iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Drew Westen

Drew Westen

Posted: August 13, 2009 09:44 AM

Change We Can Believe In: Feelings Toward the Administration by Those Who Elected It

What's Your Reaction:

Over the last couple of weeks I've been hearing rumblings. They're not from the staged or misinformed protestors at town hall meetings who have decided that shouting down a member of Congress is their right as American citizens. They're not from "the left" -- that wild, unruly group of bloggers and Birkenstockers the White House has called on repeatedly, both in public and in private, to be quiet.

They're from the parent who came to pick up her daughter after a play date with my five-year-old, as we stood in the door chatting. They're from my cousin, a family doctor, who called me when he heard about Big Pharma's sweetheart deal with the White House to prevent negotiations on the cost of prescription drugs. They're from a guy I sat next to on a plane this week who doesn't follow politics all that closely but follows closely enough to know that bankers seems to be getting bonuses as homeowners are getting foreclosure notices.

These people aren't "raving liberals." Most of them haven't even gotten word yet that they're supposed to call themselves progressives (and none of them knew the secret progressive handshake). They're ordinary voters who either sometimes or reliably vote Democratic, who were members of the Obama majority in 2008 and were convinced that this time their vote really mattered. Now they're disillusioned.

They can see the economic upturn. They see the Dow rising. They know that corporate profits are no longer in a free-fall. But they can also see that those profits are rising as their own company is considering another round of layoffs -- and that those two facts are not unrelated. And what they feel summarizes what they see: where before they had hope, now they feel primarily frustration and resentment.

As one of these people recently said to me, the cadence of Obama's speeches that used to give her shivers is now starting to grate on her nerves.

I knew just what she meant. I first had that feeling when I watched the President's speech in Africa. This time, superimposed on my usual response to Obama's eloquence (and his willingness to speak directly to people who American presidents have often failed even to notice) was a different feeling -- anger -- and a very different thought: What's he doing in Africa when the tide of public opinion is turning on health care reform back home? Africa will be there in 3 months. Public sentiment for genuine reform -- not a Botox bill, which will momentarily cover up the wrinkles in the pained face of our health care system long enough for a smiling Rose Garden ceremony -- may not.

A disquieting pattern seems to be emerging. When the President put in charge of our financial system a man who had led the New York Fed during a period of extraordinary Wall Street corruption and another who had helped dismantle protections against it, many of us scratched our heads in confusion. When he traded off billions in stimulus money that would have prevented precisely the cuts states are making today -- laying off workers and slashing essential programs, which runs counter to the whole point of the stimulus package -- for the same kind of tax cuts that ballooned the deficit during the Bush years, many of us thought he was just a really bad poker player. But he was playing solitaire, with no one on the other side of the table. We figured every President is entitled to his early mistakes.

But then came the news about the new law designed to protect consumers from credit card companies raising their rates. The President described how Americans had had enough of the fine print. But one provision seemed awfully odd: a 10-month grace period for credit card companies to "adjust" to the new legislation and make whatever changes they wanted in the meantime. You normally don't give burglars your vacation schedule in advance so they have time to "adjust."

Then the reports started to come in from ordinary Americans who were seeing their interest rates hit the roof -- applied retroactively to money they had borrowed before the recession hit or they lost their jobs.

I got my own letter today:

Important Account Price Change Notification


We are raising your Annual Percentage Rate (APR) on purchases and cash advances.

We are raising the Annual Percentage Rate (APR) on any balances that have a penalty rate because of a late payment.

We are increasing the late fee.

It was very thoughtful of them to tell me. But I was surprised the letter didn't say how much the new rates would be. I looked for a second page, but there wasn't one. Then I flipped it over, and there it was -- in fine print.

