6 Reasons Why Trump Is Too Weak To Save American Jobs

6 Reasons Trump Is Too Weak To Save American Jobs
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump speaks to members of the news media as he tours a Carrier factory in Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S., December 1, 2016.

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump speaks to members of the news media as he tours a Carrier factory in Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S., December 1, 2016.

Mike Segar / Reuters

Donald J. Trump, the most powerful man in the world, thinks he can stop corporations from shipping jobs abroad. But with Rexnord now really making the move, it is clear that the commander-in-chief can’t even stop one small manufacturing company from shipping 300 jobs to Mexico.

Here’s why he’s so weak:

1. Trump is trumped by financial strip-mining:

Rexnord is moving for obvious reasons: The new Mexican workers will make $3 an hour while the Indianapolis workers make $25 an hour. But the real motivation for moving stems from Wall Street’s favorite pastime ― stripping a company of its wealth through stock buybacks.

(Financial strip-mining refers to the full set of financial maneuvers that extract money from non-financial corporations to large investors, hedge funds, private equity companies, investment banks and insurance companies. Just as mineral strip-mining harms the natural environment, the financial kind damages the corporate environment and can leave behind hollowed-out facilities.)

To please demanding financiers Rexnord, in 2015, agreed to buyback $300 million of its own stock. By going into the market to buy its own shares, the price of the stock rises, thereby enriching these hedge fund investors virtually overnight. (19 hedge funds hold about $200 million in Rexnord stock.) The stocks rise because a) the act of buying large amounts of them in the open market bids up their price, and b) because the company’s total earnings are now spread over fewer shares.

The move to Mexico isn’t just about profits: It’s about financing the stock buybacks.

2. Trump’s deregulation agenda empowers the financial strip-miners:

From the New Deal until 1982, stock buybacks were virtually outlawed. They were considered a dangerous form of stock manipulation ― a leading cause of the 1929 Wall Street crash. During the Reagan administration stock buybacks were legalized and financial strip-mining took off with a vengeance. Trump’s deregulatory mantra means stock buybacks will continue unabated as will the incessant pressure to move jobs to low wage areas.

3. Trump ignores (or is clueless) about the massive extent of financial strip-mining:

In 1980, a mere 2 percent of corporate profits went to stock buybacks. By the crash of 2007-08, more than 75 percent of ALL corporate profits went to buy back the companies’ own shares. Our entire economy is being financially strip-mined by such stock manipulation. (Unfortunately, Trump does not have the attention span to read William Lazonick’s excellent analysis, “Profits Without Prosperity.”)

4. Trump doesn’t dare challenge how CEOs are paid:

Not only do hedge funds profit from financial strip-mining but they are aided and abetted by corporate executives who often derive more than 90 percent of their pay from stock incentives. As a result, CEOs run their companies with only one goal in mind ―raise the price of the stock. With those incentives in place, Rexnord executives could care less about Trump’s tweets. They are moving to Mexico to fund the stock buybacks that enrich the value of their own stock incentives.

5. Trump’s administration is loaded with Goldman Sachs strip-miners:

Trump’s economic advisors, nearly all produced by Wall Street, could care less about Rexnord moving to Mexico. After all they grew fabulously rich by financing such moves, pressing companies for stock buybacks and profiting from trade deals. Rexnord knows that Trump’s economic team has no interest at all in limiting the stock buyback scam.

6. Trump can bully immigrants but not Wall Street:

It is frightening to see Trump unleash the ICE on powerless immigrants, but bend over backwards to placate financial elites. A bully attacks the weak but cowers before the powerful.

To repeat, stock buybacks is how Wall Street makes money in a hurry ―- money that is squeezed out of the workforce by shifting jobs to lower wage areas. Wall Street will not tolerate any interference in they way they strip mine companies. And Trump knows it.

Working people will soon know it as well. The Rexnord workers once believed that Trump would come to their rescue, especially after he supposedly saved 700 jobs at Carrier just up the road. He didn’t and they no longer do.

Millions more voted for Trump because they believed he would save their jobs from a similar fate. But as financial strip-mining continues unabated, these workers will learn that President Trump is not president of Wall Street. Their jobs will be sacrificed on the alter of stock buybacks.

You can’t tweet away financial strip-mining.

Neither Donald Trump, nor even Bernie Sanders, can stop financial strip-mining on their own. It’s a powerful process that has been in motion for nearly 40 years. To reverse the runaway inequality it creates will require nothing short of a dedicated mass movement, the likes of which we haven’t seen for more than a generation.

As historian Michael Merrill points out, there have been four great struggles in American history.

  • The first was the struggle against royal power which was replaced by the power of a new constitutional democracy.
  • The second battle was against slave power which through a civil war was replaced by power of free labor.
  • The third great battle was against corporate power which was tamed by government regulation and union/worker power on the job.
  • And the fourth great battle is happening right now. It is the battle against financial power ― with the outcome very much in doubt.

These previous victories, always partial with battles still on-going, were not the result of spontaneous uprisings. They required vision, leadership, education, organization, and mass involvement. Each required a sustained effort over many decades.

Today we need to relearn the art of building mass movements like those created by the abolitionists, the Populists, the labor movement, and the civil rights movement.

To make any progress at all against financial power, we must come out of our issue silos and join together in a common movement. We need to recognize that the financial strip-mining of our society negatively impacts nearly every issue we care about. We need to recognize that the battle against financial power and the runaway inequality it creates, links us together.

Is such a mass effort emerging right now as tens of thousands of people take to the streets and come together in town hall meetings all over the country? Perhaps. But only if these disparate resistance efforts coalesce into a powerful unified movement to take back our country from the power of finance. We have no choice but to try.

(If you’d like to help provide education on runaway inequality and financial strip mining see here.)

Les Leopold, the director of the Labor Institute, is currently working with unions and community organizations to build the educational infrastructure of a new “reversing runaway inequality” movement. His new book Runaway Inequality: An Activist Guide to Economic Justice serves as a text for this campaign. All proceeds go to support these educational efforts. For more information, contact at LesLeopold@aol.com.

Before You Go

LOADINGERROR LOADING

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot