A lot has been written and said since the West Virginia primary about what recent results indicate in regard to Barack Obama's chances in a general election. Some of it's been said by pundits, in print and on television, and some of it's been said by mere citizens. A lot of it's been said by Hillary Clinton and her campaign staff. "He can't win," the argument seems to go. There are a lot of "hard working" people who'll never vote for a black man, and that's why we're staying in the race.
But I've got questions for Senator Clinton, her campaign staff, and her supporters. Do you think he can't win on his own, once his flaws have been picked apart by both Republicans and members of his own party? Or, do you think he couldn't win, even with your quick endorsement and unambivalent support?
For instance, what if the results of the most recent primaries had been followed by a statement from Hillary Clinton saying that she'd seen the exit polls, and that anyone who said they'd never vote for an African American candidate ought to be ashamed of themselves? It wouldn't be a revolutionary statement for Hilary Clinton to make. After all, doesn't she condemn the thinking that would lead a voter to make such a statement? And, if she does, then why would she choose, as she did, to try to expose and exploit the stated bigotry for her own gain, as opposed to condemning it? It's puzzled me. Down by an insurmountable margin, the opportunity was there to state that the reason given by many voters for opposing Obama were reprehensible. Yet she didn't do that. Talk about a missed opportunity to exit on high ground.
I assume there are those who'll say it's not her job to support another candidate while a primary race is still being run. But there is no mathematical way for her to win the primary race. There is only the hope -- and the possibility -- of exposing and exploiting Barack Obama's shortcomings, and the concurrent bigotry of much of the voting public, to the point where he is transformed from a viable, though flawed, candidate, into an unviable one. Which leads me back to another version of my original question: If sincere efforts by Senator Clinton and her supporters could lead to either Senator Obama's victory, or his defeat, why wouldn't they exercise their substantial influence for the former?
I took a certain amount of heat for my last entry here at Huffington Post, as have several others who've been critical of Senator Clinton's continued candidacy. "Sigh," read one response to my post. "You missed a spot on that dead horse, Mr. Handler." The next was more to the point. "What a jerk," it said.
The general thrust of these opinions was that being openly critical of Clinton's candidacy invited retribution in autumn. "Nothing is more dangerous than a cornered animal," stated one such concerned citizen. "But if you allow an escape route, most wild animals will take it."
If I can use the same analogy without agreeing she's a wild or a cornered animal, I'm saying there was a gallant escape route which she chose not to take.
Again, another respondent was more succinct: "You're going to eat your words in the fall when 25% of Hillary's supporters shut down your candidate."
It's that last statement that scares the hell out of me. There is anger about Hillary Clinton's apparent defeat that's being directed at a candidate whose positions are nearly identical to hers. There's talk of a movement to ensure his defeat to someone whose positions are diametrically opposed to hers. There are a substantial number of people who even say they'll go out and vote for the Republican candidate, John McCain -- a man, and a party, who are devoted to continuing to destroy much of what Senator Clinton has worked for her whole life. Why? Has Barack Obama abused her during the campaign? Or, is his somewhat extraordinary popularity at such a young age so much of an insult that they'd throw all principles away just to see him, and his supporters, thwarted?
I've spent some time imagining how transformative it would have been if a statement from Senator Clinton had emerged immediately following the West Virginia primary, or any time since. "I'm pleased to have the support of so many Americans who believe I would better represent them as President of the United States. However, the reasons given by many of those supporters troubles me. We are, and should be, long past the time when a man's skin color, or a woman's gender, should have any impact on whether or not he or she receives your vote. I'd like to be the first woman to serve as president of the United States. Senator Obama would like to be the first American of African decent to hold the office. Each one of us is qualified to serve. If I'm chosen as the candidate of my party, I'll hope for, and expect, Senator Obama's unwavering support. And if he is the party's eventually nominee, he'll certainly have mine -- just as he should have the unwavering support of anyone who has supported me."
Imagine that.
My new book is in stores now! It's Only Temporary: The Good News and the Bad News of Being Alive. Find out more about it at evanhandler.com.
Power is corrupting, and, so it seems, is the quest for it.
Oddly, as a life-long Republican (albeit 'moderate' or 'Rockefeller Republican'), this really disturbs me because I am definitely an Obama supporter. I am sure there are a lot of us 'seasoned' political types who, quite frankly, really believe it is time to turn the office over to 'the next generation'.
I just don't see how leaders so thoroughly steeped in the political battles and paradigms of the 60s, Vietnam, Cold War, Civil Rights, Women's Rights, and so forth can take us forward any further. While not denigrating any of their accomplishments or strengths, it is time for youth, vigor, and a willingness to see and try new approaches to take the lead.
