Okay, who else is already sick of the 2008 presidential campaign?
On NPR's Morning Edition on February 9, former DNC chairman and current Hillary Clinton strategist Terry McAuliffe predicted, "A year from today, there is a nominee of the Democratic and Republican party," citing the number of states which have moved or are considering moving their primary dates earlier in order to have some influence on the process. Under this scenario, the parties will have anointed their "presumptive" candidates six whole months before they hold their increasingly pointless infomercials...I mean, conventions -- and a full ten months before the general election.
We've just endured a week in which two of the prominent Democratic hopefuls began their public sniping, and it wasn't pretty. Are you telling me we've got to put up with TWENTY MORE MONTHS of this crap? Heck, that's long enough for Ross Perot to declare his candidacy, withdraw, announce again, pull out again, get back into the race a third time and still have time to withdraw again. The way things are going, I expect the first candidate for 2012 to announce the formation of his exploratory committee during the inaugural address of whoever wins in 2008.
Does anyone - the candidates, the media, the public -- have the stomach for this marathon? Aren't we in an age of acceleration? Shouldn't the internet and the 24-hour news cycle allow us to make decisions more quickly than they did in the days when ballots had to be transported on horseback? If the Academy Awards campaign season can be mercifully shortened, surely we can make some common-sense revisions to how we choose our commander-in-chief.
My suggestions:
- No one can formally announce their intention to run for President until one year before the election. That means, for the intervening twelve months, permanent-campaign-mode is suspended and the government must focus on governing. So until this November 7, Senators Clinton, McCain, Obama and their friends would have to spend their time running the country, rather than running for running the country. This would give potential candidates the advantage of being able to point to genuine achievements during their tenure besides raising money for their presidential campaigns. And what about folks who aren't currently in office, like Giuliani or Edwards? They'd have to devote this off-year to projects that improve society, not just improve their odds of becoming president. Look how vital and happy Al Gore became once he stopped running for president and started doing something with his life. Why, it's made him positively presidential!