"I don't care if it's a white cat or a black cat. It's a good cat so long as it catches mice." -- Deng Xiaoping, who opened China to foreign investment after 1978China is being called a "miracle economy." It seems to have decoupled from the rest of the world, preserving an 8% growth rate while the rest of the world sinks into the worst recession since the 1930s. How is that phenomenal growth rate possible, when other countries relying heavily on exports have suffered major downturns and remain in the doldrums? Economist Richard Wolff skeptically observes:
We now have a situation in the world where we have a global capitalist crisis. Everywhere, consumption is down. Everywhere, people are buying fewer goods, including goods from China. How is it possible that in that society, so dependent on the world economy, they could now have an explosive growth? Their stock market is now 100 percent higher than at its low -- nothing remotely like that hardly anywhere in the world, certainly not in the United States or Europe. How is that possible? In order to believe what the Chinese are saying, you would have to agree that in a matter of months, at most a year, no more, they have been able to transform their economy from an export-based powerhouse to a domestically focused industrial engine. Nowhere in the world has that ever taken less than decades.
Perhaps, and the United States has certainly failed to pull that result off with its own stimulus plan; but there is a notable difference between its stimulus plan and China's. What Wolff calls a "global capitalist crisis" is actually a credit crisis; and in China, unlike in the U.S., credit has been flowing freely again to businesses and industry. State-owned banks have massively increased lending, with local governments and state enterprises borrowing on a huge scale. The People's Bank of China estimates that total loans for the first half of 2009 were $1.08 trillion, 50% more than the amount of loans Chinese banks issued in all of 2008. The U.S. Federal Reserve has also engaged in record levels of lending, but its loans have gone chiefly to bail out the financial sector itself, leaving Main Street high and dry.
The Secret of China's Success
Samah El-Shahat is a presenter for Al Jazeera English who has a doctorate in developmental economics from the University of London. In an August 10 article titled "China Puts People Before Banks," she writes:
China is the one leading economy where the divide -- the disconnect between its financial sector and the world normal Chinese people and their businesses inhabit -- doesn't exist. Both worlds are booming again and this is due to the way the government handled its banks. China hasn't allowed its banking sector to become so powerful, so influential, and so big that it can call the shots or highjack the bailout. In simple terms, the government preferred to answer to its people and put their interests first before that of any vested interest or group. And that is why Chinese banks are lending to the people and their businesses in record numbers.
In the U.S. and the U.K., by contrast:
[T]he financial sector is booming, while the world of normal people seems to be going from bad to worse, unemployment is high, businesses are folding and house foreclosures are still taking place. Wall Street and Main Street might as well be existing on different planets. And this is in large part because banks are still not lending money to the people. In the UK and US, banks have captured all the money from the taxpayers and the cheap money from quantitative easing from central banks. They are using it to shore up, and clean up their balance sheets rather than lend it to the people. The money has been hijacked by the banks, and our governments are doing absolutely nothing about that. In fact, they have been complicit in allowing this to happen.
Cracks in the Dike?
The Chinese economy is not perfect. Chinese workers are now complaining of too much capitalism, since they are having to pay for housing, health care and higher education formerly picked up by the State. The push to make profits, particularly from foreign investment capital, has encouraged speculative ventures, with a great deal of money going into high-rise apartments and other real estate developments that most people cannot afford. And state-owned businesses and large corporations are still getting most of the loans, because the banks have been told to tighten their lending standards, and these larger entities are safer credit risks. But efforts are being made to make more loans available to medium-sized and small businesses, and China's stimulus plan seems to be working well overall.
Wolff thinks China's "miracle" is a bubble that is about to burst, with catastrophic consequences. But historically, when bubbles have collapsed suddenly, it has generally been because they were punctured by speculators. When the Japanese stock market bubble burst in 1990, and when other Asian countries followed in 1998, it was because foreign speculators were able to attack their currencies with exotic derivatives. The victims tried to defend by buying up their own national currencies with their foreign currency reserves, but the reserves were soon exhausted. Today, China has accumulated so much in the way of dollar reserves that it would be very difficult for speculators to do the same thing to the Chinese stock market. A gradual stock market decline due to natural market forces is something an economy can take in stride.
Economic Role Reversal
To the extent that China's stimulus plan is working better than in the U.S. and the U.K., this seems to be because the government is using the banks for public ends, rather than allowing the banks to use the government for private ends. The Chinese government can operate the banks' credit mechanisms in a way that serves public enterprise and trade because it actually owns the banking sector, or most of it. Ironically, that feature of China's economy may have allowed it to get closer to the original American capitalist ideal than the United States itself.
Politically, China is often referred to as communist, although it has never really been communist as defined in the textbooks and is far less so now than formerly. As Deng Xiaoping famously pointed out, the name isn't as important as whether the job gets done; and China's economy today provides a framework that effectively encourages entrepreneurs. Jim Rogers is an expatriate American investor and financial commentator based in Singapore. He wrote in a 2004 article titled "The Rise of Red Capitalism":
Some of the best capitalists in the world live and work in Communist China....No matter how long China's leaders persist in calling themselves Communists, they seem quite intent on creating the world's dominant capitalist economy.
Five years later, the Chinese have evidently succeeded in this endeavor; and they have done it by keeping a brake on irresponsible bank speculation and profiteering by keeping a leash on their banking sector. While the Chinese have been busy perfecting their own brand of capitalism, the U.S. has sunk into what Rogers calls "socialism for the rich." When ordinary businesses go bankrupt, they are left to deal with the asphalt jungle on their own. But when banks considered "too big to fail" go bankrupt, we the taxpayers pay the losses while the banks' owners keep the profits and are allowed to continue speculating with them.
