More than 2 million couples will get married in the United States this year alone. Several hundred thousand of these couples should reconsider, postpone their weddings or not get married.
Shocking new statistics released recently by the U.S. Census Bureau suggest that Americans may no longer need marriage. For the first time ever, fewer than half of the households in the United States are married couples. In the past decade, the number of unmarried couples increased 25 percent as more people chose to cohabitate. A Pew Research Center study last year put it more succinctly, finding an increasing number of Americans now believes marriage is "becoming obsolete."
This is a dangerous conclusion. It's true that far too many marriages, as currently constructed, end up disastrously. But with some common sense societal changes at the front end, marriage can still serve a vital purpose for a vast majority of adults.
Interestingly, around the same time the Pew study came out, the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, in their annual report on the health of marriage and family life, affirmed that more than three-quarters of Americans still believe marriage is "important" and that more than 70 percent of adults under age 30 desire to marry someday.
So it's clear that a majority of us still crave to be married. It's like we are hard wired to search after that person with whom we can spend the rest of our lives -- even in the face of these dire marital statistics.
I'm not trying to say that marriage is not in trouble. I am trying to say that there are some clear answers to the question of how marriage can get uniformly more satisfying for the people involved. And this I firmly believe: When done right, marriage can be the greatest institution on earth.
In his best-selling book, The Social Animal, New York Times columnist David Brooks says that "by far the most important decisions that persons will ever make are about whom to marry, and whom to befriend, what to love and what to despise, and how to control impulses." He cites multiple studies that have found a strong correlation between the stability of good relationships and increased life happiness.
But the skill of choosing a marriage partner has often been treated as relatively unimportant in our society and a whole lot less complex than it actually is. And herein lies the secret of why marriage has often turned out so disappointingly for so many.
It's frighteningly easy to choose the wrong person. Attraction and chemistry are easily mistaken for love, but they are far from the same thing. Being attracted to someone is immediate and largely subconscious. Staying deeply in love with someone happens gradually and requires conscious decisions, made over and over again, for a lifetime. Too many people choose to get married based on attraction and don't consider, or have enough perspective to recognize, whether their love can endure.
When people choose a partner unwisely, it's a source of enormous eventual pain. During my 35-year clinical career, I "presided over" the divorces of several hundred couples. I never experienced a single easy one. If one or both partners didn't get clobbered by the experience, any children involved often felt deep emotional sadness and loss. Sometimes this sadness kept impacting these people for years -- even decades.
A significant amount of research data, including an in-depth report by the Center for Marriage and Families at the Institute for American Values, buttresses my clinical impressions that parental divorce (or failure to marry) appears to increase children's risk of dropping out of high school. Moreover, children whose parents divorce have higher rates of psychological problems and other mental illnesses. And ultimately, divorce begets divorce; i.e., when you grow up outside an intact marriage, you have a greater likelihood of having children outside a marriage or getting a divorce yourself.
I have often suggested that more pain in our society comes from broken primary relationships than from any other source. If we could ever reduce the incidence of marital breakup from 40 to 50 percent of all marriages to single digits, I suspect it would be one of the greatest accomplishments of our time.
Of course, no one intends to be in an unhappy marriage. Bad marriages don't just happen to bad people. They mostly happen to good people who are not good for each other.
And inspiring marriages don't happen by accident. They require highly informed and carefully reasoned choices. Commitment and hard work are factors too. But after decades of working with a few thousand well-intended and hardworking married people, I've become convinced that 75 percent of what culminates in a disappointing marriage -- or a great marriage -- has far less to do with hard work and far more to do with partner selection based on "broad-based compatibility." It became clear to me that signs which were predictive of the huge differences between eventually disappointing and ultimately great marriages were obvious during the premarital phase of relationships.
When two people have a relationship which is predicated upon broad-based compatibility, there is every reason to be optimistic about their long term prospects. A marriage of this type has virtually no chance of becoming "obsolete."
If all of us together can focus on the challenge of getting the right persons married to each other, it just might change our society more than anything else we could do. Goodness knows, when marriage is right, little else matters nearly so much.
Dr. Neil Clark Warren is founder of eHarmony and chairman of its Board of Directors. eHarmony is an online dating website grounded in relationship science that matches single men and women for long-term relationships.
Cynthia Macdonald: Love Is a Surprise Party, Not a URL
Imagine that. One family. Six marriages. All extremely happy and successful.... and none fit the mold of conservative, republican, religious zealotry portending that a stone age book is the only blueprint to a successful life and successful family.
Being highly educated, intelligent, practical, progressive thoughtful people who know how to be successful partners and lovers... and who were smart enough to choose well from the beginning works very well. The proof is in the pudding. The original parents taught their five girls incredibly well.
Impulse control can seem difficult, but divorce is far harder... and the consequences are devasting. Knowing how to think and function honestly, intelligently, responsibly and competently works.
Unless and until we openly acknowledge that women are the primary drivers of divorce, the chances that we will ever understand why the problem exists and what can be done about it are minimal.
WHY are women getting divorced? Is the husband cheating (men cheat more than women)? Is the husband becoming abusive (men abuse wives more than women abuse husbands)? Has the husband developed a problem with alcohol or drugs (again, men more likely than women)? Is the woman not satisfied by her husband sexually (women report that more than men)? Does the man help around the house (most chore are not divided equally, regardless of number/hours of parents working)?
Yes, women do initiate divorce more than men. But don't act like the man does not drive the woman to do so, or is in no way responsible for the failure of the marriage.
Reasons most commonly cited by women seeking divorce are feeling unloved, neglected or unappreciated, lacking communication and drifting apart. I haven't seen any studies on sexual satisfaction. Some women probably do seek divorce because the men are not doing 50 percent of the housework the woman wants done, I hear enough complaints about it from divorced women. However, recent studies indicate that men make up for what they lack in housework by laboring longer hours at their jobs. In any event, many women simply want more housework done than many men want to do.
In most divorces, nobody forces the woman to decide the relationship is a failure. Her safety, for example, is not at risk. Everybody is free to leave a relationship if they want to. However, with freedom comes responsibility and accountability. I'd like to see divorced mothers stand up and say this:
"I wanted this divorce. Nobody else in the family did. I got it. I'm happier. Nobody else is."
Taking responsibility for actions you take to pursue your personal happiness is part of being an adult. I hope I've spurred your curiosity enough that you'll do some research on the topic. You might be surprised.
Archaic institution marriage is. People make me laugh when they think it's sacred or necessary. I always forget that if cavemen wouldn't of had strict marriage and divorce policies our species wouldn't exist.
While this is true, there is much more to our current societal breakdown of marriage.
It is also true that society is producing more and more and more completely narcissistic people and/or dysfunctional people who would NEVER be a "good match" for ANYONE and are incapable and/or unwilling to learn the relationship skills and the conflict resolution skills that are crucial for marriage success vs. failure.
So, for Dr. Warren to say that "there is someone for everyone" if they are just matched up right in the beginning, is a dangerous oversimplification of the issue.