, supportive leadership and management practices, including corporate citizenship, ethics, transparency and corporate responsibility practices.
  • Commitment to diversity in hiring and promotion of employees, including differences of gender, racial/ethnic group, and sexual orientation.
  • Support for workers' well-being, through wellness programs, exercise, stress management, flextime and other programs, not surface gestures like free coffee and soda.
***


Douglas LaBier, Ph.D., a business psychologist and psychotherapist, is Director of the Center for Progressive Development, in Washington, D.C. You may contact him at dlabier@CenterProgressive.org.

 
 
 

Follow Douglas LaBier on Twitter: www.twitter.com/douglaslabier

Even in the midst of our economic disaster that's hitting all but the wealthiest Americans, a transformation is continuing within people's orientation to work. I call it the rise of the 4.0 career. ...
Even in the midst of our economic disaster that's hitting all but the wealthiest Americans, a transformation is continuing within people's orientation to work. I call it the rise of the 4.0 career. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 110
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
04:13 PM on 12/03/2010
Maybe Doug should've done a little more research a little further back in time. Ever hear of the Sixties? The Peace Corps? The desire to be "relevant"? To foster change in the world?

"4.0" is just a new label for what we, the generation that grew up in the Sixties, already made for all of you that came after: A role model of socially, environmentally responsible living.

It might sound new, but it ain't.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas LaBier
12:25 PM on 12/04/2010
James, I did refer to the 60s and baby boomer generation (of which I am a member) as the initiator, in many respects, of this evolution. But many of those values and related perspectives faded over time, though continue to permeate our culture. Note I referred to what many midlife baby boomers are doing with respect to new career directions. But I do think the younger generation is adding important dimensions to this evolution, as 21st century realities and global interconnection reshape the workplace and societies. My next post will be about the younger generation's role in the 4.0 evolution. Thanks for your comments!
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
08:56 PM on 11/25/2010
Maybe if one is self-employed. But what is described here is costly and at odds with the bottomline.I don't see the trend of disposable employee, regardless of talent or experience, reversing. I see a lot of cheap labor and not in blue collar but white collar. In my profession we hire foreign-born professionals that need to get a visa to remain . Since this is a lengthy process they are someone beholden to the employer and not able to ask for much and exploited to work long hours to meet impossible deadlines.I've seen this not once but so much it is just part of the landscape in this field.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas LaBier
04:13 PM on 11/26/2010
Thanks for your observations -- certainly valid. I think, however, that the evolution I described in my post is steadily occurring, but certainly not in a linear way. The current economic conditions, including what you described, make the rise of the 4.0 career less visible at the moment. But I think those shifts continue to grow within the motivations of career-oriented men and women, and they mesh more with the needs of business for more of a "triple bottom line" approach, to remain successful in the world marketplace.
05:45 PM on 11/24/2010
I just don't see this. I've been consulting and traveling for a few years now, so I'm not entirely in the loop, but from what I hear from friends and colleagues, this isn't very realistic. The majority of the jobs out there aren't able to give people a sense of fulfillment, and most managers are so tied up of the idea of management- buzz words, hierarchy, and staying the big fish- that changing workplace environments is halfway impossible. While flexible workplaces may yield more productivity, there are still those that take advantage of them and use them to get out of work, making management suspicious of these ideas. Even if many companies try, the implementation is difficult and a lot of employees wind up unhappy.
The idea of the 4.0 workplace just seems a bit naive to me. What people report they want from a job might not really be the things that would make them happy, or an environment that they could thrive in.
08:12 AM on 11/24/2010
educational information
07:54 AM on 11/24/2010
The "greater common good" vis-a-vis "individual aspirations for money,power,family"? An old dichotomy revisited. Certainly there are instances in one's personal life that the above can go together. But there are also instances that, for "practicality" (or "realistically"?), one has to make a choice. Would one rather be a whistleblower to expose one's employer's destructive products and, at the same time, destroy one's own career? Would one rather be a socio-political activist than a successful, well-paid wall streeter? Would one rather keep his election campaign promises to the people and later on, once elected, do more instead to keep close friends (and even family) happier?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rex Flexibility
08:35 PM on 11/23/2010
I think what many of the commenters are missing here is that it's not a choice between making workplaces 4.0-friendly and keeping them productive. Research upon research has shown that the practices you mention above -- positive atmosphere, open communication, flex programs, job-sharing, even free soda -- make workpalces MORE productive, not less.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas LaBier
10:18 AM on 11/24/2010
Good point - I agree!
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
08:59 PM on 11/25/2010
The AMerican workplace is too DYSFUNCTIONAL. THat has been my experience.
Progressives-Unite
Never vote against your interests.
08:52 AM on 11/23/2010
In my opinion the status quo is not sustainable. I do agree that 4.0 careers will include a more rounded lifestyle. However i alsoI believe that thing that is the "bigger than us all" will be fundamental change in the way we are governed. I do believe the leadership today is wearing blinders and is like a freight train taking the country over a cliff. I think of the coming trainwreck in terms of the discord of the 1960's only this time on steroids.
photo
beerbagger
12-pack of genius
10:01 PM on 11/22/2010
This 4.0 should have emerged years ago. It's not coming except for maybe in very small pockets of very small forward thinking shops... Sure there are those that could argue for the likes of Google-types. The real career world is still inhabited by upper and middle mangers that are there by default. They can't wrap their heads around flextime let alone CSR. They're also way too busy lighting off incendiary e-mail flame wars and playing king/queen of the hill. Career 4.0 might be better described as hired hands, share cropping-cubicle dweller, sometimes known as contract work or temping. Call a spade a spade!!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rex Flexibility
08:32 PM on 11/23/2010
don't forget that today's "very small pockets of very small forward thinking shops" ARE tomorrow's upper and middle managers. And they CAN wrap their heads around flextime and CSR...so maybe we will be ready when 4.0 Careers come.
photo
beerbagger
12-pack of genius
08:47 PM on 11/23/2010
Let's hope!!! And that they remember!!!
photo
WoodsideCraig
Author of the blog "The Weiler Psi"
08:02 PM on 11/21/2010
Here's my version of career 4.0

