iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dylan Ratigan

Dylan Ratigan

GET UPDATES FROM Dylan Ratigan

How Much Longer for the "Royals"?

Posted: 04/28/11 03:59 PM ET

It is the best of times, it is the worst of times.

Tomorrow we will see a wedding between a Prince and a soon-to-be Princess. Polling in the US and UK shows that the public itself is largely apathetic, but we in the media can't seem to get enough of the event. The wedding will cost over $100 million in security and ceremonial costs, and the British government is giving everyone the day off. Ordinary people will use this day ostensibly to celebrate the ceremonies of those born to privilege. But what they will probably do instead is ignore the wedding and spend time with their families.

In America, we're seeing our own version of this. According to the Business Roundtable, the confidence of American CEOs has never been higher. But 70% of the American public thinks that the country is on the wrong track.

If you listen closely, you can hear a subtle creaking under the hood of the global economic system, like a car on the road that is slowly breaking down. Every day there's a new funny noise, something that says it's just not working right. The basic dynamic is inequality all over the world, in staggering proportions. But the interesting nugget is not the unfairness, but the increasing inability of elites to manage the increasing anger coming from the global losers.

Last week, it was in China, a country with even worse inequality than our own. The largest container port in the world -- Shanghai -- saw a serious strike by Chinese truckers. The strike was muzzled by a combination of a media blackout, police power, and select concessions by the Chinese government to the strikers. So what does that have to do with us?

Plenty.

China makes what America consumes. Take, for instance, Walmart. Walmart is increasingly a Chinese company these days, orchestrating the shipping of goods made by incredibly poor Chinese workers to increasingly poor American consumers. Apple is another hybrid Chinese company, a middle-man. Steve Jobs makes billions running a design, retail, marketing, and R&D shop in the US known as Apple. His business partner Foxconn CEO Terry Guo makes his billions making iPads, iPods, and iPhones with 800,000 "iSlaves" in China.

This is a system, and the strategy behind it is quite explicit. Economists have designed it, and they call it fighting inflation. Since wage gains contribute to inflation, stopping wage gains is the goal of the international trading regime. The natural end result is low wage workers in China selling to high debt consumers in America. You get an unstable system with a deeply immoral core, but hey, at least there's no inflation.

How do I know this is done on purpose? Well, the people in charge of the system say it when they think no one's paying attention. I'm going to return to this Federal Open Market Committee transcript from 2005, which has received too little attention. Here's Fed Dallas President Richard Fisher describing his conversations with area CEOs.

Everyone I've talked to continues to try to figure out ways to exploit globalization. Each of them, from the IT [information technology] guys to the big box retailers to the specialty chemical firms to the service firms, wants to have offshore supply. One of the CEOs said, "We have a long way to go in exploiting China." We've heard that forever.


If you read the New York Times article two days ago about Shanghai's new deep water port, you have to realize that those facilities are being built to ship goods out of China, not so much to ship goods into China...

Now, this is good news on the disinflationary front. The bad news is stateside. We don't have the capacity to absorb it. Long Beach and the Northwest harbors are constrained. Work rules, according to our interlocutors, are very slow to adjust. But there are ways to beat the bottlenecks... Wal- Mart just built a four million square foot warehouse in the Houston port, in order to shift part of the burden from Long Beach. But it is evident that the enemy is us as far as exploiting globalization, and I think that's a long-term problem that we might want to take note of over time.

Get that? Shanghai is increasingly an export-only port. Fisher's statements were in 2005, when our country couldn't accept enough goods because of bottlenecks at our ports. But beat the bottleneck we did, by widening the Panama Canal a few years later so China could ship to east coast ports as well. So now the American factory floor is being transferred to China at a faster and faster rate.

Which brings me back to the strikes. American CEOs have exported not just our job base, but all the labor unrest that can come with it. China is running out of capacity to make our products, and commodity prices are going up for them as well. So inflation is hitting Chinese workers very hard right now -- one of the causes of the trucker strike was a significant hike in fuel prices. The Chinese government quickly made concessions to the strikers, and is broadly attempting to deal with an incredible gap between the rich and the poor. But as Reuters noted, they aren't doing this because of goodwill.

Their worry is political:

The Party leadership is especially jumpy about threats to its control following online calls for "Jasmine Revolution" protests inspired by anti-authoritarian uprisings across the Arab world, and has detained dozens of dissidents.

Food price hikes sparked strikes in Egypt, which eventually turned into a political revolution. The Chinese government isn't stupid, but it is trapped. Their strategy is to take American know-how by undercutting us on price, using protectionist measures that we stupidly allow. Our own corporate oligarchs are well-aware of this dynamic as well. They have been preparing for this moment for some time. Walmart (along with GE and even more surprisingly, Google) led the fight in April, 2007 to gut a new labor law proposed for Chinese workers on issues like collective bargaining, severance, etc. The American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai is using aggressive tactics to ensure that Chinese wages would remain low.

Perhaps there is something ironic about aggressive lobbying tactics by multinationals being used effectively in both communist and capitalist legislatures to suppress worker rights. Or perhaps not. But you cannot suppress reality forever, and the strikes in Shanghai show that top-heavy gains eventually have consequences, even for those who make the rules. It's not always as dramatic as Mubarak's fall, but then again, Mubarak's fall wasn't the point when those first Egyptians began striking in 2007. It was the rising prices.

It's a very good time to be rich. The global trading system is benefiting those who manage huge capital flows. But unstable systems have a way of collapsing. And you can hear the creaking, even above the media circus of the royal wedding.

Connect with Dylan

Catch more from Dylan at DylanRatigan.com.

 

Follow Dylan Ratigan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DylanRatigan

 
 
  • Comments
  • 375
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoNorth
Some say I'm an enigma, but I'm not easily figured
05:11 PM on 05/01/2011
Royalty. Because God said so.

Lucky Sperm.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:35 PM on 05/01/2011
Ever hear an engine that runs out of oil - or water?

www.offthegridmpls.blogspot.com
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Turukano
In 20 years, everyone will say they voted Obama
02:10 PM on 05/01/2011
I get that Americans cannot stand royality. All I can say is tradition is important. Lets not throw every tradition away because it is not economical for some.
photo
CTDFalconer
Think twice, post once.
05:02 PM on 05/01/2011
Tradition is fine, but it makes no sense to any democratically-minded individual for there to exist a hereditary office supported by public funding. It's simply antithetical to the notion of American democracy and it looks increasingly anachronistic in a globalizing world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoNorth
Some say I'm an enigma, but I'm not easily figured
05:13 PM on 05/01/2011
Great Britain is having similar economic woes as we are having. Can you imagine the outcry in this country if we spent millions on somebody's wedding because they are simply lucky sperm. Horribly insensitive to humanity.

Oh, and the happy couple is just as married as if they eloped.
10:19 PM on 05/07/2011
No can't image the American people would produce an out cry. Wall street has CEO's that have been bailed out and are making big $$$ now while the middle class continues to shrink and the poor get poorer. The banks are doing just fine, too. Our health care system still stinks despite the passage of the health care bill and I don't hear any huge public out cry. How much worse can it get here?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
01:28 PM on 05/01/2011
While it's fine for states to advertise themselves as tourist destinations, over the last few years I've seen TV commercials for states such as Michigan offered up as a place to take a vacation.
 
 
As manufacturing jobs kept disappearing, what is left to do, Americans simply visiting each other's states to create business activity while not producing anything? 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoNorth
Some say I'm an enigma, but I'm not easily figured
05:13 PM on 05/01/2011
Yep.
01:10 PM on 05/01/2011
It's a rigged economic system BUT things can and do go wrong.

Sometimes those pesty wage slaves get uppity and fight back.
And cause the oligarchs/corporations AND governments a lot of damage.

