Every 20 minutes, a child is diagnosed with autism. In a study of select populations around the United States, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) found that one in 150 children has the condition. According to the Autism Society of America, this is the fastest growing developmental disability with a 10-17% annual growth rate.
April is annual Autism Awareness Month. The actual cause of autism and a definitive treatment are still being researched and are under debate.
Jenny McCarthy and thousands of concerned parents, doctors, and health advocates aren't just waiting for an official cure. They're finding answers, and getting results.
Jenny, an actress and a former Playboy model, continues her crusade against autism with her new book, Healing and Preventing Autism, which she co-authored with Jerry Kartzinel, MD, a pediatrician who has successfully treated hundreds of patients with autism. Dr. Kartzinel is also the parent of a son with autism. Jenny has publicly shared her struggles with finding her son, Evan, effective treatment, and now reports that he has officially recovered. Evan lost his autism diagnosis per the State of California.
On Larry King Live's blog, Generation Rescue (an autism advocacy group) Founder J. B. Handley proclaims: "Jenny McCarthy's son Evan no longer has autism. This is a very hard concept for most people to grasp, because the popular understanding of autism is that it's lifelong. Quietly, a revolution of tens of thousands of parents around the world are standing firmly behind Jenny and using the same treatments to heal their children that she used to heal Evan. Not a day goes by where I don't hear a story from a parent of their child's dramatic improvement or complete recovery from autism using what we call 'biomedical intervention.'"
What Is Autism?
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "autism ... is the most common condition in a group of developmental disorders known as the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Autism is characterized by impaired social interaction, problems with verbal and nonverbal communication, and unusual, repetitive, or severely limited activities and interests."
What Causes Autism?
The cause is not known, but experts say that autism is most likely caused by a combination of genetic vulnerability, nutritional deficiencies, and environmental factors.
Healing and Hope
In their book, Healing and Preventing Autism, Jenny and Dr. Kartzinel share their beliefs that the best way to tackle the factors contributing to autism is through a biomedical approach.
Biomedical intervention looks at nutrition, detoxification, and removal of interfering factors, such as yeast, food allergies, viruses, bacteria, and heavy metals. Jenny and Dr. Kartzinel admit that biomedical interventions do not help everyone, but thousands of children have improved with this type of therapy.
An important focus of this approach involves supporting the body's innate healing response with healthy food and nutritional supplements.
Their book asserts that autism is not rooted in one cause, and therefore successful treatment is often multifaceted.
Key Components of the Biomedical Treatment:
First of all, clean up the diet. A gluten-free, casein-free diet is one that has helped thousands of kids. In addition, eat as organic as possible, and avoid artificial colorings and flavorings, sugar, preservatives, and artificial sweeteners.
Consider nutritional supplementation. Dr. Kartzinel believes autistic kids have major nutrient deficiencies. The book highlights the supplements he has found most helpful for his patients.
Reduce or eliminate environmental toxins. Advocates of the biomedical approach believe that children with autism are especially sensitive to the toxic elements of most household cleaners, paints, pesticides, etc.
Test and treat for other contributing factors, such as food allergies, yeast infections, heavy metals, etc., that the child's doctor might suspect are involved. Treatment must be supervised by a doctor. Doctors who offer the biomedical approach, known as "DAN (Defeat Autism Now!) doctors," can be found at the Autism Research Institutes's website.
The Autism Research Institute has collected data from 26,000 parents on the effects of biomedical treatments. You can view the percentages of those parents who observed improvement in their children with such approaches as the gluten-free, casein-free diet, removing sugar from the diet, supplementing with cod liver oil, etc. Elsewhere on the site, parents share stories of their children's recovery.
The Biggest Controversy
When it comes to healing autism or any chronic condition, improving the diet and adding nutritional supplements are interventions that are rapidly gaining mainstream acceptance.
However, the most controversial area that Jenny and Dr. Kartzinel discuss in their book is that of vaccinations. The two have brought to light what they consider to be an excessive use of vaccines in the US, and therefore they have often been accused of being "anti-vaccine."
