iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ethan Nadelmann

GET UPDATES FROM Ethan Nadelmann
 

Obama's Hypocritical War on Marijuana

Posted: 05/25/2012 5:58 pm

A forthcoming biography on President Obama is making headlines, with new details about the president smoking marijuana with his teenage friends in Hawaii.

David Maraniss' book, Barack Obama: The Story, describes Obama as a marijuana enthusiast: "When a joint was making the rounds, he often elbowed his way in, out of turn, shouted 'Intercepted!' and took an extra hit," Maraniss writes. Maraniss also describes Obama's technique of "roof hits" while hot-boxing cars. "When the pot was gone, they tilted their heads back and sucked in the last bit of smoke from the ceiling," he writes. Obama has been less than shy about his drug use in the past, writing about the topic in Dreams from My Father, "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it," he writes in the memoir.

While Obama's term began with great promise for drug policy reformers, in the past two years it has been difficult to distin­guish Obama's drug policies from those of his White House predecessors. Although President Obama has acknowledged that legalization is "an entirely legitimate topic for debate" -- the first time a sitting president has made such a statement -- his administra­tion has made a string of increasingly disappointing moves over the last year. Half of all U.S. drug arrests are for marijuana -- more than 850,000 Americans were arrested for marijuana in 2010 alone, 88 percent for mere possession.

Barack Obama won a lot of hearts and minds some years ago when he talked so openly and frankly about his youthful marijuana use. That contrasted refreshingly with Bill Clinton's hemming and hawing about not having inhaled, much less George Bush's refusal to even acknowledge what old friends revealed about his marijuana use.

But the president has been losing lots of hearts and minds, especially those of young voters, with his striking silence on marijuana issues since he became president -- apart from providing lame excuses for the federal government's aggressive undermining of state medical marijuana laws.

Most disappointing is his failure to say a word as president about the fact that half of all drug arrests each year are for nothing more than possessing a small amount of marijuana, which is something Barack Obama did lots of in his younger days, or to offer any critical comments about the stunning racial disproportionality in marijuana arrests around the country.

Roughly twice as many people are arrested for marijuana possession now as were arrested in the early 1980s, even though the number of people consuming marijuana is no greater now than then. If police had been as keen on making marijuana arrests back then, it's quite possible that a young man named Barry Obama would have landed up with a criminal record -- and even more likely that he would not have his current job.

With 50 percent of Americans -- and 57 percent of Democrats -- now in favor of legalizing marijuana use, according to Gallup's most recent poll, President Obama needs to come clean once again about marijuana -- but this time he needs to speak not of his own youthful use but rather of the harmful consequences of today's punitive marijuana policies for young Americans today.

Ethan Nadelmann is the executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org)

 

Follow Ethan Nadelmann on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EthanNadelmann

FOLLOW POLITICS
A forthcoming biography on President Obama is making headlines, with new details about the president smoking marijuana with his teenage friends in Hawaii. David Maraniss' book, Barack Obama: The Stor...
A forthcoming biography on President Obama is making headlines, with new details about the president smoking marijuana with his teenage friends in Hawaii. David Maraniss' book, Barack Obama: The Stor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,923
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (122 total)
03:15 PM on 07/17/2012
The president isn't hypocritical he just needed that California bud
Govm't control sucks!
Karama
Procrastinator
06:36 PM on 06/03/2012
It's a case of "Do as I say, not as I do." Maybe he doesn't anymore, but he sure did, when he was the age of those who are doing it now. So in the past you're not punished but now you are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
casualtysr
04:53 PM on 06/01/2012
Ethan Nadelmann tells it like it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hn
American liberty with unconventional wisdom
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:20 PM on 05/29/2012
Thanks for that example proving the truth about marijuana not being a signficant cause of auto accidents.

You had to scour years worth of news to come up with a couple of accidents that MIGHT be (no proof) due to marijuana consumption - in 2010!

No such scouring of the news (with such nebulous results) is necessary to find thousands of accidents caused by alcohol use. In fact, they are so numerous, they are usually not even reported in the news, or else they wouldn't have room for any other stories.

