The Education of Jeremiah Wright

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Posted April 26, 2008 | 10:35 AM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

The much discussed, much defended, and much reviled pastor Jeremiah Wright can't be blamed for his gross naiveté on politics. After all, he's a preacher, and as he told Bill Moyers in an interview on PBS that he only talks "about the things of God." That's the way it should be for men of the faith. But that's not the way it is when one of your flock is a politician who's at the top of the heap in the dash for the White House.

It doesn't do much good as countless Wright defenders have shouted that he is being held to the old racial double standard when much of the media and the public dump on him and call him a racist, hatemonger, and anti-American for his racially inflammatory remarks, but do not pound on white preachers who rail against abortion, gay marriage, and make borderline gender and racially offensive statements. The issue in that case is not the color of the preacher or the notoriety of the member of the flock that hears the preacher's message; it's the timing of the message.

Whether Wright's statements were taken out of context, deliberately mangled and twisted, and packaged to make him look bad is irrelevant. In fact, his remarks weren't even blown up necessarily to make Obama look like a closet radical and racial panderer. Wright's words in context or not were sensational, shocking, and made in heaven news soundbits. Since Obama is a member of his church flock that made them ripe for a political spin.

But Wright should have known that. He's no babe in the wood when it comes to controversy. Sooner or later his words would be fodder for a You Tube loop and for a media whose antenna is sky high for even the slightest bit of campaign titillation. There were just too many hints of that. The early rap of his Southside Chicago church, his fiery preaching style, and his outspoken afro-centric activism on racial and social issues, were plums for the news and political pickings. Early on in the Obama campaign Wright purportedly warned him that his church membership might eventually be made an issue. He even wrote a letter to a New York Times writer lambasting her for allegedly doing a hatchet job on the church and his preachments a year before the storm broke.

His oblique dig at Obama in the Moyers interview for as he put it doing what politicians do showed he knew something about the penchant of politicians to do and say anything to win. Presumably what Wright meant in Obama's case, was that he had to do racial damage control and distance himself from his views.

Wright also learned that in politics timing is everything. The quotes that he screams were skewed and taken out of context are from older sermons and talks. There was no need to make an issue of them then because Obama was still an unknown on the national scene. Even after he tossed his hat in the presidential rink in February, 2007 it still took many months of debates, hard campaigning, and then spectacular wins in a slew of Democratic primaries and caucuses before Democratic Party top guns, much of the media, and public and that included the majority of blacks, not to mention the GOP watchdogs, really believed that he had a real shot at the presidency. There was simply no need to fasten Wright as a political albatross around Obama's neck at that point.

Wright also relearned another lesson about race and politics. It's still a touchy, volatile, and always polarizing issue that politicians step gingerly around whenever they can. That's especially true for Obama. Though he's done everything humanly possible to sell himself and his candidacy as the incarnation of inclusiveness, race neutrality, and unity, there are still the whispers and worries that a racial intent lurks just under the surface in his agenda.

For the Obama doubters and those downright suspicious of him, Wright confirmed their suspicions. There is no hard evidence that Wright did much to contribute to Obama's Pennsylvania primary loss. But the gaping racial rift between white Democrats and black Democrats in the vote there on Clinton and Obama is an inferential sign that Wright may have been on the minds of more than a few white voters.

There's no inference or guesswork that he's on the minds of North Carolina state GOP leaders. Their hit ad that welded Obama at the hip with Wright was splattered all over the state. Though John McCain quickly denounced it and demanded that it be yanked, party leaders there essentially told their man to take a hike.

Wright has retired from the pulpit at Trinity United. However, his alleged out of context and distorted remarks won't be retired. They're too much of a political goldmine and that's something that Wright got a fresh education on.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House (Middle Passage Press, February 2008).

 
 

Comments
36
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- richdoll See Profile I'm a Fan of richdoll permalink

now all the cable news owe obama an apology and stop asking why did he stay there they know
thry saw the entire clip but hey only choose to play the part they choos to help boost hillary and mcain
race to the white with sensational news.. the rev. was quoting a mr beck instead of clearing the situation msn and cnn abc fox wanted to smear obama to make it look like it something that it was not. how ironic these things came out just before people were to go into voting booth to vote. i personally don't want a 3 term of clintons or bush especcial when hillary is talking about bombing
iran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 AM on 04/27/2008
- naijaman See Profile I'm a Fan of naijaman permalink

Erm...excuse me, Olfari, but Reverend Wright's sermons WERE taken out of context, and THAT is very relevant. Your entire article misses this point. You are basically telling us that if someone heard me say "I hate America", and then took that to paint me as unamerican, when what I actually said was "my friend said to me 'I hate America'", you're telling me there is no difference?

