iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ethan Rome

Ethan Rome

GET UPDATES FROM Ethan Rome
 

GOP Keeps Attacking Planned Parenthood, Health Care and Middle Class

Posted: 04/12/11 06:15 PM ET

The Republican attacks on our health care apparently have no limits. The Republican Party is driven by a powerful, extremist obsession with turning back the clock on women's health services and undermining the health security of America's families. This was in evidence during last week's budget talks when Republicans were willing to shut down the government over funding for preventive care at Planned Parenthood health centers.

Last week's big fight in Congress was about continuing funding for the rest of the 2011 fiscal year. In many ways the Republicans hijacked the debate and muddied the waters with their focus on social issues and their attacks on women. Rather than fulfilling their campaign promises to create jobs and revive the economy, the GOP is bound and determined to take away access to basic health care for millions of women, along with seniors, children, people with disabilities, middle class families and every other one of us.

Thankfully, the President and the Senate - with the support of House Democrats - stood up to the attacks on Planned Parenthood and the new health care law, the Affordable Care Act. But more attempts to take away our health security are coming. The Republicans also want to eliminate Medicaid and Medicare as we know it, and take away guaranteed health care benefits for seniors, children and people with disabilities.

Last week's agreement did not let the Republicans eliminate breast exams, cancer screenings, and birth control that millions of American women count on. But it did allow a new standalone vote later this week on a measure known as the Pence amendment which would defund Planned Parenthood. There will also be a separate vote on whether to defund the ACA.

On the campaign trail last year, the Republicans made a lot of promises about putting Americans back to work and reducing the deficit. If the Republicans truly cared about creating jobs and addressing the deficit, they'd ask millionaires and corporations to pay their fair share in taxes. What happened to shared sacrifice and the idea that everyone should pitch in? Why are we letting millionaires and big corporations off the hook and balancing the budget on the backs of seniors and middle class families? These are questions that the Democrats should answer with overwhelming political force.

The Republicans are mounting a frontal assault on the middle class. It's not about deficit reduction. It's not about the budget. It's about remaking our society so millionaires and corporations get even richer while the rest of us are left with crumbs.

We can't preserve and expand the middle class if people don't have affordable health care they can count on. These days, people have enough to worry about with high unemployment, rising gas and food prices and mortgages that are under water because of the Wall Street-led housing crash.

Access to quality, affordable health care is about economic security and whether people can raise their families and retire with dignity as their parents did. Instead of creating jobs and growing the economy, the Republicans are attacking the middle class and undermining the American Dream. We often say that big budget and issue fights are the most important ever, the biggest in generations - that the outcome of battles we're fighting will affect life in America for decades to come. This time, that's unmistakably true.

 

Follow Ethan Rome on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@HCAN

 
 
  • Comments
  • 167
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
GirlUsingBrain
The most dangerous animal in the forest is man.
04:57 PM on 04/13/2011
"Stop Attacks on Women's Health Care

Stand with Barbara Boxer and the Democratic women of the Senate now, and urge the Senate to oppose all attempts to limit women's access to health care today, tomorrow, and in the future."

