Apparently, if you are a Democratic presidential candidate, there is no longer such a thing as being too strict about gun safety.
All three candidates were locked in a fierce battle to prove their gun control bona fides at the Democratic debate at Drake University in Iowa on Saturday night.
Advertisement
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) are not letting Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) get away with his vote for a 2005 law to shield the gun and ammunition industry from civil liability. But O'Malley turned his fire on Clinton, too, and Sanders gave as good as he got, turning the exchange into an all-out slugfest.
Clinton called Sanders' vote in favor of the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, when he was a House member, a "terrible mistake." The law shields the manufacturers, distributors and sellers of guns and ammunition from civil lawsuits seeking "damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others."
CBS moderator John Dickerson asked Clinton whether it was fair to "tattoo" Sanders for one vote when she objected to Sanders attacking her for voting to authorize the Iraq War.
Clinton insisted that her Iraq War vote was different, because she has acknowledged that it was a mistake.
Advertisement
"I said I made a mistake on Iraq. I would love to see Senator Sanders" do the same on the gun law, Clinton said. "Let's reverse the immunity!"
Sanders reiterated his willingness to reconsider portions of the law, but would not commit to its full repeal, even after being pressed about it repeatedly by Dickerson.
"I don’t know that there’s any disagreement here," Sanders said, highlighting his support for expanded background checks.
Former O'Malley also criticized Sanders' vote, but then pivoted to attacking Clinton on the issue.
"You have been on three sides of this," O'Malley said. He claimed she had called for additional federal gun regulations as a Senate candidate in 2000 and then was "portraying [herself] as Annie Oakley" as a presidential candidate in 2008, when it was more politically convenient.
Advertisement
Sanders managed to get in a swipe at O'Malley in response.
"I think it is fair to say Baltimore is not now one of the safest cities in America," he said, taking a dig at O'Malley's mayoralty of the violence-plagued city.
He then repeated his argument that, as a senator from a state with lax gun laws, he is well positioned to bridge the divide between rural gun supporters and urban backers of gun safety laws.
Still, the exchange between the three candidates showed that gun policy -- and especially his vote to protect gun makers and sellers from much legal liability -- remains a vulnerability for Sanders.
O'Malley and Clinton had also teamed up on Sanders over gun control during the first Democratic debate in Las Vegas Oct. 13. O'Malley even invited Lonnie and Sandy Phillips, the parents of a victim of the Aurora, Colorado, movie theater shooting, to sit in the audience of the debate, and referenced them in a line of attack against Sanders. O'Malley noted that the Phillips' lawsuit against the sellers of the guns, ammunition and military gear used to kill their daughter was dismissed largely because of the 2005 liability law.
During that first debate, Sanders explained his vote for the law as a result of his consideration for small gun sellers, saying that he would be willing to restore liability for large gun manufacturers. Gun safety advocates applauded Sanders’ openness to amending the law, but said it was not good enough.
Advertisement
In October, the Sanders campaign agreed to meet with the Phillips family about his gun policies at their request.
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.