Marijuana is NOT alcohol, and is not a significant cause of auto accidents - as your desperate, fruitless search confirms.
12:52 PM on 05/29/2012
Legalize,regulate and tax marijuana Like alcohol. It's the only sane policy.
I don't want my kids to grow up in a world where they could be put in jail and have a record for having a small amount of marijuana on them. Politicians cry all day and night we have to keep it illegal for the sake of the children. Kids can get it any time they feel like it and it's much easier to get than alcohol or tobacco. Let's not forget the guy that sells them weed will also be trying to get them to buy some coke or some pills or whatever else it is he's selling that is far far worse than some harmless marijuana. Gangs will lose their source of revenue. People will begin to trust law enforcement again, jobs will be created. The money we save on enforcement can be used for any number of things that we need money to do. How about pay off some of that national debt that keeps piling up, or how about national education improvements or improving our aging infrastructure. Hemp can be harnessed as an easily renewable a source of paper and building materials( and fuel !). If you've ever seen how much paper can be made from one tree it's pathetic and a practice that needs to end. There can be a bright future for this nation and it all starts with marijuana policy reform. That's some change and hope I'd be willing to get behind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hn
American liberty with unconventional wisdom
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:30 PM on 05/29/2012
This is a bogus study for a few reasons. It is based on false assumptions and does not recognize that alcohol consumers are TWELVE times more likely to have an auto accident - even with their false assumptions.

Many people think marijuana consumption causes accidents like alcohol. It doesn't, for various reasons. Research has shown marijuana is not as intoxicating as alcohol. More importantly, while alcohol drinkers think they are better drivers and so drive faster and more aggressively, marijuana consumers are very aware of their altered consciousness and correctly judge when they are too impaired to drive - refraining from doing so. If they must, they correctly compensate for their altered state by driving slower and more cautiously.

The point is, judgement is not affected like it is with alcohol. Marijuana consumers simply don't put themselves or others in harm's way. This is why the preponderance of the research shows marijuana is NOT a significant cause of auto accidents. 
 
Marijuana and Driving: A Review of the Scientific Evidence

http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=5450
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hn
American liberty with unconventional wisdom
06:54 PM on 05/29/2012
I sure don't believe it. Congress don't believe it. American schools/families don't believe it.
photo
average dude
We will get there despite you.
03:12 PM on 05/29/2012
This is an exercise in the difference between logic and critical thinking. Just because someone has trace amounts of cannabis metabolites in their blood does not mean that they are high. Those metabolites can stay in your body for as long as 30 to 45 days after you consume, well after the high and ANY effect has worn off. This is the same as saying booze made someone wreck because they drank two weeks ago. Savvy?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinking Clearly
Communication is the key to understanding
09:52 AM on 05/29/2012
Here is my take: Obama rode into office on the backs of many American voters who were fed up with the war on drugs and the criminalization of marijuana. If Obama and Romney want to ignore it now, I will be the first to help them ride on out too.

When an issue becomes one that more than 50% of American voters have an interest in, I think its time to address the issue head on and get something done. Obama and Romney are both off the track.

Obama doesn't need rehab. He needs a wake up call.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:35 PM on 05/29/2012
Right! So please vote for Gary Johnson. Not only did he save New Mexico from financial disaster while governor, he was the driving force behind implementing that state's medical marijuana program. He says:

>>>"The parallels between drug policy today and Prohibition in the 1920’s are obvious, as are the lessons our nation learned. Prohibition was repealed because it made matters worse. Today, no one is trying to sell our kids bathtub gin in the schoolyard and micro-breweries aren’t protecting their turf with machine guns. It’s time to apply that thinking to marijuana. By making it a legal, regulated product, availability can be restricted, under-age use curtailed, enforcement/court/incarceration costs reduced, and the profit removed from a massive underground and criminal economy.

