More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

"The Jews have three veltn (worlds): di velt (this world), yene velt (the next world), and Roosevelt."
--Judge Jonah Goldstein, the 1945 Republican candidate for mayor of New York City

In the nearly eighty years since President Franklin Roosevelt launched the New Deal with a pledge to "help the forgotten man," relations between American Jews and the Democratic Party have been as close as lips and teeth. Even as Jews prospered and assimilated into the mainstream of American life, most of them remained loyal to FDR's liberal vision and refrained from following the pattern of other affluent groups by shifting to the Republican Party. Over the course of the past twenty elections, a stunning 75 percent of the Jewish vote has on average gone to the Democratic presidential candidate. As the old saying goes: "Jews earn like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans."

If further proof of this were needed, it was provided by the 2008 election of Barack Obama. On a key issue for many Jewish voters -- support for Israel -- the hawkish John McCain started off with a decisive advantage over Obama, whose past associations with the anti-Semitic Reverend Jeremiah Wright and the Israel-bashing Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi raised troubling questions in the minds of many Jews. And yet, when the vote was tallied, Obama trounced McCain among Jews by a staggering 57 point margin.

"After decades of involvement in the civil rights movement by American Jews, Obama stirred deep emotions in the Jewish community," Bret Stephens, the deputy editorial page editor of the Wall Street Journal, told us. "The black-Jewish alliance was shattered in the late 1960s, and Jews have yearned ever since to restore it. Jews felt good about voting for Obama, for not only were they voting for a guy they agreed with and liked, but they were also voting for their own personal redemption."

All this should provide comfort to President Obama as his party heads into the fall's hotly contested midterm elections and fights to hold onto its majorities in the House and Senate. Faced with public frustration over the flailing economy, high unemployment, massive federal deficits, out-of-control illegal immigration, and the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, Democratic candidates need all the help they can get from their friends. And although Jews represent a mere 4 percent of the American electorate, their political activism and fund-raising prowess give them leverage in important battleground states.

There's only one hitch. Today, a sizable number of American Jews are having a serious case of buyer's remorse when it comes to Barack Obama. Recent polls of the Jewish community reflect a significant decline in support from 2008, when 78 percent of Jewish voters pulled the lever for Obama. According to a recent McLaughlin & Associates poll, a plurality of Jewish voters would now consider voting for someone else for president.

These poll numbers do not begin to measure the depth of displeasure felt by many of Jews over President Obama's performance. Their bill of particulars covers a wide variety of complaints, including the president's frosty behavior toward businessmen in general and Wall Street in particular. But what really appears to irritate American Jews is the president's roughhouse treatment of Israel.

Obama has recently backed off from some of his public assaults on Israel, but he is still in trouble with large segments of the Jewish community. Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the coordinating body for 52 Jewish groups, estimates that Obama may have lost the support of as much as one-third of Jewish voters. That may overstate the case, but as we discovered during interviews with more than a dozen Jewish leaders over the past several months, many Jews have become so annoyed with the Obama administration that they have closed their wallets and are seriously thinking of sitting out the 2010 election. According to an analysis of Federal Election Commission records by the Washington Post, contributions to Democratic candidates from the financial sector, where Jews hold important positions, are down 65 percent from two years ago.

"I started breaking with Obama ten months ago," says Martin Peretz, editor in chief of The New Republic. "And I know that a lot of West Coast Jews are also having buyer's remorse. The gut of it is Israel. Will Jews mobilize for Obama in the fall elections? They might be too embarrassed to come out directly against him. But I'll give you one sign of the times: Chuck Schumer [New York's senior Senator] waited a year and a half before he stood up for Israel, and he's been having trouble raising money on Wall Street."

"The assumption on the part of the Obama administration is that because Jews are liberals, they simply will not vote for Republicans," says the Hollywood billionaire Haim Saban, one of the Democratic Party's mega-donors. "Obama can invite the ten most prolific Jewish campaign bundlers to the White House for a discussion, and give a wonderful speech, and he'll think that this may resolve all his problems with American Jews. And it may--or it may not."

