The Silly Debate Over Whether Obama is Black or Mixed-Race

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Posted June 14, 2008 | 12:13 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.


Presumptive Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama gave the best answer to the question whether he's black, mixed race or something in between. He recently told a Chicago fundraiser crowd that to some he wasn't black enough, and he then promptly added that others say he might be too black. He's right; the knock against him has either been that he is too black or not black enough, not that he is too mixed race or not mixed race enough. Despite his occasional references to his white mother and grandmother, Obama by his own admission has never seen himself as anything other than being black. He says that's it been that way since he was 12. It's that way for those whites who flatly say that they won't vote for him because he's black. His Democratic primary losses to Hillary Clinton in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky showed there are legions of white voters who feel that race does matter to them. Few have said that they oppose him because he's mixed race.

Yet, the silly debate continues to rage over whether Obama is the black presidential candidate or the multi-racial candidate. The debate is even sillier when one considers that science has long since debunked the notion of a pure racial type. In America, race has never been a scientific or genealogical designation, but a political and social designation. Put bluntly, anyone with the faintest trace of African ancestry was and still is considered black, and treated accordingly. Their part-white ancestry doesn't give them a pass from taxis refusing to stop for them, clerks following them in department stores, from being racial-profiled by police on street corner stops, from landlords refusing to show them an apartment, or being denied a promotion. The mixed race designation doesn't magically make disappear the countless other racial sleights and indignities that are tormenting reminders that race still does matter, and matter a lot to many Americans.

Indeed, from the moment that Obama tossed his hat in the presidential rink a year ago, the mantra of the press and the public has been, "Is America ready for a black president?" Not "Is America ready for a mixed-race president?" The equally incessant mantra is that Obama if elected will make history as America's first black president not the first mixed-race president.

That tells much about the still frozen public attitudes and perceptions about race and politics in America. The deepest part of America's racial fault has always been and still remains the black and white divide. This has spawned legions of vile but durable racial stereotypes, fears, and antagonisms. Black males have been the special target of the negative typecasting. They've routinely been depicted as crime prone, derelict, sexual menaces, and chronic underachievers. There are slightly more than 6 million persons that self-identify themselves as mixed race in America. The number of persons with a black and white parent is a minuscule less that one half of one percent.

By contrast, African-Americans (mixed or not) number more than forty million in America and make up about twelve percent of the population. The designation then of "mixed race" is so new, benign and amorphous it softens racial attitudes and dilutes racial hostility. It carries none of the negative racial baggage that black or African-American does.

This is the big reason that scores of blacks have been frenzied over Obama's candidacy. They have turned out in record numbers in some primaries and have given his candidacy the greatest boost forward. They have been unabashed in saying that they back him with passion and fervor because he is black. It's hard to imagine that they'd cheer him with the same passion if he touted himself as a mixed race candidate. The thrill and pride for them is that a black man could beat the racial odds against blacks and scale the political heights.

The stock line is that Obama's candidacy shows how far America has come in that a black man has a real shot at grabbing the top elected spot in the land. No one says that Obama's candidacy shows how far America has come in that a mixed race man can win the White House. If Obama does win the presidency the new line will be that it shows not just how far America has come on race (meaning racial attitudes toward blacks), but that America has finally arrived on race (meaning racial attitudes toward blacks). Substituting mixed race for black would not have the same meaning or significance to blacks or whites.

If Obama grabs the White House, he'll claim it as a triumph for all Americans. Many blacks will claim it as a triumph for them. They'll both be right.



Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House (Middle Passage Press, February 2008).

 
 

Comments
127
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- arthuride See Profile I'm a Fan of arthuride

As usual, Earl is right. Color is irrelevant. So, too, is gender. I do not care about color or gender. Experience matters--but not longevity--as there are many senile representatives and senators in Congress, who vote for special interests and not for themselves. I supported and continue to support Hillary, but I know she lost--by number of delegates. I support Hillary because of her experience, breadth of knowledge, and congeniality. I have to wait to see about Obama. He has no record of any significance. But vote for McCain--he is a part of the senile generation that have been in the Senate too long--why kick him upstairs--the presidency of the USA is not a CEO job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 06/20/2008
- dr4Will See Profile I'm a Fan of dr4Will

black is black and white is white---there is no in-between--if you vote because of color the choice is simple--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 06/16/2008
- AshevilleVoice See Profile I'm a Fan of AshevilleVoice

