More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ellen R. Shaffer

Ellen R. Shaffer

Posted: February 10, 2010 03:55 PM

Passing Health Reform Now: Why and How

What's Your Reaction:

Given a choice, most people in this country would like to get the health insurance industry off their backs.

There is an increasingly polarized clamor from the left and the right, claiming that the modest but effective incremental proposals coming from Congress are leading us down the path of tyranny and corporate control.

Let's be clear about who is controlling what.

Corporations exist to generate profits. They want them now and they don't want a lot of guff about it. People (other than corporate executives) get to have a bit of the wealth if we fight for it. (It helps motivate us to produce and consume the goods and services that generate profits.) If corporations don't need us anymore and can figure out how to do it all with machines, they will. If they can go somewhere else where the population is under tighter political control, they will.

The government isn't static. It protects corporations and corporate rights. It also protects people and the rights of people and communities. It can strengthen or weaken organizations (like unions) and rules that protect us. It depends on who's in charge of the government and who is pushing them.

As corporations face a global meltdown, our communities are experiencing wrenching losses - of jobs, income, housing, education, social services.

The Democrats' institutional and financial base includes corporations, as well as organizations and individuals committed to limiting corporate power. Some Democrats are reliable allies. Some are not.

Corporations have an unequivocal political voice. It is the Republican party.

The last 8 years of Republican rule brought us direct cash transfers from our taxes to corporations. That's why we have a deficit. All that money went somewhere. A lot of it went to the war industry and finance capital. The recent clamor from "independents" about the deficit is not only misdirected, it is perfectly misdirected.

We also got a wholesale incursion on our civil liberties and attacks on our rights, in the name of combating terrorism. The right now complains about a lack of debate after a year of televised hearings - on C-Span!! - while their acolytes invade town hall meetings and derail debate.


If the Republicans regain control of Congress in November, the filibuster rule will go down the drain in the first month. I shudder to think what they'll do in the second.

How can we protect our rights and challenge corporate power?

We can support laws that rein in the power of corporations to take our money and do whatever they damn well please.

The health reform bills would do that.

They establish that we Americans have the right to get health care, a principle accepted all over the rest of the world. We're Americans so we say you have to pay in to claim the right. But the bills take a giant step in the right direction.

Not a small, insignificant step. A giant, major step.

They say that once you pay, you have to get what you paid for. The Mafia elements of the health insurance industry are under attack. Will the new laws be strong and effective enough? They could be. We have to pass them and then we have to fight to make them work. This is possible. We can do it this year. Here's what else we would get:

1. Health care availability for most of those left out now.
2. A requirement that employers also contribute to the cost of health insurance.
3. Premium credits help make insurance affordable for incomes up to 400% of poverty.
4. A national health insurance exchange, the first step towards a national plan.
5. Coverage for comprehensive benefits.
6. Ban on insurance industry abuses like pre-existing condition exclusions, rescissions.
7. Payment incentives and other measures to improve the quality of care, including moving away from specialty care to preventive care to address our critical public health needs.
8. Negotiated drug prices through Medicare.

Canada had years of doctors' strikes after passing universal coverage. But they stuck with it, fought for it, and made it work. (No, just passing the law wasn't the end of it. They still had to fight. They still do.)

We can pass laws that strengthen the power, funding and authority of the public sector vs. the private sector. The public option would do that.

The better route would, of course, be to get corporations out of health care. It will take massive, determined grass roots mobilizations to make it happen.

The American public might get there some day. It might or might not be about health care. But we're generally pretty healthy, and the health care system is complex and amorphous.

People are getting educated about "single payer" proposals. This is great. Some assert that the American public is already in favor of single payer, and is being restrained from achieving it because the Democrats haven't proposed it. This is an inspiring belief. There have been about 30 people arrested nationwide in support of single payer. Maybe 100. This is a good beginning. Expanding Medicare for some or for all is a popular proposal, and we can continue to fight for it.

Is it a ruse that the corporations oppose health care reform? Not according to them. The Chamber of Commerce and American's Health Insurance Plans joined forced to kill the pubic option. The NY Times (Jan. 31 p. 21) quotes Chamber chief R. Bruce Josten on the fact that "Despite the Democratic majorities in the House and the Senate, they have not been able to muster support for a single final bill [on health reform]. 'We had a good year. I have no regrets.'"

Are they just fooling? Were their lobbyists all over the Committees writing the bills, just in case something passed? You bet. When they thought it was inevitable and unstoppable they were there getting their licks in. They are, perhaps, rethinking. Do they want the package to pass? No they do not.

The Democrats need to take another look at who's voting for them and why. They need to go back and pass a bill that expands union organizing rights, as well as a jobs bill and small business tax credits. They need to go through the reconcilation process to pass a health reform bill with a public opyion, and they need to do it soon.

Then progressives can get back to work pushing the reforms further, and mobilizing our communities to fight for our rights and our stuff. We'll be able to do it because we'll be living in a country that is dominated by corporations, but still respects democratic rights, one that plays out daily the tensions between capital and people.

In my experience political and social change are hard, take consistent, intelligent work, strategic engagement with influential actors including the public, an analysis of where power lies, an understanding of the role and life cycles of organizations, including the ones that govern us and those that might create change. Atheist that I am, I have been impressed with my friends in the faith community. They are not health policy wonks, but they learn what they need to know, they identify their targets, they figure out what it will take to move them, and they do it. They attempt to analyze reality, engage with the reform proposals as they are and to try to influence them.

