iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eric Parker

GET UPDATES FROM Eric Parker
 

Why Grover Norquist Is the Most Powerful Republican in America

Posted: 03/08/11 05:50 PM ET

He's more powerful than House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and the Koch brothers, yet not many people have heard of Grover Norquist or his "Taxpayer Protection Pledge."

Mr. Norquist, founder and president of the Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), is simply the single most influential Republican of the past 25 years.

Politicians may come and go, but since 1985, Mr. Norquist has been getting an increasing number of Republicans to sign his tax pledge to the point where he now has 237 members of the House and 41 in the Senate at his disposal.

When you have the majority of the House -- including House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) and enough votes in the Senate to prevent legislation from coming up for a vote, that's real power.

When your organization's tax pledge is THE litmus test for Republicans running for office on the national level, you wield more power in your party than anyone in Congress.

Thanks to Mr. Norquist's growing influence over the past two-and-a-half decades, failure to pledge allegiance to the "no new taxes" mantra effectively dooms one's chances of getting the GOP nod for the House, Senate or White House.

To strengthen Mr. Norquist's hand, the GOP base is challenging Senators Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) from the right -- because both refused to sign the tax pledge.

According to Mr. Norquist's tax pledge, politicians who sign it "oppose any and all efforts to increase the marginal income tax rates for individuals and/or businesses," and "oppose any net reduction or elimination of deductions and credits, unless matched dollar for dollar by further reducing tax rates."

If we want to know the real story behind the $14 trillion federal debt and our annual $1.5 trillion deficits, we have to look at Mr. Norquist and his tax pledge.

If we want to know why the Republicans won the staring contest on extending the Bush tax cuts -- which are part of the "starve the beast" strategy -- the answer is Mr. Norquist and his tax pledge.

When we have successive stopgap funding bills because the GOP's only solution to the deficit is draconian cuts, blame Mr. Norquist and his tax pledge.

And when GOP leaders at both the national and state levels try to balance the budget by cutting programs that help seniors, students, the middle class and low-income families -- take a bow, Mr. Norquist.

Because of their allegiance to Mr. Norquist's tax pledge, Republicans dismiss out of hand "revenue enhancement" measures (as President Ronald Reagan called tax hikes) such as highly-popular and common-sense ideas of raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires, Wall Street bankers and the big oil companies.

That is why the GOP went on a cutting spree on the House floor when formulating their measure to fund the federal government through the end of 2012.

And that is why the debt commission's recommendation was dead on arrival.

As long as there's a House majority and at least 41 Senators who are signed onto the tax pledge, income and long-term capital gains tax rates will not return to pre-Bush levels and the estate tax (aka "the death tax") will not go back to where it was before 2002 -- because that would be raising taxes according to Mr. Norquist.

Remember, long-term capital gains -- which one pays on investment income such as stocks, bonds and real estate -- is how the Wall Street folks responsible for the Great Recession and the corporate CEOs make their millions. For three decades, they have seen their portfolios grow exponentially, while most American household incomes have stagnated.

Wall Street and corporate CEOs owe a huge debt of gratitude to Mr. Norquist.

Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich wrote in his March 2 piece in the Huffington Post that investment income should be treated the same as wage income. He's right, but doing so would mean raising taxes, and unless the tax-pledge crowd loses the House and drops below 41 Senators, it's not going to happen.

On the state level, guess who else has signed Mr. Norquist's tax pledge? Union-busting governors Scott Walker (R-Wisc.) and John Kasich (R-Ohio).

With his House majority, his filibustering Senators and his union-busting governors, Mr. Norquist has his hands in every big fiscal debate -- in Washington and in the states -- for more than two decades now.

And that is why Grover Norquist is the most powerful Republican in America.