So the President and Congress passed a new law protecting consumers from predatory lending practices and credit-card fine print, but they gave the credit card companies a grace period during which they could raise the rates and put them in the fine print. Funny, I don't remember a similar grace period for homeowners who can't pay their mortgages. Couldn't we have had a homeowners' equivalent of the student loan program, through which the federal government would give homeowners no-interest loans for a couple of years to get them through the tough times so they don't lose their homes, particularly when the unemployment rate is near 10 percent because somebody else gambled with their incomes and assets, instead of giving banks zero-interest loans and allowing them to charge usurious rates on existing debt?

Of the millions of Americans who are receiving letters like this every day, I happen to be one of the lucky ones. I don't carry a balance on my credit cards, my home is still worth more than my mortgage, and I still have a job. But if Americans are starting to turn populist anger toward a White House that has doggedly refused to focus that anger where it belongs -- toward the banks, the mortgage brokers, the regulators who failed to regulate, the oil companies that have blocked energy reform for decades while racking up record profits, the health insurance companies that make their profits by denying coverage and discriminating against the ill, the pharmaceutical companies whose lobbyists have negotiated away the right to negotiate, and the Republicans who bankrupted the treasury during the eight long years of the Bush Presidency and crashed the economy on their way out -- I can understand why.

The American people did not vote for "bipartisan" solutions that split the difference between the failed ideology of the last eight years, which continues to cost thousands of people their jobs and homes every day, and the change the President and the super-majorities they elected in both houses of Congress promised.


Drew Westen, Ph.D., is Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry at Emory University, founder of Westen Strategies, and author of "The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation."

 
 
 
Over the last couple of weeks I've been hearing rumblings. They're not from the staged or misinformed protestors at town hall meetings who have decided that shouting down a member of Congress is thei...
Over the last couple of weeks I've been hearing rumblings. They're not from the staged or misinformed protestors at town hall meetings who have decided that shouting down a member of Congress is thei...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,905
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (45 total)
10:35 AM on 08/22/2009
One of the proven keys to a recovery is employment for the unemployed, if people had jobs, be they temporary or otherwise, they will make purchases, as some might purchase a car. This neocon ideology in which this administration is employing is what got us in the mess we are in. He, the president, is a product of public service employment, (community orginizer), so, it stands that if putting the unemployed to work was effective than it will serve to stimulate the economy now as well. Give the taxpayer a source of income by giving bailing them out with their tax money., as oppose to further rewarding those who caused this mess and allowing them to millions in bonues for crashing this system.
10:38 AM on 08/19/2009
As usual, Drew, you have the pulse of the American people (or at least the majority of us who WANT healthcare reform). This feels a lot like those high school crushes where you thought you were in love and that the other person was the ONE only to discover that "he's just not that into you." I understand wanting to get re-elected. I understand trying to focus on "bi-partisan reform" but I don't understand getting into bed with big business. I seem to remember a lot of talk during the election that Obama's rhetoric might mean "class warfare." Well, I am all for "class warfare" if it means policies which benefit the majority of Americans and not just the wealthy. I once thought Obama stood for something like "Truth, Justice, and the American Way." Now I know he's just another politician....
02:24 PM on 08/18/2009
I understand the politics are the art of the possible and that the focus for Obama's advisors is already "four more years", but politics as usual doesn't appear to work any more. We need a President who recognizes the crisis. Pouring money into banks to keep them going and letting them cash in their toxic assets, doesn't help the homeowner whose house is underwater. Pulling troops out of Iraq doesn't mean much if they are transfered to Afganistan to find an endless war with huge civilian causalties. How can America be on the side of a situation where families become addicts to opium as a way to reduce hunger pangs. How can a progressive politican make compromise after compromise. Obama's HOPE poster should be replaced by one with LIAR or FAKE. That's the feeling I have. I feel like I was suckered into this situation. I want us out of Afganistan. I want an option that allows bankruptcy judges to help people save homes. I want real credit reform. I expect job creation, universal health care, and equal civil rights for everyone to be the focus of this administration. I hope the Blue Dog Democrats who have been playing the spoiler game are called out and defeated at the polls. Yes, we should vote independent, we should vote against the compromisers even if the Republicans get elected. That's the wake up call we need to send.
09:31 AM on 08/17/2009
I never believed that Obama was the most qualified candidate. Whatever was behind his meteoric rise to the presidency was always tainted by underhanded politics. It seems that that paragon of virtue (Ted Kennedy) steamrolled him into this job. That is enought to make most of us think twice but a majority of dreamers walked blindly into the trap.