1. You work as a contractor/consultant, not a permanent employee, although your wages are lower.. You have no benefits, no medical, no vacation, nada.

2. Your job is constantly uncertain as the company could let you go at any time with no severance.

3. You are constantly in danger of being outsourced.

4. It's time for a career change, but what?
photo
brooklyncitizen
Soror quaerens lucem
09:02 PM on 11/25/2010
I think it's all what you make it. I think consulting can be profitable and there are many benefits.Here's the thing, companies are no more loyal to their employees.THey are equally dispensable and exploited since the salary pay means you work as many hours as they ask you to. So you may be making $80,000 and working 12 hour days and weekends. Been there done that.
Peter Aursnes
Author, coach, cheese & life connoisseur
04:19 PM on 11/21/2010
Interesting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JL-Sosa
(Nothing offensive here...)
11:40 AM on 11/21/2010
I can clearly see that the poster's job is making up silly euphemisms for working.

Does that make him a v5.0 or nearly a v4.1 or perhaps simply a firmware update?
08:38 AM on 11/21/2010
Be your own boss... it's the only way to go.
photo
Lochness71
Here I am.
11:49 AM on 11/22/2010
Then you can have a hundred bosses.
08:11 AM on 11/21/2010
The 4.0 career all sounds great as an ideal work situation. I wouldn't, however, hold the companys I've worked for responsible for ALL of this. Yes, the satety, feeling a sense of contribution no matter your level etc Those are important, however the "fun" part doesn't sit well with me since what is fun to one person might be agony to another. I want to feel gratified at the end of the work day-from making a contribution etc--and then pursue fun on my own time away from the job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SocialNote47
12:41 AM on 11/21/2010
If we are smart as American's we will start building things again. Our country cannot survive as a service country. This country was made great, well because we made things. And that produced pride in our work. Being paper pushers is not what we can build pride in. We need to get back to the basic of what made this country great. The American worker. The American producer. The American that can say what they did during there day of work. It's all about building back the American way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akla
Leave No Trace, Just a Good Impression
10:59 PM on 11/20/2010
Sorry to burst your new terminology, but the 4.0 worker describes me and my cohort to a t. We value service to the community over recognition and financial reward. We work to provide our best to the compan/effort regardless of our position within the process. We see the value of work and contribution to the community as the purpose of our work and effort. We recognize that all work has value and contributes to the success of the community. We learned this in college, Berea to be exact, back in the 70's. But now we are devalued and tossed aside by the human resource people who write the core competencies statements that mean nothing but sound good. In sum, all the writer is trying to rename is the values we traditional workers bring to the table, we just never had some HR person to give it a nice trendy name.