Executive Director, New York Civil Liberties Union
Executive Director, New York Civil Liberties Union
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Short answer: Everything.
As executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, I’ve learned a lot about stop-and-frisk over the years.
At a “town hall” meeting on Wednesday with Sean Hannity of Fox News, Trump, in a quote now heard around the world, said about black violence:
“I would do stop-and-frisk, I think you have to. We did it in New York, it worked incredibly well...”
Advertisement
No, Mr. Trump. Stop-and-frisk in New York did not work incredibly well by any single metric. Let us count the ways.
1) It did not decrease violence.
Rudy Giuliani and other defenders of the NYPD’s massive stop-and-frisk program misleadingly claimed for years that the policing tactic was necessary for public safety. The data begged to differ:
At the height of stop-and-frisk in 2011, when the NYPD stopped a mindboggling 685,724 people:
- Nearly nine in ten New Yorkers who were stopped were innocent, meaning they were neither ticketed nor arrested.
- The supposed point of stop-and-frisk was to retrieve guns, but almost no guns were recovered. In 99.9 percent of those stops NO guns were retrieved.
Anyone paying attention to the news sees headlines every week showing the broken relationship between police and people of color. Stop-and-frisk holds no small amount of responsibility for the frustration that has led to rallies, protests and movements over the last year. It’s no mystery why.
- Nearly 4.3 million Black or Latino people were stopped under the NYPD’s massive, racially discriminatory program.
- Young people were hit the worst. Though they accounted for only 4.7 percent of the city’s population in 2011, Black and Latino males between the ages of 14-24 accounted for 41 percent of the stops.
Advertisement
- Some Black and Latino men were stopped over 100 times.
-The number of stops of young Black men exceeded the entire city population of young Black men.
3) It was a huge waste of time and money.
Between 2002 and 2013, 5 million New Yorkers were stopped. That’s more than the combined populations of Baltimore, Boston, Denver, Detroit, Pittsburgh, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington, D.C.
The NYPD stop-and-frisk regime was a massive drain on police resources.
And if you look at what that taxpayer time and money achieved, it’s pretty embarrassing for the NYPD.
In 2003, when the NYPD made 160,851 stops, they confiscated 604 guns. When they made more than four times as many stops – nearly 700,000 in 2011 – they confiscated only 176 more guns.
4) It won an election – for someone who opposed it.
New York City was in terrible shape at the end of the last administration of Mayor Bloomberg thanks to the stop-and-frisk regime.
Advertisement
In 2013, Bill de Blasio ran for mayor promising to end the massive, abusive and racially discriminatory tactic and improve relations between the NYPD and many New Yorkers, especially New Yorkers of color. And he won – defeating his Republican opponent with 73 percent of the vote.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.