As one from the unwashed masses, it is NICE to see!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Turukano
In 20 years, everyone will say they voted Obama
02:11 PM on 05/01/2011
Sigh. Some people here are way too Marxist. Everything in America cannot be boiled down to black and white. I, for one, am not rich and am not a slave.
05:09 PM on 05/01/2011
If you're not rich, you're a slave. The difference between this kind of slavery and the one we got rid of is that with this kind, you're fooled into believing that you're not a slave.
photo
catcancook
Going Forward 2013-2016
12:57 PM on 05/01/2011
I don't care what the British do, it' s none of my business.. I do care what the US does. We are one nation but we are very divided. Corporations who send their jobs overseas to avoid paying American wages are contributing to our economic downfall.

If Congress does nothing about this loss (of workers wages) but greedily collects Corps political donations while looking the other way, what can we do? So far, I see no one stepping up to change things. The building of that port shows that the Chinese expect to export more of their cheaply made c ___p to Americans.

We are heavily in debt to China via loans that I don't see anything coming out of Washington that disparages China's imbalance. But as a nation slipping economically every year, we have the responsibility to insure we buy from those who are making products in America if we can find them!

I would hope to see manufactures who run Only made in America factories to join together and start a big campaign to make American's aware of them. Then we All need to become supporters and buy their products. Avoid Wal-mart like the plague should be our mantra.

We need to hold Congress as partly responsible for not creating a system that rewards Corps who have large % in America and penalizes those who run large %'s of their businesses on foreign soil. How Un-American to openly dis the American worker. Shameless.
12:24 PM on 05/01/2011
Wage increases are not necessarily inflationary but usually are. Building a factory in China isn't necessarily inflationary but usually is. Borrowing money to participate in a tech bubble, stock bubble or housing bubble, or to buy cdo's is inflationary. Selling bonds to the wealthy instead of taxing them is inflationary. Sales taxes without a cap can be inflationary. Most of the corporate media and the corporate politicians are obsessed with the inflation caused by wage increases. The class bias wouldn't be so bad if the working classes had equal time to talk about inflation, and the representation in congress to make the other classes pay for the inflation they create.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoNorth
Some say I'm an enigma, but I'm not easily figured
05:15 PM on 05/01/2011
Most economists agree that 3% inflation is healthy. Anything more is counterproductive. Anything less is flirting with deflation, and that's even worse.
photo
undrgrndgirl
what's so funny 'bout peace, love & understanding?
12:07 PM on 05/01/2011
estimates of the cost of the wedding ranged anywhere from 20million to 100 million, projections were made that london would reap $250 billion in tourist revenue...not a bad return on investment if you ask me...while the royals may be politically irrelevant, they are not socially irrelevant...and how is the cost of the wedding any worse than the cost of any large event? like say wimbledon? or an f1 race? or the g7/g8/g20?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Turukano
In 20 years, everyone will say they voted Obama
02:12 PM on 05/01/2011
Thank you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
inthedesert
Those who never question will fall for anything.
10:06 PM on 05/01/2011
They are irrelevant....PERIOD. LOL.
11:50 AM on 05/01/2011
Mr Rattigan, I have respected your work. However, I do not understand you teaming with NuCor for your "Steel on Wheels" programs. I watched NuCor attempt to play off two depressed areas in the PNW, Hoquiam, Wa and Coos Bay, Or. NuCor had local and state officials in both areas falling over each other trying to see who could give more tax money away to NuCor. NuCor kept upping their demands for more tax breaks. Of course, they kept telling one and all about how many new well paid jobs would be created. Finally, they dumped the Washington town for an all out attack on Oregon. They demanded the State of Oregon pay for a high volume electrical line to run from Bonneville Dam, east of Portland, to the far Southwestern location of Coos Bay. When, the state refused, NuCor moved on to other pickings, such as Bobby Jindal's give away tax program in Louisianna. So, Mr Rattigan, why are you joining with this Corporate Beggar?
photo
unfoxworthy
We:ScottOlsens,the misfits,out to change the world
11:47 AM on 05/01/2011
Thanks Dylan!
Being a follower, I know how much you have researched this and many other issues on societal inequities and the recklessness of the elite class. You, like many of us here, take these issues to heart (and do not take them lightly).
With all the attention the fat cats and crooks have heaped on themselves - it's simply amazing that not a one of them has stepped forward and tried to reverse the trend for "greed".
I've seen the philanthropy - I've heard the talking "bytes" and the promises by the people at the top of government and busniess; Obama, Buffet, Gates, Blankfink, Bernanke etc., but not a real quest to right the wrongs perpetrated on society as a whole. Corporate machines with contrived and "cooked" short term visions have now infested, stolen from, and have disrupted sane planning for
...our future.
Oh yah, the walls are creaking alright!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
10:57 AM on 05/01/2011
For a while now I have been watching China knowing that 1.4 billion people are not going to stand for slave wages much longer.  Lester Brown of Earth Policy Institute wrote an interesting article titled "Who Will Feed China" pointing out the incredible stresses that Chinese rivers, soil and air have been taking in terms of the poisons they have to absorb in order for the "American Dream" to remain "affordable"!  The same stresses are beginning to be felt by India.