It may seem like a silly debate, but the fact that we are talking more openly about race, with all its myriad contradictions, is healthy for our society. I have enjoyed and learned much from the personal stories generated by Dreams From my Father, Obama's race speech, and even the Jeremiah Wright media circus. In our attempts to grow beyond racial divides, we've adapted a 'colorblind racism', where pretending that we never notice race at all is PC. I find it refreshing to invite personal stories on the effects of race in America, even if we can't yet find common conclusions. Just opening our ears as people speak their personal truth is progress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 06/16/2008
- johnnyjust See Profile I'm a Fan of johnnyjust

I could care less whether the black community or guilt-ridden whites are placated for ten minutes over Obama's Presidency. An inexperienced junior Senator is still just that, no matter what his color.

I have no problem voting for a black man, a half-black man, a three-quarters black man (or woman)....as long as they're Republican and not an Alan Keyes type nut.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 06/16/2008
- djelimon See Profile I'm a Fan of djelimon

As long as they're Republican?

So really, the problem is he's a Dem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 06/16/2008
- Cathexis See Profile I'm a Fan of Cathexis

I am coming to conclude that "experience" is another name for years of Bad Judgment and Compromise.

To hell with old guys who have learned to game the system long enough to "gain seniority" -- if that's what "experience is, then I damn well DO want an "inexperienced junior senator!"

And to hell with supporting ANY Republican, until they wake up and renounc ethe radicals that have hijacked their party.

Sincerely, -- A Former Republican

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 06/16/2008
- heyoka See Profile I'm a Fan of heyoka

I liked this article, and from an historical perspective, I believe that it is substantially correct.

There is, however, another perspective, and that is the genetic perspective. OK, I'll still grant that when it comes down to it there are no absolutely pure racial types. We really are all related--but it is absurd to think that there are no racial characteristics sufficient to support categorizations. There simply are even if there are also a substantial number of individuals who do not fit neatly into any one racial category because they are indeed mixed race.

Going beyond the crude term of mixed race, however, there are differences. Most mixed race people are mixed race from many generations back.

Not so to any measurable degree with Obama. He had a very nearly completely black father, and a nearly completely white mother. Why is this significant?

It is significant from a genetic perspective in that it makes him not a mongrel, but rather a hybred.
The term hybred vigor really does apply. His phenotype illustrates some of the best of both races.

I try to offer this as clean of any prejudices as possible as something that merely approaches being a fact.

I like Obama. I support Obama. I hope that Obama can use what strength he may have from his genetics to help us all.

But I do think that what I have written here is true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 06/15/2008
- jesselee26 See Profile I'm a Fan of jesselee26

my children would be "hybred" since their father is west african and comes from a family who traces their tribe's history back thousands of years. as far as i know, i am generation upon generation of british cocktail.

its all very special, yes, i agree.

but, and maybe i am being cynical here, but people refer to my children, point blank, as black. they don't see much difference between my kids and kids who trace their lineage back hundreds of years here in the u.s. before crossing back to africa. that seemed to be the point of the article, to me, at any rate. nobody looks at the black people i grew up with and says, "now there is a descendant of president tyler or jefferson," though some of them were. they say, "there is a black person."

its sad, that as a nation, we have a long history of racial divide which doesn't seem to allow everyone the distinctions of heritage we all have. and we all have them, this being the great "melting pot" that it is. but that is our history. and unfortunately its a history where perception tends to trump reality, every time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 06/16/2008
- djelimon See Profile I'm a Fan of djelimon

"but it is absurd to think that there are no racial characteristics sufficient to support categorizations. "

From an evolutionary biology perspective, you are incorrect. You can make arbitrary divisions, but that's as far as it goes.

In some species, race exists, and in others it doesn't. Humans fall into the latter category, mostly because we are too young as a species to have developed true subspecies.

There are populations genetically distinct from Africans who look "African".

