iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ethan Rome

GET UPDATES FROM Ethan Rome
 

Boehner Ends Talks to Protect Tax Breaks for the Super-Rich -- Time for a Clean Vote

Posted: 07/24/11 12:23 PM ET

The extremist GOP has recklessly politicized one of the most important governing opportunities of a lifetime -- Speaker of the House John Boehner walked away from bipartisan debt-ceiling talks at the last minute to protect tax loopholes for millionaires, billionaires and big corporations.

It was an astonishing display of crass, reckless partisan politics to appease the Speaker's base of Tea Party fanatics in Congress and his special-interest campaign contributors, which increasingly control him instead of his better instincts to do the right thing.

The debt-ceiling talks are about setting priorities and making hard choices. Speaker Boehner, Majority Leader Cantor and the Republicans have made their choices clear: In the negotiations they have chosen to put tax cuts for big corporations and super-rich people before all other considerations.

The Speaker and the GOP have put ideological purity and pandering to extremist right-wing interest groups and their Republican mouthpieces in Congress before problem solving to avert a crisis. Before deficit reduction. Before job creation. Before helping America's seniors and working and middle-class families get by in this tough economy.

It isn't any more complicated than that. They've made their choices clear. And so, too, has the president. He wants a deal.

By all accounts the parties were moments away from a deal that met the vast majority of the Republicans' demands while forcing Democrats to accept a disturbingly long list of concessions on core principles and priority programs they hold dear. And yet giving the Republicans a lot of what they wanted was not enough because the Republicans' dirty secret is that they don't really care about the deficit. And as the president has said, the Republicans simply don't know how to say yes. Instead, the GOP has engaged in political brinkmanship on steroids to protect tax loopholes for the wealthiest Americans and big corporations that need those tax breaks less than anyone.

When the Republicans walked away from an imminent bipartisan deal, they threw the economy, the international markets, seniors and middle-class families under the bus. They're willing to default on Americans' financial obligations and default on the American dream, which has been made possible by programs like Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, college aid and much more.

It's now abundantly clear that the Republicans are willing to drive our economy off a cliff rather than ask corporations and the super-rich to pay their fair share. They're willing to end Medicare as we know it rather than ask corporate jet owners to give up their excessive and unjustifiable tax breaks. They're willing to slash Medicaid and literally kick millions of seniors out of nursing homes -- and shift billions of dollars of costs to the states while costing millions of jobs -- rather than force Big Oil companies to give up their special tax loopholes.

The GOP's recklessness and irresponsibility has no limits even at this perilous moment. Unfortunately, they're not in power to govern. They don't care about getting things done for the best interest of the country. They're in power to posture and position themselves for the next election, and that's the last thing the country needs right now. I'm still hopeful that the Speaker will come around to a responsible way to solve this problem, but I hope that doesn't include the deal that was on the table, because President Obama was giving away too much in his effort to get a deal that would avoid default.

What's missing from the talks is the simple fact that seniors and middle-class families didn't cause the debt and shouldn't have to pay for it. Shredding the economic security of struggling families and small businesses is simply the wrong way to go. It's a bad deal for America, even if it's bipartisan.

The answer now seems pretty clear -- if a fair deal can't be arrived at promptly, the president and legislative leaders should do what's both achievable and what makes the most economic and policy sense: They should have a clean vote on the debt ceiling now, so we can end the gridlock and get to the business of governing and addressing job creation and other top priorities.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dch58
To think is to differ.
10:44 AM on 07/25/2011
The Republicans are only interested in posturing for the 2012 elections. They don't care about the deficit. They don't care about jobs. And, they don't care about regular people.

It's time for a clean vote on the debt limit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
So silly
09:36 AM on 07/25/2011
Cutting Social Security and Medicare is the same as a tax increase. They can try to frame it however they please, insisting it is preserving them but saying it doesn't make it true. If you are still taking the same amount of money from me but giving me less you are taxing me more. Why not walk out when cuts to SS and Medicare is brought up?
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
04:40 AM on 07/25/2011
Executive order the 14th admendment. Then go to work on creating jobs and balancing the budget.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JFoxCPT
12:16 AM on 07/25/2011
Republican politicians are only concerned with helping the richest people. That is ALL they care about.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
11:12 PM on 07/24/2011
The Republicans worship Greed and Money and in their temples you find altars to the richest Americans. Don't expect to be welcomed at their door, front, side or back.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JFoxCPT
05:30 PM on 07/24/2011
Republican politicians only purpose/goal is GREED and POWER. Actual human beings do not figure into their thoughts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:48 PM on 07/24/2011
This article speaks to a larger issue of a personality trait set of those on the right. Bob Altemeyer, Prof, Dep’t of Psychology, U of Manitoba described in his work, The Authoritarians, a game that was done as part of his research. http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/

It's called the Global Change Game. It compared teams with a more liberal mindset (determined through a scientifically designed questionnaire) against those with an authoritarian (right wing) mindset playing a game where the world is facing a crisis. It is very instructive to understanding what we have with the current crisis.