I notice you also failed to mention that the so-called "controversial" words from his 9/11 sermon were the words of Ambassador Edward Peck, and Wright very clearly tells the church congregation that he was quoting someone else. Oddly enough, those parts were edited out, thereby making it look like Wright was saying those words himself.

Lastly, what did the US do to end apartheid in South Africa? NOTHING....and our current VP Dick Cheney voted against sanctions against the apartheid government....were you outraged then, Olfari?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 04/27/2008
- WillBFair See Profile I'm a Fan of WillBFair permalink

You can decontextualize the postmodern paradigm all you want. Wright's comments and Obama calling rural religion bitter are insults to the red States. They might not help him unite the country, as he promises every three seconds.
It's another of the bazillion cases where his rhetoric doesn't match reality. His 'new politics' are either old liberal cliches that will have no effect on the porblems we face today, or Clinton retreads.
'Change we can believe in', and 'yes we can' are slogans more shallow than Bush's 'Compassionate Conservatism' and Nader' s proportional representation put together, especially since he was absent from both Senate seats.
Knowledgeable people know the difference between rhetoric and rational discourse. And they prefer an actuall governing record to empty promises.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 04/27/2008
- IowaKid See Profile I'm a Fan of IowaKid permalink

Thank you Bill Moyers and PBS for broadcasting the truth about Rev Wright. The main stream media is to busy getting ratings to be bothered by the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 04/26/2008
- ReVan See Profile I'm a Fan of ReVan permalink


Truth?, you wouldn't know the truth if it was a three story, and it fell on you.

Bill Moyers is an embarrassment. He couldn't have kissed Rev. Wright ass any better if his lips were stitched to it. More softballs than an over 60 league. No challenge, no follow-up, no guts, just intellectual dishonesty on a grand scale.

Context!?, What context changes the meaning of "the US Government created AIDS to kill people of color", or create Crack to "imprison Black people.

Context!, what B.S.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 04/27/2008
- StillIRise See Profile I'm a Fan of StillIRise permalink

You're just mad because Bill Moyers' interview with Reverend Wright contradicts everything you wanted to believe about him and that he not only did not hurt Senator Obama by his interview, but most certainly helped him. In the conversation between Bill Moyers and Reverend Wright, every contoversial issue that has been raised was addressed, including the soundbites that Sean Hannity used to misrepresent him. Mr Moyers didn't attack the Reverend with these questions, as I'm sure you were hoping to see, but he didn't hesitate to put the tough questions that have concerned Americans out there, and he gave Reverend Wright a platform to answer these questions without intimidation or fear of political entrapment. Is it just the question about AIDS or drugs that you wanted to hear? Perhaps if you knew your history, including the history of black America, you wouldn't have questions about Reverend Wright's concerns about this; and perhaps, as a history buff himself, this is something Mr. Moyers understood. I'm sorry that the interview did not work out the way you obviously wanted it to, but that's no reason to criticize a job well done!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 AM on 04/27/2008
- IowaKid See Profile I'm a Fan of IowaKid permalink

Your article failed to mention that Rev Wright was a Marine as medic and help in the operation of past President Lyndon B Johnson. I agree it's time people have a conversation about being black. Senator Barack Obama will be our next President, it's time to get rid of the old politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 04/26/2008
- ReVan See Profile I'm a Fan of ReVan permalink


Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marine also, and Timothy McVey was in the army, what's your point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 04/27/2008
- StillIRise See Profile I'm a Fan of StillIRise permalink

Lee Harvey Oswald was an assassin, and Timothy McVey was a terrorist.

Reverend Wright, on the other hand, not only served our country in the armed forces and as a Marine, tended to one of our renown presidents; but he, unlike those you choose to compare him with, is also a true patriot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 AM on 04/27/2008
- XXYR See Profile I'm a Fan of XXYR permalink

Still waiting for the comparison to Hagee, Falwell, Pat Robertson, Huckabee's sermons, the views of the Mormon church, etc.