No matter how you attempt to partition humanity based on looks and genes, populations fall through the cracks (not just mixed-race individuals)

I leave you with this link:

http://www.virginia.edu/woodson/courses/aas102%20(spring%2001)/articles/diamond.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 06/16/2008
- Citizenofreality See Profile I'm a Fan of Citizenofreality

I agree with your analysis heyoka. I am a hybrid myself and we as yet receive no recognition for our unique identity. People believe what they want and it's useless to argue about it. I'm surprised and disappointed at the lack of understanding on both sides.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 06/16/2008
- CEKChuck See Profile I'm a Fan of CEKChuck

You know, I don't necessarily disagree with your thesis that this is a silly debate. But, I will tell you one segment of the population to whom it DOES matter that he is mixed race: those of us who are also mixed race. Being half Korean and Caucasian, I identify with neither and both of my racial heritages. There is something unique about being mixed race, just as there is with any subcultural group. While I "pass" for white, I don't feel that way, and definitely resonate with some Korean sensibilities. But most of all, when I'm in one of my more positive moods, I definitely feel like I belong to a generation where the color lines are being blurred for the better, and I definitely feel like I relate to Barack on this level.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 06/15/2008
- IndependentAllways See Profile I'm a Fan of IndependentAllways

Being of mixed race myself I agree with you. I don't think of myself in terms of "what race do I belong to" other than just the human race. Which in our society where every one feels the need to categorize everyone can be difficult sometimes. So yes, I too definitely feel comfortable in a generation where indeed the color lines are being blurred for the better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 06/16/2008
- SCMagnolia See Profile I'm a Fan of SCMagnolia

An interesting excerpt from a Salon.com article - seems the "bifurcation of Barack" has begun:

"...we just talk about him as a black candidate and her as the white candidate, and is America ready? But obviously, he's just not your average black candidate, and not just because his middle name is Hussein and so forth, but the fact that he's half-black and his black half is continental African. And that matters. And we don't talk about that that much. But I think it's [important]. There are so many things that are different about Obama from historical black leaders. He doesn't come from a clerical background, which produced leaders over the years, whether it was Martin Luther King or Jesse Jackson or more recently Al Sharpton. He is half-black and so he's not full-blooded black, so to speak, and whether you believe in one-drop racism or whatever, it does matter. He's literally lighter-skinned. And that's something that's talked about in the black community and is going to have to be talked about in the white community. And that his black half is continental. It is different when your family is recently emigrated as opposed to being a slave descendant. And I think what's going to be really interesting about all this Rorschach notion of how white America sees itself and how white America sees black America is about how it views Barack Obama as a sort of sui generis black candidate...."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 06/15/2008
- pottery See Profile I'm a Fan of pottery

ï"¿EOF, great blog.

African Americans have only to look at the beautiful Black woman Sen Obama married and
realize he has no problem with being identified as black. Or, listen to him speak about his mother
and the grandparents who raised him to know of his love and pride in their care for him. He also
speaks often of his extensive multi-cultural family. I guess the only thing I quibble with is the
inference that Obama is reticent about revealing himself as a candidate of mixed race and culture,
or that Black people are unaware of it's role in his upbringing and character. He is African
American.

It really isn't race that puzzles people, it's the notion of cross cultural influence and where he
identifies himself. Thus, he reminds people who would like to believe that he is incapable of
knowing and embracing the less obvious side of his birthright. It's not as simple as DNA, it
culture. Clearly, he has made it plain, when he spoke about Rev. Wright vis a vis his
grandmother, that he honors and affirms all parts of his heritage. Obama himself does nothing to
disaffirm any part of his who he his. You give too little credit to the character of Americans,
black and white, who have and will, vote for Obama this fall.

You know he loves to play basketball, EOF. I know because he's actually allowed himself to be
photographed driving to the basket and dishing off to the open man!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 06/15/2008
- leduck See Profile I'm a Fan of leduck

ooops, i stuck in an extra great aftre 4 but you get the point

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 06/15/2008
- leduck See Profile I'm a Fan of leduck

of course obama is of mixed race
it's the one drop rule that causes people to think he's black despite having a white mother

here's a question for all those who think they are "pure"

do you know what all your great, great, great, great, grandparents looked like and where they came from?
Parents 2
Grand parents 4
Great, great grand parents 8
Great, great, great, grand parents 16
Great, great, great, great grand parents 32
great, great, great, great, great grand parents 64

there's always an add mixture from some other continent
there's no such thing as pure
every blogger on this site is mixed if they go far enough back

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 06/15/2008
- MyThought See Profile I'm a Fan of MyThought

If you turn the candidates inside out - they brain for all of them will still be grey - yup, it's the grey matter that counts.

