iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ellen Miller

Ellen Miller

Posted: November 23, 2009 06:00 AM

Envisioning a Real-Time Government

What's Your Reaction?

Everyday people are inundated with real time information that makes their lives, even the most mundane parts, more manageable. When I leave the house in the morning I can check weather patterns in real time on my phone. Back when the Red Sox were still alive I could find up to minute scores and stats (That's both good and bad). If I were into fantasy baseball, I could get up to the minute calculations for my team on my iPhone while games are still being played.

With so much information readily available at the tips of our fingers, the slow pace of information dispersal from the government only engenders distrust. The contrast between government and our real-time real life is simply too stark not to be frustrated by. Campaign contribution reports come out every four months, lobbyists don't disclose their actual meetings, and Congressional committees only post information online at their discretion. The information that people need to see in order to understand who's playing the game in Washington -- not to mention who's on first -- is not readily available -- and in some cases it's not available at all.

Just think how easy it is to get the history on a car through CarFax. What the public needs is a daily GovFix, an up to the minute, mobile phone accessible, real time accounting for our government leaders. If I can find out that my used car was in a rear collision accident in 2004, why can't I know that my congressman had a collision with a telecom lobbyist at a fundraiser and left the scene with a $2,300 campaign contribution? If I get a receipt immediately after every single I purchase I make throughout the year, why can't I get a receipt to see how my single biggest expenditure -- my tax dollars -- are spent?

Well, I think you should be able to. And I think we can get there.

Imagine a world where the entire influence economy in Washington were available to the public, online and in real time. The coverage of the health care debate would be far different if newspapers featured widgets on their web sites showing the daily "take" for local congressmen and senators from the health insurance and drug companies. A daily updated database of lobbyist contacts would show which special interests were involved in the secretive Baucus Gang of Six meetings over the summer. Imagine a searchable and downloadable database of all Congressional earmarks so in an instant you could see what government is spending our tax dollars on. Imagine having this sort of information across the federal government right now -- being able to track who is paying for lobbying whether in Congress or at the regulatory agencies, and what those discussions entail. One could quickly sort or browse all paid lobbying for individual clients or issue areas, and understand what agency actions are up for grabs.

At the Sunlight Foundation we've envisioned such a world starting with the executive branch -- and true to form, it's complete with web mock ups.

Picture a single website that would function as a portal for all government agencies' to file daily reports on lobbying meetings (image 1), and allow the public to examine and search through the disclosures (image 2).

2009-11-19-lobbyistDisclosure.jpg

2009-11-19-lobbyistDisclosure_2.jpg


One need only look briefly at the images to get a sense of the types of things we could expect to see. It's just a start, but it's the kind of information that would be valuable for citizens, journalists, and even agency heads and employees who are striving to evaluate decisions and understand what kinds of pressure they're feeling.

In short: this kind of simple disclosure in just one arena of the influence economy -- lobbying -- would be a game changer that would help us make better decisions and build public trust.

And what's more, with real-time access given us through the Web, this level of government transparency and accountability is actually possible. And it's possible in your pocket. That's something we couldn't even say as recently as five years ago. Information sharing is now part of the exponential curve that quits curving and just goes straight up. Today, we can present vast amounts of data meaningfully, and almost as fast as it can be created.

What this means for government and the future of citizen engagement is unprecedented.

We are on the cusp of new era of democracy and participation and it will be heralded by online, real-time government. Two hundred thirty-three years after we launched this grandest of experiments, it's time for us to take it to the next level.

Our founders would have drooled.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:02 AM on 11/25/2009
The real-time government probably doesn't start at the federal level. It's going to be cities and counties that lead the charge and begin to develop their own data repositories and access protocols. From there it's a coordination issue. From a technical perspective, we need a single API, a uniform database structure, and ultimately a single database. It could be privately managed; I don't see why the federal government needs to be involved. After all, Washington allocates the funds, but it's the local governments that do the spending.
12:05 PM on 11/24/2009
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.