The bailout of Wall Street with taxpayer money represents a radical departure from capitalist principles, one that has changed the face of the American economy. The capitalism we were taught in school involved Mom and Pop stores, single-family farms, and small entrepreneurs competing on a level playing field. The government's role was to set the rules and make sure everyone played fair. But that is not the sort of capitalism we have today. The Mom and Pop stores have been squeezed out by giant chain stores and mega-industries; the small private farms have been bought up by multinational agribusinesses; and Wall Street banks have gotten so powerful that Congressmen are complaining that the banks now own Congress. Giant banks and corporations have rewritten the rules for their own ends. Healthy competition has been replaced by a form of predator capitalism in which small fish are systematically swallowed up by sharks. The result has been an ever-widening gap between rich and poor that represents the greatest transfer of wealth in history.
The Best of Both Worlds
The Chinese solution to a failed banking system would be to nationalize the banks themselves, not just their bad debts. If the U.S. were to follow that example, we the people could get something of value for our investment -- a stable and accountable banking system that belongs to the people. If the word "nationalize" sounds un-American, think "publicly-owned and operated for the benefit of the public," like public libraries, public parks, and public courts.
We need to get our dollars out of Wall Street and back on Main Street, and we can do that only by taking the punch bowl away from our out-of-control private banking monopoly. We need to reclaim "the full faith and credit of the United States" as a monopoly of the people of the United States. If the Chinese can have the best of both worlds, so can we.
Follow Ellen Brown on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ellenhbrown
Power used in a way that does not apply deadly force, this being what ideal democracy is all about, why is our government so like China, so obsessed with using deadly force to control other nations, to imprison so many of our citizens, to torture even those who are our citizens and to evict from their homes millions and millions of unemployed citizens?
Could it be that capitalism is the freedom to compete for excessive wealth, and such a destruction of equality could only work by excessive deadly force?
"of the people, by the people, for the people"
Yes, that is ideal I can get behind!
A money system can work a particular way while the Gov/society is either good or bad to its citizens........that's a separate choice.
We're looking at the money mechanics here, and it seems China has a huge advantage in that their Gov controls it and so can adapt creatively to assist the economy. While in America, the money supply, that is far too Private ( and shouldn't have been ), owns and controls the Government. So after creating a crash by its own actions, your financial network then gets to liquidate the economy, while the US Gov passes more rules and gives them more of your tax money ( TARP etc) to assist them in doing this.
Problem is, capitalism is the freedom to compete for excessive wealth, and such a destruction of equality could only work by excessive poverty and deadly force?
Right on. Yank your money out of stocks and the banks. Let these fatcats in suits know that this kind of financial manipulation is unacceptable. Let them sweat like everyone else.
Also, China maintains it's growing economy at the expense of it's citizens' liberties...sound familiar??
This belief is misguided. The problem in the US was lack of capital in the financial system. The problem is China is lack of consumer demand. What I do like about the Chinese stimulus plan is that they help their manufacturers. The US stimulus plan is about half pork, on non-economically enhancing projects or projects that add productivity to the economy, that will have negative effects on the economy longer term as more debt accumulates, interest rates go up, and the interest on the debt continues to be tacked on into infinity. The Obama administration needs to focus on reducing dependance foreign oil, which is a massive drain on the economy as seen by the trade deficit, and on infrastructure spending, which will enhance productivity.
Further, thanks to the $US being established as the world default - in 1944 - the currency has been debased heavily but US banks and traders get away with that advantage overseas as the Dollar still held its value. But that's all about to change.
The point is, the grass is rarely as green as the media paints it. China is modernizing in a big way, which is positive and arguably good for their society as a whole, stimulating democratic institutions, etc., but anyone who believes their road ahead is smooth sailing is simply failing the test of imagination. We all face challenges ahead.
OK money changers, if big-three should adopt a uniform banking system, would we not have a one-world government?
they are also industrialists
When world oil production ends up in terminal decline due to PEAK OIL...,
there will no longer be any growth for any country in the world..., including china
I have been to your profile........you're not fooling anyone.
They have sentenced many top executives who were found guilty of embezzlement and corruption to death. TO DEATH.
What did Ken Lay get? or others at Enron, Countrywide, and all the other corrupt Corporations that have been uncovered over the last 6 years?
Talk about a deterrent.
Note: Most of the sentences have been reduced to 20 years after a while of letting them "sweat" on Death Row. Though they did execute a few who showed no remorse for their corruption and consequence to the people they harmed.
Fantastic article. I have spent the last 10 years working and building businesses in China,
People ask me if it is difficult to start a business here. It is so easy....and cheap, compared to LA, NY or comparable cities.
I have opened 9 businesses with various partners from China, US, and others.
The freedoms and comforts the average Chinese enjoy are all that they can ask for. They do not wish to "escape" to the USA. Most see us for what we are.
They keep a tight reign on incitement, violence and dissension. They fear it. They know that is what brought down Dynasties and Emperors for thousands of years. Communism has been around a mere 60 years. Just another name to them..............same system...........same control for 1000 years+
To watch an average Chinese arguing with, even pushing, a local policeman, over simple traffic violations is amazing. In the US, if you even laid a finger on an officer.....you would be tasered, cuffed and booked? Who sounds like the military state?