With The New York Times Now Monitoring, Right-Wing Media Goes Bonkers

Talk about great timing!

Just after The New York Times announced it would appoint somebody to monitor the partisan opinion media more closely, and right after editors were chastened for reacting too slowly to buzzworthy news scoops launched by the conservative media, the right-wing press went bonkers last week.

Like a proud peacock showing off its feathers, the right-wing media was in full bloom, showing the Times all the tricks that have made the movement's trade so renowned. There was outright lying, lying by omission, attempted guilt-by-association, U.S.-bashing, hateful smear campaigns (lots of those), fearmongering, incompetence, and just batshit crazy stuff. (Did I mention the heavy dose of crazy?) All the key notes were hit -- and in just one epic week.

I hope the Times is enjoying its new-found, front-row seat to the right-wing media's slow-motion crack-up, where I doubt even the denizens can keep track of the avalanche of falsehoods, smears, and lies that now tumble out on a daily (hourly?) basis. The whole enterprise has come unglued by Obama's presidency. And where serial mendacity was once the rule, a whole new level of crazy has been achieved in 2009. Even conservative blogger Rick Moran last week called out the "lunacy" that fuels so much of the Obama hate; a hate that's stoked around the clock by conservative media.

And now the Times can chronicle it every day because editors there think they might uncover news leads.

Good luck with that.

Read the entire Media Matters column here.

 

 

Follow Eric Boehlert on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EricBoehlert

Comments

[PrudenceWorthington]

I suggest they print a daily column in which they clarify misinformation from any "news" agency. It would be refreshing to be able to find the accuracy and truth in one news agency and could boost their subscriptions.

[TheEmptinessOfTruthiness]

But would they report on themselves? No, and then it only takes a few stinging send-ups and the charge of hypocrisy sticks.

Thus, the collusion.

[lcdbsez]

Read the whole piece, and I'm still confused.

So, Mr. B., are you saying that the Times shouldn't be monitoring the reichwing media/press b/c they're just regurgitating the propaganda spewed by them . . . or, b/c the Times isn't calling the reichwingers out for it (the propaganda)???

The mistake the fourth estate is making, is not consulting history and its lessons -- specifically, lessons from the 1930s . . . which is exactly where all the ranting and raving by reichwingers is coming from. They're using the same rhetoric that was used against FDR: socialist! communist! anti-American! anti-god! etc., etc.

Why is no one bringing this up and calling them out on it?

[Jamie Stiehm - Huffpost Blogger]

Eric: "Conservative" is too good a word, babe, if you know what I mean.