iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Elizabeth Kucinich

Elizabeth Kucinich

Posted: November 15, 2010 04:29 PM

As Congress goes back in session today for the final weeks of the 111th Congress, with the political mood of the country in uproar, it is essential that members and the leadership make legislative decisions based on our national, social and fiscal priorities that underscore democratic principles.

With the president's announcement last week of the postponement of troop withdrawal from the impossible war in Afghanistan from 2011 to 2014, at the cost of $190 million per day (according to a recent CRS report to Congress), one would call these priorities into question. These three additional years of war in Afghanistan will add more than $169 billion to the $365.5 billion we taxpayers have already forked over in this conflict.

In the coming days, the Child Nutrition Reauthorization Bill will be voted upon. The House has a bill would cost just $2.2 million per day ($8 billion over 10 years). A bargain at the price of feeding our nations needy children and providing for healthier food, cholesterol-free, plant-based and organic options, expanded nutrition programs and increased nutrition standards and education.

The whole 10-year child nutrition program proposed by the House of Representatives could be paid for with just 42 days worth of Afghanistan war spending.

And yet there are political forces in the Senate unwilling to pass such legislation, instead trying to force the House to accept the Senate's watered-down bill. This is a grave mistake.

How is it that we can unquestioningly fund illegal war, but not feed our children? Where better to invest our tax dollars than in the health and vitality of our children?

Children are our future. Their health, education and well being should be the nation's number-one priority. They are our nation's number-one responsibility. The track of a child's development into adulthood correlates directly to the health and vitality of the future of our nation and our world.

But today, the health and vitality of our nation is at risk because of preventable diseases caused by poor eating habits. A childhood-obesity epidemic is causing unprecedented rates of diabetes, heart disease, and other health problems. Because of political inertia and corporate monopoly of our food supply, children face a future of heart surgery, dialysis, and other treatments needed for complications brought about by a diet high in saturated fat and cholesterol. The long- and short-term health and economic costs will rock our families and our nation for decades to come unless we address the dietary behaviors that are directly causing this these health issues.

There is a tremendous opportunity to effectively and cheaply reverse the decline in public health by starting with the food we serve to children in schools. Sadly, the Child Nutrition Reauthorization process has brought to light our nation's lack of commitment to our children's health. The political stalemate in Congress over finding funding to feed our children healthy food is outrageous.

With the present overload of high-fat, high-cholesterol food, the artery walls of overweight children look more like those of an average 45 year old, according to a study presented at an American Heart Association convention. Yet neither the child, nor the 45 year old ever need to get to this point.

President Clinton recently explained that his decision to change his diet and go vegan was so that he could naturally -- without drugs -- clear his arteries, reverse his heart disease and have the added benefit of easily losing weight.

Only meat and dairy foods contain cholesterol whereas plant-based foods (whole grains, fruit, vegetables, legumes) have no cholesterol and are very low in saturated fat.

The House version of the Child Nutrition Reauthorization Bill contains provisions that will enable schools to serve more healthy, plant-based foods. This is significant because diets rich in plant-based foods with little or no meat, dairy, poultry or fish, have been scientifically proven to prevent and also help reverse some of the most common and debilitating illnesses, the causes of rising healthcare costs and death in America today.

It is time to invest in our real national security, the health of our children! Congress must find the money to fund and pass the House version of the Child Nutrition Act, H.R. 5504. The stripped down Senate version simply will not do.