Until that happens, this is substance-free and an un-American double-standard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 04/26/2008
- presto See Profile I'm a Fan of presto permalink

I think the difference is that everyone you mention, except Hagee, is not a factor in this particular campaign. And Hagee just endorsed McCain - he was not his spiritual advisor and McCain did not attend his church for 20 years. There is a difference. I think Wright's comments have been overblown but I do understand why it is an issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 PM on 04/26/2008
- Snowball See Profile I'm a Fan of Snowball permalink

The message of this post can be simply distilled: Religious figures should never speak what they believe to be the truth to their flock under the assumption that sometime in the future one of their followers might run for public office. Oh, and that only applies if you're a Democrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 04/26/2008
- StillIRise See Profile I'm a Fan of StillIRise permalink

Apparently, Mr. Hutchinson also believes that it only applies if you're a BLACK Democrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 AM on 04/27/2008
- charley0008 See Profile I'm a Fan of charley0008 permalink

What nut bush did you fall out of?
" But the gaping racial rift between white Democrats and black Democrats in the vote there on Clinton and Obama is an inferential sign that Wright may have been on the minds of more than a few white voters."
Let me see if I have this correct? The folks in Pennsylvania and Kentucky who say they will never vote for a black man, are only kidding, really they are just upset about Rev. Wright! Right?
The 150, 000 republicans who 'changed' parties with the vast majority going to Hillary, had no significance either, right? They are all just upset about Rev. Wright?
If none of these folks are racist or have racist tendency why is the Rev. Wright such a golden opportunity, who exactly would that be appealing to?
I am only interested in informed opinion, so if you were too lazy to listen to his sermon's to determine if they were taken out of context, don't bother me with your 'alleged out of context' spin.
Truth is this whole piece was nothing more than you stating the obvious and taking the opportunity to cast doubt on Rev. Wright one more time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 04/26/2008
- StillIRise See Profile I'm a Fan of StillIRise permalink

AMEN! Well said!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 04/27/2008
- Bademus See Profile I'm a Fan of Bademus permalink

Based on exit polls the majority of republicans who changed parties in PA voted for Obama. Also the discrepancies in voting trends there were much more dramatic in terms of age and gender than % of white voters voting for one or the other. Here is an interesting article about the age, gender, race effect in the PA vote:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004372459_demwomen25.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 04/26/2008
- Melkor See Profile I'm a Fan of Melkor permalink

"The issue in that case is not the color of the preacher or the notoriety of the member of the flock that hears the preacher's message; it's the timing of the message."

I disagree. Colour is EVERYTHING in the Wright controversy. Not only does the Right have a slew of outrageous religious leaders perpetually making statements that the media tacitly ignores, they've also got a noise machine apparatus in people like Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly that make ugly statements almost daily. And where is the fallout for Republicans?

Obama's problem is that Reverend Wright's outrageous opinions are those of a MINORITY, not the majority. Time has nothing to do with it. It's about who has the power to make their indignation stick.

On another note, I've noticed something in your recent writings, as well as those of Paul Krugman. Suddenly both of you are writing mainstream-media type strategy pieces - except more confusing and inscrutable. What's missing from this article and most of your recent pieces (which tend to go against Obama) is the moral centre. Why is that? Why is it you can defend Michael Vick for running a bloodsport for dogs, Barry Bonds for juicing his way to infamy, but when it comes to Obama its about political strategy and hard truths?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 04/26/2008
- SMP See Profile I'm a Fan of SMP permalink

I, as an older white female, suggest that EVERYONE read the entire sermon, then, and only then, can you make an educated decision on how you feel about Rev Wright.

Also, one last thing, Sen. Obama is his own person, made up of little pieces of America. Yes, being of mixed race gives him the right to say he knows both worlds, black and white also, poverty, middle class and now, after just paying off his student loans 2 yrs ago, and writing 2 books, the well to do class.

Go read the entire sermon before you condemn

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 04/26/2008
- wprecht See Profile I'm a Fan of wprecht permalink

Tell me in what "context" remarks such as "God DAMN America" are OK to make. Also, in what context is it OK to spread vicious lies such as that the US government is trying to commit "genocide" on the black population through drugs and/or AIDS (which was invented to kill blacks).

I have seen the complete sermons, and their supposed "context" does nothing to dull the demagogery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 PM on 04/26/2008
- Syco See Profile I'm a Fan of Syco permalink

Is it me or does all his post have to do with Obama?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 04/26/2008
- tedbear See Profile I'm a Fan of tedbear permalink

I would like to hear from other people who came of age in the 60's. This thinking of Rev. Wright about the U. S. isn't unlike the pervailing spirit of the young people of those very turbulent times. People were suspicious of the government and their decisions, which by the way put alot of Americans in harms way in a "non-war" in Vietnam. Hasn't anyone else ever heard that theory that the government might have somehow released the aids virus into the population, perhaps by an experiment gone bad. Its all just the way many people from that era thought, because that was the climate of the 60's, and the distrust was furthered by many stupid actions of the government. Would you think a person of today was not patriotic when you hear people complain that it is the government's fault that most of our jobs have gone "global?" Are you not patriotic because of the things you think about politicians and the government's decisions? I truthfully don't know anyone who doesn't question the government's policies or at least wonder what is really going on. Even worse are the millions of people who don't vote, because they are so disguisted, and feel hopelessness and helplessness when it comes to the world we live in because of government actions. Obama just might be popular because he respresents change in the way things are done in Washington. I challenge anyone to deny things need changed in the way government works.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 04/26/2008
- StillIRise See Profile I'm a Fan of StillIRise permalink