By managing marijuana like alcohol and tobacco – regulating, taxing and enforcing its lawful use – America will be better off. The billions saved on marijuana interdiction, along with the billions captured as legal revenue, can be redirected against the individuals committing real crimes against society."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinking Clearly
Communication is the key to understanding
10:55 PM on 05/29/2012
Gary Johnson has my vote.
03:28 AM on 05/29/2012
I threw my vote away on Obama last time hoping he would end the utter insanity of cannabis prohibition. His crackdown on medical providers,coupled with the new information that he is a huge hypocrite, means Im staying home on election day. I know a lot of younger people who were FURIOUS when this info came out because it makes Obama look like a hypocrite who changed his views once corporate America and big pharma had their way with him. With so many people in favor of outright legalization, I think Obama needs to realize that he is pandering to a non existent base of people who want to continue wasting resources locking up peaceful citizens for inhaling the smoke of a medicinal herb. No one has the right to tell a dying person what they can use to ease their pain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevin hunt2012
11:12 AM on 05/29/2012
I share your disappointment with Obama on a lot of issues. It's possible that Obama's advisers have warned him not to be seen as the "pot president" considering he is running against squeaky clean Romney, who has never even had a beer. Carter wanted to decriminalize weed in the 1970's. What we saw was an anti-Carter backlash that brought us 28 years of prohibitionist candidates Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush. Perhaps its a good thing that Obama isn't 100% pro-weed. Republicans in New Hampshire and Denver have been pushing for medical marijuana, possibly because they want to get support from the pro-weed voters that are fed up with Obama's crackdowns.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 PM on 05/29/2012
Obama isn't 100% pro-weed? He's not even 1% pro-weed, which SHOUTS his hypocrisy.

Polls show public support for ending the fraudulent marijuana prohibition has now passed 50 percent nationwide, so he doesn't have the "political" excuse anymore. He is simply obeying the one percent who he has shown every sign are his masters.

He will not do anything different in his second term. Vote for Gary Johnson for a REAL change you can believe in!
photo
average dude
We will get there despite you.
03:14 PM on 05/29/2012
It'snot that he isnt pro weed, it's that he is ignoring the will of the people in states that have medical cannabis, which he said he would not do. That is what is costing him in the polls.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstreet
singing dog
01:19 AM on 05/29/2012
C'mon, Barrack. Light it up. Lighten up. Hope.
photo
conservativepundit
Iced Tea on a daily basis
10:47 PM on 05/28/2012
Imagine the laws he broke along his path. And yet he's president. Time for a real change in November.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justice76
Be the change you wish to see in the world
11:43 AM on 05/29/2012
Remember the laws Bush and Cheney broke during their time in office.
02:23 PM on 05/29/2012
Surely if there was laws broken, Obama's Attorney General Holder would be on case showing Bush's people with indictments. Please tell us what crimes did Holder indict previous POTUS or his people on? Just name one. LOL
photo
Deep Thinking Man
Always Remember, A Wet Bird Never Flies At Night !
07:28 PM on 05/28/2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Narcotics_Tax_Act

this Act is that led to the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 !!!!!! each Act is lidted in the top right hand corner of the page !!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:15 PM on 05/28/2012
And each step a monstrous fraud, when it comes to marijuana.
07:00 PM on 05/28/2012
Drug War Supporters: It's about more than just Freedom (Although, here in the "Land of the Free," our Freedom ought to count for something).

The Prohibition of Cannabis only means that it's shut out of the legal economy, making Cannabis exclusive to the illegal economy. THIS LAW PROMOTES CRIME.

If you don't care about the Freedom and Liberty concerns raised by calling something a crime when it isn't; If you have no personal interest in smoking Pot; If you don't care about the million and one useful uses for Cannabis or Hemp; You should care about the crime. You should care about the murder. You should care about the destabilization of countries throughout the Western Hemisphere, including our own. You should care, because these things are fallout from this unjust Prohibition law, a law promulgated by your Government.

We are all citizens of a Nation that is Constitutionally pledged to the Liberty of its citizens. Part of how that works is, something isn't a crime simply because the Government says it is.