 

Follow Eric Parker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ericp331

 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mario59
KSU 05/04/70 RIP never ever forget
06:30 PM on 03/09/2011
I think along with the Kochs, Grover's name should be held up constantly just like Mr. Soros was to the righties. Unlike them, Mr. Soros promoted policies that went against his economic interests. We need to know who the puppetmasters are that keep us from having the country we are all working our fingers to the bone for!!! He// no, Norquist, Kochs have got to go!!! If we do manage to get these bullies to pay their taxes and they decide to go to Dubai, well then, bye bye, then, off with you to Dubai!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:53 PM on 03/09/2011
Has anyone else ever imagined Grover Norquist in a truly authoritarian Nation/State? Him and Ralph Reed. Vicious. The kind of men whom everyone would be terrified of, except the two or three who are more vicious than they.

www.offthegridmpls.blogspot.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yatahayaz
04:32 PM on 03/09/2011
Grover Norquist is the defacto governor and legislature here in Arizona. And look how well we are doing now!
04:16 PM on 03/09/2011
Been trying for years for someone to look behind the corporate, media, political facade. Wedneday Meetings were briefly in the news where Norquist hosted right wingers from religion, business, media, and politics to insure they were all on message for any given topic. Good fortune Mr. Parker. In raising this topic you awill hit a very hard wall.
08:18 PM on 03/09/2011
Thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usna73
We are all in this together
02:32 PM on 03/09/2011
Most dangerous man in America.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
02:12 PM on 03/09/2011
Doesn't it just tick you off that an unelected man behind the curtain, answerable to absolutely no one and known by only a few, has this much power in our so-called democracy?
02:29 PM on 03/09/2011
That's why I wrote this. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis said, "Sunlight is the best disinfectant."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
05:49 PM on 03/09/2011
I thank you for writing it. Norquist doesn't get a fraction of the attention he deserves. Most people I know have never heard of him.
01:59 PM on 03/09/2011
Mr. Norquist is the author of the comment about how he wants to "shrink the US government until it's so small he could drown it in the bathtub."

Isn't that treasonous?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I say the things that have to be said.
06:22 PM on 03/09/2011
I sounds that way. You have to ask yourself what kind of a perverted imagination would use the imagery of drowning a small thing in a bathtub.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
myzenthing
01:47 PM on 03/09/2011
Agreed. This is why the current "conservative" philosophy is so disastrous. Even when you have the occasional decent conservative, they are hamstrung by Norquist and the 'baggers and the anti-abortionists into these straitjacketed positions that make it impossible to govern well.

In other words, unless the current GOP is replaced by something more moderate, we as a nation will continue our rapid decline...
photo
genboomxer
Don't believe everything you think.
12:52 PM on 03/09/2011
One gets the feeling that Mr. Norquist's ideal form of government more closely resembles that of Mexico at best or Somalia at worst.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
12:47 PM on 03/09/2011
If our wages have been stagnant for 30 years, why would we be accepting of a tax increase? Since if it wouldn't be fair for our taxes not to go up, but for the taxes of others to go up, I guess we're at an impasse. I think we should just throw out entirely the idea of raising or lowering personal taxes and start looking seriously at financial transaction taxes, a flat tariff across the board on everything imported except for raw material or agricultural items, and maybe that would get us back to what the Founding Fathers wanted for us in the first place. How about it, Grover?
02:25 PM on 03/09/2011
But it is fair for the taxes of the wealthiest and corporations to increase. They appropriated our government and controlled policy to put more burden on the lower classes so that their wealth would increase. Therefore, it is fair to tax them to level out the playing field and implement public funding of elections, make it illegal for pols and their staff to accept jobs with companies that they affected, mandate that CEOs can make no more than 25X that of their average worker, a person can sit on no more than 2 corporate boards, etc.

That all wages don't track that of the upper tier prove that Grover's and conservative economic theory wrong. It's failed. The failure of free market and trickle-down ideologies must be hammered home every time the issue pops up.
02:33 PM on 03/09/2011
Financial transaction taxes would be either a new tax or raising taxes, so Norquist wouldn't like that idea.

As for tariffs, Norquist criticized Trump's tariff proposal on Chinese imports on February 14, 2011.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
05:49 PM on 03/09/2011
Norquist is against the Founding Fathers and the Constitution then. Of course anyone should be against a tariff against only one country's exports into the USA. The tariff would have to be on goods from ALL countries, not singling any one country out like that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bibulus
On my way back from Hawaii with the long-form bio
12:22 PM on 03/09/2011
I'll admit I really liked his work on Sesame Street and The Monster at the End of This Book, however, I'm deeply disturbed by his policy stances ever since he and the Cookie Monster attended that Koch Bros. soiree at the Bohemian Grove.