"The idea that we saw a black president in our lifetime is wonderful," says New York City's former mayor, Ed Koch. "It conveyed to us that this country has come such a long way. But I never fully accepted that Obama didn't hear his minister [Jeremiah Wright] make those awful anti-Semitic statements over 20 years. I wanted to believe him. I willed myself to believe him.... What he has done is break that trust. Like Humpty Dumpty, once you break it, you can't put it together again."

Correction: an earlier version said that Mr Saban had "privately expressed his dismay with 'the leftists' in the White House." Upon further investigation, the authors discovered Mr. Saban had made no such statement.

This is the end of part one of a five-part series. For part two, click here.

 
"The Jews have three veltn (worlds): di velt (this world), yene velt (the next world), and Roosevelt." --Judge Jonah Goldstein, the 1945 Republican candidate for mayor of New York City In the nearly ...
"The Jews have three veltn (worlds): di velt (this world), yene velt (the next world), and Roosevelt." --Judge Jonah Goldstein, the 1945 Republican candidate for mayor of New York City In the nearly ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 85
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Berryives
11:57 PM on 10/11/2010
We should quit supporting Israel in any form unless it gets serious about respecting the rights of Palestinians to form their own state, which means they must leave all occupied Palestinian territory. This is an issue with great leverage due to the broad irritation our position poses for Muslims in many countries. Time to threaten to end our $3 billion/yr subsidy to Israel unless they straighten up and fly right.
photo
Greg Mirsky
Riga dimd, Riga dimd, Kas to Rigu dimdinaj?
08:04 PM on 10/11/2010
Curious, why my comment was blocked. I haven't saved it all but will try:
I think that quote from Mr.Haim Saban is the closest to the root of not only Jewish concern with today Democratic Party but Americans that believe in special connection between United States and Israel - far-left rhetoric and actions coming from the white House, DNC, and groups closely associated with the Democratic Party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:38 PM on 10/09/2010
Fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on you. Obama is certainly not, with his deeds and ideas, freindly to the jewish community.

Heck its almost similar to the gay and lesbian comminity. Ignore what he says, watch what he does(or doesnt do) and who he hangs with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
allejandro
02:14 PM on 10/08/2010
Wow Huffington Post. Even the Politico's Ben Smith is calling this hit piece "spiked" journalism that was dropped from Vanity Fair. What men's room floor did you find it clinging to?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:39 PM on 10/09/2010
Well, conisdering that Vanity Fair ran the Palin piece, they certainly know hit pieces when they run them....
11:47 PM on 10/07/2010
This didn't get a lot of press in the U.S. This is from an Israeli newspaper.

Israeli missile defense programs gain further US backing (update)
In 2011, various anti-missile programs will get record funding of around $423 million.
3 August 10 10:50, Ran Dagoni, Washington
The latest US aid figures for Israeli missile Defense programs in the US 2011 fiscal year ought to please Israel’s defense establishment: next year, various anti-missile programs will get record funding of around $423 million, more than double the figure for 2010.
The jump in US funding for Israel's missile defense programs comes from a one-time $205 million grant for the procurement of ten Iron Dome batteries for defense against short-range missiles, which the government loudly trumpeted in May. The White House said at the time, "The President recognizes the threat to Israel from Hizbullah and Hamas's missile batteries."

http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000579231
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leucippe
07:25 PM on 10/06/2010
This is inflammatory and misleading. Journalists should be part of the solution and not the problem.
photo
Daniel Sieradski
Co-founder, Occupy Judaism · Digital strategist,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:06 PM on 10/06/2010
From Chuck Schumer have trouble "raising money on Wall Street" to criticism of democrats by "Hollywood billionaire" Haim Saban, I'd say this article paints a pretty stereotypical picture of American Jews. But I guess the author is one of the flock so it doesn't matter (maybe)
11:54 AM on 10/06/2010
You cannot be a liberal and support Israel's vile treatment of the Palestinians regardless of religion.Israel more and more resembles South africa during aparthied.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skye
11:03 PM on 10/05/2010
What a bunch of rubbish. I hate articles like this and I don't believe the in those so called polls. Marty Peretz, Hain Saban and Ed Koch don't speak for many American Jews including me and I resent that the authors of this article would even suggest they do. I don't think Israel is on the top of the list for most American Jews but we support Obama when it comes to his dealing with it. Jewish Dems care about the same issues as other Dems, have the same issues with Obama as other Dems and they're not going to start voting for Republicans.
09:10 AM on 10/06/2010
"Jewish Dems care about the same issues as other Dems, have the same issues with Obama as other Dems and they're not going to start voting for Republicans."