He obviously sold us out to the banks and corporations from the day he walked so arrogantly into office. Where do we go from here? What has really changed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gtalkspolitics
12:14 AM on 08/17/2009
President Obama , you have our support ,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
03:07 AM on 08/17/2009
Why? You must work on Wall Street, or you export jobs to China, or you import workers into the US to replace Americans (h-1b work visas). I mean those the people who must love Obama because he is doing everything to help us lose jobs, just like Bush.

So I got it! You must be a Bush supporters!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ksjprod
Never met a wise man, if so, it's a woman
10:25 PM on 08/16/2009
No Public Option? WTF!!!??

Where's the Change?!?
10:19 PM on 08/16/2009
Very sad and very true.
08:55 PM on 08/16/2009
For those who voted for Obama and other Democrats in the last election and are now disillusioned, like me, here's how we can show our distaste for how the party is conducting itself: Let's drop out of the Democratic Party in large numbers and register as Independents. If the dropouts are significant, the Democratic Party will get the message. I don't know what else we can do, since our pleas now fall on deaf ears.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
03:09 AM on 08/17/2009
In 2010 they will get it. But they won't care. Why? Because if Obamacare passes it will be so full of corporate welfare that all these politicians will have great jobs at Pharma and insurance companies.

And that is why they don't care. And its why Obama doesn't care either.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:18 AM on 08/19/2009
Were you this impatient with the previous administration? I just don't get you so called supporters that in seven months you expected him to have all problems solved.

No wonder Democrats are known for drawing defeat from the jaws of victory. After every Democratic President gets into office the whining starts. He's no doing this, he did this but he didn't do that.

The republicans had a message, stayed on their message and never waivered. Like John Stewart said they sold us a war on facts they didn't have and a war we didn't need.

The Dems deserve to lose because if they win they whine anyway.
dessertsfirst
because life is too short!!
08:46 PM on 08/16/2009
In any business, the change agent faces a very challenging uphill battle, and often gets very beat up in the process. The change agent rarely effects the changes needed, but usually is only able to set the wheels of change in motion. Then it is up to the next person who fills the position to continue the effort and actually make it happen. It would appear that the administration underestimated the problems they would encounter from the lobbyists and powerful corporations and yes, Republicans, none of whom want to give up their privileges to serve the common good.
Someone recently posted that with the passing of the generation of Kennedy's belonging to JFK, the era of "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" is over. It's all do unto others before they can do unto you, and me first. As long as I get mine, at any cost, I don't care about the other guy.
Sad. And say it isn't so...
03:18 PM on 08/16/2009
Dear President OBAMA and Democratic Congressman --- the time has come to hit the gas pedal, and ram everything in your policy agenda through both houses. Use all procedural means at your disposal, as proves necessary --- including the 'reconciliation' method to require only 50 senate votes, and thus avoid filibustering, etc.

The Republicans will never co-operate, compromise, nor do what the majority of Americans in fact ELECTED YOU TO DO. So ignore them to the greatest extent possible, and proceed just as the late President ROOSEVELT would have done, given the same set of circumstances.

