It boggles the mind that the White House, in announcing the deployment of more Special Operations to Syria, still insists on saying that they won't have a "combat mission."
They will tell you that sending Special Operations to advise, train, and assist means troops will behind the front lines, and thus, won't be heading over with orders to join battles.
I was an adviser in Iraq, in 2011, and I can tell you, they're likely to face combat, whether that's their mission, or not. If they are there to train the indigenous forces, can the White House guarantee that none of these so-called moderates won't turn and fire on our own troops? Will these troops be able to call in air strikes? By definition, that is a combat operation. Will these Special Operators be able to engage in anti-terror operations, like trying to stop ISIS from chopping people's heads off? Usually, that's what they do. That's a combat role.
The point is, unless the White House can guarantee that these troops will be far behind the wire, surrounded by vetted friends, and out of the reach of any enemy operations, there's a good chance they'll be in combat, with mortal consequences.
In fact, just this past week Master Sgt. Joshua L. Wheeler was killed during a raid to free hostages held by ISIS. He was one of the troops sent over there, also with no "combat mission." And yet, he was killed -- in combat.
"Of course he died in combat. That's what happened," Secretary of Defense Ash Carter said last Wednesday. Finally, honesty!
But, by Friday, Carter was singing a different tune.
"It [Wheeler's death] doesn't represent assuming a combat role. It represents a continuation of our advise-and-assist mission," Carter said.
That brings us to today's announcement.
"These forces do not have a combat mission," White House press secretary, Josh Earnest said throughout the announcement that the White House was sending additional troops.
Not only is "combat mission" a completely meaningless phrase, when these troops are likely to face combat, but it does not prepare the American people for the true danger that our troops face.
There have been two times in recent history when troops were deployed, and the danger to them was downplayed -- when Ronald Reagan sent troops on a peacekeeping mission into Beirut, and when President George H.W. Bush sent troops into Somalia. Both were incredibly dangerous regions, and it was clear to anyone in the military that it could result in American deaths. And yet, that danger was never properly conveyed to the American people. Thus, the complete and total shock among the majority of Americans, when lives were lost.
The White House needs to be honest, and needs to prepare Americans for the lives that very well may be lost in combat -- if they truly believe that there is no other way to address the rise of ISIS than to deploy more U.S. troops.
If they feel their decision is just, and necessary, there is nothing wrong with telling Americans that they have weighed all the options and risks, and that there is no other option than to send American troops into an incredibly dangerous situation, where they may have to face combat, and where they may lose their lives.
Not only will it properly brace the American people for what may come, and force people to consider our mission there more seriously, but it has the added benefit of being true and free of spin.
In the end, spinning military action at the outset almost always ends badly. The White House would be wise to remember that.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.