Here's how Jenny explains her view of this hot-button issue at the beginning of the chapter on vaccines: "Despite what anybody thinks, I'm still not against vaccines ... if I were you, I would educate myself on each shot and what it protects against, along with the possible side effects." The rest of the chapter is a conversation during which Jenny and Dr. Kartzinel discuss vaccine pros and cons, side effects, an alternative shot schedule, and the ingredients in vaccines. Resources for further research are also provided.
The autism-vaccine link is being studied because there are actual concerns that warrant these studies. Some studies support the use of certain vaccines, while other studies do not. Often there are conflicts of interest within studies. It can make anybody's head spin trying to sort through these studies.
Some research has denied the autism-vaccine link, while some has supported such a connection. There are two cases recently highlighted in the news related to children who received compensation because of a vaccination connection to autism spectrum disorder.
A Deeper Look
The autism-vaccine debate will most likely continue for a long time. Meanwhile parents are confused and often feel desperate to know how to make the right choices for their children's health and safety.
Here are some web links for further exploration of the autism and vaccine issues:
David Kirby, author of Evidence of Harm
http://evidenceofharm.com; also see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/
FourteenStudies.org, which looks at vaccine studies and presents the studies' limitations and conflicts of interest
Jay Gordon, MD, an author and pediatrician with over 30 years of experience
http://Drjaygordon.com; also see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon
Robert Sears, MD, another author and pediatrician
http://www.askdrsears.com/thevaccinebook/
Autism Awareness, Prevention, Support
I am not a pediatrician. However, I have seen numerous patients with autism spectrum disorder, who were often referred to me by pediatricians for help with food allergies and nutrition. I have witnessed the improvement in many of these children after changes in diet along with nutritional supplementation. Many of my colleagues have reported similar results to me.
I am writing this piece to encourage parents, loved ones of children, and those contemplating having children to be as informed as possible. It is important to keep up to date with the latest research and information.
There is a lot of support available. Generationrescue.org is a great resource site, with research, recommended doctors, Rescue Angels (parents who help other parents), and testimonials (listed according to the child's age, from 2 years through 10). An inspiring documentary by Generation Rescue can be found at autismyesterday.com.
Autism awareness is not just about recovery from the condition. It is also about prevention. Healing and Preventing Autism's chapter on autism prevention offers women preparing for pregnancy advice on how to remove toxins from their body and their environment, as well as how to maximize their nutrient intake.
Recovery and prevention. That's the message of Jenny McCarthy, Dr. Kartzinel, and the thousands of advocates who share their stories and support for families who are faced with the challenges of getting proper care for their children with these special needs.
Throughout Healing and Preventing Autism, Jenny passionately reminds us that she and her dedicated army of advocates for autism are in this for the long haul:
"Thousands of parents, like me, have learned so much and the only reason we won't shut up is to teach YOU, so you don't have to walk in our shoes. Dr. Jerry and I want to arm parents with all the tools and information necessary to have the healthiest baby you can. The next generation of kids is counting on it!"
*Follow HuffPostLiving on Twitter and become a fan of Huffington Post Living on Facebook*
Follow Dr. Patricia Fitzgerald on Twitter: www.twitter.com/drpatriciafitz
The Judgment on Vaccines Is In???
Jenny McCarthy: My son's recovery from autism - CNN.com
Jenny McCarthy's Autism Organization - Generation Rescue
YouTube - Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey on Autism - Larry King ...
http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/news/News_Releases/2009/04/autism-genetics.html
Since many of you are worried about who funds these things:
"The first study was supported in part by grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health, and the Autism Genome Project Consortium funded by Autism Speaks. The Children"s Hospital of Philadelphia, Autism Speaks and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development funded the second study."
Congrats to the last 2 of tons of studies on genetics and autism.
They have not yet made the connection as to what is causing the genetic mutations in everyone overnight.
It should be interesting to see where they go with their new studies regarding the safety of vaccines in the hopes of gaining parental trust in the recommended vaccine schedule.
Sorry, I am a fan of generation rescue.
