Saudi Arabia won a seat on the prestigious U.N. Security Council last week and resigned it a day later. It gave a pile of reasons, some of them spurious because it had known since April -and not October -- that its candidature for the Council was unopposed.
We may never know why Riyadh made the unprecedented decision when it did. But it is clear the government hung its hard-working U.N. delegation out to dry.
Or perhaps the sudden withdrawal -- after the 193-U.N. General Assembly had voted for Saudi Arabia -- spurred us all to keep writing about the kingdom's views as well as its idiosyncratic rulers.
What has changed since April? Not much and a lot.
In a statement from the Saudi Arabian Foreign Affairs Ministry, the kingdom said "the manner, the mechanisms of action and double standards" prevented the body from performing its duties towards preserving international peace and security.
This has been true for several years.
The statement also highlighted the Israel-Palestinian situation. This too has not changed since April.
Impunity for DamascusAnd it said Syria felt empowered to perpetuate the killing of its people, without facing punishment. There is some truth to this. The United States had threatened but did not intervene in Syria and instead pursued the destruction of chemical weapons, which will mean negotiating with the regime.
This week, Saudi members of the ruling family have tried to explain their diplomacy.
Saudi Arabia's intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, told European diplomats that the Obama administration, had failed to act effectively against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and was growing closer to Iran.
In Washington, another senior Saudi prince, Turki al-Faisal, called Obama's Syrian policies "lamentable" and suggested the deal to remove chemical weapons was a ruse to avoid military action.
So was Saudi Arabia's pique aimed at the United States and all Shi'a regimes in the region? The Iranian situation appears to be easing with the new president, Hassan Rouhani, engaging on the country's nuclear program.
Right frequencyIsraeli Ambassador Ron Prosor, in a speech on the Middle East to the Security Council, alluded to Saudi Arabia's apprehension about Iran's nuclear ambitions. "Their voices are harder to hear, but if you tune into the right frequency you will discover that they are frightened."
Or... was Saudi Arabia tired of hearing about its human rights abuses, which were put in stark relief during its run for a Council seat. But then again this has never bothered the kingdom before.
The Security Council, whose decisions can be mandatory for all 193 states, has five permanent members: Russia, China, United States, Britain, France. It has 10 members who rotate for two year terms, five each year.
Usually the coveted seats are hotly contested but this year nominations from regions had no real opposition. Nigeria, Chad, Chile, Lithuania and Saudi Arabia comprised a "clean slate."
These five nations replace Togo, Guatemala, Azerbaijan, Pakistan and Morocco and will join Argentina, Australia, Luxembourg, South Korea and Rwanda on the Council in 2014.
Founding memberSaudi Arabia, a founding member of the United Nations in 1945, has held the General Assembly presidency but never tried for a Security Council seat.
Rather than send an inarticulate prince-ling to the UN as a reward, Saudi Arabia built up its staff and sent them to the Institute of Diplomatic Studies at Columbia University.
Its U.N. ambassador, Abdallah Yahya A. Al-Mouallimi, spoke warmly about his election on October 17 (see video). And at the time of this writing, the website of the Saudi Arabian U.N. mission still reads: "Historic feat for Saudi Arabia: elected non (permanent) member of the UN Security Council."
Now Kuwait or another Gulf nation will vie for the seat. Unless Saudi Arabia changes its mind. But none of the above explains why the kingdom delayed until the Council election was over. Go figure
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.