More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ed Martin

Ed Martin

Posted: February 18, 2011 10:19 AM

The biggest surprise of this somewhat lifeless midseason is the creative resurgence of Fox's American Idol.

One might assert that the renewed appeal of this show should come as no surprise at all, given the major changes made to it by its many executive producers following the multitude of bad choices that crippled Idol during its last two seasons. That's certainly a valid observation: How could it not improve with a return to the three-judge format (instead of the clunky four-judge fiasco) and the elimination of celebrity guest judges who are not invested in the show during the crucial audition process?

Those big changes certainly helped, but it's the deluxe alterations that have really made the difference. I'm talking, of course, about the recruitment of legendary Aerosmith front man Steven Tyler and multi-talented entertainer Jennifer Lopez to replace judges Simon Cowell and Kara DioGuardi. Overall, I think Tyler and Lopez have been a little too soft in their support of many marginally talented amateurs. One look at the formidable Mr. Cowell in that brilliantly scheduled Super Bowl ad for his upcoming Fox series The X-Factor instantly reinforced my suspicions that he would not have sat idly by and let a number of this season's hopefuls through to Hollywood. But their participation this season swiftly set the "new" Idol apart from the "old" (as in "tired") one. The result has been a surprisingly sweet treat -- a wholly unexpected, twice weekly surge of warm, feel good television that has done much to take the unrelenting chill off what has been a perfectly dismal winter for most of the country.

When I first heard that Lopez was likely joining Idol -- before word came down that Tyler was also a hot contender -- I thought Jenny from the Block might bring a certain natural compassion to the show that had been lacking since the departure of Paula Abdul. So I was willing to give her a chance, even though I had gone on the record several times with my concerns that adding even one huge celebrity to Idol's on-camera team would likely compromise a show that owed its phenomenal success to its unique ability to transform unknowns into giant stars. (I'm not talking about the contestants only: Cowell, Randy Jackson and Ryan Seacrest were unknown to the American viewing public when Idol made its debut in 2002, and Abdul at the time was a fading star at best.)

Lopez has indeed proven to be a fine addition to Idol this season, but the real surprise has been the fast-growing appeal of Steven Tyler. He's not just a wild, bad-ass party boy: He's a warm, supportive, gently funny man with an ear for untapped talent; a performer who can't resist performing when another talented singer hits the right notes. How charming was it to watch him not only express his admiration for so many of the would-be contestants but to sing along with them during their auditions? I thought putting unknowns at the mercy of larger than life superstars would, as they say in network offices, damage the DNA of the show in such a way as to make it less pleasing to watch. But thanks to Tyler's unrestrained enthusiasm just the opposite has happened (though I do long for those priceless moments when Cowell would unsparingly cut down the smug and the self-involved).

Given its troubling past history with celebrity contributors, up to and including the really bad decision last season to add Ellen DeGeneres as a judge, I thought Idol in Season 10 should go with lesser known (but no less capable) personalities, such as the stern but big-hearted Gareth Malone of the BBC's brilliant observational reality series The Choir and Anastasia Brown, the life of the party on the much-missed Nashville Star. But I have to agree with a point Cowell made during a recent interview when he remarked that it was wise of the Idol producers to make it into something new, which they certainly have, rather than try to keep it as it was.

Still, I'm not going to fully retract my initial resistance to the addition of Tyler and Lopez to Idol until we're well into the individual competition shows, because that's when their new jobs will get really difficult. They must, on live television, repeatedly come up with smart things to say about the same contestants -- things that are both constructive for the singers and engaging to the many millions of people watching at home. And even before that, Tyler, Lopez and Jackson will have to prove that they can cultivate a group of finalists in whom viewers will want to invest their time. As has been well documented, that ability seemed to utterly elude Cowell, Jackson, DioGuardi and DeGeneres last season. Similarly, Cowell, Jackson, DioGuardi and Abdul brought us only one memorable contestant two seasons back - the highly entertaining Adam Lambert, who has enjoyed far greater success post-Idol than that season's winner, Kris Allen.

Also in the weeks to come, we'll discover whether or not additional changes to the show that have yet to be seen, including the contributions of music producer Jimmy Iovine as in-house mentor, are as pleasantly impactful and excitingly received as the talents of Tyler and Lopez. As this occasionally maddening powerhouse has demonstrated time and again, there are no certainties in the ongoing phenomenon that is American Idol.

 

Follow Ed Martin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PlanetEd

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:22 AM on 02/22/2011
I am loving the new judges. I like the competance and the interaction with the auditioners. There have been some mistakes IMHO... including not moving Chelsee Oaks on you can see more on article http://www.examiner.com/celebrity-headlines-in-national/american-idol-exclusive-chelsee-oaks-family-talks-idol-it-is-so-worth-it

I especially like how JLO goes for gut... and STeven Tyler you can tell when he buys into a contestant. The other contestant I really liked was Jacob Lusk = that boy brought down the house.

I do miss Simon and sometimes Paula but I think the new judges have it too... it is just a slightly differnet chemistry and they will pull it together.
photo
MiraMcB
An eternally optimistic skeptic.
10:10 AM on 02/19/2011
I've been watching snippets of this season's Idol here and there, but I havent' really be able to "commit" to it and block out two or three hours per week to watch. Thus far, it has been a bit boring to me. Sleep-inducing, even, at times. I've nodded off and, faced with the prospect of having to rescreen the whole thing, gave up and went to bed.

The lack of Simon is a big factor. Can't deny it. Having said that, I think the two new judges are fine, if perhaps a little too heavy on the syrup so far. We shall see more reality there when it goes to the live shows and they can't heavily edited the thing.

Other than that, same ole same old format. I am not sure why the 4-judge format doesn't work on Idol. It works very well on X Factor. Maybe a chemistry thing in previous attempts on Idol. Kara what's-her-name, the unlikeable, then Ellen, whom I enjoy, but wasn't suited to critiquing folks. It was a mess.

Overall, I'm left with the feeling of waiting for the other shoe to drop. That shoe is probably X Factor. It will have Simon (huge bonus points), I like the format better. The production values are HUGELY superior (at least on the UK version), etc. Mentoring/judges' houses, age ranges, Under 25's (boys/girls), Overs, GROUPS! (That's major.)

Really looking forward to XF. I think I'm done with Idol.
09:17 PM on 02/18/2011
The last 24 list has been leaked and it will be interesting to see, as you wrote -- if the new judges are able to spot stars like they're supposed to. The list that I saw, as I recall, there are about five that IMO don't belong on the Idol Stage. But it's TV, and IMO the producers aren't looking for "stars" as much as they are ratings.
photo
MiraMcB
An eternally optimistic skeptic.
10:17 AM on 02/19/2011
Yes, I think so, too. They always have that formula for the requisite numbers of train wrecks, sob stories, general filler/canon fodder and a few actually good acts. Gotta have "good TV". The problem is, after 9 seasons, we can all pretty much see it coming. It's getting a bit like your favorite uncle doing his "pull the coin" trick from behind your ear. You loved it when you were 6. You're just indulging him when your 16.