The time is NOW !
dessertsfirst
because life is too short!!
08:38 PM on 08/16/2009
Co-sign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MAragon
09:01 PM on 08/16/2009
I hope you're doing what I do: contacting him at the White House. I make a stink whenever something like this goes down. They need to hear from us on a regular basis.
photo
Helzapoppin
Don't Piss Down My Back And Tell Me It's Raining.
02:52 PM on 08/16/2009
The sycophantic cheerleaders keep accusing Obama's critics from the left of being impatient. That is nothing more than a willfully ignorant accusation. The objections are not about TIME, they are about DIRECTION! And Obama has veered off into the wrong direction since the moment he was sworn in. I'm sorry if that interferes with your blind, cultish worship of a POLITICIAN, but the truth hurts sometimes.
11:53 PM on 08/16/2009
Don't worry--they're just the Obamanuts: the equivalent of the Bushistas with the advantage of a few IQ points. They've learned to think like the Bushistas where everything is "either or" as in "you're either with us or against us." (Sad what 8 years of Bush can do?)

And the Obamanuts' criticism that "he's only been there 7 months" really doesn't cut it. After all, didn't he push the platform of public health care throughout his campaign? Bring real control to Wall Street? Investigate and prosecute Bush? Putting an end to torture? These promises are precisely what made him so appealing to those who considered themselves progressive.

So what are we getting now? BUSH lite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nightwind928
01:31 PM on 08/16/2009
Admittedly, the president of the country is not God Almighty nor is he all powerful. He is bound by the restrictions of an elected democracy and must work within that framework. Having said that, he does sit in the highest seat in the land and has more power than any living person on earth. He wanted this job, fought hard and spent millions of dollars getting it. More important, he made ardent promises to those who elected him to defeat his rivals, all of them well qualified men and women. To hold him, or any other elected leader to those promises is not anti American, sacrilegious or defamatory. These people made a deal with us to get into office. Now it's time to pony up with their end of the deal not welsh or look for a way to weasel out of the obligations. Watering down the health care promise is not holding up your end of the bargain. It's like owing 10 dollars and only wanting to pay back 3 to absolve the debt. Just because we have gotten used to politicians doing this as a rule doesn't make it right and we should always call it as the shell game it truly is. I don't care if it's Obama or anyone else. This isn't supposed to be an easy comfortable job but you asked for it because you knew the rewards are great, so do it honestly like you promised us you would!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfs5541
12:47 PM on 08/16/2009
Here's the problem: There's not one Democrat or Republican that the country specifically trusts to run it other than Obama. So you're angry that Obama is trying to reach bipartisan consensus? Tough! Moreover, I don't think the liberals are truly outraged enough to change the opinions of this administration. Let's be real: I haven't seen any non-reasoning, obstinate knuckleheads on the liberal side, only the conservatives! Where's the fire folks? Where is the anger? I know one thing: You are pointing it at the wrong people. I don't see any massive protests at the headquarters of these HMOs. I don't see the Republican politicians getting harassed at these Town Hall meetings! To fight the republicans and the folks that represent them, you got to fight fire with fire! You have to go to war with them. That's all they understand. They are bullies until they meet a bigger bully. You can be that bully, but you are too scared to be. Gay folks, don't just do "kiss-ins," interrupt the church sermons on Sunday. Single Payer proponents: Shout those Republican and Blue Dog Democrats down at the Town Hall meetings. Travel to another state if you have to do it! Get the picture? Things won't just change if you vote for the right candidate, you must fight for that change and you can't play fair!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nightwind928
01:38 PM on 08/16/2009
Absolutely right on the money. Until we take the gloves off with these people, we'll keep taking it on the chin.
04:25 PM on 08/21/2009
LOL! Take off your gloves and you'll *still* take it on the chin!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
middleoftheroad
02:01 PM on 08/16/2009
The problem is that you have the majority, so all this fire to be thrown onto the minority just doesn't work the same way then when you are protesting the majority! Also, this has proven that Obama has wide support but not deep! I voted for him, but I did not vote for Palosi to stuff the stimulus with domocratic pork, to to throw cap&trade onto the public (which will be a huge tax) and not even read these massive bills! Obama's PROBLEM is that he has not led HIS OWN PARTY! Nancy Palosi has and Obama works as the spokesman...not good.