 
As Congress goes back in session today for the final weeks of the 111th Congress, with the political mood of the country in uproar, it is essential that members and the leadership make legislative dec...
As Congress goes back in session today for the final weeks of the 111th Congress, with the political mood of the country in uproar, it is essential that members and the leadership make legislative dec...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SweetJudith
06:07 PM on 11/24/2010
I agree with everything you've written Elizabeth. It's make all the since in the world. As a vegan I try and feed our grandsons everything my husband and I eat, but it's very difficult when our son-in-laws don't always agree. But we will never quit trying as long as we are the sitters..So thrilled when President Clinton changed his diet, it's a start, a beginning...Our children are going to die at a very early age if something isn't done, it has to start now...And the very thought of all the animals that would no longer suffer at the brutal hands of mankind gives me hope..Come on America, give the children a fighting chance.......Thank you for a wonderful post........Judith
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
12:19 PM on 11/16/2010
Pretty amazing in this day and age, putting personal greed and ambitions above the needs of the people they are supposed to serve. Somehow, they think the world is theirs to dominate, with US children as their soldiers. Keep the people misinformed, and they can continue to do as they choose.

Let's demand that taxes on the rich be doubled, businesses that make windfalls be forced to contribute to our society, companies taking jobs overseas must be penalized.
12:28 PM on 11/28/2010
I agree entirely, without the ciizens of America being of top priority the nation will
continue sliding into a third world country . As with other world countries the top 5 percent
of the people controll 95 percent of the wealth. Wealth that as been gained by riding the
backs of its citizens. Using both cheap labor and lack of a personal right to pursue their
constitutional rights to life and the pursuit of wealth themselves.

This has been in the works for a" New World Order" for the last 20 years. As with our
military everything is planned for many years in advance. This secretive planning
prevents
objection or interference from ciizens who would try to stop them. China makes all our
ammunitin not only for personal guns, but our military as well.

The wealthy power players are after control of all working people from all countries in the
world.
This "New World Order," is directly responsible for what is happening in America. They
must
render the American people helpless without money and property. Without these two
foundations for a man and his family to stand upon they are easily controlled. The citizen
should
be thankful for whatever job they can get to sustain life. This is a Narcissistic approach
for domination. and control of people.
google.... tears and healing.com

quote; Hitler, Germany 1938

" When you control the bread and butter that a man can put upon his table. You can
control the man."
11:17 AM on 11/16/2010
Congress needs to stop worrying about the war in another country and focus on the epidemic we have at hand. Childhood obesity will continue to keep growing unless we change our eating habits.
02:47 AM on 11/16/2010
Elizabeth, what you say makes total sense to me. It's hard for me to comprehend how legislators could not support this bill. Without health, a country can't be successful. And the food we eat has a direct affect on our health. If this bill is not adopted, I feel sorry for the children, who are at the mercy of the adults; I worry about our future.

Judy Pokras, author, The Little e-Book of Raw Vegan Holiday Recipes
04:29 AM on 11/16/2010
Really? How many legislators do you think really care about "the kids"--especially the poor kids? They don't care about any of us. The United States Government has nothing but disdain for us. Look at where they're cutting spending; where the "deficit committee" proposes to cut in the future; look at the increasingly ridiculous lies they sell us to explain why our loved ones are still overseas fighting the fake wars against terror. Then look at where spending cuts are disallowed, whose taxes we're thinking about cutting to "help the deficit," look who is profiting from the blood of our loved ones and innocents in Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan. The government can't even credibly PRETEND TO represent the people anymore. We've just had the biggest heist ever of the American treasury, and nobody of consequence has gone to jail for it. Instead, government is working with the corporate criminals to protect THEM. And Dem/GOP doesn't even matter anymore. They are both corporate-controlled, right-wing parties who only differ in terms of how few crumbs they're willing to toss the middle class and the poor of this country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SweetJudith
05:54 PM on 11/24/2010
Fanned.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sino53
08:43 PM on 11/15/2010
There's nothing "illegal" about the Afghanistan war.

We undertook that war in our own self-defense after 19 Islamic terrorists vaporized 3,000 American men, women and CHILDREN. Yes, children, Ms. Kucinich, whom who claim to love so much.

The U.N. Charter grants every member state the right to defend itself without U.N. approval. And that's what we did. No thanks to you.

As for programs to help child nutrition, these could be funded in full if the United States withdrew altogether from the U.N.--that collection of worthless international cockroaches--and spent the money here on our own people.