We need to pass the health reform bill, and keep the email lists and the relationships we're building in the process. It's going to be a bumpy few years, and we're going to need each other.

 

Follow Ellen R. Shaffer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ershaffer

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:42 AM on 02/15/2010
Thanks for all the good sense and clarity, Ellen. Not to speak of inspiration.

Best,
Pam
http://www.pamrosenthal.com
01:03 AM on 02/11/2010
Great analysis - I was feeling very discouraged, and this offers some reasons to keep on keeping on...
10:07 PM on 02/10/2010
Thank you Ellen for this excellent analysis. While I certainly recognize the limits in the bills passed by the House and Senate, the fact is that simply getting this far is unprecedented, and has taken an extraordinary effort. As Ellen's analysis of the larger political context makes clear, this is really as far as we could get, at this time, and it IS far better than the status quo. We will have for the first time a national commitment to health care for all, at least 31 million people will gain coverage, with subsidies based on income, insurers will no longer be able to deny coverage to the sick or set premiums based on health status or gender. And we will have a new foundation from which to continue our fight!
05:58 PM on 02/10/2010
Corporations pay MORE to the Dems here Lately to do their dirty work Mame.

Trying to blame one party over the other is just plain not seeing how it all works.
05:33 PM on 02/10/2010
Excellent analysis and summary. I hope your vision of a future that's not filibuster proof will not happen.
03:09 PM on 02/10/2010
Ellen, thanks for the summary and the reminder of what we could still achieve.

Yes, establishing that we have a right to healthcare would be a huge step forward. So would real regulation of the insurance industry.

The power of the corporations has been on full display this past year - it is hard to accept, but it is a reality that must be dealt with.

For those thinking that we can get to single payer in one step - I don't see how. Lets see if we can at least get a public option and opportunities for the states to do better.

Forward motion is much better than standing still or falling back. The status quo, which results in death, suffering and bankruptcy is simply not an option. Lets not give up now. Thanks.
04:33 PM on 02/10/2010
Faith: "... establishing that we have a right to healthcare would be a huge step forward. So would real regulation of the insurance industry."

Too bad that the Congress' plan establishes neither of these.

#1 The Congress plan ...
-- leaves 20-25 million people uninsured
-- forces/dictates/mandates the purchase of a private company's health insurance plan
-- forces people into Medicaid and, therefore, estate recovery

#2 The Congress plan ...
-- does not dictate exactly what a health insurance premium will be, nor does it dictate any details, such as the co-pays or deductibles. It also does not dictate that health insurance companies must all become non-profit. Either one of those .... probably neither one feasible ... would be a "real reform" that would do us some good.

No. Sorry. Does not compute.

Bob Haiducek, Bob the Health and Health Care Advocate

If there was a right to health care, then there would b
02:18 PM on 02/10/2010
*** TO WHOM SHALL WE GIVE OUR ATTENTION? ***

As some Americans already know, much of the very bad proposed U.S. legislation is based on the very bad Massachusetts law that has hurt so many Massachusetts citizens. I have been working with them during the past two years, so I know first-hand that its bad for their finances and bad for their health.

We do not want a national version of the Massachusetts disaster.

I suggest that we can and must "listen" to the "voices" of those hurting so badly who live in the state of Massachusetts. Those citizens call their state Gestapo-like. They recently voiced their opinion jointly. Life-long Democrats in Massachusetts voted (and even promoted / campaigned) ... recently to help elect Republican Senator Scott Brown. Or don't worry about Massachusetts or other distractions and, instead, focus on my post of comments (which I will post within the next 24 hours) about what we DO want. (For now, I must get back to today's deadlines toward getting what we do want.)

Bob Haiducek, Bob the Health and Health Care Advocate
http://www.medicareforall.org/pages/helpgetcare
01:40 PM on 02/10/2010
***** WHAT WE DO NOT WANT: THE HEALTH CARE REFORM THAT THE U.S. CONGRESS DEVELOPED IN 2009 *****

(Look for my post of comments about what we do want.)

No, thanks. We do not want the very bad health care reform you are promoting.
http://www.medicareforall.org/pages/hcreform

What's so bad about it? Plenty. Feast your eyes on this summary for a start.

U.S. Congress Proposals: A Summary

1. Maintain, expand & add entitlement programs instead of replacing all with one public agency.

2. Create regulations, requiring more regulators, more cost.

3. Mandate, force, dictate Americans to purchase insurance.

4. Expand the tax code: huge tax fine if insurance is not purchased; face possible jail time if fine is not paid.

5. Force people onto an expanded Medicaid program.

6. Cause higher-than-ever health insurance premiums due to regulations put on health insurance companies.

7. Provide huge subsidies to health insurance companies to help the middle-class pay the huge premiums. These subsidies are our taxes.

8. Still have millions with no health insurance.

See more about this bad plan, starting with SPENDING over $80 billion per year instead of SAVING over $400 billion per year.
http://www.medicareforall.org/pages/hcreform
You can find some incredible information there. Check out the "Regulations" link from that web page about what already happened in the state of New York!

Bob Haiducek; Bob the Health and Health Care Advocate
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
epcraig
After a couple of strokes...
01:23 PM on 02/10/2010
We also need a Constitutional amendment to deny corporations citizens rights, such as Free Speech, especially as applied to money.