-- Mark Twain
08:19 AM on 11/24/2009
Like the song "Dirty Laundry" from the 80s, you really don't want to know what's going on in Washington. Why? Because you may learn that the same people who you trust, support and adore are doing the exact same things as the people you dispise and hate.
04:28 PM on 11/23/2009
Re-read the Federalist Papers for one answer. The other is, the Constitutional Convention of 1789 was held behind closed doors. We got a pretty good document to start things off, not perfect, but a pretty darn good start. And wow, it was done in secrecy! You want better government? Work for good candidates across the country and get them elected. That's how it works...
11:40 AM on 11/24/2009
It was done in secret because it was treason.

We must outlaw contributions for the Bribery they are.

Till then, the USA is for sale to the highest bidder: a Plutocracy.
photo
blukazoo
I support your right to disagree.
03:57 PM on 11/23/2009
More importantly, why can't we have a real government?
12:01 PM on 11/24/2009
Dang, you took the words right out of my mouth.
02:58 PM on 11/23/2009
Government should not be treated like the wonk-version of CBS' Big Brother. Government should not become an online vote, a tweet, or some reality TV show.

The problem is government's "real-time" is not instantaneous, fast-paced or frankly exciting. One need only watch C-SPAN for that to be borne out. Government does provide tons of information every day. Most of you choose not to see it, read it, hear it, click it.

People do not take advantage of the information, live news feeds, live news briefings, and more that already is available from every cabinet department, the House, the Senate and White House.

And the thought that "real-time" government might lead to "instant snap votes" is more frightful than the Mayan calendar predicting the end of the world in 2012.
02:01 PM on 11/23/2009
Great Article with some good ideas.
10:09 AM on 11/24/2009
I agree, joeblow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonRoberto
01:23 PM on 11/23/2009
The founders placed their new capital in a swamp, hours away from the nearest towns. They did so in order to isolate their elected officials from newspaper controversies and the popular passions of the day, so they could weigh the issues coolly and dispassionately, and judge issues on their merits, without having to answer to mobs.

We have slowly done away with that distance. 24/7 news channels report on every action and statement of our elected officials, and put on the irrelevant opinions of pundits when they have nothing else to broadcast. Daily opinion polling and sound bytes for the daily news cycle have become the norm.

Now you want to further our democracy by making our elected officials immediately responsible to their constituencies, in real time. Has anybody thought this through?

Transparency after the fact is a good thing, but what is the purpose of a representative democracy if the hoi polloi are in charge? Why bother with selecting our best and brightest, if Joe Plumber, Joe Sixpack, and every other citizen knows better?

It's been said the purest form of democracy is the lynch mob. Good luck with your pursuit of pure democracy.
photo
WASanford
I think, therefore I am mad as hell!
01:39 PM on 11/23/2009
Great comment! All you have to do is look at California and see what a mess direct democracy (Propositions) has done to our state.
04:20 PM on 11/23/2009
Spot on DonRoberto. While it is apparent the author has great admiration for "real time" information she neglected to reveal the same passion for real accurate information. The 24/7 news cycle has demonstrated brilliantly how the inane, trivial, and too often inaccurate is made relevant to fill airtime. Sadly, this is what the public at large is consistently drawn too and it has garnered far too much influence for the ignorant and completely uninformed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonRoberto
04:35 PM on 11/23/2009
The sad part is, I guess this makes us (you, me, and the Founders) just what the Republicans keep calling us --- elitists.

I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day.....
01:13 PM on 11/23/2009
Great Idea. The Internet and opensecrets have given use enough to realize

The USA governmnet is for sale to the highest bidder: A Plutocracy.

All Contributions Are Bribes, Not free speech.

outlaw all contributions as the bribers they are.

Public finance elections.

It's not supposed to be about the money

Even the poor and homeless are citizens.