Carol
It is no wonder that Barack Obama attracts the more educated white vote, because it is this voter that is able to see through this sham!
Bill and Hillary have prided themselves on being champions when it comes to AA issues. Well they have just thrown that all away in this race.
When Hillary presents her "popular vote" theory to the DNC rules committee, they should confront her with this issue and insist that she make a public statement renouncing all racist votes. Hillary Clinton has proven over and over again in this race that she does not deserve to be the nominee of the party.
Mrs. Clinton and her husband have shown us time and time again their sincerity throughout this campaign. It began with 'he's unelectable' (code for 'he's black') and continued on and on through West Virginia - racist whites don't like him.
I'm fairly certain the reason why she's been muzzled these past few days are threats from superdelegates that they will walk if she engages in more disengenious behavior. Let her and Bubba be so they can go live in Chappaqua. We'll do the rest.
Just yesterday while I was in the grocery store, my cousin picked up a paper while we were waiting in line. (This cousin knows I'm gay) but continued to say, "No offense cuz, but I'm glad Obama stopped talking about that faggots rights shit 'cause I'm not for that shit" My jaw hit the floor. This is the top reason I don't support Obama. He will lose a huge portion of his black support if he pursues the gay agenda. I have seen it in my black family and friends. Homophobia runs so deep. He WILL abandon the gay agenda before he loses his core support. I know it. McCain or Obama can't and won't do much for the gay agenda, So, I appreciate roe vs wade, I do. but I have to vote in my interests, and that's why I chose Clinton. Then his arrogance and petty supporters pushed me over. So, I won't vote for McCain, but Obama isn't my choice either, so for the first time in my life, I'm thinking of staying home in november.
Imagine if the way you laughed during one interview, or the fact that you ordered a glass of Juice for breakfast became headline news around the world used to smear you as a hag or an effeminate elitist.
Picking apart what they should have said at any given moment, or direction that they should have taken is legitimate. However, try and also take into consideration that both of these people are probably terrified that anything they say or do is being weighed beforehand by a league of handlers and analysts. Not much of what we see is "them."
Just my .02
I'm not seeing efforts at unity, nor admission of the reality that she lost fair and square.
With Limbaugh voters who will never vote for either Dem in the general putting her over the top in many of her recent "wins", and despite Bill Clinton going on Limbaugh's show before the Texas primary, her supporters refuse to acknowledge the impact.
I understand Hillary's motivations for power.
I wish I could understand how her supporters are tolerating these things.
-$4-$6 for a gallon gas?
-Another 4,000 US Soldier deaths?
-Going over a Trillion dollars in cost of this war?
-Roe Vs. Wade getting overturned?
-No democratic proposed health care plan, coverage mandate and no coverage mandate
-12-18 years of Republicans in power?
-an Economy in shambles
-Washington still dirty? (McSame wipes up the spilled Orange Soda, but when you walk on it, it's still sticky)
-Poverty rate still at the same level
People, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are 100% a better choice then John McCain. I think both equally bring talents and ability to the white house. Both have better foreign policies then the Republicans.
Beating a horse that has collapsed over and over again isn't going to make it get up and move.
its time to revitalize this county, bring in some fresh ideas and go into an 8 year period of recovery.
I would suggest that were the roles reversed, Obamanistas would be threatening to simply stay home in November.
Healing the country starts with healing a roughly evenly split party. There is only one way to do that. Only one.
http://www.electoral-vote.com
Hillary has been winning in the states where Dems can BEAT Republicans.
Obama has way too many red states. And no Florida or Ohio.
UNITY 08.
So where's the VP slot offer, eh?
You don't get the VP slot if you have to be dragged away kicking and screaming!
UNITY 08
Clinton supporters (supposed Democratic feminist even) willing to get John McCain into
the White House by not voting for the other Dem, staying home or
even actively campaigning against the Democrat. This will (if successful devastate the Supreme Court, dismiss any idea of health care and probably override Roe vs Wade.
Then there are the Obama supporters who would probably never vote
for McCain, but would stay home. . . .
By the time all of us have stopped our navel gazing and hurt feelings
more humans will be dead in Iraq, gas will be $7 a gallon, schools will
be barely holding on, the sick and poor will be told to bite it and more industry
will walk out of the country . . . .
Americans. . . . .
Our own worst enemy. . . .
You expect too much from the Clinton's. They are political opportunist who will do and say anything to to satiate their political avarice.