iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ed Gragert

GET UPDATES FROM Ed Gragert
 

America's Educational Exceptionalism

Posted: 12/21/11 11:29 AM ET

Worldwide, "global education" is simply known as "education." In contrast, the United States education system resists the idea that teacher and students need to learn about and engage with their peers worldwide.

US policy-makers range from being ambivalent to completely freaked-out about global education and collaboration in the classroom. The Obama Administration has clearly stated that the need to prepare the next generation of US diplomats, military officers, and global leaders in finance, health, science, technology and entrepreneurship is a national security issue. Yet, there has been no significant federal investment in international education and exchange programs for US schools. Despite the US Department of Education's National Educational Technology Plan recognizing that teaching and learning is becoming increasingly (if unevenly) global, networked, personalized and mobile, there has been no significant federal investment in preparing administrators, teachers, students and parents for globally networked, personalized "anytime, anywhere" learning.

Nor have most states, districts, foundations or corporations embraced global education and collaboration. Check out the new list of 23 Investing in Innovation (i3) finalists or the Imagine K12′s 2011 Startup Class and you will not find a single project that focuses on learning about the world or collaborating with partners abroad. The Common Core Standards makes one passing reference to learning the "fables and folktales of diverse cultures," but nothing that reflects the national security priority of our students understanding or interacting with their peers worldwide.

The main context in which most Americans frame the conversation about engaging with the world is in the need to "out-compete" it. With the exception of Alfie Kohn and a few others, our society hammers this detrimental zero-sum message into our children and their parents starting at birth. Still, despite the messaging, Americans yearn to engage and do good with the world, as exemplified by the historic Sister Cities movement, the Rotary campaign to eliminate polio, and Room to Read, as well as new efforts like The School Fund, Kiva in the Classroom, and Zynga school support in Haiti.

At a time when all US students need global competence to excel in the 21st century, collaborative movements like Connect All Schools can change the world in 2012 by sharing the global stories of US teachers and students who are re-framing the conversation. As Carol Black, the director of Schooling the World, says, there is nothing about learning that requires it to be competitive. The Connect All Schools consortium offers the US education system a model of collaboration on which to build. US teachers and students have a passionate community across the country that is committed to supporting such efforts. If we set a goal in 2012 to internationalize education for all US students, future generations of Americans will be outward-looking, locally and globally engaged, multilingual, and empathetic.

 

Follow Ed Gragert on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@iearnusa

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:50 PM on 01/05/2012
Several months ago a collaborator and myself moved the ever popular Model UN to an online venue. Most of our student participants are outside the US, but not entirely. (www.onlinemun.org). Besides the regional and global realtime debates (Future of Afghanistan, Piracy in the Indian Ocean, the Right to Protest), we are using social media to get high school students from around the world talking and collabrating together. We have small groups of people in places like Somalia and Liberia connecting (academically and socially) with kids from the UK, Singapore, Lebanon and Qatar. There is real hunger...desire for this kind of connection. Not wanting to self promote, but my feeling is programs like this are rare. I walk away from afternoon debates or collegial exchanges on FB with the sense that if you build something meaningful, they will come.

It's hard t connect with like minded teachers. I would highly recommend the Global Education Collabrative http://globaleducation.ning.com/ as another venue to like minded teachers to connect.
01:16 AM on 01/09/2012
Thank you for the message. Model UN, in which a lot of iEARN participants worldwide have participated, continues to be very popular-- great to hear about this new online version.

Totally agree about the Global Education Collaborati­ve and the awesome Global Education Conference that Lucy Gray and Steve Hargadon facilitated for the second time last November.

Programs and networks like these may be rare right now, but, yes, if we build something meaningful, they will come and make global collaboration commonplace among schools in the US and everywhere. Let's do it!
01:01 PM on 12/22/2011
As a teacher myself, I can say 100% that students are being exposed to things globally. However, with limited (extremely low) funds or items a teacher can only do so much. It is very important for our future generations to understand and contribute to global affairs. It can be done as early as elementary schools if the help is there. It is not the teachers or the students, it is the non-interest of our education from the government.
12:03 AM on 12/23/2011
Thanks for the comment

What local, state and federal resources, support and tools would help you help your students to understand and contribute to global affairs?
09:51 AM on 12/23/2011
Well the biggest thing would be funding. Funding would provide a great amount of resources. The tools that would be the biggest help would be technology. I have over 25 students and only three computers (which are outdated). How can they get on and learn all about the world or connect with people with little time on the computer. Other tools would include books, guest speakers, field trips, etc. The technology piece to me is the most important tool, students and teachers could become so advantaged with the use of any kind of technology. The students can not contribute if they do not know or understand; if students experience it they will learn!
10:36 PM on 12/21/2011
The "IB" program matches global standards and is spreading. My daughter is taking a number of IB classes. The English and History classes are very good - better than those I took. The Science classes seem to be quite good, but appear to not be challenging enough for my daughter. She is not taking the IB math, as she is moving at her own pace, which is faster than that of IB. Talking to others, I think the 3 year IB math curriculum is quite good. We would do well to use it as a model and then see how to improve it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
09:33 PM on 12/21/2011
Does "globally engaged" actually mean anything or is it just a feel good talking point?
11:47 PM on 12/22/2011
Definitely meaningful for many teachers and students. At a time when 48% of 6th to 12th graders say that there are bored at school*, global classroom connections are very engaging. Here is a sample article of this type of engagement: http://www.edutopia.org/blog/day-in-the-life-chris-baer

Or check out these reviews of iEARN participants, who aren't just spouting feel-good talking points: http://greatnonprofits.org/reviews/profile2/iearn

Hundreds of other organizations can share similar testimonials. Globally engaged classrooms are great places to find the aspects of education reform on which our country needs to focus.

(* From: Quaglia Institute for Student Aspirations My Voice National Student Report 2010 http://myvoice.pearsonfoundation.org/about/research)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
02:18 PM on 12/23/2011
Haven't bored students been common for nearly a century or more though? It's certainly been around long enough to have become cliche in tv, movies, etc. This stuff looks cool and possibly useful but I've never put much stock in articles or editorials going on about how awful the state of education is today. We've heard the same thing since Sputnik if not earlier but the general level of education has gone up not down since the '50s, just think college attendance numbers. There's things that could be fixed in education but "end is nigh" talk doesn't help anything.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Ed Gragert
02:50 PM on 12/23/2011
For me, globally engaged means exactly that--meaningful dialogue, interaction, collaborative research, etc. with peers around the world--so that students are learning with and teaching others internationally. This is happening on a daily basis within iEARN, in which about 2 million students are engaged daily in collaborative educational projects. But, it needs to be scaled to 2 billion and the technology exists to make this happen. What will be needed is considerable teacher professional development on how to integrate global engagement across the curriculum.