http://action.barbaraboxer.com/page/s/Stop_the_anti-woman_agenda?source=04132011em_antiwomanagenda
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
04:26 PM on 04/13/2011
Support for Obama's "healthcare" bill is down to 35%.
http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_17831739?source=rss
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lee Johnston
Just my opinion I could be wrong
02:35 PM on 04/13/2011
I always like an article that just states talking points. (Basically an advertisement for the Democratic Party). Did Ethan Rome have to pay for this advert? Since he admittedly works for a political action group shoudn't this be considered a commercial. From WIKI "Health Care for America Now is a progressive political campaign of organizations that promote health care reform in the United States. It is a 501(c)4 issues advocacy organization, founded in 2008 as a project of the Tides Center. Prior to the 2008 elections, HCAN ran television and radio ads informing voters where candidates stood on health care. During 2009, HCAN supported the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and in June 2009 it claimed the support of 190 Congressional Democrats, President Barack Obama, and Vice President Joseph Biden. Mr. Rome used 555 words to say "Republicans love rich people and corporations and want to kill women, along with seniors, children, people with disabilities, middle class families and every other one of us." He repeated this mantra over three times. Apparently if you repeat a statement over and over it has to be true. Actually this is a tactic Mr. Rome learned during his tour in the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. AFSCME is the second largest labor union in the United States and one of the fastest-growing, AFSCME donated $87.5 million to the off-year election campaigns with a 98:1 ratio of Democratic to Republican contributions.
02:25 PM on 04/13/2011
I tell ya why they want to cut everything to do with poor people and thats because they arent included and dont care whether the disabled or poor has any kind of healthcare/ and that is because they need to have to have the same kind of healthcare and policies we do ( IN OTHER WORDS FOLLOW THE SAME RULES AS THE GENERAL PUBLIC HAS TO ON HEALTH CARE AND THAT WOULD BE THE END OF THAT FIGHT FOR GOOD!! AND OF COURSE THEY DONT WANT THEIR ALREADLY LINED SILVER AND GOLD POCKETS TAXED MORE THEY ARE JUST LIKE SCROOGE!!! AND MOST HAVE BEEN ON THE CONGRESS OR SENATE ALL THEIR LIFE TELLING EVERYONE ELSE TO BASICLY DO WITHOUT AND WE DONT CARE ABOUT THE PEOPLE!! WELL ... IF THIS DOESNT CHANGE AND SOON THERE WILL BE ABOUT A MILLION MORE PEOPLE LIVING IN THE STREET.
12:50 PM on 04/13/2011
If the Republicans truly cared about creating jobs and addressing the deficit, they'd ask millionaires and corporations to pay their fair share in taxes. What happened to shared sacrifice and the idea that everyone should pitch in? Why are we letting millionaires and big corporations off the hook and balancing the budget on the backs of seniors and middle class families? These are questions that the Democrats should answer with overwhelming political force.
07:43 PM on 04/13/2011
Or even just "a" share in taxes. It's ludicrous that people (and the supreme court has conferred personhood on corporations) raking in billions pay nothing.
12:06 PM on 04/13/2011
To most Americans it is a simple enough procedure. The growing cancer that is the federal deficit must be excised—the question is, do we do it with a scalpel or a chainsaw?

The political theater that has been playing to packed houses in Washington this week would no doubt have Shakespeare posing the question, “Is this comedy or tragedy?” So bizarre have been the staged theatrics of the Republican and Democratic parties over continuing resolutions, the 2011 budget, the debt ceiling, and long-term debt reduction, it is hard to tell the difference between fiscal responsibility, legislative deniability, and psychosocial laughability.

What is it going to take to get our elected officials to actually govern? The Republicans can’t get it done because they are in the majority here and the minority there and they are, after all, chronically schizophrenic by nature. And the Democrats can’t get it done because they are in control of the White House and with it the responsibility for making the world safe for democracy while trying to figure out a way to extract our troops from three murky wars.

Boy! Though I would love to offer some recommendations on what the Legislature and the Executive should do, I can’t help wondering if the American people are more concerned with what happens next on the Real Housewives of New Jersey while our government seems bent on bringing back The Twilight Zone.
11:59 AM on 04/13/2011
The average state and federal worker makes more than the average private worker including beefits and when controlled for age. That means that peoples taxes are paying the salaries of those who make more. Thats taxation of the poorer to pay the wealthier.

You may say that republicans want tax breaks for the wealthy, but then you must agree that democrats what to tax the poorer to pay the wealthier.

The repulicans are not seeking tax breaks for "Millionaires". The number on the table is $250,000.00.

The republicans targeting out of control spending and the money being spent is the midlle class' tax dollars. It is clear that the republicans are looking out for the small guy and the middle class, while the democrats want to take as much as they can from the middle class and spend their monay and so that they can keep doing exactly that, they say they need to raise taxes on the rich.