Maybe I'm just missing them, but I don't see a single independent study that they've sponsored.
What about the rest of the 99.5% plus of the autism cases?
This requires President Obama to take charge and simply not allow this to continue over and over again. Our food production facilities are not investigated and I will bet that the farm where this particular strain was introduced to the world will not be shut down. We have those operations right here in the US -witness the peanut contamination for a more recent example of the failures of the FDA and other agencies that are failing to do their job.
People are sick and tired of recycled pandemics for profit. PFP's make only drug companies rich, and make people sick.
The food inspection system has failed us- the government is a failure by allowing contaminated food production and tainted ingredients to fill our stomachs and we cannot stomach anymore filth.
It's a testy subject for many, so please understand those of you who are angry with us, that we sincerely need fair debate. We need sensible & credible testing ASAP.
Many closed minds, happy to stay in the box are not helping us. Some with greed at heart are trying hard to stifle us. The good & bad about vaccinations as well as all drugs has to be brought into focus.
Lots of attacks here, I'm sorry to say. Some attacked with names & wouldn't listen to what we were saying. I was called a cheerleader with never having anything sensible to offer.
Which is what brought me to writing this in that I'm glad the many posts, links & references I contributed to this matter weren't deleted from either Jim Carrey's thread or here at Dr. Fitzgerald's.
I find it disturbing that every one of my posts concerning vaccinations mysteriously disappeared from the comments section of my profile page at Huffpo. I guess it could have been some weird glitch? Many other comments I made are all there. But everyone of them on the vaccinations are gone. I really have to wonder why?
There have been vaccine rejectionists almost since the first vaccine was introduced. Over time, the specific accusations have changed and the specific conspiracy theories have changed. However, from that day to this, vaccine rejectionists have never been right, not even once.
It is important for parents to understand that the autism "controversy" is just the latest in a long string of false claims. Every time a claim is debunked or removed (as thimerosal was removed from vaccines), they just move on to a new one.
Before any parent decides to follow the recommendations of vaccine rejectionists, he or she should demand historical evidence that vaccine rejectionists have ever been right at any time in the past. And when that evidence is not forthcoming, they should carefully consider whether they wish to follow the claims of a group that has been wrong 100% of the time over the past 200 years.
I'm sure someone's going to ask if I got vaccinated, yes my dad was in the air force in Europe. I also happened to be in utero in Germany when Chernobyl hit(westward winds) if you really want to use correlation as causation.
"Autism Speaks's advocacy has been based on the view of autism as a disease, a view shared by many but not all autism scientists.[22] In contrast, some autism activists have asserted that people with autism are different but not diseased, challenging the conceptualization of autism as a medical condition.[22]
In January 2008, an autistic blogger upset with some charities' portrayal of autism created a critical parody of the Autism Speaks website, and later took the site down in response to legal demands from Autism Speaks to stop using the Autism Speaks name and logo without permission. Autism Speaks claimed the spoof could confuse people looking for information about autism. New parody sites were later launched by Gareth Nelson, founder of the autism rights group Aspies for Freedom.[23]"
might not apply to you, but I think even 'former playmates' are entitled to her opinion, one shared by many medical professionals btw.
But are those opinions shared by mainstream medical doctors (and you've provided sufficient claims that you are not a mainstream medical doctor, but insufficient support that you are in fact a physician)? There is a case to be made for this being analogous to those mainstream scientists arguing that there is sufficient evidence for anthropogenic global warming and those outlying scientists who argue against that global warming being man-made.
Former playmates are of course entitled to their opinions, as are the rest of us. Opinions, though, should not carry the day; this isn't a debate about something ultimately unknowable like whether there is a nice sky-daddy looking out for us all (all for a sky-daddy or earth-mother, so no need to argue there). This is something that can be evaluated scientifically. So, any of our opinions on this matter ought to rest on the science. Science. I'm not sure that I feel comfortable that you have rested on science in many of your arguments, although you sling those words together quite well. Then you go and source those sites that just aren't credible.
