More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Logan Levkoff

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Logan Levkoff
 

A New Low for Fox News: Wearing Pink Makes Boys Transgendered

Posted: 04/13/11 05:45 PM ET

It's like deja vu. I know I've written about this stuff before. More than once. Remember this one?

Fox News has once again sparked an insane and hate driven debate about gender identity and sexuality. The crux of their inane argument: Pink nail polish on boys is part of insidious liberal campaign to normalize transgenderism. (Okay so here's the first thing. Being transgender doesn't need to be normalized. It's real -- not a made up issue designed to tick off conservatives.)

But let's get down to basics, shall we? Bear with me, because when I speak about Fox News I feel as if I have to speak as if I am talking to a child. So here it goes:

Dear Fox, Colors don't have genders. Colors are just colors. Liking certain colors don't mean you like girls or boys, or want to be either of them, now or in the future. And it kind of makes sense. If you're a boy who's used to only receiving toys and clothes in shades of blue, you'd like pink, too. Sincerely, Logan (sex educator, Ph.D., and mom).

So what's this really all about? A feature in a J. Crew catalog. One that I saw; it made me smile with delight. And I wasn't the only one. Melanie Klein wrote about the refreshing image in her Feminist Fatale piece last week.

In the photo, J. Crew president and creative director, Jenna Lyons, and her son, Beckett, are laughing while she paints his toes fluorescent pink. (Full disclosure: my 6-year-old son and my 2-year-old daughter are wearing fluorescent pink toe nail polish right now!) The caption next to the pair reads: "Lucky for me I ended up with a boy whose favorite color is pink. Toenail painting is way more fun in neon." (BTW, he's wearing a blue and white striped tee shirt, if you wanted to know that, too.)


But it's not just Fox News viewers that have been angered by this. Fox News expert, Dr. Keith Ablow, who in my humble and professional opinion, should be stripped of his license for perpetuating hatred and intolerance, has said in his article on the subject:

"Yeah, well, it may be fun and games now, Jenna, but at least put some money aside for psychotherapy for the kid -- and maybe a little for others who'll be affected by your "innocent" pleasure. This is a dramatic example of the way that our culture is being encouraged to abandon all trappings of gender identity -- homogenizing males and females when the outcome of such "psychological sterilization" [my word choice] is not known."

The idea that wearing pink -- or any -- nail polish can rewire your boys to become transgender is frighteningly ignorant. Aren't we done with this already? This is a new low. This has no scientific basis whatsoever. But it's not just silly. It's scary. It's an insidious campaign alright - but it ain't liberal.

 
 
 

Follow Dr. Logan Levkoff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LoganLevkoff

It's like deja vu. I know I've written about this stuff before. More than once. Remember this one? Fox News has once again sparked an insane and hate driven debate about gender identity and sexuality...
It's like deja vu. I know I've written about this stuff before. More than once. Remember this one? Fox News has once again sparked an insane and hate driven debate about gender identity and sexuality...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 142
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
03:13 PM on 04/19/2011
This whole 'pink is for gorls and blue is for boys" is really only became a thing in the 1950's. Remeber looking at your great grandparent baby and childhood pics? Regardless of gender, babies and todlers pretty much all wore little dresses. Children were regarded as asexual beings until Freud's work in the late-19th century.

An American newspaper in 1914 advised mothers, "If you like the color note on the little one's garments, use pink for the boy and blue for the girl, if you are a follower of convention." [The
Sunday Sentinal, March 29, 1914.]

"There has been a great diversity of opinion on the subject, but the generally accepted rule is pink for the boy and blue for the girl. The reason is that pink being a more decided and stronger color is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl." [Ladies Home Journal, June, 1918]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:45 PM on 04/19/2011
Oh dear. I (a woman) wore my brother's hand-me-downs growing up. I was a tom-boy who hated dresses and jump rope, loved sports and climbing trees. I guess I'd better divorce my husband and give up my two kids because ultimately, I will become transgendered (sarcasm intended). I don't think there is a connection.
01:58 PM on 04/19/2011
Parents beating their child versus parents painting their child's nails. Yeah, I can see how the latter would incite horror and anger. There are bigger fish to fry when it comes to the topic of inept parenting..
07:34 AM on 04/19/2011
So it also doesn't mean anything if you choose to put your son in a pink dress? Same argument.
TheBluesGuy
Annoy a Conservative: Think!
12:36 PM on 04/20/2011
Gender conscious people sometimes choose specific clothing, but no person ever changed gender identity due to the clothing (s)he's given as a child.