I agree. This article is no different in substance or tone then a writer presuming to speak for the entire African-American community by stating that they all plan on voting for Obama because he's black, or saying that African-Americans had buyer's remorse with x, y, or z politician because they didn't care enough about African countries. It's crass stereotyping.
11:56 PM on 10/07/2010
I agree with you. I'm Jewish, and I support President Obama. Perception isn't always reality. Yes, he wants to Israel to stop building new settlements, which he sees as an impediment to peace. But he is concerned with Israel's security as evidenced by this article at the link below.

http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000579231

Tea Party candidates say they care about Israel, but they've said they wouldn't give financial aid for Israel's defense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
10:24 PM on 10/05/2010
quoting peretz who recently said muslims don't deserve first amendment is a joke...guess obama is better off without people like peretz carrying his election pin on his chest...
09:26 PM on 10/05/2010
Although an affront at this time, construction on Israeli settlements need not ultimately be contradictory to the establishment of a Palestinian state.

If the Israeli settlers want to stay on Palestinian land, then let them. However, they must ultimately do without protection of the Israeli army, their roads must be open to Palestinians to use, and they should pay taxes to the Palestinian government as residents. They can remain Israeli citizens, and they should be eligible to apply for citizenship in Palestine. The Palestinian police force has been demonstrating its competence at maintaining order and safety, so the settlements should become their responsibility like any other town in the state.

Win-win: the settlers get to stay on their presumed Biblical lands, but they have to abide by the laws of the state where that land resides, and the Palestinians get a contiguous land for their state. So, the negotiations can proceed.

The gesture today by the rabbis bringing the korans to the burnt mosque hints to me that Jewish settlements can live in harmony in a Palestinian state. There's no reason the settlers cannot keep their Jewish customs in the land that means so much to them. They don't need a Jewish government to maintain their roads.
04:04 PM on 10/05/2010
Just so you know, not all Jews support the oppressive Zionist state. It kind of goes against some of our core values.
04:28 PM on 10/05/2010
That may well be, but a LARGE majority do support ISRAEL (you seem to have forgotten its name), as do a large majority of all Americans.
04:52 PM on 10/05/2010
Let's be clear, I have no beef with the Israeli people. I have family there.

I'm not really sure what you mean by 'a LARGE majority do support ISRAEL', I think most ethically minded people would not condone acts of oppression, abuse, war or terrorism no matter who is dealing it out.
03:49 PM on 10/05/2010
"But what really appears to irritate American Jews is the president's roughhouse treatment of Israel."

"Obama has recently backed off from some of his public assaults on Israel, but he is still in trouble with large segments of the Jewish community"

Considering like all presidents, Obama has suffered a drop in popularity after being elected and those numbers are no higher in the Jewish community than in the rest of the American population, I'm a bit uncomfortable with this one author making enormous generalization for million of other people based on their ethnic group. This article seems to be making an inordinate amount of mass generalizations and stereotypes about Jewish Americans. A lot of this writing seems to be playing to the worst sorts of beliefs. If it were a non-Jewish writer putting out a doom and gloom piece implying that Jews control elections and Obama had better watch out because "large segments" of the American Jewish community are more loyal to Israel then they are to America they would rightly be called anti-Semitic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:20 PM on 10/04/2010
The jewish groups mentioned were never pro-obama. I suspect if they are disenchanted it is for the same reason the rest of the population is. The fact that he is much farther to the right than he governs.
photo
shothot
same, same, but different
06:31 PM on 10/05/2010
Always considered myself to the left, but apparently I've become a rightist, since I agree and wholeheartily condone and approve of Obama's policies. It might even appear many of the lefties have move to the right as they too agree with his policies. Guess one can only say, "the only thing that's permanent is change".