The republicans are trying to save All of us from a ravenous monster that is over spending the money of the poor. We have a spending problem, noit an undertaxation problem.

If you make more, pay mor in taxes, that's fair. But fairness in the tax code is not the same as fairness through taxation.

Cutting spending is not targeting the middle class, it is saving its future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlueFloyd
Aldus Shrugged. The Antidote to Ayn Rand.
01:03 PM on 04/13/2011
AHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA

That was hilarious!
09:56 PM on 04/13/2011
Glad you like it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
supratroll
one indignation under a groove
03:57 PM on 04/13/2011
republicans are NOT 'trying to save us all' from anything. i'm quite sure if they met me, they wouldn't try to save me.
your stolid defense of the republican agenda is sad, since they are totally joking about deficit reduction and actually waging the same old class war they're been waging for 30 years.
all our insanity threatening a government shutdown over what, .08% of our budget? laughable.
i can't wait for the next ultimatum from the bully party. i for one would like to see these charlatans follow through on their threat to shut it down. but they won't. know why? bullys are really cowards. we all know that.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
09:54 PM on 04/13/2011
I guess you have no respect for people you disagree with...more incivility from what is obviously the left..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
11:31 AM on 04/13/2011
The republicans trying to burden the middle class for the ruling class errors. They had no problem with GW squandering the surplus and putting us into debt. Now they want to make social security and medicare pay for it. What gall.
10:23 AM on 04/13/2011
I love how cutting funding for non-essential spending is somehow an attack on women. Apparently women have a right to have future generations pay for their health screenings. That is being generous because it gives PP the benefit of the doubt.

PP has increased the number of abortions it has performed significantly year after year. This while other services they have provided have reduced and abortions across the country as a whole have declined. The two numbers that go up, abortions provided by PP and money from the federal government received by PP. We even had a whistle blower come forth that claimed that upper management was pushing local managers to increase their abortions. That they were doing that because abortion is their most profitable "service". This is backed up by data released by PP that shows that they have had a 20% increase in abortion in the last two years while also having an 80% decrease in adoption referrals. That gets overlooked by the left who usually likes to jump on groups and their "profit" motive because why?

All of that aside even if PP fulfills the mission that they claim to fill it is still wrong to borrow from future generations to pay for that mission. They will have people they need to help and their own problems they need to address. The left didn't argue that other things should be cut instead because their politicians don't want to cut spending. Which leads to other questions.
10:57 AM on 04/13/2011
An easy political compromise here would be to distribute Title X funding for women's health services to other women's health care providers/ clinics and not to Planned Parenthood. Then both sides would get what they want, or say they want: Dems would get their women's health programs which they claim are critical, and Republicans would get to stop forcing taxpayers to support the biggest abortion provider in the country. However, the Dems refuse to compromise on this issue and insist on funneling public funds to Planned Parenthood. Why is that, exactly? I have yet to hear a coherent explanation from Democratic senators and congressmen who repeatedly claim that "no federal money is used for abortion."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
12:00 PM on 04/13/2011
That was explained quite clearly this morning on the Diane Rehm Show. PP is audited every year by the gov't to see where funding goes. PP provides medical services and then submits bills to the gov't, just as medicare providers do. They get reimbursed for the services.

A rep from the Susan B Anthony group was on, stating the main reason they are targeting PP has to do with the highly edited sting videos showing that a couple of PP employees may have not reported underage trafficking.

It is possible that a small number of employees did not do what should have been done. Possible. But where in ANY organization, private or public, is there not some failure or some wrongdoing?

The infamous new gov. of Florida ran a company that had to pay the largest ever fine for medicare fraud. And instead of being in jail, he's elected to gov. Go figure.