If it was that simple, we'd dress future Conservatives in bibbed overalls and "cure" them.
02:50 AM on 04/19/2011
What if u did what was considered boy stuff growing up but realised your transgendered anyway?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ORAXX
Free lance philisopher and unicorn rancher.
04:49 PM on 04/18/2011
I have a picture of myself wearing plaid pants. I was approximately four years old at the time and, for the record, I did not grow up to be a Scotsman. So there Dr. Keith Ablow!!
12:54 PM on 04/20/2011
If you had, you could wear a skirt and nobody would bat an eyelid (I did grow up to be a Scotsman).
photo
steve11407
pending approval and won't be displayed until ...
12:52 PM on 04/18/2011
Coloring a boys nails is feminizing and subjects him to ridicule.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:53 PM on 04/18/2011
Well that settles that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 AM on 04/19/2011
And dressing as a Ninja for Halloween makes kids turn out to be assassins.
12:55 PM on 04/17/2011
I'm a bit surprised that Dr. Keith Ablow did not go on to say that, just as pink nail polish magically makes a tot transgender, that dressing up your child as a ninja assassin or pirate will cause him or her to end up on Death Row while dressing up your daughter as a princess is a sure-fire way to ensure that she marries Prince William's first-born child and heir. The logic would, of course, be the same. Everybody knows that pretend playtime activity is destiny.
photo
Computer Geek
Logician Atheist Lefty
08:46 AM on 04/17/2011
I'm not gay. Nor am I homophobic. They will tear my salmon and pink clothes out of my cold dead fingers!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
07:56 PM on 04/18/2011
LOL!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:29 PM on 04/16/2011
You don't understand. It's PINK. That's for GIRLS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:35 AM on 04/17/2011
Not until after WWII. Blue for girls, pink for boys. http://history.verdeserve.com/pink-wasnt-always-considered-a-feminine-color-and-blue-wasnt-always-masculine/
09:39 AM on 04/17/2011
Grow up. It's just a color.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:40 AM on 04/17/2011
WHATEVER. Your mom musta painted your nails pink one too many times and that's why I'm a four-star general and a lumberjack on the weekends, and you're an interior decorator.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:38 AM on 04/16/2011
Dr Logan. this gay man, works on his Jeep, can sew his own clothes, has built a house from foundation, killed fish and fowl while camping, enjoys sports ( watching and doing), can break down an entire side of beef and bake some damn good choc chip cookies (i use kahlua instead of vanilla). If we limit expression then the world would simply be a mass of ugly shades of grey. If wearing wigs and make up mean men are gay then the Founding Fathers that so often get evoked were most definitely. Nice work in bringing light to our society of the 21st century.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr. Logan Levkoff
sexologist, sex educator, intellisexual, and mom
10:21 AM on 04/19/2011
thanks so much! and I love your self-description!!!
11:50 AM on 04/15/2011
Why did you totally ignore all the pundits and similar comments on the other three major networks?
09:40 AM on 04/17/2011
The point of the article was to explore the SOURCE of this bru-ha ha and that was Fox News.
11:04 AM on 04/15/2011
Why r conservative men always so anxiety ridden over their manhood?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
Christian, liberal lawyer
03:50 PM on 04/15/2011
Apparently it's because they're one pink toenail away from choosing to engage in homosexual intercourse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msmanatee
“A hundred years from now? All new people.” AL
11:38 AM on 04/18/2011
Spot on! :)

(still snickering...)
02:56 AM on 04/19/2011
It's because their manhood is non existant or at the very least so small that it seems like it's not there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mitzy
01:34 AM on 04/15/2011
Knowing ad men, the pitch was "edgy", capitalizing on the current debate about parents who encourage their feminine boys to fully express their femininity. It was designed to get publicity because it is society's most electrifying third rail, and it succeeded magnificently. It IS about transgenderism, it IS about effeminate boys and understanding moms, and no one should be surprised that it generated a backlash in this homophobic country.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr. Logan Levkoff
sexologist, sex educator, intellisexual, and mom
06:42 AM on 04/15/2011
Mitzy,

While I understand where you are coming from, I have to disagree with your belief that this was calculated and designed to tackle the issue of "effeminate boys." It is a photo in a J. Crew catalog, not a free standing ad. And the people are not actors. It is the creative director and President of J. Crew and her son. The company is a brand that had always sold clothes of all colors to both adult men and women, and children, too. So while it is certainly a lovely moment between a mother and her son, it is not about transgenderism because toenails (of any color) have nothing to do with being transgendered.

Logan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blknightowl
Independent, in thought and voting
07:47 PM on 04/16/2011
Excellent reply. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZaneDavid
11:00 PM on 04/16/2011
Very thoughtful...and true.
My wife get a kick out of painting my toenails...
Of course when I have a bottle of nail polish handy.
JEP57
To the right of Genghis Khan
10:54 PM on 04/14/2011
So Dr. Keith Ablow, a Fox News consultant, gives his OPINION on this issue and it's somehow Fox New's official opinion also. If he actually believes what he said, then why is that hateful? I have opinions that others may disagree with and I might very well be wrong about but my beliefs are just beliefs.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
Christian, liberal lawyer
03:52 PM on 04/15/2011
Because his opinion is that there's something wrong with a boy being gay.  That's a hateful opinion.  If you view some group of people as less valuable based on a characteristic that they can't even choose, such as their sexuality, then you're a bigot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
proud2bemoderate
Independence from partisan ideologues
06:08 PM on 04/15/2011
So Dr. Ablow, not Fox News.....This is just another Fox News loathing hit piece....
02:35 PM on 04/16/2011
Dancingstu, I feel like your comment has several extreme assumptions in it that I wondered if you might clarify. It is always hateful to believe that being gay is wrong? And if you believe being gay is wrong, then you must view gay people as less valuable human beings? And sexuality is always something you can't choose? Honestly, it seems like you are being a bit bigoted towards people who disagree with you on these things...