NO CONTRIBUTIONS.
photo
WASanford
I think, therefore I am mad as hell!
01:35 PM on 11/23/2009
Publically financed campaigns?
05:10 PM on 11/23/2009
yes, use the public service part of the media licenses to require equal prime time for all candidates on the ballot. Cheap and easy, and fair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Penner
Why are you reading this? Do tell!
01:39 PM on 11/23/2009
I think that's what frightens massive corporate campaign financers the most - the fact that the poor & homeless have got a vote, too.
02:51 PM on 11/24/2009
Well, they can kill an ACORN with one lousy amateurish fake pimp with his fake prostitute...that helps keep more poor and homeless from registering to vote. Then they can make Photo ID mandatory, Indiana, that way more can't vote.
Then the robocalls can tell them to vote on another day, that exes out their votes.
They have so many ways to keep the poor from voting and the homeless - homeless, more every day.

" The comfort of the rich depends on the abundance of the poor."
"A man's worth is the amount of happiness and success - of the others - that he can destroy."
This is our country in a nutshell.
01:03 PM on 11/23/2009
I would love to see this as a peoples mandate of our government. If Obama truly wants transparency, this would be a great first step. However, my biggest concern would be a complete compliance with such a system. So many wanting the status quo of secrecy lead me to believe there will be many attempts to circumvent any requirements this kind of program needs to be truly transparent. How can we enforce the filings of reports by the various departments within the White House or any other branch for that matter?

Would this site be significantly different from Opensecrets.org, a site that already lists the amount of money contributed to various officials by lobbyists?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
12:34 PM on 11/23/2009
Hey, the current crop of senators and congress have succeeded in selling their souls at a higher rate and price than any in history. Give them a little credit!!!
11:17 AM on 11/23/2009
Great thought, we have to have HONESTY in government otherwise it will not be for the people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 AM on 11/23/2009
In theory this is a plausible idea but in reality I think there are some issues that have to be looked at and some questions answered. The first being the percentage of the electorate that are informed, involved and educated enough to make this an effective part of the dialogue with our government. A great many people have trouble wading through and understanding their local and state ballot initiatives, let alone the ability to objectively participate on complex topics such as water rights, environmental pollution standards, inustry specific corporate regulation/oversight or financial regulation measures. In many cases, these issues are already published in an open for public comment in the Federal Register. How many average people access that on a weekly basis? Don't get me wrong, while I think the lobbyist have a useful place in the process since they may have special knowledge/information about specific industry topics there is clearly abuse of the system/process going on and that most definitely needs to be reigned in. If this idea helps to yank the chains of the industries that participate in the process to give the people a louder voice in government I'm all for it and say let's give it a go.
11:19 AM on 11/23/2009
You are making a logical fallacy in your argument. These systems are deliberately convoluted to ensure that people who have access to the information are complicit in the current corrupt system. It takes a certain leap of the intellect to wade through that level of red tape and make no acknowledgment of it's deliberate counterproductive complexity. I believe the term is "pork"— whereas we see this being an excuse to keep millions of disinterested parties on the government payroll because of who their "friends" are.

On the other side of the coin, we have the media (read= industrial mouthpiece) doing a very effective job at filtering the public perception of what is going on— marking over 80% of the illegal activities on the part of industrialists as taboo, so that there can never be an open discussion on the topics that are most critical and in need of widespread awareness and discussion.

How pointing this out makes legal and medical help inaccessible to me is another matter that needs open discussion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonRoberto
01:37 PM on 11/23/2009
We have a representative democracy with a Bill of Rights instead of a pure democracy because the founders wanted to protect the rights of the individual against what Jefferson called "the tyranny of the majority".

How does reinstating the tyranny of the majority better our form of government? How long do you think our Bill of Rights will last, when those who never studied their history are calling the shots? Do you really think those who have a rudimentary understanding of the issues outnumber those who don't?

If we were all philosopher-kings, educated landowners, or the like, then maybe online, realtime participatory government might work. Unfortunately, a third of our kids never complete high school, and many of those that do are void of any real understanding of their nation or the issues we face.
10:44 AM on 11/23/2009
Excellent idea.

If that was the only thing our government accomplished, it would still be the best government America has seen in decades at the federal level.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tyler-Durden
leading a revolution of one
10:43 AM on 11/23/2009
i like this.

KEEP PUSHING IT. MAKE IT HAPPEN.