""Increases In Autism Rates Not Surprising To Education Expert"
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/62790.php
"The new national study showing higher-than-expected incidences of autism comes as no surprise to special education personnel and autism advocates, says a special education professor at the University of Indianapolis. We have seen the rates of autism increase dramatically over the last seven years," notes Dr. John Somers, director of graduate programs and coordinator of special education in UIndy's School of Education.
The rise in autism cases puts intense pressure on schools to meet the needs of autistic children. "Schools are reeling today to accommodate the needs of the increasing number of children diagnosed with autism," Somers explains. "Because students with autism embody a multitude of needs and services (special education teachers, speech-language pathologists, physical and occupational therapists, etc.), the increase is overwhelming and we do not have enough school personnel trained in this area to deliver much needed services."
Somers also noted that today autism is readily identifiable as a neurological disorder and, while no parent wants their child to have medical problems, autism is a more "comfortable" diagnosis because it carries fewer stigmas than a diagnosis of other disorders such as mental retardation or emotional disability.
Somers hopes that the findings of the study will lead to more funding to care for autistic children. "This documented increase in autism should put pressure on state legislatures and Congress to address the monetary resources that schools and society will need to meet the needs of autistic children and their families."
The professor's comments were made in response to a study released Feb. 8 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, which indicated that the autism rate is now 1 in 150."
This is a reply to those who argue that the increase in Autism is due to different diagnostic criteria; I do not recall the rate of special needs kids in the educational system ever being 1 in 150. In my opinion, this is due to the increase in the vaccination schedules.
There are studies that show a causal link between vaccines and autism, and diabetes, and asthma. Even the product literature and Physician's Desk ReferenceThere are studies that show that death rates went down as a consequence of increased sanitation, and not, vaccination. If anything, the conclusions are even more clearcut
So, what facts support my 'opinion'? Oh, I could point to lots of studies, and will, but my opinion is based on clinical observation of thousands of children in my general pediatric practice of nearly 4 decades and having treated over 600 children in the Autism Spectrum Disorder group, most within the classic Kanner definition.
I am proud to say I have never administered a vaccine, because I'm an old fashioned doctor, whose oath is to do no harm, and not, to protect the profits of the medical industry.
I think Destin has an autism type disorder as he is so introverted he often doesn't leave the house, has little to no social life and yet can be so brilliant that he lights up the room if you can get him opened up and talking about something. With him, history and music are 2 of his passions. And it's interesting, cause I didn't know fully what autism was. But I noticed that in some ways, it can work to an advantage in some respects. Like that Asperger's Syndrome thingy. It's pretty much autism, but the people end up with literally genius level IQ's in specific areas. As far as Destin, he's been told it's just "anxiety" that makes him avoid any social interactions, or that he was developing irrantional phobia's. I think he's been misdiagnosed, because, you get him on the right subject in the right setting, he'll talk about it to the point of obsession. He'll rattle of whole lists of things, not a scrap of a note to be seen anywhere. It's like he's a sponge that just absorbs data and then spits it all out later when someone pushes the right buttons.
See the other guests on that Larry King Live show and note the difference between jumping on the bandwagon and years of serious, thoughtful study of autism, which is not yet understood.
We've yet to see these children, whom "they say" are no longer autistic. On the other and, how accurate was the diagnosis--we don't know this, either.
I'd like to hear from these McCarthy Cult followers after their kids grow up. Usually after all the bonding over the cure stories that come and go, the parent(s) end up reclusive, worried about what it will be like for their adult child when they can't be there for them.
Too bad parents aren't reaching out to each other to build on good futures for them while they're young.
Scholars tell us that risk perception is modified by control, choice and origin. Vaccine rejectionists obsess about the "risks" of vaccination over which they feel they have no control, but ignore the risks of infectious disease because they think they can keep their children healthy.
The "risks" of vaccination seem large to them because vaccination is mandated, whereas the risks of not vaccinating are freely chosen. However, they fail to recognize that the risk of death from NOT vaccinating is actually ONE THOUSAND times higher than the risk from vaccinating.
