Not content with its lapdog coverage of President Bush over the past decade, the Beltway press has adopted a new, super-soft way to deal with Bush's former vice president, Dick Cheney, as well as GOP media star Sarah Palin. Journalists have set aside what had been decades' worth of guidelines and embraced special new rules for how Cheney and Palin get treated.
In a word, it's stenography.
That's how too many scribes have covered Cheney and Palin in recent months, allowing them to dispense tightly controlled pieces of information, which journalists then trumpet as breaking news. And yes, the trend is unprecedented in modern day American politics.
It's actually a two-fer. First, it's unprecedented because the Beltway press has never showered attention on political losers, such as Cheney and Palin. Meaning, the press has never cared what a former VP had to say about current events right after leaving the White House (think: Dan Quayle), or what a failed VP candidate had to say just months after losing in a landslide (think: Geraldine Ferraro). Traditionally, pundits and reporters disdain political losers (think: Mike Dukakis). But for Cheney and Palin, the rules have been generously reworked.
The second oddity is that journalists now allow Cheney and Palin to completely dictate the media ground rules and afford them the chance to have one-way relationships with the press. Palin, for instance, perhaps still bruising from her woeful 2008 media performances, still hasn't allowed herself to be interviewed by a single independent political journalist since she launched her book in November. Instead, she mostly communicates with the mainstream media via Facebook. And now that she's signed on to join the Fox News staff, the chances of Palin ever speaking with the serious press seem to be less than zero. That lack of openness stacks the deck and leads to dreadful bouts of stenography; of literally recording what controversial Republicans say, and nothing more.
Read the full Media Matters column here.
Follow Eric Boehlert on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EricBoehlert
90% of the problems in America are because of the MSM.
Dan Rather was right when he said it is not "Newscast" anymore, it is "Viewscast"
I am more troubled by the media now, and how they lie and behave, than by any other thing going on.
But what's eating me is that since they have been called on for being the boot-licking lapdogs of the last president, the media NOW want to be seen as savage watchdogs on alert for any miss-steps they perceive by Obama. They gave Bush a smile and a wave at every stupid move he made, and now try to fry Obama on even the things he gets RIGHT.
And the ignorant among us are still trumpeting on about the "liberal bias" in the Media!!!!
What a hoot !!!!!!!!!!!
And it took her SIX years and several schools to even finish that excuse for a college degree.
Definitely NOT a hoot, when one considers her popularity among the other under-educated who have just enough knowledge to think they know something.
I wonder if it is true she had zero knowledge of the backgrounds of the World Wars, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq. And a quarter of this country believes her qualified to be the leader of the world and in charge of the nuclear bomb switch.
Despair.