We have fair trade coffee and humanely raised pork. So why can't we create a market for ethically sourced pornography? A couple of decades ago, people didn't give much thought to their food's provenance. We didn't care about carbon footprints or the working conditions of the poor Africans who sold us our coffee beans. Slowly, however, consumption habits began to shift under the weight of scientific evidence and cultural change. We're becoming a little more selective in our consumer choices.
Yet not with that multi-billion dollar white elephant: pornography. We hear rumblings here and there about the sexual trafficking of women and children, and it's always a relief when a criminal ring is busted for what's euphemistically called "abuse." It's reassuring to know that whatever was going on in the far reaches of a few sick minds has little to do with our own primitive -- but relatively harmless -- impulses.
But do porn consumers ever think about where their porn is sourced? What a downer! No one wants to hear about drug-addicted runaways or Albanian teenage sex slaves. Nobody wants to imagine STD infections on movie sets or the life circumstances that would impel a woman to engage in physically punishing sexual acts on camera. (And just Google the word "bukkake" if you want a quick education in the mainstreaming of fringe sex acts.)
Part of the problem is our reluctance to acknowledge the pornification of contemporary life. If we can relegate porn to the margins of our cultural conversation, we can pretend it only touches a small minority of adult men, rather than the vast majority of Americans, many even in their first or second decade of life.
Maybe it's just too embarrassing to admit the extent of our obsession, but people of all stripes really like watching sex acts. For example, surveys of Evangelical Christians report porn viewing rates similar to the general population. Utah leads the nation in per capita subscriptions to online porn. Technology has produced the ideal Petri dish for the biggest sexual market in human history, providing easy access, affordability, and anonymity in one appealing package.
Calls to regulate the content of pornography, like Tipper Gore's ratings system for music lyrics, are missing the point. One person's degradation may be another person's kink, and we don't need more Rick Santorums policing our fantasies. Moreover, sanitized desire, like a lot of so-called "feminist porn," can be a buzz-kill.
But shouldn't consumers have some context to evaluate what they are viewing? Shampoo bottles and Tuna cans assure us that animals were unharmed. Shouldn't we know if porn actors are subject to out-of-control STD rates, or are forced to do things against their will? At a minimum, a Porn housekeeping seal of approval would tell us by, and for whom, the porn was made. It might make you think twice before downloading that random YouPorn video or chatting with a "horny Russian slut" at LiveJasmin.
There probably are attractive, uninhibited people who are excited by the rewards of porn careers -- people who are untroubled by the ethics or lifestyle limitations of making a living as sex workers, or who at the least may consider it the best of their uninspiring options. But there are probably relatively few of these people, and consumers should know who they are so they can make informed choices.
Making such informed choices would have a few collateral benefits. If we knew for sure that porn production was free of coercion and desperation, for example, we might find there are fewer women willing to be gagged, choked, and "triple penetrated" on camera.
Fair Trade porn might also finally allow us to call a moratorium on assertions that women aren't aroused by visual imagery or don't sometimes fantasize about anonymous, unemotional sex. And market forces could eventually affect the aesthetic standard of pornography, which might, in turn, shift the skewed gender balance of viewership. If you think this is a fairytale, recall that a generation ago, no one talked about animal abuse or the case against corporal punishment. Cultural norms do change.
Pornography is a fact of life, and parental controls and moralizing spoilsports won't make a dent in its exponential growth. But the bar needs raising. The sustainable food movement hasn't eliminated factory farms or our inexhaustible craving for junk food. But it provides an alternative model of consumption that we can aspire to. Organic and fair trade practices are leading us, gradually but inevitably, to a better relationship with food. Maybe Fair Trade porn could reconnect us to a better relationship with the human body.
Erika Christakis, M.P.H., M.Ed., is an educator, public health advocate, and Harvard College administrator. As House Master of one of Harvard's twelve undergraduate residential communities, she is responsible for the well-being of 400 young adults.
John Carr: Kindle - Porn Slipping in Under the Radar
On to other serious matters: yes, ethical porn is important. No, I don't want the people I'm watching to be forced (physically or mentally, including because of circumstances) to make a living that way.
I far prefer to watch porn that involves people who enjoy what they're doing, and are happy to talk about it. There are some out there.
As a therapist who has worked with a few people in the porn "industry", it is clear that the majority of people working in porn will tell you they "enjoy" what they are doing as there are real and imagined punishments for telling the truth. Many, many are reliving their own abuse (physical, mental, emotional and/or sexual abuse) with each act they perform. In many ways, doing porn and getting paid for it gives one the pseudo-power of thinking that they are in charge of the abuse.
Are their people who really enjoy doing porn? I mean, truly? I would guess a few. But, for many women, especially, it is exceptionally degrading. But that's nothing new to those who have grown up being someone else's object.
However, horniness doesn't like "coitus interruptus" much and to admit these truths means that one must think before one cums. Not very popular in today's get-it-quick society.
But I have a visceral reaction to the suggestion that our voices should not be believed. The idea that anyone who ever says anything positive about their experience in the sex industry is probably lying is a horrible suggestion. Sex work has it's downsides, but ideas like that are creating more problems rather than helping. Honestly, I'm more upset at anti-sex-work activists who deny sex workers' voices and agency than the folks who created those negative experiences I had working mainstream porn.
Those people don't belong in any field that does any research. Their bias influences data collected and results in bad research.
They are doing it because they love risking death and dying young, right?
"Organic and fair trade practices are leading us, gradually but inevitably, to a better relationship with food." Fair Trade porn could possibly reconnect us to a better relationship with the human body if a "Grade A Beef" was stamped on each porn star's hindquarters.
It seems like you are demonstrating a strong ignorance of your topic here. If you think feminist porn is overly sanitized, you haven't watched enough to know the full breadth of what porn created with feminist and anti-oppression ethics looks like. The Feminist Porn Awards have been going on for several years now, and looking at the winners (let alone the nominees) you can see a wide range of soft, kinky, romantic, intense, plot driven, smutty, gentle caresses, gagging/chocking, and everything in between. I suggest you check it out.
I think where the discussion gets more complicated is when the topic is expanded to sex in mainstream film. A-listers Kate Winslet and Halle Berry received Academy Awards for films in which they appeared nude and had lovemaking scenes. It's hard to make the case that these actresses are "exploited" as each is rumored to be worth multiple millions of dollars. If they felt their roles were degrading, they had enough resources to decline the offers.
Would "Monster's Ball" or "The Reader" have had the same impact if the nudity and sex were only suggested instead of depicted? Theses films involved no actual penetration as far as I know but at some level, it was decided that mainstream audiences audience needed to see and/or would enjoy seeing two naked people pretending to have sex.
If one first asks the question of whether there is anything intrinsically wrong with sex with spectators that justifies its being stigmatized, it could be a very short discussion.
Even sex with many different partners can become boring and lose its thrill (I hear). Does watching porn help bring back the excitement? If so...is that bad? Are there other ways that are better?