WASHINGTON -- Senate Republicans on Tuesday launched an unprecedented blockade of President Barack Obama's yet-to-be-named Supreme Court pick, saying they won't give any nominee a hearing or even meet with the candidate.
"I don't know how many times we need to say this," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters. "The Judiciary Committee has unanimously recommended to me that we not hold a hearing. I don't know the purpose of such a visit. I would not be inclined to take one myself."
Supreme Court nominees typically make courtesy calls to senators, so that lawmakers can get to know them on a more personal level and question them in a more intimate setting.
But on Tuesday, at least five senior Republican senators -- McConnell, John Barrasso (Wyo.), John Cornyn (Texas), Orrin Hatch (Utah) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.) -- said they won't participate in this tradition for an Obama nominee.
"There'd be no reason to," Barrasso told HuffPost, when asked if he'd meet with whatever nominee Obama sends to the Hill.
"I don't see the purpose," Cornyn said.
"Joe Biden. Chuck Schumer. If they were in charge they'd be doing the exact same thing," Graham added. "I'm not going to meet with the nominee. I'm sure they'll be a nice person."
McConnell's comments came after every Republican on the Judiciary Committee signed onto a letter saying they won't give a hearing to Obama's pick. Court nominees have to clear this committee before they can get a Senate confirmation vote, so without action here, literally nothing can happen.
"Because our decision is based on constitutional principle and born of a necessity to protect the will of the American people, this Committee will not hold hearings on any Supreme Court nominee until after our next President is sworn in on January 20, 2017," reads the letter.
It's signed by Cornyn, Graham and Hatch, as well as GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley (Iowa), Jeff Sessions (Ala.), Mike Lee (Utah), Ted Cruz (Texas), Jeff Flake (Ariz.), David Vitter (La.), David Perdue (Ga.) and Thom Tillis (N.C.).
Flake ducked questions about whether he thought the GOP blockade on Obama's nominee, sight unseen, could blow up in their faces.
"I'll let Sen. Grassley, the chairman, talk about it," Flake said, walking quickly down a Senate hallway. "I want to let him talk about it."
McConnell announced his intent to block any Obama nominee soon after news broke of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. He said he wants the next president to choose Scalia's replacement -- hoping, of course, that a Republican will win the 2016 election.
"The overwhelming view of the Republican conference in the Senate is that this vacancy should not be filled by this lame duck president," McConnell reiterated Tuesday afternoon.
A few senators, however, have broken with this hard-line position and said they'd be willing to look at an Obama nominee. Even under normal order, however, it will be an uphill climb; an Obama nominee would need to get the support of every single Democratic senator and at least 14 Republican ones to get confirmed.
Democrats have shot back that it would be unprecedented to not even consider a president's Supreme Court nominee and have vowed to make Republicans pay in November.
"The party of Lincoln is becoming the party of Donald Trump," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) responded Tuesday, referring to the divisive 2016 GOP front-runner. He also predicted that Grassley would "go down in history as the most obstructionist Judiciary chair" for blocking a hearing.
Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), however, said he's confident their strategy of obstruction will pay off.
"Let me just say, we are very comfortable letting the American people speak on this issue," the senator said.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.