I too came of age in the sixties, and I never questioned the historical truths that Reverend referenced in his sermons. His words echo the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, forty years ago, when he too spoke out against the injustices of the establishment, many of which are as real today as they were then. Many of our young people today, particularly those who are isolated from the harsher realities of our society and the stinging wounds of the past, repel the truths that conflict with their beliefs about the history of our nation and the insidiousness of that history that still haunts us today. But repelling it does not change it, nor does it make it go away. These are the truths that Reverend Wright speaks to, but he speaks of these truths in the context of hope and forgiveness and redemption, and challenges us not only to stand up against injustice, but to stand up for the truth that frees us all. History has a habit of repeating itself, and that habit is fueled not only by fear of truth, but by ignorance of or indifference to history itself. America is the beacon of light to the world, but that light has been dimming for some time. Senator Obama is our greatest hope to rekindle the light that will once again illuminate our nation, both at home and abroad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 AM on 04/27/2008
- Bademus See Profile I'm a Fan of Bademus permalink

The theory comes from an effort in the late 50s to vaccinate Africans for polio, which was a well intended effort. For decades or longer the SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus) in chimpanzees was in existence, but had never crossed over into humans. In Africa during the polio vaccination drive the live polio vaccine was grown on simian (monkey) kidneys. The theory is that somehow that procedure rendered a human version of the SIV virus. No one knows if that is the case but a scholarly tome has been written about it , The River: A Journey to the source of HIV and AIDS.

The AIDS theory was easily fostered based on the extreme distrust resulting from the Tuskege experiments . In those experiments African American men were monitored to study the effects of syphilis for several decades, with no treatment, allowing it to spread to their wives and subsequently children during childbirth and throughout their communities this continued until it became public knowledge in 1972.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 04/26/2008
- MaryT63 See Profile I'm a Fan of MaryT63 permalink

It's time for the public to get educated about black america on how it is to live being black in america. Why should the Rev get educated? Why is it that every article written about the Rev's comments (less than ten words) made in his sermon of apprx. 30 to 45 mins long, only zoom in on those comments? What about the work the Rev does in the community?
I saw the PBS interview on Rev Wright last night. Was that the same gentleman that have been portrayed as anti-america. A gentleman who served in both the army and navy, was on the medical watch team of President Johnson, has several higher education degrees, has done so much for his church, his community for past 40 years. Is this the same man that the MSM, the conservatives, the pundits have painted as a raving maniac.
Most of the ministers that have been allowed by MSM to speak on the Reverand comments were not his peers. The ministers were all a part of the intergration era. Rev Wright came of age during the JimCrow segregation so his views would not be the same. More of his peers should speak out.
Earl, why not write an article showing why Rev Wright would make those statements. Why not educate the people for a change. You have just recycled all that I've heard/read on why Rev Wright is a bad man. Enough already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 04/26/2008
- mjc See Profile I'm a Fan of mjc permalink

Hutchinson's point is well taken. As long as it looked as if Obama was just a new fancy for Democratic voters there was no need for the media to take not of his pastor's words, which weren't at all unknown and even accepted by many whites as well as blacks. Whether just a few preachings such as the ones that appeared on tape or the standard fare at Wright's church, they will be there for a long time and it isn't just white racists who are going to remember them, the black racists will also.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 04/26/2008
- StillIRise See Profile I'm a Fan of StillIRise permalink

The media did not "take note of his pastor's words," they selected soundbites to misrepresent his pastor's words, none of which in their entirety appealed to the baser nature of racism of either blacks or whites. Yet, some people - perhaps you - will indeed remember the soundbites and continue to take note of them to cast a shadow over Reverend Wright and his ministry, and thereby over Senator Obama as well, if not the composite black community itself. And perhaps the media also will continue to take note of these soundbites as a political tool to manipulate the American people, and thereby to manipulate the election. But most responsible, intellectually honest, and informed Americans - who are the majority of us - now know the truth and will no longer be swayed by the lies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 AM on 04/27/2008
- DBriz See Profile I'm a Fan of DBriz permalink

I watched Rev Wright on Bill Moyers Journal and he is a fine man, an excellent preacher and a true American. Americans are supposed to question authority, not goose-step to the tune of "Hail to the Chief." There are times when the government needs to be yelled at by the people. Like now.
And by the way, I am a 55 year old white, male and former Republican. I have seen the light and time for change. Real Change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 04/26/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in