If you want to know why politicians are so eager to pass a free trade agreement with Panama this month, type "Panama offshore banks" into Google and look at the paid ads. What you'll see is advertising by law firms and banks that will offer you help to set up a secret corporate structure in Panama immune from taxes.
The State Department knows this. Here's how the State Department described the Panamanian economy in 2006 in a secret memo revealed on Wikileaks.
The Panamanian "incorporation regime ensures secrecy, avoids taxes,and shields assets from the enforcement of legal judgments. Along with its sophisticated banking services, Panama remains an environment conducive to laundering the proceeds from criminal activity and creates a vulnerability to terrorist financing."
Yet, here's how President Obama describes the three NAFTA-style Free Trade agreements that Congress is attempting to ratify later this month, one with Panama.
There are a few things that we can and should do right now to redouble our efforts on behalf of the American people. Today, Congress can advance trade agreements that will help businesses sell more American-made goods and services to Asia and South America, supporting thousands of jobs here at home.
This week, I'll be covering the free trade agreements pushed by the politicians, along with the Huffington Post. The Panama FTA is one of three trade agreements up for debate and passage later this month. The agreement is supported by the business community and opposed by the AFL-CIO, and will be scored by unions. The Panama government itself wants this agreement desperately, and has complained about all of its lobbying spending in DC ($6.2 million).
Panama is too small as an economy to really impact jobs in the United States, the real value of the FTA is strategic and has to do with American geopolitical aims. For the business community, Panama is a great place to hide their money.
Panama is the second largest tax haven in the world, according to a secret State Department memo released by Wikileaks. There's a deep irony in the U.S. relationship with Panama. The country's cooperation in the war on drugs is considered pivotal, with the State Department arguing that Panama is more important to the U.S. than we are to Panama (see this cable). One third of all ships are flagged in Panama, and Panama lets the U.S. board those ships to search for drugs. But for some reason, Panama's position as a haven for drug money is not a particular concern.
In order to move the Panama FTA, Panama decided to sign a tax information sharing treaty with the U.S., but most experts think this is somewhat toothless in terms of preventing tax evasion and corporate secrecy. The evidence for this are the legions of law firms that are willing to aid wealthy Americans in avoiding taxes by using the Panamanian corporate structure. Here's one example of an offshoring firm on why you should consider putting your money in Panama. And here's another, in which the firm trash-talks "snooty" Swiss banker versus Panamanian banks.
The key question we have to face as a country is how we want to govern ourselves. From World War II until NAFTA, our trading policies were based on geopolitical needs and what would increase prosperity for America. Since NAFTA, however, the mantra of free trade has been warped to generate rights for international capital and nothing else. The agreements Congress and the president are pushing continue this unfortunate trend. What unfettered capital wants is to avoid taxes, regulations, or any state power whatsoever. And that's what this Panama deal is really about.
Connect with Dylan
Catch more from Dylan at DylanRatigan.com
Follow Dylan Ratigan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DylanRatigan
Richard Bangs: Bahrain: Once Was Paradise
The European Magazine: Revolutionaries During Ramadan
William Meers: Is Swiss Banking Still the Way to Go for Private Banking?
USTR - Panama Free Trade Agreement
Kirk Says Panama Free-Trade Agreement Ready for Congress - Bloomberg
U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement - C-SPAN Video Library
Korea, Colombia, Panama Free Trade Deals Advance - FoxNews.com
U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement - Council on Foreign Relations
If you do NOT consent to our society being destroyed by Obama dems & republicans,
GOOGLE "RIGHTtoCONSENT" and learn how we can stop this criminality.
Secondly, the outsourcing that started with Reagan but went on steroids with Clinton is precisely the reason that good manufacturing jobs are gone. NAFTA and other trade agreements continue to exacerbate the inequality and mal-distribution of wealth and and will not be back until and unless we stop our free trade policies and return to a policy of tariffs and taxation that makes it more profitable to make products here instead of abroad. This trade agreement won't cost many jobs, it will just give the 2% another convenient place to avoid paying taxes that the serfs will have to make up. It is another sign of the continuing corruption that has taken over the US these last 30 or so years.
So tell me what real difference their is between drug lords, big American biz and our enabling politicians? Their similar interests seem to far outweigh their differences, regardless of how one tries to paint them philosophically.
Bed mates are bed mates, whether they are in it for the money or just plain consensual above board political criminals and unpatriotic thieves.
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/SPanama
Please be aware that this agreement has been in the works for years. Most of the details were hashed out under Bush II. As a strong Progressive, it pains me that Obama and the State Dept have not done more to alter the agreement.
Go Dylan!
Regarding the "information sharing" agreements, who are these "most experts?" The absence of supporting evidence in an article awash in links.
And what does the size of Panama have to do with anything? Should we deprive small countries of access to the biggest market in this hemisphere just because they are too small to have a big effect on the US economy? Yes, it is a nominal (but positive) effect for the US, but a HUGE effect for tiny Panama. That SHOULD matter to people who value the human dignity of more than those accidentally born within the same borders as themselves.
Your argument seems to be the "America first" argument turned on its head. We won't put tin-pot dictators in place, but we will starve your nation of access to the biggest market in the world because you are too small (sucks to be you), and domestic interest groups don't like competition from south of the border.
The world is very confusing.
Send it down, out of town
down to south America today.
Obama's speech "help businesses in America" is a rhetoric for the wealthiest corporations and their subdivisions operating under global umbrella. The same 1% wealthiest corporations he is after to finance this failing economic and financial policies and the thrust of his argument to increase the debt ceiling.
Talking about transparency.
There's a similar on buried deep within the Peru one.
On thhis, Dylna: "Since NAFTA, however, the mantra of free trade has been warped to generate rights for international capital and nothing else." You're right, but it's been since our first Free Trade agreement in 1985, with Israel.