This law needs to be changed. It calls something a crime that isn't, directly affecting the lives of at least a tenth of the American population. It illegitimately interferes with Liberty, promotes rather than decreases crime, gets people killed, and it isn't even keeping drugs out of the hands of your kids (That last resort of the Prohibitonist argument).

My fellow Americans, it's not down to you to make other people's decisions for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:19 PM on 05/28/2012
Good post! And add to that - the great diminishment of freedom and privacy caused by the fradulent war on marijuana consumers set the nation up to sacrifice even more of their freedom and privacy (mostly unnecessarily) by such abominal legislation as the Orwellian-named "Patriot Act."

It will be a century before we can accurately assess all the damage to our country done by this hugely evil witch hunt!
04:47 AM on 05/29/2012
Hear Hear! People have been freaking out the past decade, 'Oh, they're taking our freedoms away,' completely unaware of the fact that people (them included) have been willingly giving up their freedoms for three decades now. The weakened state the Constitution and Bill of Rights are in today, the groundwork was laid for that by the corrosion of the Eighties and Nineties.

Thirty years ago, drug-testing people, whether by government or by businesses, raised serious questions and serious objections: 'Is it Unconstitutional? Does it violate privacy?' People quit asking those questions, people quit worrying about that stuff; People HAD personal objections to the proliferation of reasons why cops can pull you over, and then said 'Well, I don't like it, but that IS how they catch a lot of people with drugs...'

Totalitarianism was never going to announce itself. The government wasn't going to come right out and say 'We have assumed control.' People had to be convinced, frightened into going to the government and asking for greater control. For thirty years now, The War On Drugs has been the best catalyst for that.

To be clear, we're not at Totalitarianism now, but we used to be more resistant to submission to control than we are today. Freedom used to be about personal Freedom, not just something reserved for business.

It used to be 'Power To The People,' nowadays it's 'Power To The Power.'

But it does feel like people are starting to wise up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hn
American liberty with unconventional wisdom
12:07 PM on 05/29/2012
So the police will let people decide if cocaine or meth is good for them and let kids try it. It's their liberty and freedom, right?
Marijuana is no better than neither.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:48 PM on 05/29/2012
Prohibitionists always try to divert the discussion from marjiuana to ALL drugs. They do this to cloud the issue and cast the harms of the hard drugs onto marijuana.

We don't have the same alcohol policy, as we do tobacco policy, as we do caffiene policy. Each drug is a different story, with different levels of harm, and requires a different regulatory system. - When we were ending alcohol prohibition, nobody thought it was necessary to discuss opium.

The lie of this post is clearly found in the last line, when you say marijuana is the same as cocaine and meth! Shame on you! Science, and widespread experience have shown marijuana has NO signficant harms.

Beware of this dishonest poster!
photo
Sunlogic
What Liberal Media!?
06:27 PM on 05/29/2012
It is funny that you have to lump in cannabis with meth and cocaine to trump it up to be the boogie man! We never saw that coming from a prohibitionist. (great sarcasm)
photo
EdCorner
Now what - more of the same...
03:19 PM on 05/28/2012
More than hypocritical - planned. Tokers go to jail but the elites that bankrupt this country never serve a day.
photo
mikeholloway
support organ donation
01:00 PM on 05/28/2012
Alright then, lets talk about hypocrisy shall we? Libertarianism is something I expect to see given the derision it richly deserves when I'm reading Huffpost. But when the priority of someone's life is getting high, no matter who it might harm, even someone that considers themselves a compasionate socialist is liable to jump on the libertarian bandwagon. That's to say nothing about the legions of actual self-centered sociopathic libertarians whose primary motivation for reading Huffpost is the drug legalization.

You can learn alot about political convictions reading Huffpost. Another example: Bill Maher. Maher will heap ridicule on the anti-science propaganda of religious fundamentalists pointing out that everyone really can trust the scientific community and that they're not conspiring against us. Then in the next breath he will promote anti-vaccine anti-science propaganda citing "incontrovertible proof" that the scientific community is conspiring against us.