R.I.P. Mr. Hooper
12:03 PM on 03/09/2011
You can't blame Republicans for extending the Bush tax rates, that happened in the lame duck session with both houses dominated by the Democrats.

Tax rates have remained the same, but last month the deficit was $228B (and it isn't even leap year). It's not the taxes that have changed it's the spending.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
02:29 PM on 03/09/2011
HAHAHA.

Please. EVERYONE who read about it KNOWS, the Republicans and their letter stating they wouldn't consider any other legislation in Senate (where it counted - all the other legislation passed in the House, remember?) The House voted to ELIMINATE the Bush Tax cuts. Anyway, the Republican Senators didn't even want to consider extending the Unemployment Benefits for MILLIONS of Americans unless the President cut a deal for the 2% Tax Cuts.

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sen. Jon Kyl (Ariz.), the Republican whip, told different interviewers that they expect Congress to vote for the tax cuts, which have been in effect for almost a decade, to continue unaltered for at least several years in exchange for an agreement to extend an emergency unemployment program that expired last week for millions of people." (Washington Post, Dec, 2010)
photo
aldo
My 2 Cents
02:45 PM on 03/09/2011
Its the Bush recession.
03:15 PM on 03/09/2011
The "Bush recession" had it's roots dating back to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's creation in the late 60s. And we will not see an unemployment rate as low as what we had when Bush left office while Obama is president.
11:50 AM on 03/09/2011
Maybe the IRS should review these non-profits for misleading names. Norquist's group should be remained, Some Americans for Tax Reform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Rappaport
tired of the con game called "free markets."
01:35 PM on 03/09/2011
More accurately, Rich Americans for Tax Elimination.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
02:24 PM on 03/09/2011
Precisely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:44 AM on 03/09/2011
"I don't want to abolish government­. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub." - Grover Norquist

Yes but the most successful societies in the 21st century are doing just the opposite with government. Look at China and Europe - bigger, more intrusive governments and in Europe's case higher taxes and stronger unions.

Grover - collective action will always win out over a loosely organized group of individuals. Making the government smaller is the formula for diminishing America.
12:08 PM on 03/09/2011
I think you're 20 years behind on the times. The Europeans are shrinking government, that's why they are rioting. Beyond that, it's a little early in the century to be declaring the "most successful" just yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anelder
06:09 PM on 03/09/2011
His statement is true for the furtherment of those who want to operate in the non restricted and regulated economy. It's how wealth is acquired.

It is never the size of government that is the problem; it has always been the efficiency that matters.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:29 AM on 03/09/2011
Norquist has left a trail of societal devastation in his wake - while espousing austerity for others he has become vastly wealthy as a behind-the-scenes strategist for the GOP, whose elite have become even MORE obscenely wealthy following his advice. They are deliriously happy to shower him with money - he yields a FABULOUS return on investment.

He shuns publicity - well aware that he can do far more damage - and reap more cash - in the shadows. He holds no office - never intends to seek one - and is therefore answerable to no one but the law - which is his profession to subvert. The weaker the laws and regulation, the less oversight - the broader the playing field he and his sponsors have to strip-mine our nation and economy.

They have recently masterminded the largest transfer of wealth from the public sector to the private EVER in the history of the planet - the so-called "meltdown" of the financial sector - and its subsequent "bailout."

They play - we pay. It's really that simple - all wrapped up in a shiny package that says "low taxes" - that draws fools like children following the Pied Piper to their destruction.

Since Norquist began his rise and influence - the USA has plunged into precipitous decline - the standard of living of everyday Americans has fallen while income disparity has reached record levels.

This man and his toxic dogma are a clear and present danger to the USA...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Callah
You can't fix stupid, not even with duct tape.
12:06 PM on 03/09/2011
Couldn't have said it better.....F&F.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anelder
06:13 PM on 03/09/2011
And the only solution is to get these 41 senators and those in the house out of office. As always it comes down to us, the voters, but as always we seem to fail.