Is Obama's brain color different? NO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 06/15/2008
- ajax2 See Profile I'm a Fan of ajax2

The rules are clear as established in the Jim Crow South. Depending on what part of the Republican South you live in, 1% to 8% gets you to the back of the bus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 06/15/2008
- leduck See Profile I'm a Fan of leduck

if a person is 1% black,
there's no way anyone could tell

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 06/15/2008
- Daly See Profile I'm a Fan of Daly

Yeah there is, that 1% might not be reflected in the skin tone but history of small town life would know. I just looked at pcture of Dr Charles Drew the blood Pioneer black doctor and it would be difficult for me to say that he is black but if was not difficult for his era. He was treated as something less and he could not even get a blood transfusion himself because of being black.

link to photo of Dr Drew:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Drew

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 06/15/2008
- dumboldfarmer See Profile I'm a Fan of dumboldfarmer

"His Democratic primary losses to Hillary Clinton in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky showed there are legions of white voters who feel that race does matter to them. Few have said that they oppose him because he's mixed race."

Wonder why the states you mentioned seem to actually be more biased than some southern states?
Is it just me, or are the last bastions of bigotry those states? And why?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 06/15/2008
- ghd See Profile I'm a Fan of ghd

Having been raised in Pennsylvania and spent much of my adult life in the deep south, I can say that the north is really the bastion of racism and not the south.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 06/15/2008
- disgusted48 See Profile I'm a Fan of disgusted48

Not the south?
I was born and raised in PA, and have lived in CA, VA, RI, TX, and MD. Racism is everywhere. But PA and TX are hotbeds of racisim. Racism is just more overt in certain areas of the country. PA and TX are just two states where people feel comfortable being openly racist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 06/15/2008
- demfriend See Profile I'm a Fan of demfriend

Long ago we all learned that we are not pure of race. If you look at our DNA we have so many diffferent examples of having multiple "colors" that make us who we are. And yet we frequently are challenged by people who only see the surface color and judge us by that. I think it is truly sad that Barack Obama, our very first man of color to achieve the nomination to run for the President of the US who has the very obvious blending of black and white has to justify to anyone his color and backgound. Is he not the person who has shown us that the American Dream is still out there? That a small child of anyone from any background can achieve what he has and maybe become the President? That is what is important as well as who the man or woman is deep inside and what they represent and how they will represent us?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 06/15/2008
- ghd See Profile I'm a Fan of ghd

So true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 06/15/2008
- gregjones See Profile I'm a Fan of gregjones

Earl....there you go....lying again ! Your statement ..."This is the big reason that scores of blacks have been frenzied over Obama's candidacy. They have turned out in record numbers in some primaries and have given his candidacy the greatest boost forward. They have been unabashed in saying that they back him with passion and fervor because he is black." ABSOLUTELY MISLEADING AND PLAYS INTO THE LIES OF MSM....AGAIN !

Fact is, as you know Earl, there have been a number of blacks who have run for President. All blacks did not vote for them 'just because they were black'. Secondly, as you know (and were probably hired by the Clintons to address) Blacks were originally 82% in support of your girl, Hillary. Most blacks at the beginning didn't even know how to pronounce Obama's name, although they knew he was black. In Feb. 2007, we formed our net/grassroots organization, Blacks4Barack.org to help the black community learn more about this highly credible candidate, in hopes of invigorating support for Obama in the black community.

As people, of ALL races, learned more about Obama, the more they found him to be the right choice....while simultaneously, the more they learned about your girl, Hillary....the opposite occured. You have constantly mislead during this entire campaign and never ceased to try to create stumbling blocks for the Obama campaign. WELL.....IT DIDN'T WORK !!!!

Greg Jones
www.Blacks4Barack.org

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 06/15/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in