The only way Repubs want to let monies go to fund reproductive health services is sending them to faith based groups.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlueFloyd
Aldus Shrugged. The Antidote to Ayn Rand.
01:05 PM on 04/13/2011
oh yes, that is a very easy compromise......to type......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blissful
ignorance is not
11:18 AM on 04/13/2011
I see nothing wrong with giving assistance ( sliding scales for fees) to those in need. You sound very hard-hearted and lacking in compassion.
12:13 PM on 04/13/2011
I sound very hard-hearted because I don't think that we should be borrowing from future generations to do that? Future generations will have their own concerns that they will need to be able to pay for. I even think that it is problematic to have tax money pay for things like this. Simply because it is a forced contribution. The government as a charity is very inefficient because they have no competition. Charities are expected to have a very large percentage of their funds going to those receiving them. The government programs run like charities are lucky if they get 50% of the money going to those who need it.

Government programs aren't compassionate. The people who believe in big government programs donate little of their own resources to worthy causes. They want the government to handle "those people" so they don't have to deal with them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
04:53 PM on 04/13/2011
How about this blissful. If PP is a priority for YOU, how about YOU work to support that organization?

Because someone does not share YOUR priorities does not mean they lack compassion - just that they have other priorities for spending the tax money we are borrowing.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
10:15 AM on 04/13/2011
They are against anything the government touches, regardless.
 
There is a HUD program that helps people in mortgage trouble to stay in their homes and avoid the scam artisits once again advertising on TV around the clock that they can repair your mortgage for a fee.
 
The Dems allowed that program to be zeroed out in this latest budget deal last week.
 
Until the Dems stop living in a vacuum and come out with a "Ryan plan" of their own, the GOP will continue to dismantle government that is important to those mentioned in this article.
 
Until the Dems can make the case as effectively FOR government as the GOP makes it AGAINST government, then we will continue to (sorry for the hack cliche) keep re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
03:00 PM on 04/13/2011
...' Approximately 37,000 homeowners have received permanent modifications of their mortgages through the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Treasury and HUD estimate that these homeowners have been able to reduce their monthly payments by average of $500 a month.

The number of homeowner receiving permanent reductions in their mortgage payments through the federal government’s efforts appears low compared with the number of homeowners that have participated in HAMP. According to the Treasury and HUD, approximately 1.3 million homeowners had trial modifications of their mortgage payments between April 2009 and the end of June 2010. This meant that just under three percent of homeowners who qualified for a trial modification of a mortgage had their mortgages permanently reduced....'
And this is the problem with any govt program... even if you try to cancel a failed program, the wailing and gnashing of teeth will bemoan the 'poor' who will be hurt.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
07:10 PM on 04/13/2011
Mend it, don't end it.  Here's one idea.
 
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/treasury-eyes-single-contact-in-hamp-program-2011-04-12
 
 
But conservatives would always rather see the baby thrown out with the bath water.
 
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/02/how-is-the-hamp-loan-modification-program-doing/
 
 
Interesting that the bigger the bank, the worse it is doing.
 
Gotta love those captains of industry.
 
 
 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booksnmoreforyou
Progressive educator, activist for good government
10:05 AM on 04/13/2011
"Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."

PASS IT ON.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blissful
ignorance is not
11:18 AM on 04/13/2011
Exactly!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
12:01 PM on 04/13/2011
Great comment. F&F
annyp
A Canuck, eh!
02:50 AM on 04/13/2011
According to the Repubs/TP just get rid of the poor, the sick, the obese, the handicap, the elderly and anyone else that is a burdenv to solve the health care costs. Just deny them medical. With a healthy nation, who needs health care for all. That's how I see their agenda.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:38 AM on 04/13/2011
Doesn't it smack of creating a "master race"? Though the methods are a little subtler than what we have experienced in the past, the net result is the same. It might just take a little longer.
skmbho
A blue bird in a red state
11:26 AM on 04/13/2011
Difficult to develop a "master race" comprised of old white males from the Southeast region of the US. Especially since they don't believe in genetics because it is not discussed in the bible
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alafonse
It's definitely a crap-shoot.
11:26 AM on 04/13/2011
Doesn't appear subtle to me at all. It's plain to see they think THEY are the only important people and the rest of us are just chaff to be thrown into the wind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marisa Stein
~I solemly swear that I am up to no good~
11:44 AM on 04/13/2011
you must have missed it, Obamacare passed now everyone is entitled to free healthcare but the death panels are still in place so Granny isn't safe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AdamWest1313
Hardcore Agnostic
02:25 PM on 04/13/2011
Free healthcare? Ohh, you are one of those misguided people that think Obamacare is Single Payer or Socialist? Wow...
08:19 PM on 04/13/2011
I did miss the "free healthcare" bit, that's what I get for reading actual news and not the Tea Party express.

