More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eric Alterman

Eric Alterman

Posted: January 21, 2010 06:08 PM

Think Again: Tea Party/Fox Party

What's Your Reaction:

Crossposted with theCenter for American Progress. With Mickey Ehrlich

Success has many fathers, and few successes have enjoyed more fathers than Scott Brown's shocking victory in the race for Ted Kennedy's--and before that Jack Kennedy's--Senate seat in Massachusetts. While many have focused on Brown's "Tea Party" base, one proud papa whose work has gone relatively unnoticed so far is Fox News.

The network repeatedly gave Brown a platform on its shows for him to promote his campaign website and to solicit funds for his campaign. Dick Morris told "Hannity" viewers to go to his website to help elect Brown. "Fox and Friends" produced a segment entitled "What Can Brown Do For You? A boost in your 401k may be in the cards. " Indeed, it's hard to imagine Brown and his Tea Party supporters pulling off his historic upset without them.

This is a piece of Fox's philosophy and day-to-day operations. As Howard Fineman of Newsweek observed, "In a relentless (and spectacularly successful) hunt for cable ratings, [Fox President Roger] Ailes has given invaluable publicity to the tea partiers, furnished tryout platforms to GOP candidates, and trained a fire hose of populist anger at the president and his allies in Congress."

Can Fox do for a Sarah Palin-for-president campaign what it helped do for Brown's successful Senate effort? On January 13, Palin made her debut as a Fox analyst (The announcement came just days after the world learned that she would also deliver the keynote address at the first Tea Party Convention to be held in Nashville in February). Rather than appear on panels to discuss issues other than herself, Palin instead began her tenure as a "political analyst" with two extended interview segments with Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck...

You can read the rest of Eric Alterman and Mickey Ehrlich's analysis in their recent article, "Think Again: Tea Party/Fox Party"

Eric Alterman is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress and a Distinguished Professor of English at Brooklyn College. He is also a Nation columnist and a professor of journalism at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism. His seventh book, Why We're Liberals: A Handbook for Restoring America's Most Important Ideals, was recently published in paperback. He occasionally blogs at http://www.thenation.com/blogs/altercation and is a regular contributor to The Daily Beast.

Mickey Ehrlich is a freelance writer based in New York.

 

Follow Eric Alterman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Eric_Alterman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Schalaine
We are women. We vote.
09:23 AM on 01/24/2010
When a Republican is in the whitehouse, it doesn't matter how badly he screws things up. Let a Democrat win and all hell breaks loose. I hope Fox does not completely destroy this country. Between the birthers, deathers, teabaggers and GOPers, are there any reasonable people left?
President Obama's biggest mistake was assuming the American people had sense. Hopefully he realizes his mistake and will begin to talk to the public as if we are retarded two year olds. He had a truly progressive agenda, but no, we are not ready for that. We like things just the way they are. If Republicans do nothing else, they have raised the stupid bar just a bit higher.
11:46 AM on 01/22/2010
I see a conflict of interest when persons such as the author here, a professor funded by taxpayer dollars and protected by tenure, support liberal policies that pour more money into govt. employees.
It is hard to criticize the source of your own income.
It reminds me of public employee unions that get a politician elected who then "negotiates" their contracts for pay and ends up being a soft touch (go wonder..).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SagesseBleu
the Mitt doesn't fit.
07:05 PM on 01/22/2010
I see a conflict of interest when persons such as renaissance use publicly funded roads; use dollar bills printed by the US Mint; send messages over the internet, which was born as a result of US government research funding, decry the very liberal policies that have created the society from which s/he benefits by existing in today. The difference between anti-goverment conservatives the U.S. and anarchists in Europe seems marginal at best. If government is the problem then overthrow it by any means necessary.
06:22 PM on 01/21/2010
I became aware of a rumor on the net that FOX will host a noode follies of political figures including FOX's male and female hosts. Anyone hear about this? I like the idea and understand that Palin and Brown are early-on favorites.