Imagine a product so irresistible that most Americans thought they couldn't live without it. Every President talked of its importance, and it was perceived of as the key to you or your child's future. There was a limited supply, and prices kept going up. The best business to be in would be lending to people so they can buy it.
I'm talking about higher education, and student loans. In my new book Greedy Bastards, I'm letting you into the tricks used by those who run our culture to profit from misdirection. Like banks and oil companies, those who run our universities push the hidden risk they incur to taxpayers. It's not as obvious as what we saw with subprime home loans, but it is potentially as destructive.
In President Obama's first speech to a joint session of Congress, he said "education in no longer a pathway to opportunity, it is a prerequisite." It's no wonder - conventional wisdom says that those with college degrees earn roughly a million more dollars over their lives than those without them. And there is a vast apparatus of lending institutions and Federal guarantees set up to help put people into college. They do this not by keeping tuition free or low, as we did as a country after World War II, but by helping people get access to student loans.
This is the essence of what I've been calling The Very Bad Deal, where costs are deferred while benefits accrue upfront. If you get a student loan, you get to attend college, and college is apparently the key to earning more over your lifetime, to "opportunity". But student debt has some very nasty tricks and traps that most 18 year olds aren't aware of when they sign on the dotted line, and college may not be the opportunity gateway we've been assured it is.
The scale of the deal is vast and getting bigger - two thirds of those who attend college do so with borrowed money. In August of 2010, the Wall Street reported that student loan debt surpassed credit card debt for the first time in history. This amount is now sitting at roughly a trillion dollars. Higher education inflation is the higher than health care inflation, and two and a half times the rate of normal inflation. Are students really learning two and a half times as much?
Of course not. What is happening is that universities have pricing power, and the Greedy Bastard behavior encourages them to compete on facilities and brand-name faculties rather than price and quality. The Chronicle of Higher Education has described "an arms race of expenditures triggered by the pursuit of prestige." Student debt also distorts pricing. If students had to pay the full freight in college, they might be more price-sensitive consumers. But since the costs of the education they are receiving are hidden, they don't pressure universities to reign in costs. Lavish living environments, pointlessly luxurious sports facilities, and high salaries for administrators are just symptoms of a system where costs have become irrelevant.
Of course, someone must eventually pay that cost, which is increasingly borne by the current and future generation. While college is supposedly a great investment, those who graduated in the midst of the Great Recession from 2008-2010 could not find the good jobs a college diploma supposedly assured them. Tamara Draut, an expert on educational debt, told me that we now "have a whole generation twenty-four thousand dollars in debt... they have graduated but nobody will hire them. They're back at home in their childhood bedroom." It gets worse - student debt is not dischargeable in bankruptcy, so it's lifelong. And there's no guarantee college degrees will serve the same income-producing function they have for decades.
Nearly everyone I've spoken to thinks this system is fixable if we get rid of the incentives that lead to Greedy Bastard--style profit-taking. Much university spending doesn't go to learning, so if we made that spending transparent we could take on cost structures. We don't have to go to the universities that do prestige marketing, we don't have to hire from them, and we don't have to spend our dollars with them. This would lead to innovations in education that could take advantage of technology to increase learning. And we can make student lending more equitable and transparent, so 18 year olds aren't signing their financial lives away.
We spoke with The Huffington Post's Chris Kirkham in depth on the topic -- take a listen below.
Click through to view full Infographic
Follow Dylan Ratigan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DylanRatigan
Randall Amster: Debt of Gratitude: Less Earning, More Learning
Brad Hirschfield: Are Clergy Public Servants? Gov't Says NO!
A student can get educated anywhere. Aside from a few outliers (most prestigious of universities, like the Ivy League schools and such) the quality is exactly the same. As is the value.
Competition is now about student life. What you get besides your education.
This is an important problem to solve and as Ratigan has pointed out has not been properly addressed.
Further there are so many requirements at so many schools that do not contribute to developing judgment and critical thought that many of these courses could be discontinues along with the archaic profs who rely on the archaic curriculums.
why not have fast track 3 year programs that eliminate fluff but not a liberal arts education.
Thus I call on Lawmakers (read: THEM) and advocates (read: YOU) to demand that the government 'phase out' making or guaranteeing of Student Loans. -Period. -- Students DO need to pay full price, and when they do, then *dishonest* colleges & universities will *know* students can NOT afford a 'million dollar' education, and then the market will DROP like a ROCK, and tuition will be affordable once again.
DEBT $ = FEAR
Much has been written on this subject for years now but of course when the bubble bursts we'll here the chorus here saying "nobody knew".
Being a trades person and craftsman was said not the be the wave of the future. Yet now, no one seems to know how to change a tire, fix a leaking pipe, or roof.
Why the Unions didn't fight for those issues has always been a question? They moved their power to public sector jobs instead of standing up for private industry positions. Why is that?
This is not hard to do in Florida. EVERYTHING related to expenditures are required to be public information. Someone just has to do the leg work to make the requests and gather the information.
From what i have observed I know there are many ways to have either reduced or at least contained the cost of a degree - but lavish spending, even on parking garages has made Miami a showplace, but at the expense of the students with large loans and a public that needs better access to the top public in Ohio - as well as too many out of state students.
So start now. If you can, budget around 10% of your monthly income to pay off your student debt. Complain all you like, but the only way this debt goes away is if you pay it off, and you certainly can't do it at $50/month.