More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eric Schurenberg

Eric Schurenberg

Posted: September 28, 2009 11:05 AM

Bernanke to Housing Market: Please Don't Drop Dead

What's Your Reaction:

As I pointed out in a post a week ago, getting Uncle Sam out of real estate is shaping up to be tougher than anyone would like. The Federal Reserve's statements since I blogged -- including this speech Friday from Fed governor Ken Warsh -- bear me out. And on top of that comes August's disappointing 2.7% decline in existing housing sales, the first drop in five months, followed Friday by a disappointing shortfall in new home sales volume. A graceful exit for Uncle appears even less likely than it did just a few days ago.

The government's exit strategy remains one of the biggest questions of the rebound, as my colleagues Mark Thoma and Jill Schlesinger explain. How does the government turn off the economy's life support systems without killing the patient? And yet how does it prevent the inflation that will surely result from keeping the spending going too long? The record on this isn't encouraging. As Warsh puts it:

Economic histories in the United States and elsewhere are packed with examples in which the monetary authorities, with the overwhelming benefit of hindsight, may have misjudged the communication, timing or force of their exit strategies. In some cases, policymakers may have waited too long to remove easy-money policies. In other cases, policymakers may have acted too abruptly, normalizing policy before the economy was capable of self-sustaining growth.


Errors of each sort are neither uncommon nor unexpected in the normal conduct of monetary policy...And the current environment is anything but normal.


Extricating itself from the housing market is just one part of this multi-stage balancing act. Among other supports, the Fed has been buying billions of mortgage-backed securities, a program that was supposed to expire at the end of the year. Shutting down the program too abruptly could trigger a rise in mortgage rates, so the Fed announced last week that it will extend the purchases into 2010. Probably a good move: There's still a wave of foreclosures related to option ARMs and commercial real estate on the way.


Still, the Fed will eventually have to remove the cash-drip I.V., unpopular as that move will be in the real estate industry. It's going to take some guts on the Fed's part -- let alone impeccable timing -- not to stay too generous for too long.

Which brings us to another arm of government, not known either for good timing or courage: Congress. It's responsible for the $8,000 first-time home buyer's tax credit, another housing market prop due to expire near the end of the year. Yet under pressure from realtors and home builders, Congress appears poised to extend the period in which the credit would apply -- and could even double the size of the credit. On Thursday, Goldman Sachs analyst Joshua Pollard put the odds at an extension at greater than 50%.

And housing is just one of the economic sectors the government is propping up. Uncle Sam has to ease out of banking, autos and all the programs authorized under the Obama stimulus bill without either starving the recovery or feeding inflation. It's going to be hard enough for the Fed to get the balance right. For the Fed and Congress to pull it off in perfect harmony seems next to impossible. The likeliest scenario seems to be that Congress, or both Congress and the Fed, will be too loose for too long. Hello, inflation.

More on CBS MoneyWatch.com

 

Follow Eric Schurenberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EditorBNET

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marinara
03:58 AM on 09/29/2009
Another dip in home prices is nothing compared to other policy disasters like tax credits for sending jobs overseas, propping up derivatives gamblers, allowing zombie banks to deep freeze the credit market.

As the economy tanks, that's just more money they can pour in without causing the inflation numbers to budge. For this government, that's just fine with them.
03:16 AM on 09/29/2009
The irony may be that helicopter Ben's actions induces deflation versus inflation. The race may be to the bottom.
10:54 PM on 09/28/2009
Oh for gosh sakes, the article is arguing that government involvement in the real estate market is a good thing? Remember Fannie? Freddie? Ginnie soon? Thanks to the $8000 Tax Credit to Homebuyers who have not bought a house in the last three years, more bad loans have been made that will also go bust over time. The market needs to find the real prices of these homes on it's own, artificially manipulating the market only distorts it and puts off the correction a little while while making the problems even worst in the future when they can no longer finance the illusion. Housing follows the same rules as does the car industry "The better the weather, the more people are likely to come out and buy a home or a car" There is always a downturn moving into winter until spring.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themodernleader
10:24 PM on 09/28/2009
When the only thing a country does is print and loan money to unworthy customers for unworthy investments, then bail out those investments. Eric S. is right: The only outcome is inflation with no job creation except for paper shufflers and bailed out monopolies. This Obama bunch is worse than the Hoover bunch by far. Hoover was a fanatical libertian when the word did not exist. But he and his subordinates had integrity and fidelity to the Constitution. The Obama bunch or simply a bunch of river foxes trying to grab what is left of of a dying economic and political system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montemalone
oenophile, aquarist, francophone, radical moderate
12:18 PM on 09/28/2009
Why not simply tax back all the ill goten gains from the ponzi schemers and CDO/MBS dealers and wall streeters?
The tax code has so many one offs in it now that adding a few to cover the trillions these thieves made off with over the past few years, while creating this economic disaster, won't be a problem.
That'll pay for the tax breaks for working folks ( the ones still working, that is) to spend their money to create jobs for the rest of us.
More people back to work means more people paying taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marinara
04:00 AM on 09/29/2009
i have a sarcastic answer: If Goldman Sachs didn't make profits, then where would Obama get his cabinet members from? He'd have to put in poor people!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:49 AM on 09/28/2009
I just love people who speak of inflation as a problem that "might be" on the horizon. LOL! Here in the United States, we've experienced price inflation of 25% since 1999, 170% since 1980, and 450% since Nixon closed the gold window in 1971! Inflation is the de facto POLICY of the U.S. government--how could it be otherwise? Washington decided decades ago that come hell or high water, it was going to spend as much money as it wanted, whenever it wanted, wherever it wanted, FOREVER. How would this pigfest be paid for? Through the backdoor tax of inflation, which would ensure that YOU and I would fund the government's insane, never-ending spending needs with chronic, never-ending INFLATION for the rest of our lives. To do that, the government had to a) adopt a fractional reserve banking system (hello, Federal Reserve) and b) make sure that any connection between gold and silver and the U.S. dollar was completely destroyed. It has succeeded on both counts. And if you don't think that that's TREASON, then you're not paying attention....