Finally, many vaccine rejectionists labor under the delusion that "natural" choices are inherently safe just because they are natural. This is not and has never been true. Catching whooping cough or polio is entirely "natural," and far more dangerous than any technological method of preventing or treating these diseases.
Vaccine rejectionists are absolutely certain that the risks of refusing vaccination are so small as to be trivial and are far outweighed by the risks of "toxins" in vaccination. This is a misperception of the risk. Because rejecting vaccination encourages a sense of control, is a risk that is freely chosen, and is perceived as natural the risks of vaccine rejection are misunderstood. The consequences of this misunderstanding are deadly.
We allow our children to have shots we deem necessary. Common sense dictates what's up here. We want big pharma to stop pushing drugs that are destroying our children's immune systems. Google "Gardasil deaths" for details on this one that's been around such a short time we fear what's up the road for these girls.
We parents know because we're there. Let's see all you who back big paharma, let's see your children's inoculation records..
The proof is in the experience of parents witnessing immediate reaction to shots & then conditions & symptoms that they know were caused by the injections. Truth to this & the fact no one can even open a lawsuit to prove their dilemma, hushes the fact in favor of big pharma. They won't win this one. Parents & good people like Jenny are here to see to that.
And if these injections really did anything. then people who got them wouldn't get ill at the same rate as those who don't. Add to this the fact that a great many people who develop autism don't show any reaction as you've described and the coincidence that autism usually develops when vaccines are scheduled (regardless of whether or not the vaccines are received) And it seems like you have a lot of mothers really upset over a terrible situation trying to find some reason for it al.
Vaccine rejectionists who pride themselves on "doing their homework" would do well to note that there is no discernible pattern to the "Gardasil deaths". When broken down by cause of death we find: viral illnesses (3); pulmonary embolism (2); cardiac events (2); diabetes (1); seizure disorder (1); ALS (1); and drug overdose (2). Remaining cases are of unknown cause.
These numbers are consistent with the expected mortality rate for 15-24 years olds:
Heart disease 2.5/100,000
Pulmonary .6/100,000
Pneumonia/flu .5/100,000
Stroke .5/100,000
Conclusion: No data suggest that Garasil increases the mortality rate among 15-24 year olds. Also, blaming Gardasil for killing girls, with little or no basis in fact, is both reckless and an ineffective strategy to prove that you are not anti-vaccine.
These figures are available to any one Googles "Gardasil deaths"
Have you noticed that you keep on chanting the same mantras? Your answer to people asking awkward questions is that they are defective people, not to answer the questions.
Just a thought.
They are dealing with huge numbers of children.
It is a crisis that has been ignored.
Also, science is great in that, if you have the money, time and will, you could easily verify the claims of pro-vaccine researchers by throwing down a few million dollars, putting together an unbiased, double blinded controlled study with a large enough sample size and see if your findings are concurrent with the vast swath of medical literature or not. I'm pretty sure that Jim Carrey has a few million to throw around for this kind of life saving research.
Take the MMR. Not only is the measles virus component of it associated with antibodies to Myelin Basic Protein (from the chick embryo cells that they are cultured on) - thus causing the autoimmune reaction of attacking the body's own MBP - but the vax contains glutamate, which is an excitotoxin, wreaking havoc in the brain in its own right. And as well, glutamate lowers glutathione levels, which is the body's natural chelator. Thus the MMR given at the same time as other vaccines containing heavy metals/toxins, like mercury and aluminum, can cause the body not to be able to eliminate those toxins as well as normal. And so forth.
There's a lot about vaccines that needs cleaning up; well worth continued research on their effects.
As for the article in Epidemiology "Is Infant Immunization a Risk Factor for Childhood Asthma or Allergy?" The study was done on a very small group of non-vaccinated children (23 children), of which the authors admit may be too small to get reliable data. The authors also admit the study is not supported by similar studies with larger datasets of vaccinated vs vaccinated children which show no difference in asthma rates. Here are a few (all of which have vaccinated control groups):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19255024?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974720?ordinalpos=6&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17181437?ordinalpos=9&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum