Diversity has been on everyone’s lips lately, but more questions abound than answers.
Like Chief Justice John Roberts’ question in the affirmative action case Fisher v. Texas. He asked, according to the hearing transcript, “What unique perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class?”
The reply is not forthcoming, no matter your thoughts on diversity. It’s difficult to articulate why an array of ethnicities and their lived experiences would change the study of an objective field like physics or math, compared to, for instance, creative writing or psychology.
In search of some answers, The Huffington Post caught up with social science professors Sheen Levine and David Stark, authors of a recent New York Times op-ed, “Diversity Makes You Brighter.”
They conducted a group of studies on how ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles across Southeast Asia and North America, in which participants simulated trading stocks in either ethnically homogeneous or diverse markets. They found that people performed far better at pricing in diverse markets, and concluded that ethnic diversity might be beneficial because it “facilitates friction that enhances deliberation and upends conformity.”
Let’s break that down. “Diversity makes us smarter because in the company of people that look different from us, we change the way we think,” Levine said.
Is that to say that literally interacting with people of different races can make you smarter? “Yes,” Levine said. “We really tried to isolate ethnic diversity” for our experiment, he said, and found that whether in Singapore or in the U.S. [which have different multiracial demographics], just the mere presence of people of other races ― even if they brought no new experiences ― changed the way other people think.”
In addition, according to Levine, subjects in more diverse surroundings are “more careful scrutinizing evidence and less likely to mindlessly intake what others say.”
Sheen and Levine thus posit an “empirical case for diversity” that is separate from the philosophical and social arguments for it. It’s unrelated to the notion of “reparations for past wrongdoing” that comes with an expiration date, like in the Supreme Court case Grutter v. Bollinger, which upheld affirmative action in 2003 with the comment that it would become unnecessary “25 years from now.” Levine suggested their performance-related rationale is more evergreen.
It helps that speculating on prices is a relatively objective task. Their experiment design was “based on the desire to study a setting that is seemingly completely unrelated to ethnicity and race,” Levine said. “In a way, we foresaw what Roberts asked yesterday by studying a field with objective true answers,” such as asset prices.
The intended audience for their research, Levine said, is “certainly anyone in business, whether buying or selling assets, or anyone who manages employees,” as well as “those who work in public policy and government and want to improve the way their teams work.” Which is all to say, the classroom is not the endgame for diversity, although it is its most frequent battleground.
But what’s the takeaway for someone who understands the value of diversity, but happens to live in an ethnically homogeneous place? “Move to New York,” laughed Stark.
“No, but really, I suppose you could make sure your city is doing as much as possible to welcome immigrants, welcome Muslim immigrants, refugees, say you’re all for gay marriage,” and so forth, Stark suggested.
Levine added that the internet also provides “many more venues to expose yourself to people who are different from you, even if the difference is just superficial, because that superficial difference matters a lot.”
He acknowledged that “diversity is sometimes awkward because it’s a fact that we gravitate toward people who are like us, which is why many of our friends are the same gender or ethnicity as us.”
But “diversity is like fresh air,” he added. It’s a public good, beneficial for everyone involved.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.