The U.N. was America's idea. And it turned out to be a bad idea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
12:16 AM on 11/16/2010
You're totally right about the war in Afghanistan. It's tragic that the neocons seem to have guaranteed that we will LOSE that war to the Taliban and Bin Laden because of the 1000% percent illegal, and utterly lying, proxy war for Likud to "protect" Israel, not us, the neocons waged in Iraq, thereby completely neglecting Afghanistan and allowing the Taliban to regroup and ultimately drive us out of their country. This defeat caused by the neocons will, of course, mean that the whole Afghanistan war was fought in vain, as it never would have been, if we hadn't had neocons running the Pentagon to protect Israel not us. Next, of course, these neocons will blow thousands more American lives and trillions more in debt to again protect Israel, not us, by using our blood and treasure to illegally invade Iran for Netanyahu and friends.
04:03 AM on 11/16/2010
And you're wrong on Iraq. We went after Saddam for two reasons: 1) oil and 2) because he started trading oil in euros instead of dollars, thereby threatening US dollar hegemony. Little known fact that whole trading oil in euros thing. (Couldn't have anything to do with having a corporate-controlled media, could it?) After we took out Saddam, tore up the country, and wrote the new Iraqi Constitution (because we love and respect freedom, democracy, and civil rights so much that we don't think any country has a right to write their own constitution), we got Iraq trading oil in dollars again.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
07:09 PM on 11/15/2010
I think when trying to promote new policy they should begin to express budgetary amounts as "# of days of Pentagon budget". Something like "this program has an annual cost of 1.5 Pentagon Days" or "this is going to cost us 1 aircraft carrier over the next 30yrs". Perhaps then people might be able to better grasp what we give up to have a grotesquely bloated military.
05:53 PM on 11/15/2010
The answer is simple. Because after Vietnam, the Military Industrial Complex manipulated a compromise (repeal of the draft) so they could continue to make billions selling arms and starting wars. What should have happened is we should have kept the draft (2 years service, like Norway) and demanded an end to profiting from wars, and engagement in wars only as a last resort. Now we're in a situation where the MIC has so much power I cannot imagine an end to war. I believe there will always be one from this point on, and without an Eisenhower era tax rate for the rich, education will continue to suffer. These people don't give two hoots about kids, because their kids will always be able to afford private schools. Great plan
12:42 PM on 11/28/2010
It is great to meet another who knows the history behind what is happening. Only when this plan has
began to separate people from their own creature comforts, and money, that they pull their heads out of that hole in the ground. They wonder around wondering which way to go. Be patient the government will soon find a useful purpose for the slave labor lowly workers. First the Mexicans, and other foreighners within the American borders. Then the Amerians will have no choice if they which to survive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockyrococoAZ
ArizonaEagletarian (dot) com
05:35 PM on 11/15/2010
A sad commentary on what people think freedom and democracy should mean. Indeed, getting the nation's children started properly nutrition-wise is a sound investment for the long-term.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Sick Of Greed
05:27 PM on 11/15/2010
good luck with changing the minds of those who want a never ending war....
get used to it, we have permanent bases in Irsaq, who is to say we are ever going to leave
any other country?
this country is moving in reverse...so sad
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyeshinka
05:23 PM on 11/15/2010
There is nothing to be gained by spending money on our kids. Healthy kids? Why? Do you realize what would happen to the stock prices of drug companies if nobody needed drugs to control weight, diabetes, cholesterol, erectile dysfunction---all ailments that are indirectly related to bad food and bad diet? America's priorities have always been to make the rich richer and the poor poorer, and they take pleasure in the destruction of whatever measly wealth possessed by the middle class. That's the way it is, and I doubt it can ever change.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
07:03 PM on 11/15/2010
As long as people believe that change for the better is impossible, it will be. We have the ability, for some reason ignorance, self interest, apathy, whatever we have chosen not to use it.