A federal lawsuit in Michigan has unearthed a cache of emails that suggests Republican staffers purposely gerrymandered the state’s congressional districts in 2011.
The emails, some of which explicitly refer to gerrymandering and contain strong language trashing Democrats, appear to contradict “years of claims” that Michigan’s district lines were drawn without political bias, reported Bridge Michigan, a magazine run by the Center for Michigan, on Wednesday.
The documents were introduced this week as part of an ongoing federal lawsuit — led by the League of Women Voters of Michigan — that claims Republicans violated the constitution by “cracking and packing Democratic voters while efficiently spreading Republican voters across safe Republican districts” when they drew up state legislative and congressional maps in 2011.
“This is gerrymandering in all its ugliness,” Mark Brewer, attorney for the league, told Bridge Michigan.
In one email, an aide to former Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) boasted about cramming “Dem garbage” into gerrymandered districts.
“In a glorious way that makes it easier to cram ALL of the Dem garbage in Wayne, Washtenaw, Oakland and Macomb counties into only four districts. Is there anyone on our side who doesn’t recognize that dynamic?” Jack Daly wrote in a May 2011 email to GOP consultant Jeff Timmer.
Daly also suggested in a separate exchange that residents in two adjacent districts be swapped to meet “the obvious objective ― putting dems in a dem district and reps in a GOP district.”
“It will help increase the black population in the black districts because the former is 17 percent black while the latter is only 6 percent black,” Daly wrote to Timmer and Republican strategist Robert LaBrant.
In another email, an unnamed Republican aide said a Democratic district in southeast Michigan looked like it was “giving the finger” to Rep. Sandy Levin (D-Mich.). “I love it,” the aide quipped.
According to Bridge Michigan, the emails reveal how the Republican drafters had originally intended to create a map that would have given the Republicans 10 House seats compared to just four for the Democrats.
In a May 2011 email, however, LaBrant warned Timmer that such a map would be too “obvious.”
“We needed for legal and PR purposes a good looking map that did not look like an obvious gerrymander,” LaBrant said.
Also that month, LaBrant sent an email to an aide to Dave Camp, who was then a congressman, promising to “accommodate whatever Dave wants in his district.”
“We’ve spent a lot of time providing options to ensure we have a solid 9-5 delegation in 2012 and beyond,” LaBrant wrote, according to The Detroit News, which was the first outlet to report on the existence of the emails.
A study released in June by the Citizens Research Council of Michigan concluded that the state does have a serious gerrymandering problem, with “current district maps drawn so that Republicans are ensured disproportionate majorities on both the state and federal levels.”
“It’s not just sour grapes that one party has won consistently, and the other has been on the outside looking in,” council president Eric Lupher said in a statement. “The game is being stacked against one of the players in the game, and that’s significant.”
The Michigan Supreme Court is currently mulling whether or not a proposed constitutional amendment to end gerrymandering in the state can appear on the state ballot in November. The New York Times suggested this week that the newly-released emails could spur momentum for the amendment.
As Brewer, the attorney for the League of Women Voters of Michigan, noted this week, it’s not just Republicans who are guilty of gerrymandering ― Democrats too have been known to redraw maps for their own partisan advantage.
“Both parties should stop,” Brewer, a former chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, told Bridge Michigan. “It’s unfair to voters. It’s grotesque and extreme.”
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.