And of course Granny isn't safe, the Teapubs are trying to cut her medicare funds so her doctor won't see her, ratchet up her Big Pharma drug costs so she can't get her drugs, and cutting food aid, so she won't even be able to afford food. You won't even need a "panel" to kill Granny.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
12:26 AM on 04/13/2011
Given that the long term and unwavering goal of the GOP is to destroy what is left of the middle class and take every last scrap of any value for themselves and their rich overlords, what about this situation surprises you even slightly?

People acting outrage that the GOP are not more considerate make about as much sense as people who get upset by a crocodile eating the nice little furry critter that walks his way. This is what crocodiles do. Being greedy cold hearted self righteous, self absorbed and cruel is what GOPers do. Getting all worked up about it is pointless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marisa Stein
~I solemly swear that I am up to no good~
11:45 AM on 04/13/2011
so I take it that you like having to pay higher taxes for services you don't use?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
12:07 PM on 04/13/2011
Like all those unnecessary military bases overseas? Or lifetime medical and pensions for congresspeople? Clearly, you don't understand the common good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
C Winebrinner
12:34 PM on 04/13/2011
I'd be perfectly happy paying more taxes, as long as that top 2% get their taxes raised as well!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Althea Lewis
10:45 PM on 04/12/2011
Wait until the Teabaggers realize that most of their programs will be cut under the new budget... Because afterall most of them are as poor as a church mouse.!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tess41
say a prayer for the pretender
12:42 PM on 04/13/2011
Its' the liberals on the dole, whether Tea Party members are poor or not, they DO NOT believe in living off the government - they make their way the best they can without hand-outs. You are so backwards on this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
05:15 PM on 04/13/2011
Don't fret Tess. He is just trying to incite with purposefully erroneous statements - for lack of having a coherent point to make.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Althea Lewis
08:01 PM on 04/13/2011
Really !!! I don't think you know that most of the Teabaggers are living off government programs, and then turn around and bash government. Check your facts insted of listening to Faux news and all their lies. !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flyby777
Tea parties are for little girls, not government
10:45 PM on 04/12/2011
The deficit is not the primary agenda for conservatives. The repubs are making this about social issues, not spending. The majority of tea party members are white evangelical Christians and want abortion to be illegal. They've targeted planned parenthood as "abortion control central" and will admittedly lie in order to make their point. Jon Kyl (R AZ) stated that 90% of planned parenthood is about performing abortions. When corrected (3%) the response was "His remark was not intended to be a factual statement" I still am trying to wrap my head around that remark. If the deficit is the problem, and it is, defunding planned parenthood is not the answer. Planned parenthood more than pays for itself. And, if they are as concerned about the child as they want to portray, defunding programs that protect infants and children is not in keeping with their apparent beliefs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alafonse
It's definitely a crap-shoot.
11:29 AM on 04/13/2011
I don't see the white Evangelicals whining about wanting to adopt the kids saved from abortion either. "Save them to live— kill them in wars" seems to be their mantra. Just more cannon fodder.
08:43 PM on 04/13/2011
Oh they don't care about the fetus once it's born, hence the cutting of medical and food aid to mothers, even pregnant ones, so they don't even care that much about the fetus either.
08:42 PM on 04/13/2011
Um they don't limit it to abortion, they want miscarriage to be illegal, see Georgia.

They lie about abortion all the time, Kyl just got caught admitting to it.