and regarding gay marriage, " interrupting church sermons on Sunday" would be the worst thing gays could do. You think THAT is going to help them??...not to mention, if you look at the california demos, it was really the black and latino community who both voted for Obama and then flipped and voted for prop 8. They should be kissing in Inglewood and Echo Park not Utah!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfs5541
03:31 PM on 08/16/2009
That a bunch of nonsense. It's obvious that you been dwelling in a cave! The birthers, the tea baggers, the idiot militia in the backwoods with the gun! All were at those health care Town Halls! Moreover, gays should cause a ruckus at churches on Sunday. That's where most of the anti-gay talk happens anyway. It's the most segregated 2-3 hours of the week. Those preachers talk about stuff that would make reasonable people cringe. And it not just the Mormons, it's the tele-evangelists, the small mom and pop churches, all of them. That 2-3 hours is the only time they escape the "secular-humanistic societies" they supposedly live in, so disrupting "their day" isn't a bad idea, it's a flippin great idea!!!! Take some advice from your straight friend, those kiss-ins ARE LOSERS! Heck that! Do a kiss-in during a sermon! It doesn't matter if the church is black, white, latino or asian!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
12:27 PM on 08/16/2009
Some people seem to have a memory lapse when it comes to history remember 2000 when GW Bush won the election we had a surplus the Government really had money and GW Bush and his merry band of man of mass destruction managed in one year to turn this country into a spend like there is no end country. So with the ability to spend and not replace the surplus in 8 wonderful ill advised years this country will pay for more then any one person can imagine if any one out there thinks President Obama can fiscally get our house in order after 8 years of failure then your only fooling yourself. Even if President Obama gets another 4 years it will be a struggle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
middleoftheroad
02:04 PM on 08/16/2009
And what happened...American tossed them out of office....Between 2000-2006 people we saying the Deomcratic party was dean. Robert Redford was freaking out saying if they did not win last year the party was finished etc etc etc...The GOP overreached, messed up and were booted...which is what is going to happen to Dems in 2010 if they dont listen to their districts!
12:13 PM on 08/16/2009
These "What's in it for me?" diatribes are becoming a bore. Get over yourselves. This nation had been on the verge of total collapse; unrecognizable to those of us who have lived long enough to know the difference. The ones who DEMAND that things be done in nano-seconds, without any compromises or without the forethought to think through the consequences; the same ones who screamed at Bush for his "My way or the highway!"...GROW UP! If you want immediate change and for everything to be done YOUR WAY, then go live in an alternate reality where your selfish "where's mine" can keep you warm. The rest of us, who live in the REAL world, know and accept that this task we face, with all the challenges ahead of us, is going to take a LONG time and will happen slowly and in stages. Oh and while I'm at it...try slinging some of that bitterness and disappointment CONGRESS' way. After all, CONGRESS makes and passes laws, NOT the President. You want to be LEAD...join the Army or the Boy Scouts. Responsible adults MAKE their futures, they don't wait for someone to LEAD them there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:41 PM on 08/16/2009
MaryKathO, I actually did what you suggested. I helped elect Obama. I do not expect immediate gratification. I expect campaign promises to be kept, at least the major ones (e.g., focrcing pharmaceutical companies to negotiate with the federal government on prices like they would have to with any other big purchaser), and I epxect those promises to be placed above weakness or fear of blaming anyone for acts that have harmed millions of people masquerading as bipartisanship. We can only hope that it's weakness or fear, because the alternative is that all the contributions from the bankers and the pharmaceutical industries have bought the President like Nate SIlver has demonstrated empirically the health industry has bought the Congress, whether they're consciously or unconsciously. As many have noted here, the issue isn't time, and the issue isn't Congress, The issue is whether Obama the candidate and Obama the President are the same Obama and whether the latter is acting primarily on behalf of the American people or special interests. Right now I'd score it 50:50 (within a margin of error of +/- 15 points). That's a lousy score for someone who promised change.