I expect a liberalism to stick to convictions of compassion, social good, and evidence based policies. Anyone calling themselves a liberal that deviates from these principles in favor of social policies that feel good at the expense of others is a hypocrite.
02:29 PM on 05/28/2012
Bill Maher's hypocrisy aside, Former President Richard Nixon started this "War on Drugs" 41 years ago. How would you assess our country's progress so far?

We should probably give it another 41 years just to confirm the idiocy of our strategy right? Forty-ones year should have been long enough for us to scratch our collective heads, come to an informed decision and all cry out in unison -- d'oh!

Prohibition wasn't successful against alcohol use and trafficking and it is not successful against illegal drug use or trafficking...d'oh! Oh no, yet another failed government policy.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist or Bill Maher to figure this one out.

Legalize it, regulate it and tax it. Don't do it for me; do it for those who have served and are still serving time for the possession, use or dealing of illegal drugs. And do it for that "sane" politician you're going to vote for. If he had been arrested for his pot or cocaine possession back in the day you would not have the choice of voting for your "sane" President.

Just think if Ronald Reagan had been a better Commander-in-Chief in the "War on Drugs" Obama would be probably be chooming and snorting with his convicted buds somewhere on the islands.
photo
mikeholloway
support organ donation
03:01 PM on 05/28/2012
" "War on Drugs" 41 years ago. How would you assess our country's progress so far?"
 
Red herring appreciated only by someone who's high.  We've had a "war" on punching out our neighbor for several millenia.  Maybe we should legalize that too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmKonDotNet
Legalize Hemp!
04:11 PM on 05/28/2012
If only President Nixon listened to the study he asked to be done we wouldn't be having this discussion. That's right, the Shafer Commission, the study that was done at the behest of the President, recommended we decriminalize marijuana.

Nixon of course completely disregarded the findings and started the "war on drugs" which as most of us agree has been a dismal failure. Over half the adult population has admitted to smoking cannabis at one point during their lives; we've spent over $1 trillion since the "war" started; we lock up 850,000 Americans every year, 750,000 for possession alone, how can anyone defend this as a success?

The war on drugs was supposed to reduce demand and supply, neither goal has been accomplished. And if they're trying to keep drugs away from kids they're doing a piss poor job as well considering high school students report they can find marijuana easier than alcohol or tobacco, often within an hour.

Shafer Commission -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Commission_on_Marihuana_and_Drug_Abuse
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:09 PM on 05/28/2012
Wow. Some really bizarre assumptions there. Who do you imagine has a "life priority" of getting high? And who do you imagine would be "harmed" by ending the fraudulent, counter-productive marijuana prohibition? And why do you deny the monstrous harm done by the war on marijuana consumers?

And how can you state Obama's believing in decriminalizing marijuana all his life until AT LEAST 2004, then suddenly becoming close-minded on marijuana reform with becoming president, is NOT hypocrisy.

Sometimes being an apologist is an impossible job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmKonDotNet
Legalize Hemp!
04:36 PM on 05/28/2012
"And who do you imagine would be "harmed" by ending the fraudulent, counter-productive marijuana prohibition?"

Perhaps he's a prison guard...

http://www.republicreport.org/2012/marijuana-lobby-illegal/
photo
mikeholloway
support organ donation
05:31 PM on 05/28/2012
"
And how can you state Obama's believing in decriminalizing marijuana all his life until AT LEAST 2004, then suddenly becoming close-minded on marijuana reform with becoming president, is NOT hypocrisy. "Because that's not what's happening out here in the real world.  Obama swore an oath to uphold the nation's law's. It's what he wants to do.  As a lawyer he has a pretty firm grasp of what that entails, and he's been doing a pretty good job of it.  The other factually bizarre fallacy being bandied about here is that Obama can wave his hand and make marijuana a medicine.  That's the job of the medical community and the FDA.
11:07 AM on 05/28/2012
id rather smoke a joint than start a war that will leave hundreds of thousands maimed and destitute
11:26 AM on 05/28/2012
So would many people, who have no shares in arms and logistics industries..