There were two stories that made the front-page news last week. One had to do with art and an obscene amount of money. The other was a cringe-inducing story about the shameful treatment by the Chinese authorities of yet another political dissident, Chen Guangcheng.
The first story, as you have already probably guessed, had to do with the record amount of money paid at auction for Edvard Munch's "The Scream." Of the four existing versions of this world famous image, this was the only one still in private hands, while others are in Norwegian museums.
As one of the most recognizable, the most often reproduced artworks of our time, "The Scream" has become almost a brand unto itself, a sort of priceless icon. And all of a sudden it is for sale. Is it a great work of art? Is it worth $120 million? Would I spend this amount of money on it if I were a museum director? It is difficult for me to give a definitive answer.
A great painting by Cezanne, a late self-portrait by Rembrandt, or a religious, erotically charged image by Caravaggio -- these would inspire me to beg museum trustees to open their wallets. And yet, why would so many people recognize "The Scream," but not the works of the great artists that I cherish?
In an interview with the Christian Science Monitor, I suggested that the unique power of this late-19th century iconic artwork comes from its ability to predict and embody all the horror and destruction of the coming 20th century. One doesn't need to know a thing about Munch, Norway or European art history for that matter, to have an immediate gut reaction to this screaming face on the bridge. In its utter despair, this creature screams for all of humanity and therefore, with a nod to John Donne, I want to say: Don't ask for whom the Munch screams, it screams for thee...
The other story dominating the news last week was the inhuman treatment of a blind, legal activist Chen Guangcheng by the Chinese government. Escaping house arrest he seriously damaged his leg but nevertheless managed to reach the safety of the U.S. Embassy in Beijing. After diplomatic negotiations at the highest level, he left the embassy for the hospital, and sort of, kind of, was promised a safe passage to America, if one can trust the promises of the Chinese government.
And that brings me to the shameful treatment of Ai Weiwei, the world-famous Chinese dissident artist of amazing talent and unsurpassed courage. His story is eloquently told in a soon-to-be-released documentary by first-time director Alison Klayman, who gained close access to the artist and his family.
The "Bird's Nest" stadium Ai Weiwei designed became a symbol of the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. But disgusted by the government propaganda surrounding the Olympics, he refused to allow his name to be used.
For years he has been a thorn in the side of the Chinese government, literally giving the finger to the powers that be. There is a famous series of photographs of his middle finger in front of Tiananmen Square and other sites of global authority in Paris, Berlin, and Washington.
After the disastrous earthquake in China that killed more than 5,000 children in shoddily built schools, an event that the authorities tried to downplay, Ai Weiwei started to collect the names of the victims and put them on his blog. Needless to say, his blog was shut down and his studio compound in Shanghai was destroyed. Then, under pretense of unpaid taxes, he was imprisoned for three months and only recently released.
If that's how a famous artist is treated, just think what happens to the unknown dissidents in China. It makes one want to scream.
Banner Image: (L) Auction at Sotheby's in New York on May 2, 2012, photo from the Associated Press; (R) Detail of The Scream (1895) by Edvard Munch, photo courtesy of Sotheby's
Edward Goldman is an art critic and the host of "Art Talk," a program on art and culture for KCRW 89.9 FM. To listen to the show and hear Edward's charming Russian accent, click here.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.