The liberal teams negotiated, worked with other nations and resolved problems. The authoritarian group, with their belligerence, militancy, stubborn refusal to budge from their own positions, refusal to negotiate, and tendency to dominate and win at all costs all too soon created a world war that destroyed everything.

For the Republican congress that we got as a result of the 2010 midterms, total catastrophic destruction is far more important than giving any ground.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schalaine
We are women. We vote.
04:15 PM on 07/24/2011
Now, I am officially scared.
jhNY
Mercy.
02:04 PM on 07/24/2011
If, in the coming days, the debt ceiling has been raised as a result of a a bargain between parties that causes cuts to come to social service programs, the Democratic Party, led by Obama, will have sold the heart of what ought to be our greatest distinguishing asset: we will no longer be seen, even by ourselves, as the party that would protect those in harm's way from the most ruinous effects of our economic system's periodic downturns.

Instead, we will be the party that will sacrifice the needs of the powerless to the demands of a fudged balance sheet. Most of the cheers for our dubious labors will be coming from the Republican Party.

Or if, we somehow manage to get the debt ceiling raised without having to actually cut social service programs, we will nevertheless be the party whose head, our president, dangled the fates of seniors, children and the poor as a sacrifice during negotiations.

The Republicans would run as follows: 'All of us have agreed cuts are necessary, even President Obama, who has offered up billions in cuts to social security and medicare. Now we're just having a discussion about where to make them and how deep they've got to be. But rest assured-- the Republican Party will never pull the plug on Grandma.'

Sounds like a winning ticket to me-- but not for the Democratic Party, and not for the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Penelope Pappas Sells
I cast my vote for sanity
01:36 PM on 07/24/2011
Boehner left the debt ceiling talks because his real agenda is to make sure Obama is a "one-term-president" and ANY agreement that moves the country forward could potentially help Obama in the next election. The same obstructionist "all for us-nothing for the 98% of the USA who don't have lobbists" crap.... what else is new?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerryW
12:45 PM on 07/24/2011
Very good and clear article outlining the talks ( history or aerial view) and what the clear result should be. Thanks Ethan.
12:41 PM on 07/24/2011
Can't President Obama just send in the Capitol Police to arrest all (Republicans) who are engaged in unAmerican activities? Yes, of course, senators and "representatives" have a right to free speech, but their right, like that of all Americans, ends when it puts the country in danger.

And the Republicans' insistence on playing games clearly endangers this country and the world.

Arrest them now, pass the debt limit, and then, if any of them have the nerve to protest their incarceration, let them try to defend their foolishness in a court of law. Any jury made up of the American people, not members of special interest groups, would convict them in a second.
photo
SeenItBefore
Ya want to super size that?
12:40 PM on 07/24/2011
Nicely crafted piece... What does make reasonable intelligent people decide the downtrodden, poverty stricken, elderly and sickly among us need to step up and bail out the obscenely wealthy?

What makes the American equivalent of groundlings imagine that they occupy an iota of concern by those in Congress, or those ensconced behind high walls and expensive security services?

Why would anyone who is poor and disabled, or sick and old, think the likes of McConnell, Canter, Geithner or Obama gives a rats patoote about them outside of a vote?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jerry Vasquez
A Unapologetic liberal
12:35 PM on 07/24/2011
Well one thing is for sure and for certain, boehner is not the man to be leading the negotiations.
He is just a front man. The real power lies either with eric cantor or grover norquist.
Someone must have E-mailed or tweeted him and that would explain why he left so abruptly during
budget talks. He needed to have his Marching orders up-dated. The President and the country should not be forced to negotiate with a messenger.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
12:25 PM on 07/24/2011
Great, truthful article; however, all it does is let off steam. NO ONE in Congress or the WH cares about the middle class or the poor - NO ONE, and that includes our President. We are on our own, folks, we are on our own. The only way for us to be heard now is TAKE TO THE STREETS.
photo
runswithscissors
Hobson's Choice ≠ Free Will
12:12 PM on 07/24/2011
The deal that Boehner walked away from gave away too much anyway. Next one should be scaled back considerably, and Obama should lay out the parameters of it publicly. Raise one additional dollar in revenues for every dollar cut...the same plan that worked for Clinton. Remind people that Clinton left a budget surplus, that it was the GOP that got us into this mess we're in now, and offer the same plan that Clinton used to eliminate the deficit. Anyone with even a hint of sanity will understand that this is better than throwing Grandma out on the street and better than cutting programs that benefit the poor (which will accomplish nothing more than increasing the crime rate, thus the jail population, and thus a net INCREASE in spending).