The continued shrinking of the American middle class is going to begin wreaking havoc on Asian manufacturing countries because we now have to tighten our belts, suck it up and do without!  India and China are beginning to feel those crunches since they're growth economies are now so closely tied to American consumption.  The system is not sustainable and the greed in this country has gone completely unchecked since the immortal words of Gordon Gecko in Stone's classic Wall Street!

Now we are beginning to understand why it's called the American Dream, because you have to be asleep to live it!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Turukano
In 20 years, everyone will say they voted Obama
02:14 PM on 05/01/2011
It is a good thing our fathers and grandfathers werent that pessimistic ... heck, imagine if the founding fathers had just called it quits.
 
We create our own futures .... if you give that up, what is the point of fighting for anything?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnitedStatesOfTara
Maker of Music and Dreamer of Dreams
03:46 PM on 05/01/2011
Acknowledging the failures of, and working to change, a deeply flawed system is not the same thing as "calling it quits". I imagine the Founding Fathers would expect nothing less.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:52 PM on 05/01/2011
The American Dream is still alive, at least for some.
As negative as your comments are, there is no other country in the world like America where you can make your dreams come true.
photo
Austro-libertarian
Sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guidelines
10:22 AM on 05/01/2011
Why are people so reluctant to talk about government's central role in all the is going wrong in the world? - Because they're all dependent on the government for their livelihood.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Turukano
In 20 years, everyone will say they voted Obama
02:17 PM on 05/01/2011
Do you live on an island? Do you grow your own food? Can you conduct surgery on yourself?
 
If not, government has a legtimate role to play in society. The idea that every family is independent went away with modern civilization; the world is too small for that non-sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
09:30 PM on 05/01/2011
Whoa, there is a big difference between domestic policy and foreign policy. This might not be the most most popular example, but take in consideration the Neo-cons. They were relatively moderate on domestic social spending, conservative when it came to "global spending initiatives" (and held a very conservative view point on US exceptionalism) and liberal when it came to spreading democracy via whatever means (peace keeping, war, humintarian, ect). Consider as far as moderate domestic policy the fact that Bush signed the prescription medicare act and no child left behind. Thats not to say Bush was a progressive but significantly less conservative on domestic policy than the radical TP conservatives in office now!
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
10:17 AM on 05/01/2011
I expect the "Royal" wedding brought in enough tourist dollars to be a net gain for England's economy. Might even have had positive effects throughout the rest of the "United Kingdom".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ancientuno
09:50 AM on 05/01/2011
Why is it America constantly bashing the Royal Family and that it has no business in a democracy? I certainly don't the American system working out so well today. Make sure your own house is clean before complaining about others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Savage Saint Roger
Card Carrying Liberal
09:46 AM on 05/01/2011
The royal CEO's of America are portrayed as such only by their worshippers, the conservatives and of course their bought officials. The rest of us know better! Corporate America has killed America, as they do everything, by exhaustive and irresponsible exploitation.
Walmart is perhaps the biggest American lie going. They single handedly moved small business America off Main Street and into the Flea Markets.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
01:22 PM on 05/01/2011
The US 'royals' have no sense of duty the the country.  At least in England, their royals are duty bound.  The princes serve in the military and their lives are structured around service to the Kingdom.  We should be so lucky here.